Home Blog Page 24

Labour turmoil as Keir Starmer refuses to back Heathrow expansion plans

0

Andy Burnham has renewed questions over the future of Heathrow’s expansion plans, only weeks after his Chancellor publicly backed the project.

As the Labour conference opened, the Prime Minister repeatedly declined to give an outright endorsement to the proposed third runway during an interview.

He said the decision was primarily a matter for London, adding that ministers were still awaiting the results of a public consultation.

However, Defence Secretary John Healey told MPs earlier this month that the Government supports the Heathrow project.

The Prime Minister has criticised the proposal for years. In January last year, while serving as mayor of Greater Manchester, Mr Burnham described the expansion as a “model for an ever-overheating UK economy”. He also warned that it must not come at the “expense of essential investment in northern infrastructure”.

Andy Burnham fuelled fresh doubts about the Heathrow expansion today, just weeks after his Chancellor backed it

Andy Burnham has renewed doubts over Heathrow’s expansion, just weeks after his Chancellor backed the scheme

Bosses at the airport are seeking to obtain permission to build a full-length, 3,500-metre runway

Heathrow’s owners are seeking permission to construct a full-length runway measuring 3,500 metres

In 2018, he said: “I’m against a third runway at Heathrow because of the need to limit national levels of aviation. We should use spare capacity at Manchester and Birmingham instead.”

A year later, he cautioned that the scheme could “trap infrastructure spending inside the M25 for ten years”.

Heathrow Airport Limited is seeking approval for a 3,500-metre runway that would involve diverting or relocating part of the M25 motorway.

Former Chancellor Rachel Reeves said in June that she was determined to see “spades in the ground” on the third runway during the current Parliament, with a target completion date of 2035.

That timetable now appears increasingly difficult to meet, with 2039 reportedly considered the earliest realistic completion date.

Asked by the BBC if he supported the expansion, Mr Burnham replied: “Principally, it’s a matter for London and Londoners.”

When pressed on his position, he added: “It’s not right for me to just jump straight in on the back of the consultation.

“I think it’s right that we hear what people have said through the consultation, and then then consider the way forward from there.”

Heathrow’s proposed expansion has faced longstanding opposition from climate experts and London Mayor Sadiq Khan.

John Healey told the Commons earlier this month that the government has given the go-ahead for the project because it will help to 'bring growth'

John Healey told MPs that ministers had approved the project because it would help “bring growth”

Heathrow, however, argues that a third runway would create jobs, boost economic growth and help make air travel more affordable.

Mr Healey told the Commons earlier this month: “After years of delay, years of indecision, years of often vexatious challenge, we have given the go-ahead to this project quite simply because the economic case stacks up and will help bring growth.”

The public consultation on the Government’s Heathrow expansion national policy statement closed on September 1.

A Heathrow spokesman said: ‘We agree with the Prime Minister that local voices must be heard. 

‘We know from consistent polling over the last decade that communities support our plans for expansion, and support is only growing over time. 

‘But critically, expanding Heathrow is a national project which will create jobs and boost growth in every part of the country. 

‘That’s why it is supported by trade unions, business groups, airports and communities across the UK and why we need to crack on with delivering it as quickly as possible.’ 

READ MORE:

Sure you’re not thinking about a snap election, Andy? Another megapoll shows Labour recovering as Reform surge recedes 

John Healey admits he must stem exodus of billionaires as ANOTHER business mogul quits Britain… but Chancellor still hints wealth taxes coming in Budget 

Burnham faces Labour conference civil war: Rayner stands by ‘drive-by shooting’ on immigration plans, Left accuses PM of ‘ghosting’ – and Chancellor admits he might need to find billions for fuel bailout 

Kaia Gerber’s Family Worried About Her After Brother Presley’s Death

0

Democratic Duo Fuel Speculation About 2028 Presidential Ticket

0

Seasoned political observers know that a fall book tour can offer an early glimpse into a potential presidential campaign.

Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear and Maryland Governor Wes Moore provided the latest example last week, appearing together in Washington, DC, at an event promoting Beshear’s new book.

The discussion soon shifted toward whether either governor might seek the White House in 2028.

Beshear has repeatedly said he has not made a decision, although his comments have become noticeably less dismissive of a potential presidential bid.

Looking back on his 2023 reelection as Kentucky governor, Beshear told Politico that he once expected never to run for office again.

Now, he said, “I’m not sure that’s true.”

Beshear emphasized that the comment was not an announcement of a presidential campaign.

Still, combined with his growing national profile, the remark was enough to spark fresh speculation among Democrats.

Maryland Governor told Wes Moore Beshear, 'Our country needs you,' when question of a future presidential run arose

Maryland Governor Wes Moore told Beshear, “Our country needs you,” when the possibility of a future presidential run came up.

