Actor Ryan Reynolds recently posted a sweet selfie with his spouse, actress Blake Lively, during a rare evening out without their four kids. This moment of togetherness comes as the couple navigates a legal dispute involving Justin Baldoni.

The picture captures the joyous duo, who tied the knot in 2012, striking a pose on the street while flashing genuine smiles at the camera.

He paired the picture with Hootie & the Blowfish’s 1994 hit Only Wanna Be with You playing on the background of his Instagram Story.

Their date night comes after their lawyers raised new allegations in their hotly contested case in court on Monday. 

Baldoni’s attorney Bryan Freedman pleaded with the judge to move the case forward as quickly as possible because his client was ‘suffering greatly.’ 

Lively’s lawyer Michael Gottlieb, however, vehemently denied the claim that Lively was purposely dragging her heels in the lawsuit. 

Despite attempts by Lively and Reynolds to silence Team Baldoni after a string of contentious accusations from his legal representatives, Judge Lewis Liman dismissed their request.

But Gottlieb said they intend to hit Baldoni with fresh allegations in Lively’s sexual harassment case, and insisted that protecting the couple’s celebrity friends was going to be ‘very important.’

Gottlieb told the court during the hearing that they intend to add ‘both claims and parties’ to a revised complaint which will be filed by Valentine’s Day.

The move came after Baldoni updated his own complaint in his $400 million defamation case against the Gossip Girl star which accused Lively of giving The New York Times advanced access to her complaint of sexual harassment during the filming of the movie It Ends With Us.

Gottlieb attacked Freedman for making statements outside of court which had challenged the ‘character, integrity and truthfulness’ of Lively.

After complaining, Lively’s lawyers were told was that ‘we (Lively) started it’ with the New York Times article, Gottlieb said.

Gottlieb cited an interview in People magazine in which Freedman accused Lively of a ‘pattern of bullying.’

In another statement Freedman claimed that if Lively really was sexually harassed she wouldn’t have returned to the film. 

A skeptical Judge Liman said: ‘isn’t that what’s stated in his complaint?’ 

Gottlieb said no and that lawyers were ‘not supposed to launch attacks on another party’s character’.

He added that the leaking of raw footage from It Ends With Us was ‘particularly concerning’ because it could start an ‘arms race’ whereby lawyers have to appear in the media to fire back at every disclosure.

‘If there’s no guard rails in place….we (the attorneys) have to and go out on shows arguing on shows what a particular document or video means’.

Freedman fired back that the statements had ‘not been a one way street’ and tried to walk the court through a number made by Lively’s lawyers.

After listening to them, Judge Liman said Freedman ‘went a little bit further’ than Lively’s lawyers.

The judge said that he was adopting rules for lawyers known as Rule 3.6 which bars both of them from making extrajudicial statements that could influence the jury.

 Judge Liman said he was ‘hesitant to adopt it’ but after both sides agreed to it, he changed his mind.

He said: ‘My expectation is the parties will comply with their ethical obligations. I don’t expect this case to devolve into satellite litigation over the comments of a lawyer.

‘Both have said a lot in the pleadings that give the public plenty to feast upon’.

Freedman tried to protest and said: ‘Not to sound like a four year old fighting a four year old with ‘but they started it’ but once someone says something it becomes fact, there’s no way to fight against it.

‘You start to lose things without the ability to have the court’s adjudication. This was not started by us.’

Judge Liman also warned that if both sides didn’t behave themselves he could move the date of the trial forward from March next year.

He said: ‘I’m not going to do that, I’m convinced the parties need the time for discovery.

‘But if it turns out that this ends up being litigated in the press in a way that would prejudice the opportunity of a fair trial…one of the tools the court has is to accelerate the date of the trial.

‘That’s something that is out there. I don’t want to do that.’

Earlier in the hearing, Gottlieb, who also represents Reynolds, said that he would be seeking a protective order through the court for future filings to protect the couple’s celebrity friends.

While he did not name Taylor Swift, she would likely be one of those affected as she was referred to in Baldoni’s complaint.

Gottlieb said: ‘We do believe there will be provisions in a protective order that will be appropriate in this case given the nature of the allegations and the high profile nature of some of the individuals who will be involved.

‘There is a significant number of high profile individuals on both sides.

‘In particular addressing the interests and needs of third parties is going to be very important in this case.’

Gottlieb said he would plan to ‘seek protections we believe will be very important particularly in a case where there’s been a significant amount of leaking materials.’

He said: ‘We do intend to propose a protective order in this case.’

Judge Liman agreed and said that even before the other parties were named ‘you already got a lot of high profile people’ involved.

Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman said he would be prepared to agree to the order.

Gottlieb also talked about discovery and how there will be a significant amount about how Baldoni and the other defendants used the media to ‘shape and push forward’ their retaliation strategy.

He also talked about finding material on ‘individuals who may have been paid for taking certain positions in public.’

Freedman, who represents Baldoni and his PR team, asked the judge in todays first court hearing to move the case forward as quickly as possible because his clients were ‘suffering greatly.’