A 66-year-old man fell at least 800 feet to his death while hiking on Washington’s Sauk Mountain over the weekend, authorities said. His death came just one day after another hiker was found dead on the same mountain.
Gary Idleburg of Olympia may have fallen as far as 1,000 feet after going over the edge of a switchback trail, according to the Skagit County Sheriff’s Office. Witnesses notified authorities that the fall occurred at about 3:30 p.m. local time Saturday.
Other hikers found Idleburg and directed emergency responders to his location, the sheriff’s office said. Medics tried to save him, but he was pronounced dead at the scene. Because he had fallen into a remote area marked by “difficult terrain,” crews did not complete the recovery until about 8 p.m.
Idleburg’s death followed the discovery of another hiker, Peter Kalapaca, 78, who was found unresponsive in a steep section of the Sauk Mountain Trail on Friday night. The sheriff’s office announced his death Saturday.
Kalapaca had been reported missing on the mountain Thursday. A helicopter crew located him and determined that he had died, but his body was in an area inaccessible to ground search teams. A second helicopter later recovered his remains.
The sheriff’s office expressed its condolences to Kalapaca’s family.
“While nothing can lessen the loss of a loved one, we are grateful for the extraordinary effort made by everyone involved, which allows some measure of closure for the family,” the office said in a statement.
Sauk Mountain reaches 5,500 feet and features a popular hiking route in northwestern Washington that spans slightly more than 4 miles roundtrip, according to the Washington Trails Association. The organization warns that several people have died after falling on the trail, which is “steep and narrow” and has sections eroded by hikers cutting across switchbacks.
Richard Hammond’s Terrifying Burglary Ordeal After He Feared His Family Had Been Gassed
Richard Hammond and his family believe they were gassed during a 2018 holiday (Image: ITV)
Richard Hammond and his family were burgled during a 2018 holiday in southeast France, and the former Top Gear presenter believes the group may have been gassed before thieves searched the villa. Richard, 56, his now-ex-wife Mindy Hammond, their daughter Willow and several friends were staying in Saint-Tropez when the property was targeted.
Mindy later called the incident a “horror story” and recalled how she nearly encountered one of the burglars. After hearing a door close downstairs, she went to investigate and heard a “male voice behind the door”. Assuming it was one of the other couples in their group, she returned to bed, only later realising that the voice was likely that of an intruder.
“That just makes my blood run cold. I could have easily walked in and it could have been unpleasant,” she told the Sunday Express at the time.
The robbery took place just days after their arrival. The 15 guests eventually discovered that cash had been taken from their wallets and purses.
Willow, Richard and Mindy’s 15-year-old daughter at the time, also noticed that her watch had disappeared.
“I thought back on it and realised it was odd, because the first thing I noticed when I woke up was our bedroom door was open, as was everybody else’s,” Mindy said.
“I’m pretty convinced we must have been gassed or something, because they were in all of the bedrooms – they went where they wanted, into each room, opening and closing the drawers, searching through handbags etc.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE: Taylor Swift Hints at A-List Love Triangle in Patient Zero Video
Richard was holidaying with his ex-wife Mindy, their daughter and a group of friends when the burglary took place (Image: Getty)
“You have got to have some kind of confidence to do that and to be quite satisfied that people aren’t going to wake up.”
Anaesthetic gas had reportedly been used in the region before, with Formula 1 driver Jenson Button among those previously believed to have been targeted in a similar incident.
Mindy said everyone in the villa found it difficult to wake the next morning. Even Richard’s loud snoring had failed to disturb her.
The group later learned that the neighbouring property had also been burgled that night. The villa’s owner contacted police, who patrolled the area, while additional security measures were introduced.
“We also employed a security guard for the rest of the holiday, night watch, to reassure everybody,” Mindy revealed. Two suspects were captured on camera and arrested by police within 48 hours of the break-in.
“It’s particularly worrying when you have a teenage girl who knows that her bedside table has been rifled through while she was sleeping – that’s not very nice at all.”
