House lawmakers have voted to end the war in Iran, passing a war powers resolution designed to prevent President Donald Trump from continuing military action without approval from Congress.

The late Tuesday night vote was 220-204, closely mirroring earlier votes this summer. A handful of additional Republicans joined Democrats in backing an effort to bring the conflict to a close.

None of the previous resolutions has reached the president’s desk, where Trump would be expected to veto the legislation.

‘Remember when Donald Trump said that this war would last just a few weeks?’ said Rep. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., who served as a Marine in the Iraq War and led the push for the resolution.

Moulton said Congress must ‘actually ask tough questions, as the Constitution directs us to do, rather than be subservient to another warmongering administration.’

Rep. Brian Mast, a Florida Republican who chairs the House Foreign Affairs Committee, questioned what military assets Democrats would seek to pull from the region, arguing that Iran remains a threat.

Mast said Trump opposes ‘forever wars’ and is working to end what he described as decades of hostilities involving Iran.

‘They are a continuous ongoing threat to the United States,’ Mast said. ‘Enough is enough.’

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 would give Congress a mechanism to limit the president’s use of military force without congressional authorization. 

The action is likely the last House vote on the Iran war ahead of the midterm elections, where the conflict overseas is playing a substantial role in the political campaigns. 

The war that Trump launched on February 28 has dragged, with on-again, off-again deadly missile strikes being exchanged and causing havoc in the region for nearly seven months. 

Before voting even began, Representative Thomas Massie read aloud articles of impeachment against War Secretary Pete Hegseth on the House floor, putting the secretary’s conduct during the Iran war in the spotlight as lawmakers weigh whether or not to invoke the War Powers Resolution.

He accused Hegseth of unlawfully continuing US military action against Iran without proper authorization from Congress.

Massie’s move could force House Republicans into an uncomfortable showdown over Hegseth’s conduct, although impeachment itself is far from certain. 

The Kentucky congressman filed the measure as a privileged resolution, meaning the House must take it up within two legislative days, setting the stage for a potentially explosive vote.

And Massie did not give his party a heads-up that he was doing this, according to Axios. 

Massie has been one of the most outspoken Republican critics of the Iran war and of Trump’s use of military force without congressional authorization.

In July, he said the Iran war had ‘significantly weakened’ the United States, and in 2025 he introduced his own bipartisan War Powers Resolution with Democratic Representative Ro Khanna.

The vote on Tuesday comes after the House already passed two similar Iran War Powers resolutions this year, with a small group of Republicans joining Democrats both times.

In June, the House passed H. Con. Res. 86 by 215-208, with four Republicans breaking with their party to support it.

Those Republicans were Representatives Tom Barrett, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Warren Davidson and Thomas Massie.

On July 23, the same four Republicans again voted with Democrats as the House passed H. Con. Res. 89 by 214-208.

The House Clerk’s official tally shows four Republicans voting yes and 207 Republicans voting no.

READ MORE: NBC Helicopter Crash Victims Identified as Reporter Eliana Moreno and Pilot George Marciniw

The July vote marked the second time the House had successfully approved an Iran War Powers resolution.

In the previous House actions, four Republicans voted to halt the war in Iran, but that number rose to seven in Tuesday’s war powers vote, including GOP lawmakers from battleground Iowa, Rep. Zachary Nunn and Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks, and retiring Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina.

They joined GOP Reps. Tom Barrett of Michigan, Warren Davidson of Ohio, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky voting in favor of the war powers resolution, with all Democrats.

Fitzpatrick has argued that his support is rooted in congressional authority rather than opposition to US military action against Iran.

After voting for an earlier resolution in May, Fitzpatrick said the United States was safer after Iran’s nuclear capabilities had been degraded but argued that the country was also a nation governed by the rule of law.

He said the War Powers Act requires conflicts lasting more than 60 days to come before Congress and said lawmakers had to follow the law as written.

Fitzpatrick had also introduced his own War Powers legislation back in April designed to comply with the 1973 law while allowing more time for cease-fire negotiations.

Barrett also has a similar view.

After voting for the June resolution, the Michigan Republican said ‘Congress has the exclusive authority under the Constitution to declare war and authorize the use of force.’

He argued that the War Powers Act had given the president temporary authority that had expired and that Congress should decide the scope and limits of the Iran mission.

