If you or someone you know is considering suicide, immediate help is available by contacting the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-TALK (8255).
In a critical turn of events, prosecutors have started dismantling the defense’s narrative of Lindsay Clancy as being excessively medicated. They presented nine bottles of medication prescribed to her, each still holding many of the pills.
During his testimony on Monday, Patrick Clancy, her ex-husband, confirmed that numerous psychiatric medications had indeed been prescribed to Lindsay in the months leading up to the tragic deaths of their children. However, Assistant District Attorney Shanan Buckingham pointed out, through her questioning, that many of these prescriptions appeared to be only partially consumed.
“There were a lot of prescriptions, but not many pills actually taken. Correct?” Buckingham challenged, brandishing a bag filled with prescriptions in front of the jury.
Assistant Plymouth County District Attorney Jennifer Sprague introduced the collection of Lindsay Clancy’s prescription medications as evidence on the opening day of her trial. (Greg Derr/Pool/The Patriot Ledger)
“Is that comprehensive?” Patrick responded. “Of all the pills that were prescribed?”
“These are the pills that you brought into the police station,” Buckingham said. “So out of these.”
“Out of those, yeah,” Patrick said. “It’s possible that not a lot were taken.”
Buckingham also sought to distinguish between the total number of medications prescribed over several months and how many Lindsay was prescribed at one time.
Patrick estimated that she was taking three or four medications at most. Buckingham then asked whether it would surprise him to learn that Lindsay was prescribed no more than three medications at any given time and usually two.
Patrick Clancy took the stand Monday and described watching his wife fall into a “big spiral” before she allegedly strangled their three young children inside the family’s Massachusetts home. (Greg Derr/Pool/The Patriot Ledger)
“It wouldn’t be terribly surprising, no,” Patrick said.
Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani said the questioning appeared designed to prevent the defense from controlling how jurors view the cocktail of medications that Lindsay Clancy was prescribed in the months before authorities say she strangled Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, inside the family’s Duxbury home in January 2023.
Lindsay Clancy reacts as the details of her children’s deaths are read in court on Monday. (Greg Derr/Pool/The Patriot Ledger)
“An important part of being a good prosecutor is not just proving your case, but anticipating the defense’s arguments,” Rahmani, president of West Coast Trial Lawyers, told News Media. “The prosecution wants to get out ahead of that potentially bad evidence by arguing that even though she was prescribed all these meds, she wasn’t prescribed them at the same time. At most, she was prescribed two, three, maybe four medications at once and importantly, she wasn’t taking them.”
Rahmani said prosecutors appeared to be getting ahead of the defense’s claim that Lindsay’s changing prescriptions contributed to her alleged psychosis.
“The last thing you want is the defense to gain control of the key piece of evidence,” he said. “It can be O.J.’s glove or a bag of pills.”
Defense attorney Kevin Reddington shows a list of medications prescribed to Lindsay Clancy, who is accused of killing her children, during his opening statement in Clancy’s murder trial at Plymouth Superior Court, in Plymouth, Massachusetts, U.S., July 27, 2026.
Rahmani said the next phase will likely focus on how long Lindsay took each medication, when she stopped taking it and how many drugs she was prescribed at once.
“It’s not uncommon for psychiatrists to try different medications and stop them when they stop working,” he said. “So how long was she on the Zoloft versus the Ativan versus the Seroquel? How many pills was she taking? I think the prosecution is gonna argue that Lindsay and her doctors were trying to get her better, and the fact that she wasn’t on all these pills at once really shows that the defense is trying to mislead the jury.”
Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial is expected to last six to eight weeks, and the witness list contains more than 200 names. (Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via Pool)
The defense has argued that Lindsay was suffering from psychosis and was not criminally responsible when she strangled her three young children. Prosecutors, meanwhile, framed the mom of three as a calculated killer, saying that Clancy’s children were “deliberately and meticulously killed.”
Buckingham alleged that Clancy deliberately sent Patrick from their Duxbury home to pick up medication and takeout food, giving herself enough time to strangle each child with an exercise band before attempting to kill herself.
Patrick Clancy exits Plymouth Superior Court, Plymouth, Mass., Monday, July27, 2026. His ex-wife, Lindsay Clancy, is on trial for the murder of their three children. (David McGlynn for News Media)
During opening statements, defense attorney Kevin Reddington conceded that Clancy killed the children but argued that the only meaningful dispute is what was happening inside her mind.
“She knows that she killed these children,” Reddington told jurors. “The issue for consideration is what was going on in that woman’s mind.”
Clancy, a former labor and delivery nurse at Massachusetts General Hospital, has pleaded not guilty to three counts each of murder and strangulation.
Judge William Sullivan told jurors that the Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Clancy was criminally responsible when the children were killed.