Share and Follow
Eric Swalwell’s campaign has directed over $300,000 to a law firm renowned for its expertise in white-collar criminal defense, as revealed by Federal Election Commission records. This firm received 44 payments over a span of seven years, with amounts varying from $250 to upwards of $35,000 per transaction.
The law firm in question is Coblentz Patch Duffy & Bass, a prominent Bay Area legal practice specializing in criminal defense as well as employment law.
These payments coincide with a timeline that includes a 2018 Justice Department initiative reportedly targeting records from various members of Congress, Swalwell among them. Additionally, they cover a 2021 inquiry by the House Ethics Committee into his interactions with an individual suspected of being linked to Chinese intelligence, an investigation that concluded in 2023.
Get Ready for Some Dramatic Democratic Disputes: Steyer’s Ad Criticizing Swalwell and the Fiery Democratic Response
According to the campaign, the expenditures were necessitated by the pressure exerted by the Trump administration and the need to brace for potential investigations.
Grab the Popcorn for Some Fun Dem Infighting: Steyer Ad About Swalwell, the Angry Dem Reaction
The campaign says the spending was tied to pressure from the Trump administration and the need to prepare for possible investigations.
A spokesman for Swalwell’s campaign said the payments were for legal guidance amid President Donald Trump’s “retaliatory investigations” that “have put his family and staff at risk.”
The campaign points to those investigations but does not identify a specific legal matter tied to the spending, and when asked for an example, it cited the 2018 DOJ records seizure and the ethics probe, both already public.
The attorney who received the payments described the work as compliance advice and preparation, not tied to any specific case.
“I was retained as outside counsel to provide legal guidance to the congressman’s office, ensuring staff remained fully compliant with applicable laws and prepared for potential contact from politically motivated actors. This was not related to any employment matter.”
President Donald Trump was in office for four of the seven years covered by those payments, a period the campaign cites in explaining the legal costs tied to potential investigations. The filings show those payments continuing across multiple reporting cycles, rather than tied to a single event or discrete legal matter, including years when no new investigative action was publicly identified. That pattern reflects ongoing outside legal involvement over time, not a one-time response to a specific development.
Adam Schiff faced similar scrutiny, including the reported DOJ records sweep, yet his campaign filings do not show comparable spending on white-collar criminal defense attorneys during that period; later, as scrutiny increased, he took a different approach by creating a legal defense fund.
More than $300,000. Forty-four payments. Criminal defense attorneys. Those payments were made with campaign funds, yet the filings do not tie them to any specific case.
Come November, voters will decide whether that adds up.
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy RedState’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.