Barrett has also proposed his own authorization for use of military force, which would establish specific objectives for the Iran operation, prohibit an occupation or nation-building in Iran and impose reporting requirements and a deadline on the conflict.

Massie and Davidson have also voted for both House Iran War Powers resolutions.

Last week Trump said he expects the war to end immediately after the November midterm elections, while reports have indicated that some of his senior advisers privately warned the conflict could continue much longer.

Congress has tried repeatedly to alter the trajectory of the war against Iran, but efforts to limit the Trump administration’s military action remain a longshot so long as the president is able to fend off or veto the measures. 

While the Constitution gives Congress the authority to declare war, it also gives the president authority as the commander in chief to engage in some military actions. 

The War Powers Act, created in the aftermath of the Vietnam conflict, sought to put a more specific time limit on the president’s power, requiring congressional approval for sustained military actions after 60 or 90 days.

Lawmakers are heading home at the end of the week to campaign nearly full-time, with less than 50 days to go before the elections that will determine control of Congress as Democrats try to wrest power from Republicans.

Voters are confronting high prices, particularly for gas at the pumps, as the conflict disrupts the flow of oil resources through the vital Strait of Hormuz.

The Congressional Budget Office said Tuesday that the war has cost more than $380 billion  as of August 1, and is projected to be costing between $2 billion and $3 billion monthly, depending on the intensity of the fighting. 

The budget office projected inflation will be 0.5 percentage points higher than expected heading into 2027 due to the war. 

House Speaker Mike Johnson acknowledged at a press conference Tuesday the need to bring gas prices down.

But the Republican speaker said he believes the Iran conflict is entering a ‘new phase’ as allies step up to help stabilize the region. When that happens, he said, ‘you´re going to see, as the president said, anytime gas prices will go down again, the cost of groceries will as well.’

Johnson said Trump expects the shift after the election, and the speaker added, ‘I’d love it to happen today.’

Trump himself had promised not to involve the US in foreign wars when he won a second term in the White House, and his actions against Iran are weighing on the Republican Party that controls the House and Senate. 

Most Americans say the war in Iran has not been worth fighting, according to an AP-NORC poll in July.

Sen. Ted Cruz said Republicans will face a defining internal battle over the party’s direction ahead of the 2028 presidential race, arguing that there is no clear successor who can replicate Donald Trump’s singular political appeal.

In the latest episode of “Pod Force One,” the Texas Republican — a 2016 presidential contender who has acknowledged his own continued interest in the White House — told host Miranda Devine that the GOP should expect a crowded, competitive contest to choose President Trump’s successor.

Asked whether Vice President JD Vance or Secretary of State Marco Rubio could simply inherit Trump’s mantle, Cruz said Republican voters, rather than party leaders, would settle the question through a robust primary campaign.

“I think we are going to have a full and vigorous primary and discussion,” Cruz said. “I think the voters are going to decide who are we and what do we believe, and that matters.” He added that Trump stands apart as a political force: “President Trump is a unique historical figure. I’m going to say right now, there is no Donald Trump on the horizon to succeed [him].”

Cruz repeatedly declined to delve into a potential 2028 Republican primary matchup involving himself, Vance or Rubio, saying such speculation can wait until after the midterm elections.

“There will be plenty of time to have these conversations,” he told Devine. “We are less than two months out from the midterm election. This is the most consequential midterm I’ve ever seen in my life.”

Still, Cruz offered his assessment of the likely Democratic field, warning that the party’s ideological shift could lead to a far-left candidate reaching the Oval Office in 2029.

Full Episode

“I think the Democrat Party has gotten radical and extreme, but what’s dangerous is radical and extreme can win,” Cruz said.

RELATED: Ed Sheeran Tour Faces Cancellation After All Opening Acts Drop Out

Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for exclusive and candid conversations with the most influential disruptors in Washington on ‘Pod Force One.’ Subscribe here!

“I don’t want to wake up in two years and find a radical, left-wing zealot in the White House, and I think there’s a very real danger of that,” he warned, while adding that someone like Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, a Democrat who is often described as a centrist, has no shot at winning the party’s nomination.

On the GOP side, Cruz explained that “as a party, we’re going to have a discussion … I think voters are going to say, ‘All right, who’s got the backbone, who has the strength, who has the record to continue this?’” 

