Sen Johnson: Media 'either duped or complicit' in Russia election interference 'narrative'
Share and Follow


Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) accused the media of being “either duped or complicit” on the interference of the 2016 election by Russians.

“I want the press to be honest. I want Pulitzer Prizes to be returned. They were either duped or complicit in pushing that false narrative that put America in political turmoil for years,” Johnson told NewsNation’s Blake Burman on “The Hill.” 

“It’s continuing to go on, all based on a Hillary Clinton dirty trick, the Steele Dossier that those guys knew was a dirty trick, and yet they used that to gin up the Mueller investigation, impeachments, everything else,” he added. “Listen, this is, again election interference orders of magnitude worse than anything Russia or China ever, ever could hope to achieve,” he added.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard put out a report last week alleging that Obama administration officials manipulated intelligence linked to Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Gabbard argued in a statement that former officials took part in a “treasonous conspiracy” and said her office was turning over evidence to the Justice Department for possible criminal referrals.

The report follows President Trump’s March memo ordering the declassification of “all files related to Crossfire Hurricane,” the name given to the FBI’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Trump has long denied that Russia influenced his successful White House bid in 2016 against Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton.

On Tuesday, Former President Obama denied the Trump administration’s assertions that he manipulated evidence linked to Russian interference in the 2016 election.

“These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction,” Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush said in a statement to The Hill’s sister network NewsNation.

“Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio,” he added.

The Hill has reached out to The Clinton Foundation for comment.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Pelosi’s Fiery Remarks: Why She Labels Trump as the ‘Worst Thing on Earth

In a recent conversation with CNN’s Elex Michaelson, Representative Nancy Pelosi from…

Los Angeles Dodgers Dominate Headlines: What Keeps the Team in the Spotlight?

Welcome to the sports section of the Good Pirate Ship RedState,…

Professional Soccer Player Advocates for ‘Gender Standards,’ Receives Pushback from Team

The National Women’s Soccer League is currently navigating a contentious debate sparked…

Bipartisan Effort: Moderate House Democrats and Republicans Unite to Extend ObamaCare Subsidies with New Principles

A bipartisan group of House lawmakers unveiled a proposal on Monday aimed…

Mamdani Compares Cuomo Vote to Supporting Trump in Bold Statement

Zohran Mamdani, a Democratic candidate in the New York City mayoral race,…

How Trump’s Comments on Spain Could Benefit Putin’s Agenda

In light of the evident risk posed by Russia, an increase in…

Unveiling the Crisis: How a Surge of 300 Male Migrants is Transforming This Small City Amidst Controversy

Sir Keir Starmer’s recent approach to addressing the asylum crisis seems to…

How the Trump Administration is Revamping SNAP Amidst Democratic Delays: A Bold Move for Food Security

The ongoing government shutdown, often referred to as the “Schumer Shutdown,”…