Nannies in a New York City neighborhood are now living in a permanent state of paranoia with wealthy residents prepared to name and shame those who behave badly on a popular Facebook group. 

While the Moms of the Upper East Side (MUES) group serves as a lifeline to its 33,000 members, nannies are now afraid they will find their picture one day plastered across its message boards. 

One mother recalled the panicked moment she saw a photo of her daughter alongside an ominous message about her nanny’s behavior. 

‘If you recognize this blonde girl with pigtails I saw yesterday afternoon around 78th and 2nd, please DM me,’ the message read. 

‘I think you will want to know what your nanny did.’ 

She knew instantly it was her daughter and found herself spiraling over what her nanny – whom, it then dawned on her, she barely knew – could have done with her two-year-old. 

After enquiring after what happened, she was told her nanny allegedly roughly handled the child and threated to cancel a zoo trip if they didn’t ‘shut up’. 

The accused nanny denied the incident, but suddenly trust was gone and she let the nanny go before putting her daughter into a daycare that offered a livestream feed. 

Upper East Side residents are taking to Facebook armed with claims of nannies acting out of line in the streets of New York City

Holly Flanders, who runs a local nannying agency, says the page has caused fear among the professionals she works with. There is no suggestion that anyone associated with Choice Parenting has done anything wrong

Photos like this are often shared to the Facebook group of a back profile of a caregiver posted alongside an ominous message

The Facebook group also told many similar tales of nannies allegedly dealing out punishments of smacking, withholding food, leaving children unsupervised or neglecting the child.  

Another post photographed a woman sitting on her phone with her headphones in as an infant crawled next to her. 

‘I was really mad watching the whole scene,’ the post said. ‘I’m not exaggerating, this person NEVER stopped [using] the phone during the whole class. The baby was TOTALLY ignored.’ 

Whilst some shared the outrage of the post, with one who said :’This makes me so upset. If this was the nanny, she’s on her phone during working hours and that’s not OK. If this was my kid I’d be so p***ed.’ 

Others highlighted the issues with these posts that are often lacking context. 

‘Stop assuming the worst about people and situations you know nothing about,’ one reply said. 

‘This is not abuse. It’s not dangerous, and it’s absolutely none of your business.’ 

However, many brought up the issue of how much is costs to employ a nanny on the Upper East Side of New York City. 

Pictured: A photo shared to the Facebook group of what the witness claims is a nanny on her phone

Some of the most experienced and qualified nannies can charge up to $150,000 a year. 

But the fear of being caught on camera, in even the most innocent of situations, has nannies worried to go out in public while working. 

Holly Flanders of Choice Parenting, a company that places nannies in the area, said that now going to the park or out in public is a challenge for nannies. 

‘How are you supposed to interact with children if you’re being judged constantly?’ she told Air Mail. There is no suggestion that anyone associated with Choice Parenting has done anything wrong.

One mother, Christina Allen, said the MUES has created a fearful and untrusting environment in the nannying world. 

‘I hardly ever have the chill and playful experience at our local playgrounds,’ Allen said. 

‘There’s usually some sort of drama, and I feel as though everyone is judging everything you say and do. I think this is down to our area. I’m going to put it out there that maybe the playground politics is an UES thing, in fear of being featured on the Facebook page.’ 

Allen said she could imagine a scenario where her child became involved in a situation resulting in Allen’s photo being plastered on the group’s page asking, ‘Whose nanny is this?’ 

While the posts can highlight dangerous behavior from caregivers, for the nannies who wind up accused of such incidents in a misunderstood situation there is typically little room to defend themselves

One user posted a photo of one child’s caregiver walking down the street with a harrowing recount of what she saw. 

‘Gosh I never thought I would be one of those mom’s,’ she wrote. ‘…especially as a woman of color myself but is this your nanny?’

The post read that the nanny was rough with the child, ‘way more than I as a mom would find acceptable.’ 

‘Your child was crying but not throwing a tantrum, she needed love and support not rough handling and sternness,’ the post said. ‘It was not a nice scene to watch.’  

Other posts showed pictures of nannies sat on their phones with strollers or children beside them, or the back profile of a caregiver posted alongside an ominous message to their parent. 

‘Trying to find this child’s parents to let them know of a situation that occurred today,’ one warning said, followed by an explanation of the child running into the street before almost getting hit by a car. 

Another said: ‘If this is your caretaker and your child is very blonde… I’d want someone to share with me if my nanny was treating my child the way I witnessed this woman treat the boy in her stroller.’

While the posts can highlight dangerous behavior from caregivers, for the nannies who wind up accused of such incidents in a misunderstood situation there is typically little room to defend themselves.

Flanders said the ‘vast majority’ of them who end up on Facebook’s ‘wall of shame’ end up losing their jobs. Pictured: File photo of an Upper East Side street 

Flanders said the ‘vast majority’ of them who end up on Facebook’s ‘wall of shame’ end up losing their jobs. 

‘It’s not like there’s an HR department. If you’re a mom and you’re having to wonder, “Is this nanny being kind to my child? Are they hurting them?,” it’s really hard to sit at work all day with that on your conscience,’ she said. 

‘There are definitely some nannies out there who are benignly neglectful, lazy and on their phone too much. But the sort of scary stuff you see on Lifetime is not all that common.’