Appearing on NBC¿s Meet the Press in July 2025, Beshear said he would consider the possibility of a presidential run, declaring that he would not 'leave a broken country to my kids or to anyone else¿s'

Appearing on NBC’s Meet the Press in July 2025, Beshear said he would consider a presidential run, declaring that he would not “leave a broken country to my kids or to anyone else’s.”

An Echelon Insights survey conducted on September 23 puts the former vice president at 24 percent, ahead of California Governor Gavin Newsom at 14 percent and Pete Buttigieg at 10 percent, with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Jon Ossoff both at 8 percent

An Echelon Insights survey conducted on September 23 placed the former vice president at 24 percent, ahead of California Governor Gavin Newsom at 14 percent and Pete Buttigieg at 10 percent; Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Jon Ossoff each received 8 percent.

Moore, who is also viewed as a possible 2028 White House contender, then made an even more striking comment.

“Our country needs you,” the Maryland governor told Beshear.

“We make a pretty good team,” Beshear replied, immediately fueling speculation about a possible Moore-Beshear or Beshear-Moore ticket.

Beshear later acknowledged the strength of the potential field, telling Moore, “We may have a lot of great candidates.”

This was not the first time Beshear has publicly entertained the idea of running for president.

During a July 2025 appearance on NBC’s Meet the Press, Beshear said he would consider a White House bid, adding that he would not “leave a broken country to my kids or to anyone else’s.”

California Governor Gavin Newsom remains a prominent figure as Democrats look ahead to the next presidential cycle, while his political activity has also intensified questions about whether Kamala Harris might make another run for the White House.

Newsom told CNN’s Jake Tapper that he would not run if Harris’s name appeared on the ballot.

Harris has not offered a firm yes-or-no answer, reiterating that her immediate priority is helping Democrats win the midterm elections.

She campaigned on Tuesday for the first time this election season alongside Michigan Democratic Senate hopeful Abdul El-Sayed on a Black maternal healthcare panel. 

New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was unusually honest about the trajectory of her political career in a New York Times interview this week, acknowledging that she is seriously weighing a potential presidential bid.

But other life plans could change that decision, as she has been open about freezing her eggs and her plans for motherhood down the line as she approaches 40.

And Pete Buttigieg, who mounted his own presidential campaign in 2020, offered perhaps the clearest signal of all.

Speaking on a podcast last month, the former transportation secretary said he was ‘more inclined than not’ to run.

Behind them is an unusually deep bench of governors, senators and former officials who have either acknowledged that they are considering a campaign or have deliberately declined to close the door.

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker and Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro are among the governors whose national ambitions have drawn attention.

Arizona Senators Mark Kelly and Ruben Gallego, New Jersey’s Cory Booker, Maryland’s Chris Van Hollen and Michigan’s Elissa Slotkin have all found themselves in the conversation as Democrats contemplate who might lead the party after 2028.

Representative Ro Khanna has also spoken openly about the possibility, while former Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel and former New Orleans mayor Mitch Landrieu remain among the other Democratic figures whose names continue to surface.

That does not mean all or any of them will ultimately decide to run.

And Beshear has an especially pertinent reason to wait. 

As chairman of the Democratic Governors Association, he has a national platform but is unlikely to want his political future to overshadow that role.

He has suggested that his plans could become clearer after his tenure ends in December.

Moore, meanwhile, remains focused on his Maryland reelection campaign.

An Echelon Insights survey conducted on September 23 puts the former vice president at 24 percent, ahead of California Governor Gavin Newsom at 14 percent and Pete Buttigieg at 10 percent, with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Jon Ossoff both at 8 percent.

RealClearPolling’s current average likewise places Harris first at 24.9 percent, followed by Newsom at 14.0 percent and Buttigieg at 12.8 percent.

Democrat Eric Jones backed by activist who said ‘evil Jews run the world’

0

Adina Flores, an activist and self-described “civil rights” advocate known for her highly unconventional social media content, is backing Eric Jones, the Democratic congressional candidate in California’s 4th Congressional District.

Flores’ endorsement centers on Jones’ pledge to fight the sexual exploitation of women—an issue that, by itself, would not typically draw unusual attention.

However, Flores’ Facebook, Instagram and Substack accounts contain a stream of provocative posts portraying political conflicts through the lenses of race, sexual orientation and alleged covert networks of influence.

Because social media videos indicate that Jones has met with Flores several times, her endorsement has raised questions about whether he shares any of her views.

In one Facebook video, Flores claimed that part of California—including Sonoma County—was controlled by Jews.

“But we’re literally run by the gay Jewish mafia — the Zionists in Sonoma County. The Jews still run the world. That’s where we’re at,” Flores said. “All our money gets sent to Israel, but nobody wants to talk about that.”

