So, there’s a bit less ground to cover this evening, as I’m not trying to cram three-plus days’ worth of litigation news into one column, but that doesn’t mean Tuesday was completely uneventful. 

There was another Supreme Court decision handed down in the case of Monsalvo Velazquez v. Bondi. This one also has to do with immigration, but I think some folks are reading too much into it. It involves 2021 removal proceedings against the petitioner (the case only involves Pam Bondi since she is the current Attorney General — previously, Merrick Garland was the named defendant), and whether his 60-day deadline to reopen his removal proceedings ended on a Saturday or the following Monday. In a nutshell, it’s a ruling about when the “i” gets dotted. 

And here is Tuesday’s round-up of the ongoing cases challenging the Trump administration’s executive actions:

• Abrego Garcia v. Noem – 8:25-cv-00951 – (case challenging removal of plaintiff — a/k/a “Maryland father” — to El Salvador) — The Trump administration filed its Tuesday status report with the court. This one, however, was under seal…so we’re left guessing as to its contents (for now, at least). In the meantime, the parties are sparring over the expedited discovery, and we’re learning a bit more about the particulars of Abrego Garcia’s case, namely, that, while “’approximately $6 million’ has been made available to the Government of El Salvador (GOES) to be used by the GOES for its law enforcement needs, including ‘for the detention of these [Venezuelan] foreign terrorists,’ the United States has not provided any specific assistance with respect to the detention of Abrego Garcia or any other Salvadoran national.” (emphasis mine) Judge Paula Xinis (Maryland) has now issued an order regarding the discovery dispute long on directives and short on patience. She does require the plaintiffs to narrow a couple of their requests, but largely, her ruling is addressed to the government, overruling the majority of its objections and giving it until 6:00 p.m. Wednesday to beef up its responses and its bases for objections.
• – 3:25-cv-02847 – (case challenging contract termination of funding allocated to legal services for unaccompanied children in immigration proceedings) — District Court Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín (Northern District of California) entered an order on Monday denying the administration’s motion to dissolve her prior entered TRO and stay the proceedings pending appeal. A hearing on the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction is set for Wednesday. 
• Widakuswara v. Lake – 1:25-cv-01015 – (case challenging dismantling of United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM)) — On Tuesday, District Court Judge Royce Lamberth (D.C.) entered an order granting in part and denying in part the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. He granted it as to Voice of America, Radio Free Asia, and Middle East Broadcasting Network, but denied it as to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Open Technology Fund because their current agreements/grant funding status differs from the first three entities.