A seasoned CIA officer made waves in the U.S. Senate on Wednesday with claims that Dr. Anthony Fauci intentionally skewed intelligence analyses regarding the origins of COVID-19. Allegedly, Fauci directed federal probes away from the lab leak hypothesis and towards a conclusion favoring a natural origin. From the outset, it was suggested that Fauci carefully selected experts, influenced the investigation process, and utilized researchers reliant on grants to ensure the intelligence community aligned with his preferred narrative. This hearing confirmed the suspicions of many Americans: the government knew it was disseminating falsehoods.
James Erdman III, a CIA special operations officer with 13 years of service, made his first public appearance during the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee meeting after being subpoenaed—a move his agency attempted to prevent. Interestingly, no Democrats were present; each one opted to skip a public session focused on a potential government cover-up concerning a pandemic that claimed over a million American lives. The hearing was presided over by Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky.
Fauci’s strategy reportedly involved selecting experts for consultation who were inclined to dismiss the lab leak theory, including contributors to the controversial 2020 “Proximal Origin” paper. Initially, these authors considered the possibility of a Wuhan lab origin but changed their stance following a Zoom call with Fauci and NIH leadership. Notably, one author received a $9 million grant from Fauci’s agency after reversing his position.
This situation did not arise in isolation; it was facilitated by an existing network, with those conducting the investigation being accountable to the same institutional structure that supported it.
Wuhan Lab Funder Daszak Served as Facebook Fact-Checker and on WHO Investigation Team
CIA analysts reached the same conclusion repeatedly between 2021 and 2023: a lab leak was the most likely origin. Those findings never reached Congress or the public. Erdman rejected reports of direct bribes but said the outcome was arguably worse: “Six of the seven technical experts say, ‘Yep, we still think it’s a lab leak.’ And they were sticking to their guns. Management changed the analytic line.”
That management capitulation didn’t happen in a vacuum. It happened because the network was already in place, and the people running the investigation were answerable to the same institutional circles that built it.
Wuhan Lab Funder Daszak Served as Facebook Fact-Checker and on WHO Investigation Team
The structural conflict ran deep, and it didn’t start with Fauci alone. Fauci’s agency funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and Fauci was then invited into classified deliberations to assess whether that research caused the pandemic. Researcher Ralph Baric collaborated with Wuhan’s Dr. Zhengli Shi to engineer gain-of-function coronaviruses, then sat on the Biological Sciences Experts Group advising the intelligence community on COVID’s origins. Peter Daszak received hundreds of millions in U.S. government funding, worked with Shi on the same experiments, and was dispatched to China with the WHO to investigate the outbreak he may have helped cause. This is the network. The same people who funded the research, ran the research, and partnered with Chinese Communist Party-linked scientists were then handed the keys to the investigation. That isn’t independent expertise — it’s a closed loop, and it was built that way.
“It was not until after the 2024 election that the outgoing Biden Administration directed the CIA to issue an assessment — not because of new intelligence, but so officials could walk out the door claiming there was nothing left to find,” Paul said. “That is not analysis. That is a cleanup operation.”
The CIA’s response was to attack the process rather than the evidence — calling the hearing “dishonest political theater” and dismissing Erdman as a subpoena witness rather than a truth-teller. It was a classic bureaucratic deflection: Impugn the messenger, ignore the message, and hope nobody reads past the first paragraph. It didn’t work. The Agency’s own statement contained the line that blew up the whole attack: “As the CIA has already assessed, COVID-19 most likely originated from a lab leak.” Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) read it aloud and demanded a public apology from CIA Director John Ratcliffe. He didn’t get one — but the contradiction was already on the record, in the CIA’s own words.Â
Erdman further testified that the CIA is withholding up to 2,000 pages of classified COVID origins material in violation of a 2023 law requiring disclosure — and that whistleblowers conducting the review were illegally surveilled by the very agency they were investigating.
More than a million Americans died. Children lost years of education. Businesses were destroyed. Vaccine mandates were imposed under emergency authorities built, according to Wednesday’s testimony, on an origins narrative the government had reason to doubt from the start. The American people are owed the complete record — and accountability for everyone who helped hide it.
Editor’s Note:Â Do you enjoy RedState’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.