In an August Instagram post, Flores wrote, “Evil Jews run the world through Masonic Lodges.”

In another post earlier this year, she attacked Santa Rosa City Schools, accusing the district of recruiting “little gay communists” and describing public schools as “liberal prison indoctrination centers.”

Asked about Flores’ online statements, Jones’ campaign said he condemns prejudice against Jewish people.

“I firmly condemn any and all hate toward our Jewish and LGBTQ+ communities. It has no place in our district. My wife is Jewish, we are raising our kids in a Jewish household, I’m a fierce advocate for our public schools and educators, and I have zero tolerance for hateful commentary toward my neighbors or my family,” a campaign spokesperson told Fox News Digital.

Alongside her comments about Jews, Flores frequently denounces what she characterizes as attempts to indoctrinate children with LGBTQ+ ideology through institutions such as schools and local governments.

In one video, Flores said she had opposed “wokeness” and defended conservative parents. While displaying a design created by a local school, she criticized its rainbow colors as “pride indoctrination” and made a sexually explicit comparison about the image.

The design shows a tree atop a hill, rendered in rainbow colors.

Flores then used profanity and an ableist slur while claiming that children in public schools would be influenced to become gay. She urged parents to remove their children from Santa Rosa schools.

Her attacks, often expressed in similarly inflammatory terms, are directed at both major political parties.

In one post, Flores said her Instagram feed was filled with Democrats and Republicans arguing over which side was more “gay” and used another slur to describe both parties, which she said were “two sides of the same bird [sic].”

She then identified the Freemasons as “the real puppet master,” insisting they were not part of a conspiracy and were responsible for shaping the narratives promoted by both Democrats and Republicans.

Flores has also said that she previously worked for the government but was forced out and prohibited from holding public-sector positions again.

“I got started in my activism because I am a former government employee. I’m a whistleblower who was forced out of the government,” she said.

Flores said her removal was connected to COVID-19 mask mandates and information shared with parents.

For his own part, Jones has centered his campaign around issues like affordability, government transparency and protecting government-run programs.

On his website, Jones has listed three main priorities: ending corruption, lowering the cost of living and resource sustainability in government. His stances have attracted endorsements from progressive groups like Indivisible and Our Revolution, organizations with ties to progressive Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.

Throughout his campaign, Jones has highlighted his family’s struggle with financial stability. He grew up in a military family and had a disabled father. According to Jones, the family also struggled to overcome medical debt, relying on Medicaid and food stamps.

In her endorsement of Jones, which she made shortly after the resignation of Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., Flores praised Jones’ promise to be a voice for survivors of sexual misconduct. Swalwell, a prominent California Democrat, surrendered his office after several women accused him of unwanted sexual advances, allegations that he denied.

“Thank you for being one of the only candidates — and this is insane because you’re not even in office yet, but you’re talking about this very critical issue, so God bless you, brother,” Flores said.

After Fox News Digital reached out to Flores, who has over 144,000 followers on Instagram, for comment, she posted a video response on Instagram dismissing the inquiry and saying she was a “private citizen” and that her social media accounts are “not monetized.”

“My views are mine & mine alone. I am an unpaid advocate & have never been paid to support a political candidate,” her post said. “I am highly against the two-party system. If I feel someone is a good fit for office, I support them. F— your gangs! It’s really that simple!”

Rep. Kean Returns After Unexplained Absence for First, Only Debate

0

Republican Rep. Tom Kean Jr. and Democrat Rebecca Bennett are set to face off Sunday night in the only scheduled debate of their tightly contested race. Kean, a New Jersey congressman, was absent from the House for four months this year before revealing that he had been receiving treatment for depression.

New Jersey’s 7th Congressional District, which includes President Donald Trump’s golf club in Bedminster, has switched party control in each of the past two midterm elections. That history has made the district a major target for campaign spending and a closely watched political bellwether. Republicans are working to preserve their slim House majority as Trump’s approval ratings remain deeply negative and gasoline prices climb amid his war with Iran.

Kean, a former state legislator and member of a prominent New Jersey political family, is campaigning for a third term. During his time away from Washington, he missed more than 100 congressional votes.

He returned to Congress in June and disclosed that he had been hospitalized for depression. Kean also described himself as a private person.

Bennett, a former Navy pilot and healthcare executive, is running for office for the first time. She emerged from a competitive Democratic primary in June and was broadly regarded as a more moderate, stronger general-election candidate than several of her rivals.

The contest has attracted millions of dollars in outside spending.

Last week, a super PAC aligned with the Republican president said it planned to spend more than $3 million to support Kean. A Democratic-linked political action committee has earmarked roughly $2.5 million for television advertising in the New York market, backing Bennett as well as another Democrat running in a New York congressional district.

