Fresh evidence obtained by Candace Owens is calling into question official accounts about where conservative activist Charlie Kirk was transported after his fatal shooting, reopening scrutiny of how the tragic episode was reported and handled by both authorities and the press.

For several weeks, official accounts stated that Kirk had been transported to Timpanogos Regional Hospital following the ambush at Utah Valley University. However, newly surfaced emails are casting doubt on this narrative, suggesting he may have been taken instead to the larger Utah Valley Hospital—renowned for its Level 1 trauma care.

Candace Owens, who has been investigating the matter, revealed the growing confusion: “We received numerous tips indicating that Charlie was not at Timpanogos hospital, but rather at UVU hospital,” she explained. The situation baffled her team because Timpanogos is a Level 3 trauma center, whereas Utah Valley Hospital is closer and provides more comprehensive emergency care.

As the investigation deepened, more firsthand accounts emerged, complicating the story further. “We had individuals claiming, ‘I was at UVU, and I saw Charlie being brought in. I’m certain he was at this hospital,’” Owens elaborated.

Adding to the intrigue, Owens recounted an encounter with someone who was receiving treatment at Utah Valley Hospital. This individual claimed they overheard an announcement stating that Charlie had passed away upstairs, which Owens found peculiar.

Internal Hospital Emails Suggest Restricted Access

The most compelling piece of evidence came in the form of an email from a Utah Valley Hospital staff member, which Owens believes is a definitive indicator of Kirk’s presence there. “We received an email from a UVU medical staff member, asserting with certainty that he was here. They mentioned having access to a medical file, but also noted a directive received at 2:08 p.m. prohibiting them from accessing the file,” Owens recounted.

Owens read from the message: “Here is the entry in the UVU system for Charlie Kirk. It had his right birthday. It has age. It had an MRN number. And then this individual shared the internal message that went out telling them that they’re not allowed to touch the file. Here it is. Hi all. There was a media event that took place today that led to a trauma patient… Due to the nature of a situation, the only individuals who will be allowed in the chart will be Deborah and myself. No one else is allowed to hover or open the chart.”

Despite these revelations, the situation remains murky. Owens noted she considered the possibility of record-sharing between hospitals: “I said maybe the reason for this is these two medical hospitals speak to each other… like if you pick up a prescription at one CVS, the other location knows that it happens. I’ve confirmed that doesn’t seem to be the circumstance.”

She further suggested that physician logistics could be the answer: “It’s possible that it could be because maybe Dr. Lee Trotter, which I have heard, works at both—limited surgeons going back and forth. That’s somehow created a file. But I’d like to know definitively what the answer for that is. Why he also has a file at UVU. Why there seem to be so much confusion.”

Throughout the segment, Owens took pains not to jump to conclusions, stating, “We don’t need to go crazy with conspiracy theories. There could be a logical answer. I have not stumbled upon it yet. And so medical community, feel free to email us.”

However, her main takeaway is clear: all parties around this episode are acting with what she calls “suspicious” opacity. “There could be a logical reason. But it just seems like all parties around this UVU event are acting suspicious,” Owens said, underscoring a sense of distrust in the official narrative.

This new revelation adds to an ongoing pattern of inconsistencies from those involved in the aftermath of the Kirk shooting. While there may still be an innocent or technical explanation for the records at Utah Valley Hospital, the lack of forthright clarification from hospitals, law enforcement, and others continues to erode public confidence in the process.

Once again, what transpired after the death of Charlie Kirk appears deeply at odds with the initial story presented to the public. At minimum, Candace Owens’ investigation has laid bare that the facts about Kirk’s final hours were misrepresented—and that any logical explanation, if it exists, remains stubbornly out of reach.