“And no one’s going to step into [Trump’s] shoes, but we’ve got to keep winning … and who can produce it?” 

Cruz said the debate taking place within the GOP is about both foreign policy and economics. 

“Economically, are we a small government, free market conservative party? Or are we a big government nanny state party?” he said.  

“And related to that, on foreign policy, are we an isolationist party? Do we want to just withdraw from the world? Or do we believe in American leadership in the world?”

The parents of a five-year-old boy have been arrested after he died in a hot car outside their Arizona home while the family held a post-church party.

Theo Sabo was discovered unresponsive inside the overheated vehicle outside his family’s $1.1 million home in Peoria on Sunday.

His parents, Anca Sabo, 45, and Mihail Sabo, 50, have been charged with negligent homicide and child abuse for leaving him in the vehicle as temperatures reached 105 degrees, Fox 10 reported.

Police said the family arrived home at about 1pm after attending the baptism of another child. Theo was not reported missing until approximately 3.45pm, while the gathering was underway.

Relatives removed Theo from the vehicle and began CPR before firefighters transported him to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead.

According to court records, Mihail told investigators that, shortly after the family returned from church, he instructed his unnamed 14-year-old son to take Theo out of the car.

The teenager told police he did not recall being asked to remove his younger brother from the vehicle.

“It appears that it was either a miscommunication between who or which family member was supposed to get the child out of the car,” police community relations officer William Kennedy said.

During a court hearing on Monday, the parents’ lawyer, Leah Dodd, called the circumstances a “tragedy.”

‘Mom is hosting a party at their home, assumes dad is gonna get [the boy]. Dad asks the 14-year-old. That’s not asking a young child to get another child out of the vehicle,’ Dodd said in court footage obtained by @collectcallfrom.

‘He was sleeping, and there was a lot going on, but this does not deviate from what a normal person would do in this situation.’

The attorney also argued abuse and negligent homicide charges were not appropriate.

‘She called 911, she administered life-saving efforts, she answered all questions of detectives. This is not someone who is running away,’ Dodd said.

‘Everything that she and her husband did upon finding the child in the vehicle was standard care.’

RELATED: Alachua County Woman Pleads Guilty to Federal Child Porn Charges

The Maricopa County Medical Examiner’s Office has not released the boy’s cause or manner of death. 

During the hearing, Anca begged the judge to let her see her other children.

‘I want to see my kids. Please let me see my kids,’ she said through tears.

The parents were given a $150,000 bond each and ordered not to have contact with each other, but the judge did allow supervised visits with their other children.

Both Anca and Mihail have a status conference scheduled for September 21 and a preliminary hearing on September 23.

A GoFundMe has been set up for the Sabo family to support Theo’s funeral and memorial expenses, and has raised over $223,000 as of Tuesday.

‘The Sabo family experienced the unimaginable heartbreak of losing their precious little boy, Theo,’ the fundraiser said.

‘If you know the Sabo family, you know how deeply loved they are and how much they have poured into their community through serving, loving, and giving to others.

‘As the Sabo family walks through these incredibly difficult days, we want to surround them with love, prayer, and practical support so they can focus on grieving, being together, and honoring Theo’s precious life.’

The Daily Mail contacted the Peoria Police Department, the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, and the couple’s defense attorney for comment.

Iran is intentionally pursuing U.S. naval drones in the Strait of Hormuz to collect intelligence on American surveillance technology and identify ways to bypass U.S. defenses, drone specialists warned Tuesday.

Experts said Tehran’s approach appears highly coordinated, potentially revealing valuable information about U.S. Navy operations in one of the world’s most strategically sensitive maritime chokepoints—even if no classified material is compromised.

The assessment follows heightened Gulf tensions on Sept. 14, when U.S. forces destroyed two Iranian small boats during what the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps allegedly attempted as a seizure of an American unmanned surface vessel, or USV, operating in the region, according to reports.

Iranian state media initially portrayed the episode as a U.S. attack on civilian fishing boats. Iranian officials said search-and-rescue efforts were underway off Kargan and near Larak Island, where they claimed fishermen had gone missing.

U.S. Central Command spokesman Capt. Tim Hawkins confirmed Tuesday that Iranian vessels had tried to take the American drone.

