Who has Hailee Steinfeld dated? Boyfriends List, Dating History
Share and Follow

The high court has overturned a decision by the police watchdog that an officer who punched an elderly black man in the face had no case to answer.

Errol Dixon, 71, sustained a broken nose, displaced septum and fractured a cheekbone and an eye socket in the incident in south-east London in September 2021. He was stopped in his car by police officers in Bromley and the primary officer held Dixon round the neck and punched him in the face.

The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) held an independent investigation and concluded in November that no officer had a case to answer for misconduct or gross misconduct.

The IOPC stated at the time they had found the primary officer had acted in self-defence and the force used had been reasonable.

Dixon applied to the high court in February to challenge the outcome, arguing that the watchdog’s decision-maker had misapplied the correct legal test and that a misconduct panel could find that the officer had used disproportionate force and had been dishonest about the events.

He also argued that the decision that the officers had no case to answer for misconduct had been irrational, and that the IOPC had failed to properly apply the law in relation to race discrimination.

The IOPC accepted the decision-maker had applied the incorrect legal test but maintained that the decision was lawful and that therefore permission should be refused.

In April, a judge granted permission to Dixon to challenge the decision by way of judicial review, with the IOPC subsequently conceding that their original decision was unlawful.

The administrative court has now quashed the IOPC’s original decision and a new decision-maker with no previous involvement will consider the case.

Dixon, who was represented by Bhatt Murphy Solicitors, said: “I was shocked and disappointed by the first decision of the IOPC that the force used by [the officer], who throttled me and punched me directly in the face, could not amount to misconduct.

“I still believe that [the officer] used excessive force upon me because I am a black man and that if I was an elderly white man I would have been treated very differently.

“I am very pleased that the high court has struck down the first IOPC decision.

“I can only hope that the IOPC will now uphold my complaint so that [the officer] can face justice at an independent police tribunal.”

Share and Follow
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

D.C. appeals court temporarily suspends ex-Trump lawyer’s law license 

The D.C. Court of Appeals has temporarily suspended the law license of…

Sunday Shows preview: College protests heat up nationwide, Noem faces backlash

The political tension around the ever-growing pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses will…

WWE star Cody Rhodes saved the day after my daughter, 11, was tricked out of $300 by a cruel stranger on Facebook

A YOUNG girl’s love of wrestling has been renewed thanks to WWE…

To prevent Georgia going down Putin’s path, sanction the country’s Russian puppets

Georgian billionaire and former Prime Minister Bidzina Ivanishvili — the power behind…

To Brexit-hating EU officials our Rwanda plan is heartless…but what about policies pushing families towards smugglers?

TO the Brexit-hating EU officials, our Rwanda policy is heartless and cruel.…

My HOA is forcing my family out of our home after fee jumped to $750 – it’s all because they lost a legal battle

RISING homeowners association fees are forcing a woman and her family out…

Less is more: The Supreme Court should not decide immunity ‘for the ages’ 

After listening to two and half hours of oral argument in the…

Russian authority requests the apprehension of Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky

Russia has issued arrest warrants for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as well…