National Science Foundation staffers express concerns about political bias
Share and Follow


Employees of the National Science Foundation (NSF) are going public with what they described as “politically motivated and legally questionable” actions by the Trump administration related to their agency.

Their concerns range from mass firings by the administration’s Department of Government Efficiency to interference with the grant process. 

In particular, the employees allege that for grants “a covert and ideologically driven secondary review process by unqualified political appointees is now interfering with the scientific merit-based review system.”

The accusation and others are detailed in a letter addressed to Rep. Zoe Lofgren (Calif.), the top Democrat on the House Science, Space and Technology Committee. Lofgren said at a press conference that the letter was being submitted to her office as “a protected whistleblower disclosure.”

It was signed by 149 staffers, virtually all of whom signed either anonymously or whose names were redacted in the version of the letter that was made public on Tuesday.

The NSF is an independent science agency that supports scientific research across various fields including biology, engineering, computer science and geoscience.

The agency declined to comment on the letter.

The staffers also said that the administration canceled 1,600 NSF grants in April and May using  “undisclosed criteria” and that the White House Office of Management was withholding $2.2 billion of the agency’s $9 billion budget that was appropriated by Congress.

“Members of the administration have a say on what programs get funded and what proposals get awarded,” said Jesus Soriano, president of the AFGE Local 3403, which represents NSF employees.

Their full list of concerns was: “A Proposed Budget Cut That Would Cripple American Science,” “Termination of Active Research Awards Without Transparency or Lawful Justification,” “Political Review of Scientific Grants,” “Withholding of Appropriated Funds,” “Unlawful Terminations and Threatened Mass Reductions in Force,” “Coerced Resignations and Loss of Expertise,” “Unannounced and Unplanned Eviction from Headquarters” and “NSF’s Betrayal of Scientific Integrity Through Politicized Probation Policies.”

The letter comes after staff members at other agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Institutes of Health published letters of “dissent” to raise concerns about Trump administration policies. The administration put the signers of the EPA letter on leave after its publication.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Chicago Faces Flooding: Heavy Rain Predicted with Flash Floods Disrupting Traffic | LIVE RADAR

CHICAGO (WLS) — Storms brought heavy rain that flooded roadways in the…

Multiple Injuries Reported in Brooklyn’s Taste of the City Lounge Shooting

Shooting incidents took place inside a Brooklyn restaurant early Sunday morning just…

Jacksonville Sheriff Provides Further Details on William McNeil Jr. Traffic Stop

It comes following the release of a 16-page investigative memo that cleared…

Revealed: Inmate’s Daring Escape Plan from Arkansas

An Arkansas inmate known as the ‘Devil in the Ozarks’ escaped prison…

Mechanic finds Ford assembly worker’s lost wallet in vehicle hood from 11 years ago

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! A Minnesota mechanic working…

I used to visit Vegas regularly—here’s why the city is declining.

A former Las Vegas regular has revealed why they believe Sin City…

Clarendon Hills Triumphs Over Mid-Atlantic in LLWS 2025 Matchup

CLARENDON HILLS, Ill. (WLS) — A Clarendon Hills baseball team won a…

Significant Update Following Detention of Mother and Son in the US

A woman from New Zealand and her six-year-old child have been freed…