DOJ doubles down on Supreme Court intervening in Trump firing case 
Share and Follow


The Justice Department doubled down on its demand that the Supreme Court step in to greenlight President Trump’s firing of a government whistleblower office head, warning in a Wednesday letter that he is still “wielding executive power.” 

The high court last week punted on the emergency motion to immediately terminate U.S. Special Counsel Hampton Dellinger, keeping him in his post in what has become the first major test of the new administration’s effort to consolidate control over federal independent agencies. 

In the new letter, Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris pointed to a federal judge’s ruling hours earlier that extended the block on Dellinger’s firing for another three days. 

“Those developments underscore the grounds for vacating the district court’s order,” Harris wrote.

Her letter also noted that as Dellinger has remained on the job, his office on Wednesday convinced the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) to temporarily block the firing of six federal employees terminated as part of the administration’s efforts to oust probationary staffers. 

Trump had also attempted to fire the Democratic-appointed MSPB chair, but another court has temporarily reinstated her. 

“In short, a fired Special Counsel is wielding executive power, over the elected Executive’s objection, to halt employment decisions made by other executive agencies,” she wrote. 

Since taking office last month, Trump has moved to rapidly consolidate the White House’s control over agencies that have traditionally held independence from the political inclinations of the presidency. 

The firings have set up a series of cases that could set the stage for the Supreme Court to overturn its 90-year-old precedent allowing Congress to institute removal protections for such agencies. 

Dellinger’s office, the Office of Special Counsel, provides an avenue for whistleblowers to report concerns about government wrongdoing and works to protect them from reprisal. It also responds to potential violations of the Hatch Act, the law that guards against electioneering by federal employees. 

It is different from the Justice Department special counsels, such as Jack Smith, who are appointed to oversee particular investigations. 

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Nicola Peltz Honors Late Valentino While Brooklyn Beckham Takes on ‘Fake’ Family in Viral Online Rant

Nicola Peltz recently honored legendary fashion designer Valentino Garavani, who passed away…

Netflix Adapts: New Strategy Ensures Movie Plots Are Repeatedly Explained for Phone-Scrolling Viewers

Actor Matt Damon recently shared some intriguing insights about how Netflix influences…

Trump Evades Questions on Potential Military Action for Greenland Acquisition

During an interview with NBC News on Monday, President Trump refrained from…

Trump Attends College Football Playoff Final with Ivanka and Kai, Greeted Enthusiastically by Miami Fans

Donald Trump received a warm reception from the Miami crowd as he…

Calls for Australian Tennis Icon Wally Masur’s Dismissal Following Controversial Comment on Novak Djokovic

Enraged tennis enthusiasts are demanding the removal of a renowned tennis commentator…

EU President’s High-Stakes Congress Meeting: Greenland’s Future & Transatlantic Trade on the Agenda

Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission, engaged in…

Victims of Spanish Train Disaster Ejected from Windows, Found Hundreds of Yards Away; Death Toll Exceeds 39 as Investigation into “Truly Strange” Incident Deepens

Officials reported a tragic derailment in Spain last night involving two high-speed…

Republican Strategist Sounds Alarm for Trump in Major Red State Following Intensified ICE Crackdown

Karl Rove, a veteran strategist for the Republican Party, has issued a…