NJ attorney general: Universal injunctions still possible after Supreme Court ruling
Share and Follow


New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin (D) argued Monday that sweeping injunctions blocking the Trump administration’s policies could still be achieved, despite a Supreme Court ruling against them last week.

“[The Supreme Court] said very clearly: States still may need nationwide relief if, in fact, the harms that we experience as states … the consequences to states are enormous; so, they asked lower courts to consider that question,” Platkin, one of the state attorneys general who has advocated on behalf of the injunctions, told CNN’s Kate Bolduan in an interview. “I think we will very clearly be able to meet the standard that even this Supreme Court set out for states to meet should we need nationwide relief.”

The high court issued a 6-3 ruling along ideological lines Friday that pushed back on judicial holds that have been used to stymie the president’s agenda since his return to the White House in January.

“These injunctions — known as ‘universal injunctions’ — likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts,” Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the court’s six Republican-appointed justices, after the Trump administration argued that judicial overreach was entrenching on the president’s powers.

The justices ordered the lower courts to move “expeditiously” to reconsider their injunctions and comply with the Friday ruling.

Platkin told Bolduan he thinks that leaves room for universal injunctions in some cases.

“Notably, it was a rhetorically very strong opinion, but it actually was quite a middle of the road opinion for what the administration wanted,” he said.

The case that prompted the court’s decision centered on an executive order Trump signed earlier this year to restrict birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to immigrants.

The court didn’t weigh in on the merits of birthright citizenship.

“Look, I think it’s important to remember what the Supreme Court did not do on Friday,” Platkin said. “They didn’t opine on the merits of birthright citizenship because everyone, for the last 157 years, has understood that babies born on U.S. soil since the Civil War have been treated as citizens.”

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Ozzy Osbourne’s Family Holds Funeral at His Mansion with Humorous Sign, Elton John Among Attendees

Ozzy Osbourne’s widow Sharon and her family are today laying the heavy…

Dead son’s brain was ‘handed to parents in box that leaked’ all over car and left it ‘smelling of death,’ family says

TWO funeral homes have been accused of packaging a dead man’s brain…

Senate Approves Joe Kent, Ex-Special Forces, as Head of Counterterrorism Agency

The Senate voted 52-44 to confirm former special operations soldier Joe Kent…

Top Biden aide Steve Ricchetti tells GOP panel ex-president was ‘fully capable’

Steve Ricchetti, who was a top adviser to former President Joe Biden…

Murder probe launched into death of model, 18, who fell 200ft from balcony after threesome with Bitcoin tycoon & wife

A MURDER probe has been launched into the death of a teen…

Jess Glynne blasts White House after using her viral Jet2 meme song over clip of Trump’s ICE deportations

POPSTAR Jess Glynne has hit out at the White House for using…

Four people are found dead in home & cops link case to 7-month-old baby left abandoned in stranger’s yard in 100F heat

FOUR people have been found dead inside a home just hours after…

Terrifying moment swinging ‘360 Degrees’ amusement park ride splits in HALF leaving 23 people injured in Saudi Arabia

TERRIFYING footage has captured the moment a swinging amusement park ride collapsed…