NJ attorney general: Universal injunctions still possible after Supreme Court ruling
Share and Follow


New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin (D) argued Monday that sweeping injunctions blocking the Trump administration’s policies could still be achieved, despite a Supreme Court ruling against them last week.

“[The Supreme Court] said very clearly: States still may need nationwide relief if, in fact, the harms that we experience as states … the consequences to states are enormous; so, they asked lower courts to consider that question,” Platkin, one of the state attorneys general who has advocated on behalf of the injunctions, told CNN’s Kate Bolduan in an interview. “I think we will very clearly be able to meet the standard that even this Supreme Court set out for states to meet should we need nationwide relief.”

The high court issued a 6-3 ruling along ideological lines Friday that pushed back on judicial holds that have been used to stymie the president’s agenda since his return to the White House in January.

“These injunctions — known as ‘universal injunctions’ — likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts,” Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the court’s six Republican-appointed justices, after the Trump administration argued that judicial overreach was entrenching on the president’s powers.

The justices ordered the lower courts to move “expeditiously” to reconsider their injunctions and comply with the Friday ruling.

Platkin told Bolduan he thinks that leaves room for universal injunctions in some cases.

“Notably, it was a rhetorically very strong opinion, but it actually was quite a middle of the road opinion for what the administration wanted,” he said.

The case that prompted the court’s decision centered on an executive order Trump signed earlier this year to restrict birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to immigrants.

The court didn’t weigh in on the merits of birthright citizenship.

“Look, I think it’s important to remember what the Supreme Court did not do on Friday,” Platkin said. “They didn’t opine on the merits of birthright citizenship because everyone, for the last 157 years, has understood that babies born on U.S. soil since the Civil War have been treated as citizens.”

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Woman arrested after newborn baby found decapitated and dismembered in rubbish bin

POLICE have arrested a woman suspected of decapitating her new-born baby and…

Pool sex assault epidemic sweeps Germany with 74 attacks in just one region after Syrian men arrested for ‘groping kids’

A DISTURBING epidemic is sweeping through Germany with hundreds of people reporting…

Toddler dies after ‘being forgotten’ inside car in Spain during 35C afternoon

A TODDLER has died after being “forgotten” inside a car in Spain…

Idaho victim’s sister shares gut-wrenching open letter slamming Bryan Kohberger’s last-minute plea deal & begs for trial

THE SISTER of one of the victims of the Idaho murders has…

Disney Dream cruise passengers recall horror after girl went overboard & dad jumped in water after her

PASSENGERS on board a Disney Dream cruise ship have spoken of their…

Trash chaos with fears bags will pile up on streets of major US city as 10,000 workers walk off the job

TRASH pick-up has been paused in a major US city, and residents…

At least one dead & 3 others injured as knifeman goes on stabbing rampage in Germany after attacker storms office

AT least one person has been killed and three others injured after…

NYC Pride ends in chaos after teen girl shot in the head near Stonewall Inn hours after 50 hurt by bear spray attack

TWO teenagers were shot near the historic Stonewall Inn on Sunday night…