Rep. Luna looks to force House vote on stock trading ban
Share and Follow


() Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., has announced plans to force a House vote on a stock trading ban for members for Congress in September.

Luna said she’d be filing a discharge petition in a social media post Tuesday, writing, “If Congress doesn’t do this now with a slim majority, it’s never going to happen. If anyone says I shouldn’t be doing a discharge petition in order to accomplish this, it’s because either they want to maintain control or the status quo. Either way, this does not benefit the American people.”

According to Center Forward, a bipartisan nonprofit, a discharge petition is a legislative maneuver in the U.S. House of Representatives that allows members to force a bill out of committee, bypass House leadership and onto the House floor for a vote. The petition requires a House majority of 218 signatures and has rarely been successful. It’s worth noting that Luna has already successfully petitioned a discharge this year, when she was able to secure enough signatures to force a vote on proxy voting for new parents in March.

This time, the legislation Luna is looking to force a vote on is a bill introduced by Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., which seeks to prohibit stock trading and ownership by members of Congress, their spouses and dependent children. Luna’s announcement comes amid growing tension around the subject on Capitol Hill on both sides of the aisle.

Earlier in July, the House Ethics Committee released a report detailing an investigation into allegations that Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Penn., his wife purchased stocks using confidential information he had acquired through his work as a lawmaker. According to the report, the committee “did not find substantial evidence” that Kelly violated any laws, but it did criticize him and his wife for their “lack of cooperation.”

Meanwhile, in the Senate, Axios reports that a stock trading ban proposed by Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., is receiving pushback from White House officials over language changes that subject the president and vice president to the ban.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like
SNAP benefits don't cover healthier diet costs: Study

Study Reveals SNAP Benefits Fall Short in Covering Costs of Healthier Diets

As the government shutdown persists, 42 million low-income individuals relying on SNAP…
FDA opens investigation into ByHeart baby formula after 13 infants sickened with botulism

Urgent FDA Probe: ByHeart Baby Formula Linked to Botulism Outbreak in Infants

Infants in 10 states, including Arizona, California, Illinois, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon,…
Seattle mayor election results 2025

Cleveland Mayoral Race 2025: Unveiling Election Results and Future City Leadership

Cleveland voters are gearing up for a significant decision as they prepare…
Kim Kardashian FINALLY reveals if she passed the bar exam

Kim Kardashian Triumphs: Reality Star Passes Bar Exam, Paving Way for Legal Career

Kim Kardashian has finally put an end to the anticipation surrounding her…
Offshore wind project climbs to $11.2B in cost due to tariffs

Tariff Hikes Push Offshore Wind Project to a Staggering $11.2 Billion

The Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind project, the United States’ most ambitious offshore…
Tariffs push US wine industry into uncertain territory: 'Really creates a challenge'

US Wine Industry Faces Uncertainty Amid New Tariffs: ‘A Significant Challenge

In Napa, California, tariffs on imported goods are presenting significant obstacles for…
Housing director confirms Trump admin. ‘working on’ 50-year mortgage

Trump Administration Explores Potential Introduction of 50-Year Mortgage Option, Confirms Housing Director

The Trump administration is actively crafting a proposal to introduce 50-year mortgage…
Fans accuse workers of seemingly hoarding viral Starbucks bear cup

Starbucks Bear Cup Controversy: Fans Claim Workers Are Stockpiling Popular Item

Starbucks’ latest merchandise release has stirred quite the commotion, with enthusiasts queuing…