Wall Street Journal slams Trump's tariff plans: 'The dumbest trade war in history'
Share and Follow


The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board published a punchy Saturday op-ed listing all the failed reasons for President Trump’s tariff plan, citing a declining trend in trade and manufacturing culpability following signed sanctions. 

Trump on Saturday imposed significant tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China, fueling a potential trade war.

“Tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China are SIGNED!” White House spokesperson Harrison Fields posted on X. “This bold move holds these countries accountable for stopping illegal immigration and the flow of dangerous drugs like fentanyl.”

“Leaving China aside, Mr. Trump’s justification for this economic assault on the neighbors makes no sense,” the board wrote. 

Writers challenged the idea that exorbitant pricing for imports and exports would urge neighboring governments to stem the flow of illicit drugs.

“White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt says they’ve ‘enabled illegal drugs to pour into America. But drugs have flowed into the U.S. for decades, and will continue to do so as long as Americans keep using them,” read the Wall Street Journal op-ed. 

“Neither country can stop it.”

The board denied the notion that increasing the cost of business deals between borders would lead to a fulfilling economy. 

“Mr. Trump sometimes sounds as if the U.S. shouldn’t import anything at all, that America can be a perfectly closed economy making everything at home. This is called autarky, and it isn’t the world we live in, or one that we should want to live in, as Mr. Trump may soon find out,” they outlined. 

“Take the U.S. auto industry, which is really a North American industry because supply chains in the three countries are highly integrated. In 2024 Canada supplied almost 13% of U.S. imports of auto parts and Mexico nearly 42%. Industry experts say a vehicle made on the continent goes back and forth across borders a half dozen times or more, as companies source components and add value in the most cost-effective ways,” they added.

“And everyone benefits.”

The board alleged that the car industry, farm goods and oil would suffer from the president’s new policies. 

“None of this is supposed to happen under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement that Mr. Trump negotiated and signed in his first term. The U.S. willingness to ignore its treaty obligations, even with friends, won’t make other countries eager to do deals,” they wrote. 

“Maybe Mr. Trump will claim victory and pull back if he wins some token concessions. But if a North American trade war persists, it will qualify as one of the dumbest in history.”

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Historic Government Shutdown Ends as House Approves Crucial Funding Bill

The federal government is set to resume operations on Thursday morning, concluding…

Democrats Face Scrutiny Over Inaction on Epstein Files: Missed Opportunity or Strategic Move?

Republican Representative Tim Burchett from Tennessee’s 18th district recently challenged Democrats…

Woman Stabbed at Chicago Train Station Months Following Ukrainian Refugee’s Death

Chicago police are currently on the hunt for a man accused of…

Why Kris Jenner’s Birthday Posts No Longer Feature Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Photos

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were noticeably absent from Kim Kardashian’s Instagram…

Breaking: Trump Approves Short-Term Funding Bill, Concluding Government Shutdown

On Wednesday evening, President Trump approved a revised continuing resolution, a…

Veteran Fox News Anchor Announces Hiatus Citing Health Concerns

A seasoned Fox News presenter has announced a temporary hiatus from her…

Ex-Top Aide to Gov. Newsom Faces 32 Felony Charges in Major Federal Conspiracy and Fraud Investigation

Dana Williamson, who once served as chief of staff for California…

England vs Serbia – World Cup Qualifiers LIVE: Real-Time Score, Team Announcements, and Updates as Morgan Rogers Selected Over Jude Bellingham for Prestigious No. 10 Role

Another international break on the horizon? It seems like these breaks are…