CHICAGO — Legal proceedings are intensifying in the murder trial of Adam Beckerink, as his defense team seeks to prevent key pieces of evidence from becoming public. Central to this legal skirmish is the debate over access to Beckerink’s electronic devices, mental health intake records from his time at Cook County Jail, and personal diaries.
Earlier this year, Beckerink, a Chicago-based tax attorney, entered a plea of not guilty to nine charges, including the murder of his 36-year-old wife, Caitlin Tracey, and the subsequent concealment of her body. Tracey’s remains were discovered at the base of a stairwell in Beckerink’s South Loop condominium in October 2024.
ABC7 Chicago is now streaming 24/7. Click here to watch
Following Beckerink’s extradition to Cook County, where he faced charges for Tracey’s murder after serving a domestic violence sentence against her in Michigan, courtroom focus has shifted to the admissibility of evidence. A pivotal issue is whether prosecutors should have access to Beckerink’s mental health records from his jail intake.
ABC7 Chief Legal Analyst Gil Soffer commented on the situation, stating, “It’s going to be a pitched battle over these things because there can be really valuable information there. It doesn’t mean, however, that it’s all disclosable.”
The defense is particularly resistant to the potential release of the “bruise sheet” or intake form used during Beckerink’s processing at the jail.
SEE ALSO | Parents to retain custody of woman’s body after death at husband’s South Loop condo, judge rules
Soffer told the I-Team prosecutors will have to show a need for information that is generally considered private.
“In theory, if a defendant is making statements about his own mental health that could undermine a defense, he may later bring that’s based on his mental health, it could be really prohibitive and really helpful to the state’s case,” said Soffer.
Also at issue is the testing of DNA evidence by the state. That testing may consume the remainder of that biological evidence. Beckerink’s attorneys telling the court their client has “a constitutional right to independently test the evidence the State intends to use against him,” something that cannot happen if all evidence is consumed.
READ MORE | Body camera video of now-deceased woman detailing husband’s abuse can be played at trial
“A court will try to accommodate a defense request to have some of this biological evidence to work with, unless the state can demonstrate that it’s simply impossible to get a fair test without consuming all of the evidence,” said Soffer.
Prosecutors also want access to personal diaries that were recovered from Beckerink, diaries written in booklets with his former legal firm’s name on them. Beckerink’s attorneys say that is privileged legal information that should not be admitted.
“It’s important to know writing something down in a document or in a booklet that has a law firm’s name on it doesn’t make the contents of that document or booklet privilege,” said Soffer.
Prosecutors also want access to Beckerink’s personal devices. We reached out to Beckerink’s attorneys but did not immediately hear back.
Copyright © 2026 WLS-TV. All Rights Reserved.