Share and Follow
Tyler Robinson, accused of attempting to assassinate Charlie Kirk, has officially requested a court order to exclude all cameras and microphones from a pivotal hearing set for April 17. This motion, filed on Sunday, aims to limit media coverage during the proceedings.
During this upcoming hearing, Robinson is expected to appear in court as both the prosecution and defense present numerous motions. The decision on whether electronic media will be permitted for the duration of the trial has yet to be determined by Judge Tony Graf.
Robinson, who faces charges related to the shooting of Charlie Kirk, was last seen in a courtroom during a session at the 4th District Court in Provo on February 3, 2026.
Fox News Legal Analyst Donna Rotunno, who also hosts the podcast “Crime & Justice with Donna Rotunno,” has expressed that Judge Graf should assert control over the situation and issue a clear ruling concerning media presence in the courtroom for the remainder of the case.
Fox News Legal Analyst Donna Rotunno, and host of the podcast “Crime & Justice with Donna Rotunno,” said Graf should “take control” and make a definitive ruling on media in the courtroom throughout the rest of the proceedings.
She said the defense asking only to ban electronic media for the April 17 hearing could be indicative of a larger strategy, and that they may ask to bar media on a hearing-by-hearing basis. That way, if Graf rules against them, they will only lose the motion for one specific hearing, and not for all of the proceedings moving forward.
Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, has pleaded for cameras to be allowed during the trial.
Tyler Robinson, left, accused in the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk, sits beside defense attorney Kathryn Nester during a hearing in Fourth District Court in Provo on Friday, Jan. 16, 2026. (Bethany Baker/The Salt Lake Tribune)
“There were cameras all over my husband when he was murdered,” she told Fox News’ Jesse Watters in an exclusive interview in November. “There have been cameras all over my friends and family mourning. There have been cameras all over me, analyzing my every move, analyzing my every smile, my every tear. We deserve to have cameras in there.”
“Why not be transparent?” Kirk continued. “There’s nothing to hide. I know there’s not because I’ve seen what the case is built on.”
Prosecutors also filed a response to a motion filed by Robinson’s team last week, asking the court a May 18 preliminary hearing back. The defense is asking to push back the preliminary hearing until expert discovery is complete, and prosecutors argue that the hearing should be held on the scheduled date.
Erika Kirk, Charlie Kirk’s widow, speaks at the public memorial service for right-wing activist Charlie Kirk at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, on September 21, 2025. (Patrick T. Fallon/AFP)
The state argues that the defense is trying to confer upon itself rights during the preliminary stage of the trial that it is not entitled to until the actual trial itself, and that discovery is meant to be reserved for the trial, not preliminary proceedings.
Rotunno agrees that the defense has been given enough discovery leeway in the preliminary stage of the court proceedings, and that the hearing should remain scheduled for May 18.