Kaitlan Collins Absent From CNN Show After Trump Ban

CNN Chief White House Correspondent Kaitlan Collins did not appear on her primetime program Friday evening, only hours after President Donald Trump barred both her and CNN from the White House.

By Friday night, Collins had not issued a public response to the White House ban. Her most recent social media post instead focused on reporting the president’s own Oval Office remarks about the decision.

Her absence from CNN’s 9 p.m. EST program, The Source, was notable after she hosted the broadcast as usual on Thursday night.

Collins has frequently drawn Trump’s criticism over the years. The president has previously dismissed her questions as “dumb” and told the journalist that she should “smile more.”

As the dispute escalated, CNN retained prominent First Amendment lawyer Ted Boutros.

“CNN stands fully behind our White House team and their fair and accurate reporting without hindrance or interference from the government,” the network said in a statement.

“Should the ban which President Trump threatened go ahead, it would be an illegal assault on that fundamental and constitutionally-protected right.”

While Collins has remained silent publicly, several CNN colleagues have spoken out, including Jake Tapper, who opened his program with a sharp condemnation of Trump’s order.

‘President Trump’s definition of what is “fake” has been pretty clearly established as any stories he does not like,’ the longtime news anchor began. 

Tapper then went on to note that Trump praised Breitbart and Fox News as the two media organizations he finds fair, as he argued that the two outlets repeatedly publish articles favorable to the president.

‘One suspects that the real issue is now CNN or how CNN covers the news. One suspects the issue is the facts he does not like – facts, stubborn things that are leading to rough forecasts for the president’s party in November,’ Tapper argued.

‘Facts, such as record-high diesel prices, facts such as voters’ expressing concerns with their ability to afford to live in the United States, facts such as the president’s abysmal approval/disapproval ratings, facts such as Republicans on the campaign trail starting to publicly break with him.’

He also noted that the president suggested his ban of media outlets may expand, after Trump attacked The New York Times and the Washington Post as ‘fake’ and ‘disgusting.’

‘If there is any strategy to this – and it’s not clear that there is – it is that the president would rather today’s focus be about this unconstitutional tantrum than about any of the facts that we cover everyday…’ Tapper continued.

‘That is not going to happen no matter how hard he tries,’ the journalist vowed. ‘He cannot ban what I’m saying to you right now.’

Tapper then pointed out that when War Secretary Pete Hegseth ousted certain outlets from the Pentagon ‘the coverage did not change, because the facts are what they are – a stalemate in Iran, at least 18 servicemembers killed in the Iran action, if not more, depleted munitions, unanswered questions about Iranian citizens, most regrettably children, killed.

‘The Pentagon ban did not work. This one will not either,’ he declared as he vowed to keep covering the news. 

Tapper also responded to the president’s claim that the ban could be lifted if CNN, MS Now and Politico ‘straighten’ themselves out.

‘If that means covering the president with adulation, that’s not our job,’ he argued.

‘And “straighten” when you think about it is not really the term he wants. He doesn’t want to “straighten,” he wants the news to bend, he wants the news to warp around his views, his desires, what he wants covered.’

In his Oval Office address, Trump admitted there was no particular reason for the timing of the ban – just a ‘cumulation of stories over the past few years’ that he got ‘sick of.’ 

‘Maybe they can get better, and we’d like to have them in,’ Trump remarked. ‘Somebody has got to keep them away.’ 

‘Media Outlets shouldn’t be able to constantly write or report FICTION and LIES when they’re covering the President of the United States, the Trump Administration, or the United States of America. Other Fake News Media Outlets to follow,’ he had earlier warned on Truth Social.

READ MORE: Who Was Leke Alder's First Wife? Exploring His Love Life and Children – NewsFinale

When a reporter then asked who those other outlets could be, Trump pointed to The Times and the Washington Post. 

‘They’re crummy papers. Both doing poorly, by the way,’ he said.

‘We’re probably not going to display the paper anymore in the White House. We haven’t taken the step of throwing them out,’ Trump added.

Reporters were overheard at the White House when the news broke, asking if this was a ‘Trump hissy fit’ or a real decision.

But by Friday night, CNN and Politico released statements defending their reporters.

‘POLITICO will continue to fairly report on this White House and future ones,’ the newspaper said in a statement. 

‘We will vigorously defend our First Amendment rights against any attempt to restrict them. The claims that POLITICO received government subsidies are false and have been thoroughly debunked,’ it noted.

A number of outlets and press freedom organizations have since expressed their support for the ousted journalists.

‘The president said it plainly in the Oval Office, describing his own planned action as a “ban on the free press,”‘ Jacqui Heinrich, president of the White House Correspondents Association, said in a statement.  

‘The Constitution protects the freedom of the press from government interference. That protection does not depend on whether the president likes a news organization’s coverage, agrees with its reporting, or approves of the questions its journalists ask.

‘This is about more than the rights of journalists. It is about the right of the American people to receive a full and independent account of the activities, policies and decisions of whoever occupies the nation’s highest office.

‘The WHCA stands in defense of our colleagues at CNN, MSNOW, and Politico who are being singled out for doing their jobs.’

Similarly, National Press Club President Mark Schoeff Jr said he condemns Trump’s decision.

‘Banning news organization from the White House based on the administration’s disapproval of their coverage is a clear attempt to control which voices are allowed to witness and report on the exercise of presidential power,’ he argued.

‘Every American should understand what is at stake,’ Schoeff continued. ‘If implemented, this ban would mark an unprecedented assault on press freedom.

‘The National Press Club calls on the President to reverse this declaration immediately.’

Schoeff then went on to argue that Trump is ‘continuing his relentless and disturbing effort to bully the news media,’ after he tried to keep AP reporters from the White House when the outlet decided not to enact his name changes for the Gulf of America.

‘This simply can’t happen in a democracy that has depended on a free and independent press to cover the country’s leaders for 250 years,’ he said. 

‘The First Amendment does not permit the government to pick and choose which journalists are allowed to do their jobs,’ Schoeff argued.

‘When the President of the United States bars credentialed news organizations from access to his administration, he weakens one of the nation’s strongest checks on those who hold power.

‘A government confident in its actions should never fear independent scrutiny,’ he noted. 

‘A free press exists to ask difficult questions, uncover uncomfortable facts and inform the American people. By barring major national news outlets from the White House, the administration is not only attacking individual outlets – it is directly attacking every reporter’s constitutionally-protected right to hold power to account, regardless of political party.

‘The scrutiny a president receives from the White House Press Corps benefits readers, viewers and listeners across the country, giving Americans a greater understanding of government policies.

‘The message today’s action sends is alarming,’ Schoeff concluded. ‘It tells other news organizations to soften their coverage. It tells reporters to think twice before asking difficult questions or else lose access. And it leaves the American people knowing less about the government that serves them.’

 The Daily Mail has reached out to CNN for comment.