Share and Follow
WASHINGTON — Sen. Bernie Sanders and Howard Schultz are squaring off Wednesday in a highly anticipated hearing about the company’s labor practices, which the former Starbucks CEO is defending against criticism.
Schultz is testifying before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, which is chaired by Sanders, I-Vt., in a hearing unsubtly titled, “No Company is Above the Law: The Need to End Illegal Union Busting at Starbucks.”
It comes after weeks of clashes between the Sanders-led panel and Starbucks, which unsuccessfully urged the panel to hear testimony from someone other than Schultz, who officially exited the company on March 20. Sanders refused and Schultz eventually agreed to testify under threat of subpoena.
“Strong unions are a vital part of rebuilding the declining middle class in this country,” Sanders said in his opening statement, adding that as union activity has risen, “corporations have engaged in an unprecedented level of illegal union busting activities” and blamed Starbucks. “Over the past 18 months, Starbucks has waged the most aggressive and illegal union-busting campaign in the modern history of our country.”
The hearing, which began at 10 a.m. ET, features a defense of Starbucks labor practices from Schultz and testimony from a Starbucks barista, a former Starbucks worker and other witnesses.
Schultz found a warmer reception from Republicans on the committee, with Ranking Member Bill Cassidy, R-La., saying that the hearing is “not a good faith effort to get the facts.”
“It’s a smear campaign against an individual and a company based upon allegations that everyone knows are still under litigation,” Cassidy said. “Let’s not kid ourselves. This is not a fair and impartial hearing.” He also criticized the National Labor Relations Board for putting “their thumb on the scale for unions.”
Schultz told the committee that Starbucks is “100% committed to fulfilling our obligations as an employer under the National Labor Relations Act and are committed to good faith negotiations on first contracts for each unionized store.”
“Every day, we wake up thinking about how we can put our people first position to win. We do everything we can to demonstrate the heart and the values of service,” he said.
In response to aggressive questioning from Sanders, Schultz repeatedly denied that Starbucks has violated the law and vowed to continue negotiating with union organizers in “good faith.”
Schultz also touted Starbucks’ wages and benefits, saying that while “unions have served an important role in American business for many years,” that has tended to be more prevalent with companies that mistreat workers.
“We do nothing that is nefarious,” he said. “And that’s why Starbucks doesn’t need a union.”
Read Related Also: Bolingbrook home invasion: Vigil held in memory of shooting victims Cartez Daniels, Sanai Daniels and Samiya Shelton-Tillman
Sanders, a two-time Democratic presidential primary runner-up who has built a brand as a champion of labor unions, has taken a keen interest in Starbucks and Schultz.
A recent report by Democratic majority staff on the HELP Committee declared: “Under Schultz’s leadership, Starbucks has become the most aggressive union-busting company in America.”
It said the NLRB “has filed over 80 complaints against Starbucks for violating federal labor law and there have been over 500 unfair labor practice charges lodged against this company. These violations include the illegal firing of more than a dozen Starbucks workers for ‘the crime’ of exercising their right to form a union and collectively bargain for better wages, benefits, and working conditions.”
A Sanders communications aide said the report was released to counter claims from the company so that viewers “don’t get blended into a Frappuccino by Starbucks’ PR team.”
Gianna Reeve, a Starbucks worker in Buffalo, New York, and organizing member of Starbucks Workers United, said in a statement that the union hopes the hearing “exposes Starbucks’ illegal union-busting campaign and exposes the truth about how Starbucks really treats their workers.” Reeve added that “you can’t be a progressive company and be anti-union.”
First-term Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin, of Oklahoma, used his time to attack Sanders, claiming that the Vermont senator is worth $8 million and shouldn’t criticize other wealthy people.
Sanders said he was lying, to which Mullin said it was a matter of public record.
“You’re probably looking at some phony right-wing internet stuff,” Sanders said. “It ain’t true.”
Speaking at the hearing Wednesday, Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, noted Schultz’s past presidential bid.
“I recognize at the outset there’s some irony to a non-coffee-drinking Mormon conservative defending a Democrat candidate for president in perhaps one of the most liberal companies in America,” he said. “I also think it’s somewhat rich that you’re being grilled by people who have never had the opportunity to create a single job.”
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., opened his remarks at the committee Wednesday by quoting the novelist Ayn Rand on “the ingratitude man has for the entrepreneur.”
“Don’t deride one of the great American success stories,” he said. “I don’t want to be part of any witch hunt that vilifies any American business.”
