Senate parliamentarian greenlights AI moratorium again
Share and Follow


A provision that bars states from regulating artificial intelligence (AI) for a 10-year period can remain in President Trump’s sweeping tax package, the Senate parliamentarian determined Friday. 

The decision, announced by Senate Budget Democrats, once again found the moratorium clears a procedural hurdle known as the Byrd rule. 

The provision’s future in the reconciliation bill appeared in danger Thursday, after Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough asked Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz (R-Texas) to rewrite the measure. 

It had initially been cleared by the Senate referee last weekend, after Cruz altered the language to tie the moratorium to federal funding.  

The most recent language banned states from regulating AI models and systems if they want access to $500 million in AI infrastructure and deployment funds. 

However, the parliamentarian voiced concerns about the provision when she met with Cruz and Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), the top Democrat on the Senate Commerce Committee, on Wednesday night, Cantwell told reporters Thursday. 

Democrats had argued that the measure would impact $42 billion in broadband funding in violation of the Byrd rule. 

MacDonough’s latest approval notes that the provision “does not violate the Byrd Rule as long as the conditions only apply to the new $500 million provided by the reconciliation bill,” according to a press release from Senate Budget Democrats. 

The Byrd rule, which determines what can be voted on as part of the budget reconciliation process with a simple-majority vote, has represented a key hurdle to Republican priorities as they rush to pass Trump’s spending bill by his self-imposed deadline of July 4. 

While the AI moratorium has cleared the Byrd rule, it may still face additional hurdles, with several House and Senate Republicans voicing opposition to the measure. Sens. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) have all come out against the provision. 

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Congress is abandoning centuries-old ethics lessons in its crypto push

Congress is finally taking action to regulate the digital asset marketplace. By…

Victoria Beckham Hosts a Star-Studded Premiere Party for Her Revealing Netflix Documentary on Overcoming an Eating Disorder

It was the night Victoria Beckham had always dreamed of.  And even…

New Jersey's GOP governor nominee breaks with Trump on wind farm, Tylenol

New Jersey’s GOP governor nominee, Jack Ciattarelli, on Wednesday broke with the…

What Are the Next Steps After Losing the Federal EV Tax Credit?

Looking to buy an electric vehicle? Don’t count on that federal subsidy…

AOC Humorous Retraction on Stephen Miller Comment After Experiencing ‘Spiritual Height’ Karma

As the Schumer Shutdown rolls on, the woman who has been floated…

Whiplash: California County Enforces COVID Mask Rule Days After Newsom Signs Law Banning Masks for ICE

California has long been known for its counter-culture, its zaniness, its “otherness.”…

Sorry, Newsom: Arrest in Palisades Fire Marks the Start of a Troubling Aftermath

After Wednesday’s arrest of Jonathan Rinderknecht in connection with the deadly Palisades…

Ashes to ashes: The electric vehicle mandate is well and truly dead

The federal electric vehicle mandate is dead. And not a moment too…