The mother-of-two added: “The other worry for all the wives was that the husbands think, ‘We are going to stay up all night because we are dads and husbands and have to protect our families’.
“That could have ended up in a very bad situation if there was a confrontation. There would have been too much emotion involved.”
RELATED: Unexpected New Chapter: Texas AG’s Mistress After Scandal Unraveled
Black Former Classmate Accuses Palestinian Woman Dubbed ‘Rachel Dolezal’ of Prioritizing Personal Gain Over Activism
A Black former University of Pennsylvania classmate of Hannah Gann, dubbed the “Palestinian Rachel Dolezal,” said the activist appeared more focused on “personal gain” than advancing the cause after being identified as a white Jewish woman.
The former associate, who said she knew the 35-year-old before Gann allegedly began presenting a false identity, accused her of trying to “take advantage of vulnerable communities” in comments to The Post on Wednesday.
“The moment you start lying and perpetrating as if you’re somebody else is when your whole point, your whole message, starts to fall flat,” said the former student, who requested anonymity.
“If you truly care about the cause more so than about personal gain, then that’s just what it is,” she said of Gann, a high school teacher whose outspoken activism led Accuracy in Media to label her “Philadelphia’s Leading Antisemite.”
The former classmate said she knew Gann through their shared participation in urban studies and public-service programs at UPenn.
“She definitely wasn’t Black,” she said. “There were a lot of Jewish students at Penn during my time, including in my program, who looked like her — light skin and curly dark hair.”
The UPenn graduate also said she worked at the university’s Black Cultural Center, where she “built strong relationships” with other Black students.
MUST READ: Kyrsten Sinema’s Ex-Lover, Former Bodyguard Arrested Over Home Damage
“And I don’t remember her being there or being a part of that at all,” she said.
Gann issued an apology on Instagram in recent days, acknowledging that she had lied to fellow activists about her identity for years after being confronted by members of the movement.
Former allies have cut ties with Gann following her admission that she has no Black or Palestinian ancestry and is a white Israeli with relatives living in the West Bank.
The revelations have cast fresh attention on her earlier statements, including her description of Hamas members as “martyrs” and calls for violence on American streets in support of the Palestinian cause.
“I can’t speak to her motivation. But it seems like she just tried to take advantage of vulnerable communities because she got involved and couldn’t fully engage in the ways that she wanted based on her identity,” Gann’s former classmate said.
“There’s this cultural blackwashing that happens when [people] encounter certain cultures and want to be involved, and they end up seeking the benefits of being another race without the drawbacks. That’s part of what makes it even more corrupt,” she added.
Gann, a 10th-grade history teacher at a West Philadelphia high school, has been called the “Palestinian Rachel Dolezal” on social media. The comparison refers to the former Idaho NAACP chapter leader who deceived fellow activists for years by claiming to be Black.
The school district has not said whether the revelations will lead to any consequences for Gann.
Warlock paedophile – Missing Schoolboy Case: Woman Claims She Knows Who Killed Him
A woman has reportedly come forward with a claim about the disappearance of a schoolboy who vanished around four decades ago, saying she knows who killed him. The allegation also refers to a suspected paedophile known by the nickname “Warlock”.
However, the available brief does not identify the boy, the woman, the alleged offender, the country or the precise date of the disappearance. That means the claim cannot responsibly be presented as an established murder, nor can any individual be named as the alleged killer without verified reporting or official records.
What can be said is that the case concerns a long-running missing-child investigation in which a new witness account may have revived questions about what happened. The distinction between a witness’s belief, police evidence and a proven fact is especially important in a case involving a child, a suspected sexual offender and an allegation of murder.
What happened to the missing schoolboy?
The boy reportedly disappeared without trace as a teenager, in a case dating back approximately 40 years. The central unanswered questions are where he was last seen, who he was with, whether his disappearance was initially treated as a runaway case and what evidence investigators recovered at the time.
