Controversial Neo-Nazi Inmate Sparks Outcry Over Prison Conditions: The Shower and Cell Time Debate

Joel Davis, a 31-year-old currently in custody, has been facing serious allegations since his arrest in November. He is accused of inciting the “rhetorical rape” of Allegra Spender, the independent Member of Parliament for Wentworth.

Since his detainment, Davis has been held in segregation, reportedly due to his suspected political ties. According to court documents, he has not stepped outside since December 24, highlighting the restrictive nature of his custody.

In these documents, it is also noted that Davis has gone up to four days without access to a shower, as he is only permitted to leave his cell under escort for such necessities.

Justice Natalie Adams remarked on the severity of Davis’s conditions, stating, “Those are unusual conditions in custody that most inmates are not experiencing.”

At this stage, Davis has yet to enter a plea regarding the charge of using a carriage service to menace, harass, or offend.

Delays in the legal system mean he is likely to spend months – if not another year – in similar conditions if he is not granted bail, his barrister Sebastian De Brennan argued.

Prosecutor Laura Goodwin conceded the 31-year-old has experienced hardship over and above what he might have been expected to endure while in custody. 

But she argued he should not be released into the community because he might commit serious offences or endanger the safety of individuals or the community. 

“The alleged conduct has the capacity to incite others to affect the applicant’s desires,” Goodwin said. 

The messages might be reviled or seen as extremely unpalatable, but their criminality was contested, De Brennan told the court. 

Davis has denied having a violent mindset and is willing to engage in positive change, he said.

An expert report noted that while the 31-year-old still holds the controversial views expressed online, he has reflected on the best ways to communicate and was on the “precipice of change”.

The network was deregistered in January, thereby removing his platform for sharing those views, the court was told.

The major consideration for granting bail is what conditions would ensure he doesn’t repeat his behaviour, given that he still holds the views, even if he has shown insight into his past approach, Justice Adams said.

“The central hurdle to overcome in this case is that when someone has rigid views, it’s hard to modify one’s behaviour overnight,” she said. 

Davis would undertake not to post, appear, or comment publicly on social media, including under aliases or anonymously, amid a suite of strict bail conditions, De Brennan told the court. 

Justice Adams was expected to hand down her decision this afternoon. 

NEVER MISS A STORY: Get your breaking news and exclusive stories first by following us across all platforms.