Share and Follow

AUSTIN — A man offering free housing to entice people to relocate to a remote area of West Texas is now embroiled in a legal battle with the state’s attorney general.

The office of Attorney General Ken Paxton has announced that Malcolm Tanner is under fire for allegedly concocting an “illegal scheme” with the intent to seize political control of Loving County, Texas’s least populated county. Paxton is seeking a temporary restraining order to halt Tanner’s activities.

In a series of social media videos, Tanner has claimed he’s in the process of constructing 100 free homes and is offering a ,000 monthly incentive to those ready to move to the area.

According to the lawsuit, Tanner owns two undeveloped five-acre plots in Loving County. Investigative reporting from the Houston Chronicle reveals that roughly three dozen people have already moved to the area, many living in RVs, tents or makeshift shelters.

The Texas Attorney General’s Office alleges these settlements violate the Texas Health and Safety Code because of improper sewage disposal and a lack of sanitation.

“His deceptive and unlawful scheme to lure people with free housing for the purpose of conducting a political takeover is a disgustingly fraudulent plot to line his own pockets,” Paxton said in a statement. “I will not stand by while frauds try to carve up Texas for themselves and make everyone sicker and less safe along the way”.

Videos posted on Tanner’s Facebook feature captions like ”Come build a future together. Say yes and join the movement.” Other posts mention “free political homes.” His page shows videos of a handful of people building, dancing or walking in the community.

affiliate KXAN reached out to Tanner through social media and the Clubhouse app he frequently promotes, but has not yet received a response.

Houston Chronicle investigative reporter Eric Dexheimer, in his investigation, said Tanner has said on social media that the goal is to get enough people in the area to register to vote to win county seats. The county has a population of just 64 people, according to Census data. Tanner also claims to be running for president in 2028.

The Temporary Restraining Order seeks to halt further habitation on Tanner’s land until it complies with health regulations and to prevent further sewage discharge that could contaminate soil or water.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like
Biden hails Trump's Gaza peace deal while trying to take some credit

Biden Commends Trump’s Gaza Peace Efforts, Seeks to Share in Success

In a rare moment of bipartisanship, President Joe Biden has lauded former…
Trump's Gaza deal hanging by a thread as Hamas 'plays tricks'

Trump’s Gaza Peace Deal Under Siege: How Hamas Tactics Threaten Stability

During a whirlwind tour of the Middle East, Donald Trump announced on…
Mitt Romney breaks silence on sister-in-law's shock death

Mitt Romney Speaks Out: Unveiling the Tragic Loss of His Sister-in-Law

In the wake of a tragic family loss, Mitt Romney has publicly…

Plane crashes onto a Massachusetts highway, killing 2 and wounding 1 on the ground

DARTMOUTH, Mass. (AP) — A small plane crashed along a major highway…
Missing bodies of hostages top the list of uncertainties as fragile Gaza ceasefire holds

Unresolved Hostage Mysteries Loom Over Fragile Gaza Ceasefire Amidst Uncertainty

The future remains uncertain as longer-term challenges loom on the horizon, such…
Project connects Americans to the Dutch people who honor their relatives at World War II cemetery

Initiative Bridges Americans with Dutch Guardians of WWII Cemetery Memorials

DALLAS (AP) — In the decades since June West Brandt’s older brother…
There's 'great fear on part of many people' in NYC: Bill O'Reilly

Bill O’Reilly Claims Trump’s Global Influence Skyrockets by 1000% Amid Political Shifts

() Bill O’Reilly believes President Trump’s role in securing a peace deal…
Trump use of funds to pay troops 'probably not' legal, says Democrat

Trump use of funds to pay troops 'probably not' legal, says Democrat

Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) said Sunday it is “probably not” legal for…