Trump's 'Midnight Massacre' of 17 Inspectors General Throws DC Status Quo Into Chaos
Share and Follow


President Trump summarily dismissed 17 agency inspectors general Friday night in a move that caught official Washington by surprise.

A senior White House official confirmed to POLITICO that “some” inspectors general had been fired.

The known firings include the IGs of the departments of State, Agriculture, Interior, Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Education, Labor, and Defense, as well as the Small Business Administration, the US Energy Corporation, and the Environmental Protection Agency.

The inspector generals are allegedly independent of the administration and are supposed to root out fraud, waste, abuse, and lawbreaking. The reality is much more checkered. 

Without playing politics, you don’t achieve the political profile necessary to get a presidential appointment. That political incentive means that an IG is a double-edged sword because their purported independence provides an incentive to curry favor with all parties. Trump’s first impeachment was Michael Atkinson, the intelligence community inspector general who alerted Congress to the that led to Trump’s first impeachment. That action now looks more like part of a calculated political hit than a call to duty.

What makes the list so curious is that Sean O’Donnell, the EPA IG appointed by Trump’s first term, was fired while the DOJ IG, Michael Horowitz, who never lifted a finger to reel in Merrick Garland’s massive abuses of power, was retained.

But Friday’s dismissals befuddled and stunned the watchdog community, as many of those let go had done hard-hitting investigations of Biden administration operations.

“Befuddled and stunned” is the default position for most of them, but that’s a different post.

For example, Michael Missal, the inspector general at the Veterans Affairs Department, oversaw multiple investigations of how the Biden administration handled the agency’s troubled effort to build a massive electronic health records system for veterans’ medical information. Among other conclusions, the reports showed that veterans had been put at risk as their prescriptions were lost in the system. The project has been paused for months.

Mark Greenblatt, a Trump appointee at the Interior Department who was fired Friday, released a lengthy investigation in 2021 concluding that when the U.S. Park Police led law enforcement officers into a crowd of mostly peaceful protesters outside Lafayette Square during the first Trump administration, they did so as part of a plan made days earlier to build a fence around the park to protect officers — not to facilitate the visit minutes later by the president to a nearby church.

Among those apparently spared Friday was Joseph V. Cuffari Jr., the embattled inspector general at the Department of Homeland Security. A Trump appointee, Cuffari was found in October by an independent panel of watchdogs to have misled the Senate during his nomination process and committed other misconduct during his five years in office.

Of course, people are unhappy.

“Inspectors general are charged with rooting out government waste, fraud, abuse and preventing misconduct,” Senator Elizabeth Warren, Democrat of Massachusetts, said in a statement. “President Trump is dismantling checks on his power and paving the way for widespread corruption.”

I would say it is surprising that Warren seems totally unacquainted with how the US government works and that “checks and balances” are functions of the three branches of government, and the Executive isn’t required to provide a check upon itself, but I’m not.

This has set up an interesting side skirmish. This mass dismissal apparently violates the law, creating the federal IG system.

The coming fight has also potentially pitted Trump against Chuck Grassley.

“I guess it’s the case of whether he believes in congressional oversight, because I work closely with all the inspector generals and I think I’ve got a good reputation for defending them. And I intend to defend them,” he said.

I’m sure this is heading to court, and it is a good bet that the Supreme Court will eventually decide that Congress can’t put that kind of leash on the president’s ability to fire a presidential appointee. 

This move is curious. If it isn’t simply an impulsive act, the Trump White House may be using this court case to audition arguments that can be used on another Congressional “permission” case, like a challenge to the Impoundment Control Act of 1974.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Republicans Secure Victory in South Carolina’s Special Elections

In a decisive sweep, South Carolina Republicans clinched all three legislative special…

Christine Quinn Sets the Record Straight: A Bold Call-Out to Widow Erika Kirk on Selling Sunset

In a surprising move, Christine Quinn, famed for her role on Netflix’s…

David Beckham and Sons Celebrate Christmas in Style Amid Family Drama with Brooklyn

David Beckham, along with his sons Romeo and Cruz, embraced the holiday…

Nayib Bukele Challenges Hillary Clinton Over Prisoner Critique: Will She Accept El Salvador’s Inmates?

El Salvador’s President, Nayib Bukele, recently extended an invitation to Hillary…

Prepare for the Busiest Travel Day in Five Years: Avoid Roads from 11 AM to 7 PM as Millions Embark on Getaways Today

Significant travel disruptions have ensued as a key motorway has been shut…

Erika Kirk Addresses Controversy Surrounding Charlie Kirk Murder Allegations

Erika Kirk has passionately condemned the “evil” conspiracy theorists who have been…

Putin’s Stance on War Casualties Sparks Controversy: No Limit on Lives Lost

During Tuesday’s episode of “The Story” on the Fox News Channel, U.S.…

Zelensky Unveils Bold Demilitarized Zone Plan in New Peace Proposal to End Conflict

In the latest bid to bring an end to the ongoing…