Those details are not supplied in the editorial brief. Without them, it is not possible to build a reliable chronology or confirm whether the boy was ever formally declared dead, whether remains were found or whether a murder investigation was opened.
Long-term missing-person cases often contain competing accounts. Early assumptions may later be questioned, witnesses may remember events differently over time and information that appeared insignificant decades ago can acquire new importance. None of those possibilities, by themselves, proves that the missing teenager was murdered.
What is the woman claiming?
The reported woman says she knows who killed the schoolboy. That is a serious allegation, but the basis of her claim remains unclear from the information available here.
It is not known whether she says she witnessed the killing, heard a confession, was told about it by another person or has drawn her conclusion from information connected with the boy’s disappearance. Those distinctions matter. A direct eyewitness account, second-hand information and personal suspicion would be assessed very differently by investigators and prosecutors.
Her account would also need to be tested against the existing case file. Investigators would normally examine:
- when and where she first received the information;
- whether her account has changed over time;
- what relationship, if any, she had with the missing boy or the person she accuses;
- whether other witnesses support any part of her story;
- whether physical, documentary or digital evidence corroborates it; and
- whether the allegation is consistent with the known timeline.
A person making a public accusation is not the same as a suspect being charged, and a suspect being investigated is not the same as a person being found guilty. Until a court determines otherwise, the alleged killer should not be described as responsible for the boy’s death as a matter of fact.
Who was the “Warlock” paedophile?
“Warlock” appears to be a nickname associated with a suspected or convicted paedophile connected in some way with the story. The supplied material does not establish the person’s real name, conviction history, location or precise relationship to the missing schoolboy.
That gap is significant. A nickname can be used in different ways: it may have been a police or media label, a name used within a particular social group or simply a description repeated by later witnesses. It should not be treated as proof of identity.
Nor does an association with a known sex offender establish that the person killed the missing teenager. Investigators would need evidence linking the individual to the boy, the time of the disappearance and the alleged crime. A criminal record for another offence, however serious, cannot substitute for proof in this case.
Why has the case resurfaced after 40 years?
Old missing-person investigations can return to public attention for several reasons. A witness may decide to speak after many years, relatives may renew calls for information, previously overlooked records may be reviewed or advances in forensic work may create a new investigative opportunity.
Time can also make an account harder to assess. Memories fade, people die and documents may be incomplete. At the same time, a witness who was frightened, dependent on another person or unaware of the significance of what they knew may not have felt able to speak earlier.
That does not make a late disclosure false. It does mean that investigators must examine both the content of the account and the reason it emerged when it did. A responsible report should therefore describe the woman’s statement as an allegation unless it has been independently confirmed.
What remains unconfirmed in the missing schoolboy case?
Several essential points cannot be confirmed from the supplied information:
- the schoolboy’s name and age;
- the exact date and location of his disappearance;
- the circumstances of his last known sighting;
- whether his body or remains were ever recovered;
- the identity of the person known as “Warlock”;
- whether police have formally reopened or reviewed the case;
- whether the woman has given a statement to investigators; and
- whether anyone has been arrested, charged or convicted in connection with the disappearance.
These are not minor omissions. They determine whether the story is about a new police breakthrough, a witness appeal, a documentary claim or an allegation circulating without official action.
Until those facts are established, the safest conclusion is limited: a woman is reported to have made a claim about the fate of a schoolboy who disappeared decades ago, and the allegation may warrant examination. It does not, on its own, resolve the mystery.
What would count as a breakthrough?
A genuine breakthrough would usually involve more than a new assertion. It might include a formally recorded witness statement, a police announcement, newly identified forensic evidence, a credible confession or information that leads investigators to a specific location or person.
Even then, the public may not immediately receive every detail. Police may withhold information to protect an investigation, prevent contamination of witness evidence or preserve the fairness of any future trial.
Families of missing people are often left balancing the hope that new information could provide answers with the fear that it may confirm the worst. Coverage should avoid turning that uncertainty into entertainment or treating an untested accusation as a solved crime.
