Reflecting on these tensions, an official from the self-proclaimed Chagossian government-in-exile emphasized Diego Garcia’s critical role in U.S. military strategy and the region’s stability. Following an Iranian strike on a significant U.S. installation in Bahrain, the Pentagon has been rerouting logistical operations to this isolated U.K.-U.S. base in the Indian Ocean.

Located in the southern Chagos Archipelago, the base has played a crucial role in supporting carrier strike groups such as the USS Abraham Lincoln. These forces have been pivotal in conducting air missions and enforcing blockades on Iranian ports.

Currently, the U.S. military’s logistics network extends over a 2,200-mile maritime supply line to Diego Garcia, minimizing exposure to coastal facilities that could be targets for Iranian attacks. However, this new route requires extended supply runs and slower replenishment times, as reported by The New York Times.

“While it’s an inconvenience, it underscores the base’s significance,” remarked James Tumbridge, an international lawyer who acts as the attorney general for the Chagossian government-in-exile, during an interview with News Media.

“The base is integral to regional security for the U.K., U.S. and our allies. This latest news emphasizes it.”

“Bahrain is a far easier target, so the U.S. change of supply arrangement makes sense,” Tumbridge said, adding, “Hopefully the new British PM will not deny the U.S. this change of use.”

“It shows the importance of the base and asking a third country for permission is not what the U.S. will want, and so I hope this means Trump will still oppose the handover,” Tumbridge went on to say, referring to a proposed agreement that would transfer sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius.

In 2025, the U.K. and Mauritius signed a treaty that would recognize Mauritian sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago while allowing the U.K. to retain control of Diego Garcia for an initial 99-year period.

The British government later put implementation of the agreement on hold amid renewed U.S. concerns over the sovereignty transfer.

Reports emerged in June that U.S. officials had drafted a proposal to bypass Britain and strike a deal to take control of Diego Garcia, one of several alternatives to then-Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s plan to transfer sovereignty to Mauritius.

The first minister of the self-described Chagossian government-in-exile responded that month and said the Chagos Islands were not for sale or “for stealing either,” but argued that he “can’t blame” Trump for “looking to secure the military base.”

“Trump cannot buy the islands. That suggestion made by some is unhelpful to us all. Only the U.K. can sell the islands, as only the U.K. owns them,” Tumbridge also said on Sunday.

“The arguments over sovereignty do not get fixed via a sale, and Mauritius cannot sell them unless the U.K. first gives them away,” he added.

“It is not in the U.K.’s interest to sell them. Whether we keep them and continue our support for the U.S. base or we cede them to Mauritius is the choice — my desire is the former.”

Mauritius has long claimed sovereignty over the archipelago, a position backed by a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice and subsequent U.N. action.

The U.K. government, however, permitted the U.S. to use Diego Garcia for limited defensive operations targeting Iranian missile capabilities in March after initially withholding approval for offensive strikes.

“The U.S. wanted to use Chagos Diego Garcia for air strikes at the very beginning. The U.K. consulted Mauritius and refused — hence Trump finally appreciating why sovereignty transfer was a problem,” Tumbridge said.

“After the attacks on Cyprus, the U.K. allowed certain so-called defense uses, and Iran did fire at Diego Garcia, but they missed.”

On March 20, Reuters reported that Iran had fired two ballistic missiles toward Diego Garcia.

One missile failed in flight, while a U.S. warship fired an interceptor at the other, though it was initially unclear whether the interception succeeded. British officials later said one missile fell short and the other was intercepted.

“No serious concerns have been shared — the earlier attempt showed a lack of range and targeting ability,” Tumbridge said.

“The British Government and the Commissioner for the Territory have already tried to say the last attack makes the islands unsafe. No one seriously believes that Iran would try to target the outer islands that presently only have a population of six people.”

The reported U.S. logistical strains and renewed focus on Diego Garcia came as the USS Abraham Lincoln approached nine months of continuous deployment in the region.

Speaking at Joint Base Andrews on Aug. 14, Trump said a new aircraft carrier was heading to the Middle East to replace it.

“That ship is moving,” Trump said when reporters asked about the carrier.

Meanwhile, Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of U.S. Central Command, also met with service members aboard the carrier, which is expected to be relieved amid concerns raised by families over the extended deployment.

News Media has reached out to the Pentagon for comment.

Mark Cuban, the outspoken billionaire and well-known ‘Shark Tank’ investor, recently delivered a lesson to California Representative Ro Khanna on the pitfalls of the proposed “billionaire tax.”

The timing couldn’t be more relevant, as two other tech giants, Google’s Eric Schmidt and Sergey Brin, appear to be at odds over how to effectively oppose this tax measure, also referred to as Proposition 40.

In an eye-opening dialogue on X, Cuban highlighted a critical flaw: imposing a 5% wealth tax on tech entrepreneurs when their startups go public would drive them out of California. The implications are clear—entrepreneurs would be forced to seek greener pastures elsewhere.

Avoiding taxes is not the sole motivator for this exodus. According to Cuban, the potential departure is driven by a larger issue—venture capitalists’ reluctance to pour funds into companies based in California under such burdensome conditions.

Who would willingly invest in a venture that inherently promises a 5% financial loss? The rhetorical question underscores the fundamental problem with Proposition 40’s model.

Khanna came up with a plan that he thought was bright: If entrepreneurs won’t sell their companies to pay the “billionaire tax,” the government can lend them the money to pay it.

