Pathologist Claims New Evidence Points to Strangulation in Jeffrey Epstein’s Death

Dr. Michael Baden, a pathologist who observed Jeffrey Epstein's autopsy, has raised concerns about the initial determination of Epstein's cause of death,...
HomeUSFlorida AG Pam Bondi Reveals Full Release of Epstein Files, Unveiling Over...

Florida AG Pam Bondi Reveals Full Release of Epstein Files, Unveiling Over 300 Influential Names

Share and Follow

In an exclusive first reported by Fox, Attorney General Pam Bondi revealed through a letter on Saturday that all files related to the Jeffrey Epstein case have been disclosed, aligning with the stipulations of the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

The letter, addressed to key figures in the Senate and House Judiciary Committees—Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, Ranking Member Dick Durbin, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, and Ranking Member Jamie Raskin—was obtained by Fox News Digital, shedding light on this significant release.

Bondi’s letter emphasized that the Department has adhered to the Act’s mandates, releasing all pertinent materials in its possession. These documents encompass a wide array of records, communications, and investigative materials linked to nine distinct categories, as outlined in the Department’s submissions to the courts handling the Epstein and Maxwell cases in the Southern District of New York.

Attorney General Pam Bondi

Highlighting the breadth of the information disclosed, the letter lists over 300 prominent individuals, including such notable figures as President Donald Trump, Barack and Michelle Obama, Prince Harry, Bill Gates, Woody Allen, Kim Kardashian, Kurt Cobain, Mark Zuckerberg, and Bruce Springsteen.

The letter includes a list of more than 300 high-profile names, including President Donald Trump, Barack and Michelle Obama, Prince Harry, Bill Gates, Woody Allen, Kim Kardashian, Kurt Cobain, Mark Zuckerberg and Bruce Springsteen.

The letter adds, “No records were withheld or redacted ‘on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.’”

The document outlines the broad range of Epstein-related materials the Justice Department says are encompassed, including records concerning Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell; references to individuals—up to and including government officials—connected to Epstein’s activities; and documents tied to civil settlements and legal resolutions such as immunity deals, plea agreements, non-prosecution agreements, and sealed arrangements. 

Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell

The letter adds, “No records were withheld or redacted ‘on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.’” (Patrick McMullan via Getty Images)

It also includes information on organizations and networks allegedly linked to Epstein’s trafficking and financial operations across corporate, nonprofit, academic, and governmental spheres, as well as internal DOJ emails, memos, and meeting notes reflecting decisions about whether to charge, decline, or pursue investigations.

The documents also cover records addressing potential destruction or concealment of relevant material and documentation surrounding Epstein’s detention and death, including incident reports, witness interviews, and medical examiner/autopsy-related records.

The letter adds, “No records were withheld or redacted ‘on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.’”

“Any omissions from the list are unintentional and, as explained in the previous letters to Congress, a result of the volume and speed with which the Department complied with the Act,” the letter states. “Individuals whose names were redacted for law-enforcement sensitive purposes are not included.”

Epstein and Maxwell

The letter states that “individuals whose names were redacted for law-enforcement sensitive purposes are not included” in the files. (Joe Schildhorn/Patrick McMullan via Getty Images)

The letter says the redaction process was “extensive” including consultation with victims and victim counsel, to redact “segregable portions” that contain information identifiable to victims, such as medical files that could jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution, or depict/contain images of death, physical abuse, or injury. 

“Any omissions from the list are unintentional and, as explained in the previous letters to Congress, a result of the volume and speed with which the Department complied with the Act,” the letter states. “Individuals whose names were redacted for law-enforcement sensitive purposes are not included.” 

Share and Follow