President Trump must stop any remaining television commercials financed with millions of dollars in taxpayer funds to promote his political message, a federal judge ruled Sunday night.
US District Judge Jennifer L. Rochon in New York sided with a coalition that includes the nonpartisan watchdog Common Cause, which argued that the advertisements represented an illegal use of government money.
In granting a temporary restraining order, Rochon directed the administration to cancel all remaining ads, including those scheduled to air Sunday night.
‘Defendants shall not enter into, renew, or expand any agreement authorizing the development, creation, dissemination, placement, or airing of the challenged advertisements’ during the two-week duration of the order, the judge wrote.
The administration had already indicated that the advertising campaign was nearing its end. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment Sunday night.
In a court filing submitted late Saturday, the Justice Department contended that a temporary restraining order was unnecessary because ‘the alleged offending conduct will end tomorrow.’
The Department of Homeland Security allocated $20 million in taxpayer money for the advertising campaign.
Legal experts have said the spending may violate a federal law barring the use of money appropriated by Congress for ‘publicity or propaganda.’
A federal judge has ordered President Donald Trump to halt a $20 million taxpayer-funded advertising campaign accused of promoting his political agenda ahead of the midterms
The television commercials featured patriotic imagery and footage highlighting Trump’s accomplishments, along with a promise that America ‘will never be a communist country’
The spots began airing on Fox News and other television networks during commercial breaks in late September, using taxpayer funds allocated to the Department of Homeland Security
‘We are pleased the court acted swiftly to prevent more taxpayer dollars from being used for such blatantly unlawful political propaganda,’ the plaintiffs said in a statement released by Democracy Forward, the nonprofit legal group representing them.
‘There is no legal justification – and no precedent – for the president to use the machinery of the government and funds set aside by Congress for other uses to influence electoral outcomes that further his own agenda.’
In a declaration filed Saturday, senior DHS official Holly Mehringer said the money came from congressional appropriations that are ‘available for, among other things, “commemorating efforts and events related to border security.”‘
The White House has defended the commercials as public service announcements, similar to campaigns used by previous administrations to promote government policies.
Critics, however, say the latest advertisements are different from many earlier public service campaigns because they do not provide information intended to help people access or use a specific government program.
The ads began airing in late September and portray Trump in a favorable light while echoing his political messaging ahead of the midterm elections.
One commercial includes a clip of Trump discussing the threat of communism, while another reuses an advertisement from his most recent presidential campaign.
The campaign’s fifth commercial began airing Tuesday and focused on the Trump administration’s capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro.
MORE STORY: Putin ignored US warnings about a potential terror attack three days prior – NewsFinale
The White House said taxpayers will not be reimbursed after $20 million was spent on a national media contract that had already used more than $10 million to air Trump advertisements on television
Trump told a reporter last week that he would ‘gladly’ pay for the commercials ‘if somebody said that’s wrong’
The use of public funds to pay for the ads drew heavy criticism – including from some in the GOP.
‘It shouldn’t be paid for with taxpayer dollars,’ Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-SD, told reporters.
The Democratic National Committee has separately sued the Republican administration over the ads.
Amid the backlash, Trump said he would start paying for the ads through a political action committee.
‘These are ads for the country. You have to understand. I’m not promoting a candidate. I’m not promoting myself because I’m not running for office. I’m promoting the country,’ Trump said.
A White House official said there were no immediate plans to reimburse the government for money already spent.
Trump is facing record low approval ratings, an unpopular war in Iran, and high gas prices as the elections are just weeks away.
Many Republican insiders in Washington are privately bracing for a major Democratic wave to sweep them out of power in Congress, leaving Trump a lame duck president for his final two years in office.
Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he wished the ads were not funded with taxpayer dollars
Join the discussion
Should politicians ever use taxpayer money to boost their image before an election?
The latest polls show that Republicans are running behind, particularly in critical Senate races in Ohio, North Carolina, Michigan, and even traditionally safe states for Republicans like Iowa and Texas.
The shift toward Democratic control in the prediction market has been particularly notable because Republicans held the advantage in the Senate market for much of the Midterm campaign.
Republicans currently hold 53 Senate seats compared with 47 for Democrats and have an advantage of 219-214 in the House.
The battle for the lower chamber is looking increasingly difficult for Republicans, with Democrats currently projected to hold around 230 seats compared with 200 for Republicans.
Democrats need 218 seats for a majority there and would need 51 Senate seats to be able to avoid a tiebreaking vote from Vance.