Frequently Asked Questions
-
Did the missing schoolboy definitely get murdered?
No. The available information describes an allegation that a woman knows who killed him. It does not establish that a murder occurred or that anyone has been found responsible.
-
How long ago did the boy disappear?
The case is described as dating back around 40 years. The exact year is not provided in the available brief.
-
Who is the “Warlock”?
The nickname is associated with a suspected or convicted paedophile in the reported account, but the person’s real identity and connection to the case are not confirmed here.
-
What does the woman say she knows?
She reportedly says she knows who killed the schoolboy. The available information does not explain how she came by that knowledge or whether it has been corroborated.
-
Has anyone been charged?
No charge or arrest can be confirmed from the information supplied.
-
Why are late witnesses important in historic cases?
They may hold information that was previously withheld, overlooked or not understood. Their evidence still has to be tested against records, other witnesses and physical evidence.
-
Can the woman’s allegation be reported as fact?
No. Until supported by reliable evidence or established in court, it should be described as an allegation or claim.
The woman’s reported statement may give investigators a new line of inquiry into a schoolboy’s disappearance that has remained unresolved for decades. But the identity of the boy, the alleged “Warlock” offender, the evidence behind the claim and the legal status of the case all require confirmation. For now, the story represents a potentially significant allegation—not a proven account of who killed him.
ALSO READ: John Fetterman’s Wife Opens Up About ‘Divorce’ Rumors in Revealing New Book
Teen Who Stabbed Cancer-Stricken ‘Uncle’ and Bragged About Watching Him Die Learns His Fate
Inset: Kemaree Davis in Muskegon Circuit Court (WZZM). Background: The area where Davis killed 73-year-old Thomas Stewart (Google Maps).
A Michigan teenager will spend decades behind bars for killing a 73-year-old man during a home robbery. Shortly after the shooting, 16-year-old Kemaree Davis texted a friend that the “old man was dead” and said he had watched the victim “gasp his last breath.”
Muskegon Circuit Judge Matthew R. Kacel sentenced Davis on Tuesday to 20 to 60 years in a state correctional facility for the 2025 killing of Thomas Stewart, according to court records.
Davis entered a no-contest plea to one count of open murder and two felony weapons charges before receiving the sentence.
The hearing drew a courtroom filled with relatives and friends of both Stewart and the teenage defendant, MLive reported.
Authorities responding to a reported shooting on the morning of Dec. 1, 2025, found Stewart dead in the area between the kitchen and living room of a home in the 1400 block of Jiroch Street. He had suffered a gunshot wound to his upper body, as Law&Crime previously reported.
Stewart’s wallet was discovered beside his body, while his pockets had been pulled out, police said.
Surveillance video showed Davis, who knew Stewart from the neighborhood, going into and leaving the residence. Investigators arrested Davis roughly one week after Stewart’s body was found.
According to investigators, Davis went to the home intending to rob Stewart. During a police interview, he allegedly said Stewart gave him $20 after finding him inside. Davis claimed his gun “went off” and killed Stewart, then acknowledged taking an additional $20 from the victim’s wallet.
Approximately an hour after the shooting, Davis messaged a 17-year-old friend.
KEEP READING: Veteran QB Jimmy Garoppolo Emerges in Giants Buzz After Dart Injury
“The old man is dead. Bro, I watched him gasp his last breath,” Davis wrote.
The text became important evidence for prosecutors, who also presented witness testimony and investigative findings connecting Davis to the killing.
At the sentencing hearing, Stewart’s relatives remembered him as “Uncle Tommy,” a man who dedicated his life to helping others. His son, Terrance Stewart, said his father had been fighting cancer and weighed about 100 pounds when he died.
“My father always pushed us to reach our goals and be great,” Terrance Stewart said, according to MLive. “If I could become half the man my father was, I’d live a good life.”
Another son, Dalrecus Stewart, said he had pictured his father’s killer as someone visibly evil. Seeing Davis in court left him shocked.
