A middle schooler was suspended from class and banned from athletic events for wearing black face paint to a football game
Share and Follow

A STUDENT has been suspended from school over claims that he donned blackface for a football game but his parents say it was just war paint.

A photo shows J.A., an eighth grader whose full name has been withheld for privacy reasons, attending a football game between La Jolla High School and Morse High School in California on October 13.

A middle schooler was suspended from class and banned from athletic events for wearing black face paint to a football game

A middle schooler was suspended from class and banned from athletic events for wearing black face paint to a football gameCredit: Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression
An organization for individual rights and expression stated that the suspension violated the boy's First Amendment rights

An organization for individual rights and expression stated that the suspension violated the boy’s First Amendment rightsCredit: Getty

The boy had dark face paint on his cheeks and chin, according to the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).

“He had a fun, great night without any trouble,” the child’s father told Cal Coast News while claiming that a security guard, who was Black, encouraged his son to put on more paint.

The student attends Muirlands Middle School in La Jolla and attended the high school football game in his free time rather than as part of a school function.

However, a week after the game, the boy and his parents were called into a meeting by Jeff Luna, the principal of Muirland Middle School.

The family was told that their son would receive a two-day suspension and was banned from attending future athletic events.

A disciplinary notice read that J.A. “painted his face black at a football game,” calling the incident an “offensive comment, intent to harm.”

Principal Luna also reportedly called the face paint offensive because Morse High School has a “largely Black” student population.

FIRE sent a letter to the principal, claiming that the boy’s First Amendment right was violated and called for a reversal of the decision.

“As the First Amendment protects J.A.’s non-disruptive expression of team spirit via a style commonly used by athletes and fans – notwithstanding your inaccurate description of it as ‘blackface’ – FIRE calls on the school to remove the infraction from J.A.’s disciplinary record and lift the ban on his attendance at future athletic events,” read the letter.

Aaron Terr, the organization’s director of public advocacy, argued that the boy’s “appearance emulated the style of eye black worn by many athletes,” adding that “such use of eye black began as a way to reduce glare during games, but long ago evolved into ‘miniature billboards for personal messages and war-paint slatherings.’”

Terr explained that this was different from blackface, which he described as “dark makeup worn to mimic the appearance of a Black person and especially to mock or ridicule Black people.”

“It has its origins in racist minstrel shows that featured white actors caricaturing Black people, and generally entails covering the entire face in dark makeup and exaggerating certain facial features.”

However, J.A. instead followed a popular war paint-inspired trend of athletes using large amounts of eye black under their eyes, said Terr.

“Which was no racial connotations whatsoever.”

J.A. wore the face paint “throughout the game without incident,” said Terr, who mentioned a landmark Supreme Court case that upheld the First Amendment rights of students.

“In the seminal student speech case Tinker v. Des Moines, the Supreme Court held the First Amendment protected public school students’ right to wear black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War,” he said.

“The Court made clear school officials cannot restrict student speech based on speculative ‘undifferentiated fear’ that it will cause disruption or feelings or unpleasantness or discomfort among the student body.

“Rather Tinker requires evidence that the speech has or will ‘materially and substantially disrupt the work and discipline of the school.’

“There is no evidence J.A.’s face paint caused a disruption – let alone a material and substantial one – at the football game or at school afterward,” he said.

Terr asked for a response from the school by November 22 but soon filed another letter to the San Diego Unified School District on Monday after the district denied his request to overturn J.A.’s suspension.

The U.S. Sun contacted San Diego Unified School District and Principal Jeff Luna for comment.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Locals fear Brit mum’s murder in French village was professional hit as children break silence on unsolved killing

FEARS are growing that Brit mum Karen Carter was killed in a…

PM snubs call to axe powerful No10 chief Morgan McSweeney after welfare backlash

THE PM’S powerful chief of staff Morgan McSweeney is “not going anywhere”…

Protecting Women’s Sports from Transgender Athletes

The new president of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) said on Thursday…

Trump megabill narrowly advances in Senate despite two GOP defections

Senate Republicans on Saturday narrowly voted to advance a sprawling 1,000-page bill…

With Iran, President Trump faces his neocon moment

Donald Trump rose to the presidency on a promise to end America’s…

Kimberly Guilfoyle’s aspiration to be the ‘Belle of the Mediterranean’ is threatened by scrutinized intimate life

Kimberly Guilfoyle is preparing to face an intense grilling from Democrats on…

Residents furious after rendering plant makes homes smell like ‘rotting flesh’ – it’s been a year & there’s no relief

RESIDENTS of one city have been plagued by a foul-smelling issue for…

Lost 2,400-year-old city uncovered by archaeologists with multi-storey buildings and temple dedicated to cobra goddess

A ONCE bustling city with multi-storey tower houses and a cobra goddess…