“Iranian small boats recently attempted to take possession of a U.S. unmanned surface vessel, but they were unsuccessful after CENTCOM forcefully responded,” Hawkins said.

“The surface drone remains under U.S. operational control.”

“What’s going on with drones generally in the Strait right now—when we see all these types of intel capture missions that Iran is launching—we need to make no mistake that these are very coordinated, absolutely deliberate drone capture missions,” Cameron Chell, CEO of U.S. drone manufacturer Draganfly, told News Media.

PENTAGON DRONE SPENDING SURGES FROM $225 MILLION TO $55 BILLION AS LOW-COST ATTACKS TEST U.S. DEFENSES

Chell warned that even a brief examination of a captured drone provides Tehran with a quick win by revealing how the U.S. conducts surveillance and how to counter those systems.

“If Iran captures a drone, it could give them an immediate tactical advantage,” Chell said.

“It may not yield specific classified data, but it gives insight into the theater of operations, which at any given moment offers an advantage. I wouldn’t doubt it for a heartbeat that it is escalating.” 

“Just getting little tidbits of intel starts to paint a picture, giving them different attack plans, battle plans, and thoughts on what the U.S. might be doing. I would be very surprised if this wasn’t an ongoing effort.”

Iran’s attempts to capture drones underscore growing security volatility in the Strait of Hormuz, the vital international shipping lane where commercial transit has fallen below historic levels since the war broke out in February.

Chell emphasized that any access to captured hardware over the last six months would allow Iranian forces to evaluate sensitive onboard sensors.

“It really speaks to the bigger picture of how the whole intelligence infrastructure works of, say, the Navy, for example,” Chell said.

READ MORE: Dancing with the Stars Season 35 Premiere: 8 Dances, 1 Elimination

“The other important thing is that when they get their hands on these drones—even if they’re only able to spend some time glimpsing at them before they have to evacuate or abort a mission—is they get a real understanding of the types of sensors on them.”

“That gives them a complete picture of how they can launch attacks and evade the type of sensing equipment out there,” Chell continued.

“They can understand how to counter or measure the intelligence being gathered, and potentially use that design offensively in their own equipment.”

The latest escalation also follows a Sept. 8 incident involving Iran’s capture of a Dive-LD autonomous underwater drone manufactured by defense contractor Anduril.

While Anduril CEO Palmer Luckey said the drone was designed to operate in “environments too dangerous for humans where capture is an expected possibility.”

“I can’t get into the details, but it provided significant value for months before capture,” Luckey dded.

“Unboxing ceremony by our reverse engineers, tomorrow morning!” Iran’s embassy in Hyderabad also wrote on X.

U.S. Navy representatives however, said the recovered drone was an older model that had malfunctioned and gone dead in the water.

“The U.S. being alert to the fact that these are high-value targets dictates where and how they use and protect them,” Chell noted.

“I don’t doubt that the captured underwater drone had sensitive information on it, but that’s not the point. Again, the point is, they want to see the type of equipment and information being gathered, or view logs to see where it has been. This all just puts the U.S. on higher alert.”

Tehran has previously leveraged captured U.S. assets—including an RQ-170 Sentinel stealth drone seized in 2011—to bolster domestic technology and regional propaganda.

Then-President Barack Obama publicly asked Tehran to return the aircraft. Iran later claimed it reverse-engineered the platform to build domestic lookalikes.

In 2022, a U.S. Navy patrol ship and an MH-60S Seahawk helicopter intercepted an Iranian naval vessel attempting to tow a Saildrone surface vessel in the Gulf.

“Iran actually has a history of attempting this in the past, and at times has been successful,” Chell said, noting Washington takes the threat “very, very seriously.”

“In other instances where they’ve gotten sail ship drones, for example, and tried to bring them into Iranian territory—” Chell said, pointing back to the RQ-170 seizure: “a number of Iranian drones look suspiciously like the RQ line.”

“Still, when the U.S. knows a drone has been captured, they adjust their tactics and operational overview accordingly,” Chell, whose firm has been awarded a five-year contract by the Government of Canada to provide low-cost tactical intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance uncrewed aircraft systems to the Canadian Armed Forces, concluded.

“There is no question that autonomy and unmanned systems are the new standard in warfare,” Chell said.