Elon Musk's Twitter Sues Law Firm that Prior Management Used to Force Buyout
Share and Follow

Elon Musk’s Twitter has filed a lawsuit against prominent law firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen, and Katz, alleging that the firm charged an excessive and unwarranted fee for its services during Twitter’s privatization process. The law firm billed Twitter $90 million for its successful efforts to force Musk to follow through on his commitment to take the company private.

CNBC reports that Elon Musk’s Twitter has filed a lawsuit against renowned law firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen and Katz, claiming that the company overcharged for its services during Twitter’s privatization process.

Musk

Twitter owner Elon Musk  (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

The lawsuit focuses on a $90 million legal bill that was presented by Wachtell, the law firm that represented Twitter when Musk was waffling on taking the company private last year. The legal bill, described as a “last minute” charge, has been contested by Musk’s attorneys who argue that the fee was excessive and unjustified.

Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen, and Katz was Twitter’s legal representation prior to Musk’s acquisition. The firm had stepped in to represent Twitter after Musk initially withdrew his offer to take Twitter private for $44 billion. The law firm played a crucial role in finalizing the deal in November 2022, for which it received the contested $90 million fee.

The lawsuit, filed by X Corp., Twitter’s holding company, is seeking repayment of “any associated excess fee payment” and attorneys’ fees associated with the cost of litigation. The legal representation for Musk’s company in this matter is Reid Collins & Tsai, a litigation boutique based in Austin, Texas.

This legal dispute is not an isolated incident. After Musk took over Twitter, the company was saddled with $13 billion in debt and faced at least 26 lawsuits for vendor non-payment. Among other disputes, the company stopped paying rent at some of its San Francisco offices and was reportedly refusing to pay Google for use of its cloud infrastructure.

The case is X Corp v Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, in the California Superior Court (County of San Francisco), Case No. CGC-23-607461.

Read more at CNBC here.

Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolan

Share and Follow
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

To Brexit-hating EU officials our Rwanda plan is heartless…but what about policies pushing families towards smugglers?

TO the Brexit-hating EU officials, our Rwanda policy is heartless and cruel.…

JFK’s grandson Jack Schlossberg plays Putin and claims he showers ‘every 10 days’ in outrageous new Instagram story

JACK Schlossberg, the grandson of former president John F. Kennedy, has shared…

Shock pictures as floods overtake Houston with 100s forced to flee homes and officials warn ‘worst’ might be on the way

MASSIVE amounts of rain have caused flooding in Texas as hundreds are…

Chilling details of how brothers Jake & Callum Robinson, & friend Carter Rhoad ‘were killed and dumped in well’

LEGAL BEFORE LIVE LOCAL police have revealed that the two missing brothers…

Sunday Shows preview: College protests heat up nationwide, Noem faces backlash

The political tension around the ever-growing pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses will…

LSU Students Dismiss Pro-Hamas Supporters Because of Lack of SEC Titles

There are a few schools where these silly little pro-Hamas protests don’t…

Unequal Treatment Exposed in New Jersey Gun Permit Process, Highlighting Racial Bias

American gun control laws have been racist from their inception. Throughout the…

Hamas begin ‘serious’ talks for ‘Gaza truce’ that would see up to 33 Israeli hostages returned

HAMAS began talks last night on a possible Gaza truce that would…