Outrage as Convicted Serial Rapist Sentenced to 124 Years Goes Free After 20

A California man convicted of drugging and raping three women, and originally sentenced to 124 years behind bars, has been released after serving about two decades in prison. The decision has triggered outrage among local officials, who say it raises serious public safety concerns.

Andrew Luster, the great-grandson of cosmetics pioneer Max Factor, left state prison earlier this month and is reportedly living in Glendora, California, KTLA reported.

Glendora Mayor David Fredendall denounced the release in a statement obtained by News Media, saying it was unacceptable that a convicted serial rapist was reportedly residing in the community.

“The City of Glendora is beyond disappointed. We are outraged,” Fredendall said. “Andrew Luster was convicted of 86 felony counts stemming from the drugging and sexual assault of unconscious women. He was originally sentenced to 124 years in prison. He has now been released from State prison and is reportedly residing in our community. This is unacceptable.”

Luster was convicted in 2003 on 86 felony counts related to the drugging and sexual assault of three women at his beachfront home in Ventura County.

Prosecutors said Luster used GHB to make the women unconscious before sexually assaulting them.

During his trial, Luster fled to Mexico in January 2003 while free on $1 million bail. He was convicted in absentia and later apprehended in Puerto Vallarta by celebrity bounty hunter Duane “Dog” Chapman.

Although Luster initially received a 124-year sentence, a California judge set it aside in March 2013. The judge found that the trial court had not sufficiently explained its reasons for ordering the sentences to be served consecutively, as News Media previously reported.

Ventura County Superior Court Judge Kathryne Ann Stoltz declined to overturn Luster’s convictions but granted him a new sentencing hearing.

In April 2013, Stoltz resentenced Luster to 50 years in prison, according to The Associated Press.

Prosecutors opposed the shorter sentence, characterizing Luster’s crimes as “cruel, vicious and callous.”

Luster’s release has renewed scrutiny of California’s criminal justice system, including Proposition 57. Approved by voters in 2016, the measure expanded parole consideration for certain incarcerated individuals.

KTLA reported that Luster was denied parole in 2022 but granted parole in 2024. Ventura County prosecutors successfully challenged that decision, and he was denied parole again in April 2025.

He was subsequently expected to remain in custody until October 2026, when his calculated prison term was set to expire, the outlet reported.

SEE ALSO: Subway Shooting Victim Identified as Bronx Resident Darell Rodriguez

Fredendall said the case contradicts assurances California voters received when Proposition 57 was approved.

“When California voters approved Proposition 57 in 2016, they were assured by Governor Jerry Brown and his administration that dangerous offenders would remain behind bars,” Fredendall said.

“The State may argue that this was not technically an early release. It can point to sentencing credits, legal calculations, and administrative requirements,” the mayor continued. “However, those technical explanations do not address the larger concern: how an individual originally sentenced to 124 years in prison for heinous crimes is able to walk out of a secured facility after only 20 years.”

California Assemblywoman Blanca E. Rubio also condemned Luster’s release in a statement obtained by News Media.

“I am outraged and deeply disturbed by the decision to grant parole to convicted serial rapist Andrew Luster,” Rubio said. “It is incomprehensible that an individual originally sentenced to 124 years in prison for such horrific crimes could be granted parole after serving approximately 20 years.”

Rubio, who represents California’s 48th Assembly District, said the decision raises questions about the state’s parole system and whether it adequately protects victims and communities.

“Our justice system is supposed to protect the innocent, hold violent criminals accountable, and provide victims with a sense of justice,” she said. “Decisions like this undermine public confidence in that system and send a devastating message to survivors of sexual assault.”

Rubio said she is working with local officials and law enforcement to learn more about the circumstances surrounding Luster’s release, including the conditions of his supervision.

Fredendall also expressed concern about Luster reportedly living near schools, parks, playgrounds and other community spaces.

“Our Police Department will work with State parole authorities to ensure every applicable law and condition of supervision is followed,” Fredendall said. “We will do everything within our lawful authority to protect our residents. But local governments should not be forced to shoulder the public-safety consequences of decisions made in Sacramento without adequate transparency and accountability.”

The mayor said the city is demanding additional information from state officials about the release and measures being taken to protect residents.

“The victims deserve better. The people of Glendora deserve better. California must do better,” Fredendall said.

News Media has reached out to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation seeking confirmation of Luster’s release date, clarification of the sentencing calculations that led to his release and details about his parole supervision.