“He looks like a little boy,” Dalrecus Stewart said. “I wanted to hate because of the loss of my father, but it’s my father’s words to me that prevents me from going there.”
Davis apologized to Stewart’s family when the judge allowed him to speak.
“From the bottom of my heart, I just want to say I’m sorry for what happened to your loved one, Mr. Stewart,” Davis said, according to Grand Rapids, Michigan, ABC affiliate WZZM. “The world has lost a kind and caring man. I am truly sorry and I feel terrible for that, and I will for the rest of my life.”
Davis also received two years for felony firearm use and two to five years for carrying a concealed weapon. Those sentences will run concurrently. He was credited with 288 days already served, but the credit applies only to the weapons convictions and not to the murder sentence, court records show.
The post Teen who killed neighborhood “uncle” battling cancer and bragged about watching him die learns his fate first appeared on Law & Crime.
Suzy Lamplugh Murder: What Happened and Who Killed Her?
Suzy Lamplugh disappeared on 28 July 1986 after leaving work to meet a prospective property client in west London. She was 25, working as an estate agent, and told colleagues she was going to meet a man calling himself “Mr Kipper.” She was never seen again.
Police have long treated the case as a murder, but no body has been found and nobody has been charged with killing her. The man most strongly linked to the disappearance is convicted murderer John Cannan. However, his involvement has never been proved in court, and Suzy Lamplugh’s real killer remains legally unidentified.
What happened to Suzy Lamplugh?
On the afternoon of 28 July 1986, Lamplugh left the Fulham office of estate agency Sturgis to show a property to a potential client. The appointment was recorded under the name “Mr Kipper,” a name that investigators later concluded was probably false.
Witnesses reported seeing Lamplugh speaking with a man near a white car outside the property in Shorrolds Road, Fulham. She was then seen getting into or near the vehicle. That was the last confirmed sighting of her.
Lamplugh did not return to work or contact her family. Her white Ford Fiesta was later found abandoned near the property. Her handbag and other personal belongings were reportedly inside, but Lamplugh herself had vanished.
Her disappearance prompted an immediate police investigation and one of the most extensive missing-person inquiries in Britain. Searches, appeals and reviews of potential sightings continued for decades, but no confirmed trace of her has been discovered.
Was Suzy Lamplugh murdered?
Lamplugh was legally declared dead in 1994, eight years after she disappeared. Police have treated the case as a murder investigation rather than a voluntary disappearance because of the circumstances: she was seen going to meet a stranger, left behind her car and possessions, and never made contact with family or friends again.
There has been no evidence that she deliberately abandoned her life. Investigators have also found no credible explanation showing that she left the country or began a new identity.
Even so, a legal declaration of death is not the same as a murder conviction. The circumstances strongly suggest that Lamplugh was killed, but the location of her remains and the precise sequence of events have never been established publicly.
Who was “Mr Kipper”?
“Mr Kipper” was the name given by the person who arranged the appointment with Lamplugh. Police came to believe that the client was not genuine and that the name was used to lure her to the meeting.
The most widely accepted account is that Lamplugh met a man outside the property and was persuaded to enter a vehicle. There is no complete, proven account of what happened after that point. Some details associated with the case come from witness statements, police theories and later media reports rather than evidence tested in court.
The false name became one of the defining clues in the investigation. It also helped establish that Lamplugh’s disappearance was probably connected to the appointment, rather than being an unexplained absence from work.
Why is John Cannan linked to the case?
John Cannan is the person most often identified as the leading suspect in the disappearance. Cannan was convicted of the murder of Julie Dart, a woman who disappeared in 1987 after meeting a man who had contacted her through a personal advertisement. He was also convicted of other serious offences.
Investigators have pointed to similarities between the Dart case and Lamplugh’s disappearance. Both women were young, and both were connected to meetings arranged with a man who appeared to be using a false or misleading identity. Cannan was also in the wider area at a time that attracted police attention.
