This week, military veterans and lawmakers voiced strong criticism against the proposed design for the Global War on Terrorism Memorial, arguing that its abstract nature fails to adequately honor the memory of fallen service members.
The design, crafted by Japanese architect Kengo Kuma, features a “classically inspired amphitheater” with a distinctive ribbon made from reclaimed steel used in combat operations, draped in vegetation that arches over the memorial’s marble surface.
Plans for the memorial also include steel and stone from the 9/11 attack sites, positioned at the entrances, alongside a shallow reflecting pool. This pool is intended to allow visitors to leave their footprints beside embedded ones, symbolizing “the weight of war and the varied experiences of those who served and their families,” as explained by the Global War on Terrorism Memorial Foundation, the organization advocating for the monument to be installed on the National Mall in Washington, DC.
However, critics have called for a redesign, arguing that the current concept falls short.
Senator Mike Lee of Utah expressed his dissatisfaction on social media platform X, stating, “This design resembles a landscape feature more fitting for a hotel courtyard or mini-golf course than a monument honoring the brave men and women who fought and the lives lost to radical Islamic terrorism.”
“There are American designers ready and willing to inspire their countrymen and honor those who served,” he urged. “Let’s start over and hire one of them.”
Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-Wis.), a retired Navy SEAL, indicated there is bipartisan support in both the House and Senate “to stop this proposed Jazz Hands monument to our fallen brothers and sisters. “
Van Orden warned he would hold the Global War on Terrorism Memorial Foundation “organizationally and personally accountable if you proceed with [this] abomination.”
Fox News contributor and Marine veteran Joey Jones lamented that “considering how Afghanistan ended … maybe we survivors deserve the ugliest memorial on the mall … but the warriors eternally resting under a modest headstone deserve better than whatever this [Global War on Terrorism Memorial Foundation] grass-topped abstract art project is.”
Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ind.), a Navy veteran who served in Afghanistan, called the proposal “a disgrace.”
“Thousands of heroic Americans sacrificed everything in service to our nation during the Global War on Terror,” Banks wrote on X. “I served in Afghanistan. These were real people with real stories.
“They deserve to be honored with dignity, not disconnected abstract art.”
The Global War on Terrorism Memorial Foundation did not immediately respond to The Post’s request for comment.
The foundation, in a press release, said it gathered input from “20,000 Americans across all 50 states and territories, including members of every branch of service and veterans of every conflict since World War II” before settling on the memorial’s design.
The group also noted that “a 23-member Design Advisory Council of Gold Star family members, veterans, veteran families, and service members guided the design team, ensuring that lived experience, not symbolism alone, would inform every element of the design.”
“This Memorial is not an abstract commission for our team, it is a sacred responsibility,” Kuma, the architect of the memorial, said in a statement,
Kuma, who noted he lost a close friend in the attacks on the World Trade Center, said his role was “not to impose a design, but to listen.”
“The voices of those who served and the families who stood beside them became our source of inspiration,” he said.
“We wanted to create a place of reflection and connection, a living Memorial where nature, light, and the materials of this war come together as an embrace for a grateful Nation.”