NJ attorney general: Universal injunctions still possible after Supreme Court ruling
Share and Follow


New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin (D) argued Monday that sweeping injunctions blocking the Trump administration’s policies could still be achieved, despite a Supreme Court ruling against them last week.

“[The Supreme Court] said very clearly: States still may need nationwide relief if, in fact, the harms that we experience as states … the consequences to states are enormous; so, they asked lower courts to consider that question,” Platkin, one of the state attorneys general who has advocated on behalf of the injunctions, told CNN’s Kate Bolduan in an interview. “I think we will very clearly be able to meet the standard that even this Supreme Court set out for states to meet should we need nationwide relief.”

The high court issued a 6-3 ruling along ideological lines Friday that pushed back on judicial holds that have been used to stymie the president’s agenda since his return to the White House in January.

“These injunctions — known as ‘universal injunctions’ — likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts,” Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the court’s six Republican-appointed justices, after the Trump administration argued that judicial overreach was entrenching on the president’s powers.

The justices ordered the lower courts to move “expeditiously” to reconsider their injunctions and comply with the Friday ruling.

Platkin told Bolduan he thinks that leaves room for universal injunctions in some cases.

“Notably, it was a rhetorically very strong opinion, but it actually was quite a middle of the road opinion for what the administration wanted,” he said.

The case that prompted the court’s decision centered on an executive order Trump signed earlier this year to restrict birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to immigrants.

The court didn’t weigh in on the merits of birthright citizenship.

“Look, I think it’s important to remember what the Supreme Court did not do on Friday,” Platkin said. “They didn’t opine on the merits of birthright citizenship because everyone, for the last 157 years, has understood that babies born on U.S. soil since the Civil War have been treated as citizens.”

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Most Americans believe the shutdown will last two weeks or less: Survey

A new poll shows most Americans say they believe the government shutdown…

Shocking Alert: Chicago Police Instructed to Hold Back as Federal Agents Encounter Encirclement

We have reached a very dangerous level of political hackery. Dangerous, vitriolic…

“Thousands of Jews Gather to Mourn Two Victims in Attack Amidst Safety Concerns in Britain”

Thousands of Jewish people have come together in London and Manchester to mourn…

AI won’t end work for bankers — it will redefine it

What do Jerome Powell and Henry Ford have in common? A recognition…

Trump reveals date for White House's UFC fight: His 80th birthday

President Trump on Sunday revealed a new detail about the hyped UFC…

Trump to sailors on pay held back by shutdown: 'Do not worry about it'

President Trump on Sunday told Navy sailors not to “worry about” their…

Analyzing the Story Behind the Resistance Judiciary

If you’re like me, anytime you hear or see a news story…

Trump calls on Democratic attorney general nominee Jay Jones to drop out of race

President Trump called on Democratic Virginia Attorney General nominee Jay Jones to…