Share and Follow

What Is Peter Singer Disability? Health Update and Illness – Peter Singer talks on Disability and Treatment of Global Poverty being inconsistent and why it matters. Here is more.

Peter Singer devoted much of his time and effort and a portion of his income to social, political causes, animal rights, famine and poverty relief, environmentalism, and reproductive rights.

What is Peter Singer Disability?

Peter Singer works on treatment of disability and global poverty. In his treatment of disability, his thoughts about, should parents wish, killing a disabled infant is not morally equivalent to killing a person.

He began to argue that it is ethical to give parents the option to euthanize infants with disabilities in consultation with doctors.

On the topic of poverty, Peter argues that there is an obligation to do what one can to alleviate global poverty.

 

 

Peter discussed severe forms of disabilities such as anencephaly or spina bifida. The value of a life should be based on the good quality of physical and mental health and the self-conscious nature of logical behavior.

Infants who lack these attributes might have serious issues in the future. Abortion or euthanizing infants should not be equated to killing normal human beings.

The thought of killing disabled babies is very dangerous because the concept of abortion is still a hot debate.

To Peter Singer, severe disability is more a problem to be solved than a difference to be embraced and accommodated.

Health Update and Illness. Peter Singer is he sick? 

No, Peter Singer is not sick or has any health issues. He is known for his views regarding the lives of profoundly intellectually disabled humans.  

Peter specializes in applied ethics and approaches ethical issues from a utilitarian, secular perspective.

Peter stated goal has been to create universal ethics that allow reason to play an important part in ethical decisions.

 

 

Peter is known for his book Animal Liberation (1975), in which he favors veganism, and in his essay on Famine, Affluence, and Morality, he favors donating to help the global poor. 

Peter makes the argument that it should be allowable for parents to end the life of an infant with haemophilia or Down syndrome, or other major disabilities.

He discusses that a fetus known to be disabled with these conditions is widely accepted as grounds for abortion and his view that birth does not mark a morally significant dividing line.

Share and Follow