In 2002, police publicly stated that they believed Cannan was responsible for Lamplugh’s murder. He denied killing her. The evidence available to investigators was not sufficient to charge him with the offence, and no court has ruled that he killed Lamplugh.
For that reason, describing Cannan as the “real killer” goes beyond what has been legally established. He is the principal suspect named in the case, but not a convicted killer in relation to Lamplugh.
What evidence has been found in the investigation?
The case has produced important leads but no conclusive proof of what happened to Lamplugh. The main established facts are:
- Lamplugh left work to meet a prospective client on 28 July 1986.
- The appointment was made under the name “Mr Kipper.”
- She was seen near a property in Shorrolds Road, Fulham.
- Her car was found abandoned after she disappeared.
- No confirmed sighting of Lamplugh has been established after the meeting.
- Her body has never been found.
Police have conducted searches and repeatedly reviewed the evidence. Various locations have been examined over the years, including places linked to possible theories about where her remains might have been taken. None has produced proof that resolves the case.
The absence of a body has made prosecution especially difficult, but it does not prevent a murder conviction in principle. The greater problem is that prosecutors would still need sufficiently strong evidence identifying the killer and proving the offence beyond reasonable doubt.
What happened to the investigation?
Lamplugh’s disappearance became a national case and remained in the public eye long after the initial search. Her parents and family continued to seek answers, while police investigated reported sightings and possible links to known offenders.
The creation of the Suzy Lamplugh Trust brought another lasting consequence. Established in her memory, the charity focuses on personal safety and the prevention of abuse, stalking and violence. Its work helped ensure that Lamplugh’s name became associated not only with an unsolved crime but also with public education about personal safety.
Over time, the case has been revisited through police reviews, documentaries and media investigations. Those reviews have generated theories, but they have not changed the central legal position: Lamplugh is presumed dead, her disappearance is treated as murder, and nobody has been convicted of killing her.
Why has Suzy Lamplugh’s body never been found?
No confirmed explanation has been established. If Lamplugh was murdered, investigators believe her body may have been moved and concealed. The passage of time, changes to buildings and land, incomplete records and the lack of a known crime scene have all complicated the search.
Public speculation has focused on several possible burial locations, including places associated with Cannan. Searches based on those theories have not produced conclusive evidence. A suspected location should not be treated as proof simply because it has appeared in police inquiries or media coverage.
The missing body is one reason the case continues to generate uncertainty. It also means that many accounts of the final hours contain a mixture of established evidence, police belief and speculation.
Who is Suzy Lamplugh’s killer?
There is no legally proven answer. John Cannan remains the main suspect publicly associated with the murder, and police have said they believed he was responsible. He was never charged with killing Lamplugh, however, and he denied involvement.
The most accurate answer is therefore that Suzy Lamplugh is presumed to have been murdered, but her killer has not been established in court. Calling Cannan the killer as a confirmed fact would misstate the evidence and the legal position.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. When did Suzy Lamplugh disappear?
She disappeared on 28 July 1986 after leaving work to meet a prospective property client in Fulham, west London.
2. How old was Suzy Lamplugh?
Lamplugh was 25 when she disappeared.
3. Who was “Mr Kipper”?
“Mr Kipper” was the name used by the person who arranged the appointment with Lamplugh. Police believe it was a false identity.
4. Was Suzy Lamplugh ever found?
No. Her body has never been found, and there has been no confirmed sighting of her since the day she disappeared.
5. Was Suzy Lamplugh legally declared dead?
Yes. She was legally declared dead in 1994, eight years after her disappearance.
6. Is John Cannan Suzy Lamplugh’s killer?
Police have identified Cannan as the main suspect and said they believed he was responsible. However, he was never charged with Lamplugh’s murder, and no court has established that he killed her.
7. Why do police believe Lamplugh was murdered?
She disappeared after meeting a stranger, left her car and belongings behind, and never contacted anyone again. These circumstances led police to treat the case as murder.