Of course, they’d have to hand the loan right back to the government, and spend several decades paying off that loan, with interest. 

But after all — don’t billionaires borrow against their assets all the time, to fund their lifestyles?

There’s a difference between taking out a loan you know you can repay, and being forced to borrow money just to pay taxes.

If these paper billionaires can’t make their payments, the government would have to seize their assets. 

The state would suddenly own a bunch of bad debt and failing companies.

That’s a surefire way to tank the economy. And it would kill California’s startup culture.

Cuban slammed Khanna — who represents Silicon Valley — for joining the socialist mob.

“Ideology is not a strategy,” he said.

It’s all hypocrisy from Khanna, one of the wealthiest members of Congress, with a net worth in the hundreds of millions. 

He’s not volunteering 5% of his own wealth.

Khanna is posturing as the champion of the “working class,” ahead of a run for president in 2028.

He is trying to fill the left-wing lane Bernie Sanders occupied when he ran for the Democratic nomination in 2016 and 2020. 

But Sanders has been a socialist his whole life. He’s also a hypocrite — buying multiple homes, flying private jets — but at least voters knew what he stood for, theoretically.

Khanna postured as a pro-business progressive from Silicon Valley. Now he’s trashing the people he represents in a bid for power.

Good on Mark Cuban for taking Ro Khanna down. More business leaders need to speak up against Proposition 40, especially while infighting threatens to divide the opposition to it.

Download The California Post App, follow us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters

A heartbroken family is pursuing a $105 million lawsuit against New York City, alleging that a “stray electrical current” startled a horse pulling a carriage in Central Park, leading to a tragic accident.

The incident occurred in June when 18-year-old Romanch Mahajan, during a family vacation from India, leapt from the carriage and sustained a fatal head injury while attempting to protect his mother in the bustling streets of Manhattan.

Seeking justice for Mahajan, the family has initiated legal action against the city’s government and multiple municipal agencies. They contend that a rogue electrical current caused the horse’s spooked reaction, according to a report by the New York Times.

Filed on Friday, the claim accuses both city authorities and Con Edison of negligence in maintaining safety standards within the carriage industry and Central Park. The family blames stray voltage as a significant factor contributing to the horse’s sudden distress.

The lawsuit also targets several city departments, including Parks and Recreation, Health and Mental Hygiene, Transportation, and Consumer and Worker Protection, as reported by the outlet.

Jamie McShane, a spokesperson for the electrical company, told the outlet that the utility ‘observed very low levels of stray voltage on July 16 and July 23.’

‘We determined that neither instance originated from Con Edison equipment,’ he added. 

Following the discovery of stray voltage activity, the Transport Workers Union said on X: ‘NYC Council Members should now reconsider and reject the proposed carriage-horse ban, which would unfairly punish drivers for faulty city and Central Park Conservancy electrical infrastructure.’

Mahajan’s family have been publicly critical of the horse carriage industry and pushed for a ban since their son’s death. The teenager’s parents appeared on video during a Health Committee hearing on the bill that would see the industry’s ban, the Times reported.

In a statement to New York Daily News, the union said that the revelation ‘raises serious questions about whether the horse was shocked and whether stray voltage triggered the tragic incident.’ 

‘Now that we know there is a utility failure, it would be horrifically unfair to eliminate the jobs of 200 overwhelmingly immigrant workers without allowing a full investigation to be conducted,’ the union Vice President Alexander Kemp told the outlet.

To the Times, Kemp said in a statement: ‘Blue-collar carriage drivers should not be punished for an unforeseeable hazard caused by flaws in the city’s power grid.’

PETA Director Ashley Byrne released a statement in June in response to the incident.

‘From collapsing horses to careening carriages, how many more disasters have to strike before we get these beleaguered horses out of the park?’ Byrne said.

‘For everyone’s safety, PETA is calling on council members, Health Committee Chair Lynn Schulman, and Speaker Julie Menin to stop dithering and pass Ryder’s Law immediately.’

Currently, the bill has secured the backing of enough Council members to pass but awaits an environmental review to determine its economic impact, the outlet reported. 

Mahajan was killed in the tragic accident at Cherry Hill on June 17 after the carriage driver had stopped to take a photo of the family. The horse, Sampson, suddenly bolted with all of them inside, Deepak Mahajan, the teen’s father, told the Times in June.   

‘We were yelling, “Help me, help me!”,’ his distraught father recalled to the outlet.

Deepak said he and his family clung to each other, but as the carriage stormed down the pavement, his wife, Priya, flew out, and their son immediately jumped out to save her.

‘My son, just to save his mother, he fell off. He was screaming, “Mom!”,’ Deepak, 44, continued. 

As he did so, he hit his head on the ground. He was pronounced dead on Wednesday night at New York-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center.

The rest of his family suffered minor injuries. Their carriage shattered into pieces after crashing into another during the incident.

The operator soon caught up to the startled horse near the restaurant Tavern on the Green.

The seven-year-old horse appeared to be uninjured and in stable condition.

Just hours before the deadly incident, Romanch’s parents shared several pictures on Instagram of them traveling all over New York City.

They visited iconic landmarks like the Statue of Liberty, Battery Park, the Charging Bull on Wall Street, the Oculus, and more.

The Daily Mail reached out to the City of New York and Con Edison for comment.