Judge blocks part of Trump election overhaul
Share and Follow


A federal judge blocked part of the Trump administration from enacting changes to how federal elections are run, which included proof of citizenship in order to register to vote.

In an order Thursday, U.S. District Judge Collen Kollar-Kotelly granted a preliminary injunction to stop the citizenship requirement from being implemented immediately while the lawsuit carries on.

The proof of citizenship portion of Trump’s order is similar to the GOP-led Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, which requires documentary proof of citizenship when people go to register to vote.

The order has sparked backlash with critics arguing large numbers of voters will be disenfranchised.

The judge also blocked part of Trump’s order that required people enrolled in public assistance to have their citizenship assessed before receiving access to the federal voter registration form.

Kollar-Kotelly refused to block part of the order that tightens mail-in ballot deadlines and Trump’s order for the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to compare immigration databases and state voter rolls.

Late last month, Trump signed an executive order that said it was his administration’s policy to enforce federal law and “to protect the integrity of our election process.”

A group of organizations sued the administration to block Trump’s order, calling it unconstitutional. The group of plaintiffs, represented in part by the American Civil Liberties Union, argue that it violates the Constitution’s clause that said states have the authority to determine election procedures, not the president.

“This executive order is part of a broader attack on our democratic elections by promoting baseless nativist conspiracy theories,” the ALCU’s director of its Voting Rights Project, Sophia Lin Lakin, said in a statement. “Today, the court blocked a key strategy of this attack. And we will keep fighting to ensure every eligible voter can make their voice heard without interference or intimidation.”

The groups noted that the order would complicate lives for many people who are unable to secure a passport but should still be allowed the right to vote. They called for the order to ultimately be struck down.

Michael Gates, who represents the Trump administration, said during an April 17 hearing that a preliminary injunction from the court was not necessary since the order had yet to be implemented and the proof of citizenship requirement would not be part of the process for many months, The Associated Press reported.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Alex Pretti Confronts ICE Agents in Tense Incident Caught on Camera, 11 Days Before Fatal Shooting

Alex Pretti, who became a focal point of national attention following his…

Shocking Incident: Car Crashes Multiple Times Into Brooklyn’s Chabad World Headquarters

In a distressing incident on Wednesday evening, a Honda sedan was involved…

San José State University Faces Title IX Compliance Issues Over Treatment of Transgender Athletes

The U.S. Department of Education (ED) announced on Wednesday that it has…

Federal Judge in Minnesota Halts ICE Operations, Mandates Immediate Release of Lawfully Admitted Refugees

A recent development emerged from a federal District Court in Minnesota…

Chicago Educator Suspended Over Controversial ‘Go ICE’ Social Media Post

A teacher from Gary Elementary School in Chicago has been suspended following…

Hospital Bug Scare: Baby Declared Infection-Free Amid Lucy Letby Defense Claims

No signs of infection were detected in a baby girl whose case…

Renowned Fox News Journalist Reveals Shocking Photo of Field Injuries That Altered Life Forever

A prominent Fox News correspondent recently unveiled a stark image illustrating his…

Gallup Report: How 2023 Sees a Decline in Employee Engagement from Pandemic Peaks

In a recent Gallup survey, a noticeable decline has been observed in…