8. What happened to Suzy Lamplugh’s car?
Her white Ford Fiesta was found abandoned near the property where she had gone to meet the supposed client.
9. Is the case still unsolved?
Yes. The disappearance is treated as a murder, but no person has been convicted and Lamplugh’s remains have not been located.
Four decades after Suzy Lamplugh went to meet “Mr Kipper,” the central facts remain painfully clear but incomplete. She disappeared during a professional appointment in 1986 and was later declared legally dead. Police believe she was murdered and have linked John Cannan most closely to the case, yet the evidence has never produced a conviction. Until her remains are found or new evidence establishes what happened, her killer remains officially unknown.
Texas Triple Murderer Delivers Final Message to Death Row Inmates
A Texas man convicted of killing three people during a drug robbery was executed Wednesday evening, one week after his alleged accomplice was put to death for the same murders.
Ker’Sean Ramey, 41, was executed by lethal injection at the state penitentiary in Huntsville and pronounced dead at 6:34 p.m. CDT, according to The Associated Press.
Inside the execution chamber, a prison chaplain placed a hand on Ramey’s shoulder and led him in a short prayer. The warden then asked whether he had any final statement, the AP reported.
Ramey praised God and expressed gratitude to his friends, family members and fellow death row prisoners, whom he referred to as his brothers.
This photo provided by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice shows Ker’Sean Ramey on Oct. 31, 2022. (Texas Department of Criminal Justice via AP)
“To the brothers on Texas death row that grew up with me, that poured into me and showed what it means to be a man, because I came in young, and didn’t understand what manhood was… to you brothers… I greatly appreciate you,” Ramey said shortly before the lethal injection began.
As the pentobarbital took effect, Ramey inhaled deeply, sputtered and began snoring. He became still after 10 loud snores and two that were barely audible.
Officials pronounced him dead 14 minutes after the injection was administered.
Ramey was the sixth person executed in Texas this year. The state plans to carry out three additional lethal injections during the next two months.
He was convicted and sentenced to death in January 2007 for the August 2005 shootings of Samuel Roberts, 24, Tiffani Peacock, 18, and Celso Lopez, 38. The victims were killed at the home they shared in Edna, a small rural city roughly 100 miles southwest of Houston.
The state of Texas execution chamber in Huntsville, Texas, is seen on May 27, 2008. (AP Photo/Pat Sullivan)
According to court records, Ramey’s accomplice, LeJames Norman, lived across the street from the residence. The two men came to believe the home contained cocaine.
On Aug. 24, 2005, they approached the house wearing masks and knocked on the door. When Lopez answered, the men forced their way inside, court records state.
After discovering there were no drugs, the men shot Lopez. They later killed Peacock and Roberts when the pair arrived at the house. Court documents say Ramey returned before the men left and shot the victims again to make sure they were dead.
Norman was executed Sept. 16 at the Huntsville prison, the site of all executions in Texas.
The Huntsville Unit prison is seen in Huntsville, Texas, on Sept. 14, 2024. (Francois Picard/AFP)
The Supreme Court rejected Ramey’s final appeal hours before his execution. His lawyers argued that jurors had not heard mitigating evidence about his childhood, including that he suffered physical abuse and was raised in poverty.
Texas prosecutors asked the Supreme Court to deny the appeal, describing it as “meritless” and arguing that Ramey’s record reflected an escalating pattern of criminal conduct.
Norman was arrested about five months after the killings while trying to cross back into the United States from Mexico, where he had fled. At Ramey’s January 2007 trial, Norman testified that both men participated in the shootings, while Ramey’s attorneys maintained that Norman alone was responsible.
This photo provided by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice shows LeJames Norman on Feb. 28, 2024. (Texas Department of Criminal Justice via AP)
Ramey’s former girlfriend testified that she was with him when he threw two handguns into a lake after the killings and that he later gave her a detailed account of his role in the crime.
Norman pleaded guilty to capital murder and was sentenced to death in December 2008.