Judge blocks part of Trump election overhaul
Share and Follow


A federal judge blocked part of the Trump administration from enacting changes to how federal elections are run, which included proof of citizenship in order to register to vote.

In an order Thursday, U.S. District Judge Collen Kollar-Kotelly granted a preliminary injunction to stop the citizenship requirement from being implemented immediately while the lawsuit carries on.

The proof of citizenship portion of Trump’s order is similar to the GOP-led Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, which requires documentary proof of citizenship when people go to register to vote.

The order has sparked backlash with critics arguing large numbers of voters will be disenfranchised.

The judge also blocked part of Trump’s order that required people enrolled in public assistance to have their citizenship assessed before receiving access to the federal voter registration form.

Kollar-Kotelly refused to block part of the order that tightens mail-in ballot deadlines and Trump’s order for the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to compare immigration databases and state voter rolls.

Late last month, Trump signed an executive order that said it was his administration’s policy to enforce federal law and “to protect the integrity of our election process.”

A group of organizations sued the administration to block Trump’s order, calling it unconstitutional. The group of plaintiffs, represented in part by the American Civil Liberties Union, argue that it violates the Constitution’s clause that said states have the authority to determine election procedures, not the president.

“This executive order is part of a broader attack on our democratic elections by promoting baseless nativist conspiracy theories,” the ALCU’s director of its Voting Rights Project, Sophia Lin Lakin, said in a statement. “Today, the court blocked a key strategy of this attack. And we will keep fighting to ensure every eligible voter can make their voice heard without interference or intimidation.”

The groups noted that the order would complicate lives for many people who are unable to secure a passport but should still be allowed the right to vote. They called for the order to ultimately be struck down.

Michael Gates, who represents the Trump administration, said during an April 17 hearing that a preliminary injunction from the court was not necessary since the order had yet to be implemented and the proof of citizenship requirement would not be part of the process for many months, The Associated Press reported.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Breaking: Senate Passes Critical Bill to Reopen Government as House Prepares for Action

On Monday evening, the Senate took decisive action to conclude the 41-day…

TV Star Faces Mugging Attempt En Route to O2 Arena, Highlights Safety Concerns in London

A Gladiators finalist shared a harrowing tale last night, revealing how she…

DoorDash Unveils Significant Economic Insights in Latest Announcement

If you’re someone who enjoys using food delivery platforms like Grubhub…

RFK Jr. Unveils Groundbreaking FDA Initiative Focused on Women’s Health

On Monday, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Secretary of Health and Human…

Senate Nears Deal to End Government Shutdown, Leaves ACA Credits in Limbo

The Senate is poised to bring an end to the longest government…

Unmasking Chaos: Antifa Clashes with TPUSA Attendees in Berkeley’s Heated Showdown

On Monday evening, the University of California, Berkeley hosted the final…

Why Congressional Republicans May Have Missed Their Chance to Regain Independence

It’s been nine months since President Trump commenced his second term, yet…

Greene Urges Trump: Grant Clemency to Tina Peters

On Monday, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene from Georgia expressed her gratitude to…