In a recent segment on NPR’s “Morning Edition,” Representative Adam Smith (D-WA) discussed the complex legal landscape surrounding the interception of oil tankers near Venezuela. While there are grounds to stop and inspect certain vessels, Smith emphasized that this issue is largely overshadowed by political motivations, particularly the U.S. administration’s desire to unseat Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.

Smith elaborated on the legal nuances, explaining, “There is a legal basis for it if you’re dealing with vessels operating under false or no flags, especially if they’re involved in illegal activities. This kind of enforcement is not uncommon globally. For instance, Russia is notorious for operating numerous ‘dark fleet’ vessels. Intercepting and inspecting these ships is legally justified, although the situation becomes more complex when it comes to seizing them.”

Despite the legal justifications, Smith argued that the primary drive behind targeting these vessels is ingrained in the broader political agenda: “The focus on these ships is not merely about upholding international maritime law. The real aim is to push Maduro out of power, making this less about legal technicalities and more about an ongoing regime change effort.”

Addressing the possibilities of curtailing funding for operations against Venezuela, Smith noted, “There are measures we could take to cut off funds for such actions. However, this requires the Republicans to prioritize their policy convictions over political fears related to Donald Trump. We haven’t reached that point yet, but it’s crucial to continue pressing forward.”