Deconstructing the Narrative of the Resistance Judiciary
Share and Follow


If you’re like me, anytime you hear or see a news story now that starts out with: “X number of such-and-such experts” or “former intelligence officials” or “retired military officers” or some such “sign letter saying Y,” you’ve learned to discount it. We’re supposed to be impressed by the appeal to authority and/or the number of those signing off on a proposition. 

We aren’t. Not even when they’re judges. 

Now, it pains me a bit to say that because I’m a firm believer in the judiciary and its having a critical role in our governance. And, as a recovering lawyer myself, one who practiced law in multiple courts before multiple judges over the course of almost three decades, respect for the bench is ingrained. I’m well acquainted with the fact that rulings often don’t go the way we want them to, but primed to start from the premise that judges know what they’re doing and get it right more often than not. They get that “wisdom of Solomon” deference, which, I realize, is often unwarranted. I’m simply acknowledging my default setting on this. 

So when I saw the story several days ago about “42 retired judges” having signed off on an “open letter” criticizing the Trump administration’s indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, I semi-dismissed it. I knew not to put much stock in it — that it was likely a cohort of NeverTrump sorts being trotted out to sound impressive; that I’d probably disagree with their take; and that, in the whole scheme of things, it wasn’t worth the ink or digital space used to create it. I wrote it off. 

But then, while listening to my favorite podcast (“America This Week”) on Saturday, hosts Matt Taibbi and Walter Kirn fleshed it out a bit more, and I was stunned at the absolute absurdity of the portions of the letter they shared. 

So, I felt compelled to search it out myself and see if it was as dunderheaded as it sounded. Indeed, it was and is, so, as I did with the narrative of the left following Charlie Kirk’s assassination, I now feel compelled to deconstruct this ridiculous letter authored/signed by what I am now referring to as the Resistance Judiciary™️.


Share and Follow
You May Also Like

1971 Gold Standard Shift: The Hidden Economic Impact on the Middle Class

Retired Army Col. Douglas Macgregor is sounding an alarm that cuts across…

Legal Halting of Certain Tankers May Impact Funding, Yet Remains a Secondary Concern

In a recent segment on NPR’s “Morning Edition,” Representative Adam Smith (D-WA)…

Brown University Puts Safety Chief on Leave Amid Growing Safety Concerns: A Delayed Response?

In response to the tragic shooting deaths of students Ella Cook…

California’s ‘Lying Teacher’ Law Struck Down: Judge Rules in Favor of Parents’ Rights

In a controversial move, California’s leadership, spearheaded by Governor Gavin Newsom,…

Brown University Custodian Alerted Security Repeatedly About Potential Shooter Surveillance

A custodian at Brown University reported witnessing a suspicious individual, later…

Unveiling the 1971 Gold Betrayal: How It Reshaped the Middle Class Forever

Retired Army Col. Douglas Macgregor is sounding an alarm that cuts across…

Breaking: Stricter Citizenship Rules for Foreigners in Japan – What You Need to Know

The Japanese government is gearing up to overhaul its immigration policies, making…

Revealed Emails Indicate FBI Concerns Over Insufficient Evidence Prior to Mar-a-Lago Search

Recently unveiled documents have brought to light that the FBI did not…