WASHINGTON — Amid the ongoing legal challenge concerning contentious border infrastructure, the federal government announced in court on Friday its decision to extend the suspension of construction activities within Big Bend National Park until mid-September. This development has been warmly received by opponents of the project, who have been vocal since the plans were unveiled.
Recently, Customs and Border Protection had temporarily halted these activities following a visit to the park by CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott. During his visit, he engaged in discussions with local officials, following eruptions of public protest when bulldozers began making their mark on the park’s southern Texas terrain.
At the time, the Department of Homeland Security clarified that the machinery was not initiating full-scale construction but instead conducting preliminary design and survey tasks. This interruption, initially instated by Scott, was expected to lapse this coming Monday.
The proposed plans within Big Bend National Park include the creation of a new road, implementation of advanced detection technology, and the erection of vehicle-stopping barriers at the border. However, government representatives stress that definitive blueprints for the park project remain undecided.
On Friday, U.S. District Judge Orlando L. Garcia expressed his intention for both parties to leverage the additional time to collaboratively address their respective issues. The pause encompasses efforts across both the national park and an adjacent area located upriver and westward of the park, as confirmed by a Justice Department attorney during the hearing.
The work in Big Bend National Park is part of a $46 billion plan by the Trump administration to cover the length of the 2,000-mile border from the Pacific Ocean to the Gulf of Mexico in a combination of 30-foot-tall steel bollard walls, vehicle barriers and detection technology to stop illegal immigration and smugglers.
As construction has ramped into high gear, the administration has
But the government argued Friday that Customs and Border Protection's authority to build the wall or other border infrastructure derives from Congress.
“Congress gave them the authority,” said government lawyer Pamela Amaechi. "Congress has spoken.”
The lawsuit in Friday's case alleges that the government overstretched its authority in seeking to build border infrastructure in a national park established by Congress. And the lawsuit alleges the slated construction violates the religious freedoms and cultural practices of Native Americans for whom access to burial sites or areas where they conduct specific ceremonies is central to their religious practices.
The government has argued that it has authority granted by Congress to build the wall and other border security infrastructure and to waive certain regulations to do so swiftly. They’ve also argued that the plaintiffs haven’t shown that the construction projects will in fact restrict anyone’s ability to practice their religion and that the construction plans in the park are limited.
Roland Gutierrez, a Democrat state senator in Texas who also argued the case Friday against the government, called the outcome a “win” for their side even though the pause is temporary. Gutierrez said anything that slows the government down until midterm elections in November is a good thing, with the hope that a change in control of Congress might result in a rethinking of the border wall plans.
Copyright © 2026 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.