Share and Follow
A federal judge has decided not to pause an immigration enforcement surge taking place in Minnesota and the Twin Cities, as a legal challenge against it continues.
On Saturday, Judge Katherine M. Menendez denied a preliminary injunction request filed earlier this month by Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, alongside the mayors of Minneapolis and St. Paul. The lawsuit contends that the Department of Homeland Security is infringing upon constitutional rights. The plaintiffs had sought an immediate order to either stop the enforcement action or restrict its scope. However, attorneys from the U.S. Department of Justice dismissed the lawsuit as “legally frivolous.”
The injunction decision primarily centered on Minnesota officials’ argument that the federal government’s actions breach the 10th Amendment of the Constitution, which restricts the federal government from encroaching on state sovereignty. Judge Menendez evaluated the likelihood of this argument prevailing in court as part of her ruling.
The federal authorities have justified the initiative, known as Operation Metro Surge, by emphasizing the need to remove criminal immigrants from the streets. They argue that their efforts have been obstructed by state and local “sanctuary laws and policies.”
The federal government argued that the surge, dubbed Operation Metro Surge, is necessary in its effort to take criminal immigrants off the streets and because federal efforts have been hindered by state and local “sanctuary laws and policies.”
State and local officials argued that the surge amounts to retaliation after the federal government’s initial attempts to withhold federal funding to try to force immigration cooperation failed. They also maintain that the surge has amounted to an unconstitutional drain on state and local resources, noting that schools and businesses have been shuttered in the wake of what local officials say are aggressive, poorly trained and armed federal officers.
“Because there is evidence supporting both sides’ arguments as to motivation and the relative merits of each side’s competing positions are unclear, the Court is reluctant to find that the likelihood-of-success factor weighs sufficiently in favor of granting a preliminary injunction,” the judge said in the ruling.
The judge also said she was influenced by the government’s recent victory at the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The court had set aside her decision putting limits on the use of force by immigration officers against peaceful Minnesota protesters.
“If that injunction went too far, then the one at issue here — halting the entire operation — certainly would,” Menendez said.
U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi took to social media Saturday to laud the ruling, calling it “another HUGE” legal win for the Justice Department on X.
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said in a statement that he was disappointed by the ruling.
“This decision doesn’t change what people here have lived through — fear, disruption, and harm caused by a federal operation that never belonged in Minneapolis in the first place,” Frey said. “This operation has not brought public safety. It’s brought the opposite and has detracted from the order we need for a working city. It’s an invasion, and it needs to stop.”
Neither the Minnesota Attorney General’s office nor attorneys for the city of St. Paul immediately answered questions left Saturday in phone and email messages seeking comment.
The state, and particularly the city of Minneapolis, has been on edge after federal officers fatally shot two people on the streets of Minneapolis: Renee Good on Jan. 7 and Alex Pretti on Jan. 24. Thousands of people have taken to the streets to protest the federal action in Minnesota and across the country.
——
AP writer Ed White contributed to this report from Detroit.