HomeUSLegal Battle Erupts Between Surrogate and California Parents Amid Newborn's Critical Heart...

Legal Battle Erupts Between Surrogate and California Parents Amid Newborn’s Critical Heart Surgery

Amidst an intense surrogate custody battle, a critically ill newborn has been placed back on a breathing tube following complications after open-heart surgery, as revealed by recent court documents.

The infant remains in critical condition under vigilant medical care, as stated by intended parents Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed in documents obtained by TMZ.

The couple reported that the child experienced potential complications after undergoing a Norwood procedure, which is designed to address a severe heart defect. This led to a decline in his condition overnight, necessitating a return to intubation.

McKenna West arrives with her legal team for a Dallas court hearing in the surrogacy custody dispute

McKenna West walks with her legal team during a Dallas family court hearing amid the ongoing legal battle concerning the critically ill infant. (LM Otero/AP Photo)

In Dallas on Tuesday, Gilkar and Ahmed stood before surrogate McKenna West in a courtroom as they disputed who should have the authority to make medical decisions for the baby. This case has captured national attention, particularly due to West’s refusal of the California couple’s previous request to terminate the pregnancy following the diagnosis of the baby’s severe heart condition.

Gilkar and Ahmed call the baby Rumi. West, an Alaska cardiac nurse, calls him Gabriel and is asking a Texas judge to give her sole conservatorship, which would put medical decision-making in her hands.

Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed arrive at a Dallas court hearing in their dispute with surrogate McKenna West

California couple Nausheen Gilkar, center, and Omar Ahmed, right, arrive for a hearing over custody and medical decision-making for their newborn son. (LM Otero/AP Photo)

Gilkar told the court the couple has been at their son’s bedside as he fights through treatment. She said that since surgery, he has struggled to breathe, choked on tubes and needed a blood transfusion, according to court reporting by The Associated Press.

“He’s our child,” Gilkar said, according to the AP.

She accused West of trying to take him away. “She’s trying to take him from us,” Gilkar said.

Gilkar described the newborn as “the love of our lives” and said, “He’s suffering a lot.”

McKenna West walks through a Dallas courthouse with her legal team

McKenna West arrives at a Dallas court hearing over the custody dispute. (LM Otero/AP Photo)

The custody feud began after the baby was diagnosed at about 20 weeks with hypoplastic left heart syndrome, or HLHS. West says Gilkar and Ahmed then asked her to terminate the pregnancy. She refused and later traveled to Texas to give birth, News Media previously reported.

HLHS leaves one side of the heart underdeveloped and disrupts normal blood flow. Without treatment, the condition can be fatal within days or weeks, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

McKenna West stands with her legal team

McKenna West, left, appears with attorneys at Dallas family court amid a custody dispute with the intended parents of the baby she carried. (LM Otero/AP Photo)

Budner disputes key parts of West’s account and says the couple did agree to the baby’s treatment. He told News Media that doctors determined on Aug. 14 that the child was eligible for the Norwood procedure, the first of three open-heart surgeries generally used to treat HLHS.

Gilkar and Ahmed consented to the surgery, which was performed Aug. 17, he said. At the time, Budner described the baby’s condition as “critical and complex.”

McKenna West arrives at a Dallas courthouse with members of her legal team

McKenna West arrives for a Dallas court hearing in the surrogate custody dispute. (LM Otero/AP Photo)

West’s lawyers have argued that the court should make sure the baby continues to receive life-saving care. West told the judge she would abandon her custody request if the court determines the intended parents are committed to that care, according to the AP.

Gilkar and Ahmed have asked the court to delay a hearing over the temporary restraining order that gave them custody while the legal fight continues, TMZ reported.

The custody battle is only one part of the couple’s broader legal fight with West.

Before the baby was born, Gilkar and Ahmed filed counterclaims seeking more than $100,000, alleging West breached their surrogacy agreement and caused them emotional distress. The counterclaims, obtained by TMZ, said the couple paid West $60,000 during the pregnancy under an agreement that addressed termination. West has denied wrongdoing and asked the court to dismiss the claims.

The dispute has only grown more personal since the baby’s Aug. 12 birth. West said in a New York Post opinion piece last week that she had only about a minute with the newborn, while his umbilical cord was still attached, before he was taken away. A court order has since barred her from seeing or holding the baby.

On Tuesday, the judge left that order in place and did not immediately decide the larger question of custody or conservatorship, according to the AP.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton secured an emergency court order before the birth directing that medically necessary care not be delayed or obstructed, News Media previously reported. Paxton’s office also notified two Dallas medical centers of their obligations to provide life-saving treatment.