The district shifted modestly toward Republicans after lawmakers redrew its boundaries following the 2020 census. Democrats nevertheless see the seat as one of their best opportunities to gain ground.

Kean captured the seat in 2022 by defeating Democrat Tom Malinowski, who had previously taken it from Republican Leonard Lance in 2018.

Kean’s political lineage reaches back roughly 250 years, to the nation’s founding era, when one of his ancestors became New Jersey’s first leader after independence.

His great-grandfather served in the Senate, his grandfather represented New Jersey in Congress and his father was elected governor twice.

Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Lee Gilley, Accused Texas Wife Killer, Clings to Italian Lifeline

0

“I’ve never represented anyone in a case like this.”

Texas defense attorney Dick DeGuerin has spent 60 years practicing criminal law. He is now representing Lee Gilley.

Gilley, 39, is accused of killing his pregnant wife, 38-year-old Christa Bauer Gilley, inside their Houston home in October 2024.

Lee Mongerson Gilley standing and looking forward

Prosecutors allege Lee Mongerson Gilley murdered his nine-months-pregnant wife, Christa Bauer Gilley, in Houston in 2024. (Christa Bauer Gilley/Facebook)

Authorities say Gilley removed his ankle monitor and left the United States for Italy in May, just weeks before his trial was scheduled to begin.

DeGuerin said that although he has occasionally represented clients who fled while out on bond, Gilley’s case is unlike anything he has encountered during his career.

Italian authorities arrested Gilley after he arrived in the country. He has remained jailed in Turin ever since, according to DeGuerin.

aerial image shows city of Turin

Lee Gilley has remained in a Turin jail following his arrest by Italian authorities. (Getty Images: FilippoBacci)

The U.S. government began seeking Gilley’s extradition during the summer so he could return to Texas and face the allegations. That effort stalled after Italian courts rejected the initial request.

DeGuerin explained that Italy generally will not extradite a defendant when the death penalty could be imposed. Gilley faces a capital murder charge in Texas, where the possible sentences are death or life in prison without parole.

On Sept. 18, prosecutors in Harris County withdrew their request for the death penalty after Italian judges sought formal assurances that Gilley would not face execution if returned.

Lee Mongerson Gilley appears in a Houston courtroom in 2024 after being charged with capital murder in the death of his pregnant wife.

Lee Mongerson Gilley and his attorney, Ed McClees, right, appear in the 497th District Court at the Harris County Justice Center in Houston on Thursday, Oct. 17, 2024. Gilley is charged with capital murder in the death of his wife, Christa Gilley. (Melissa Phillip/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images)

“Italy wants a complete commitment that the death penalty will not be pursued,” DeGuerin said.

He added that the defense never believed execution would ultimately be sought, but Italian officials required the guarantee as part of the extradition process.

Even with that issue addressed, however, Gilley’s return to the United States remains unresolved.

Defense attorney Ed McClees and client Lee Mongerson Gilley seated in Harris County courtroom

Defense attorney Ed McClees and his client, Lee Mongerson Gilley, appear in the 497th District Court at the Harris County Justice Center in Houston on Oct. 17, 2024. Gilley is charged with capital murder in the death of his wife, Christa Gilley. (Melissa Phillip/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images)

According to DeGuerin, Italian judges are also concerned that a Texas judge might still have authority to impose a death sentence despite the prosecutors’ decision.

“The answer is clearly no,” DeGuerin said, emphasizing that only a jury has the authority to impose the death penalty in Texas.

Gilley’s attorney also told News Media that Italy could continue to deny extradition if there remains any possibility that Gilley could receive life without parole following a conviction.

Lee Mongerson Gilley standing in a courtroom

Lee Mongerson Gilley, 39, is accused of killing his wife, Christa Bauer Gilley, and their unborn child in Houston in 2024. (Christa Bauer Gilley/Facebook; Melissa Phillip/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images)

The U.S. has until Sept. 30 to respond to Italy’s requests for clarification. After that happens, there will be a status conference on where Italy stands in the extradition process.

“We’ve maintained from the very beginning that he is not guilty and he did not kill his wife,” DeGuerin said. 

Gilley’s status conference is set for Oct. 7.

New mega-poll shows Labour recovering as Reform UK surge fades

0

Labour’s conference in Liverpool is unfolding amid renewed speculation about a snap general election, despite Andy Burnham insisting that the prospect is “dead”.

The latest major voting projection suggests Labour’s electoral position has strengthened significantly as delegates gather for the party’s annual conference.

Research from the non-profit organisation More in Common estimates that Labour would win 250 parliamentary seats if an election were held now—around 140 more than its July projection.

The figures put Labour comfortably ahead of Reform, which is projected to take 147 seats. That represents a fall of 146 seats compared with the party’s estimate just three months ago, although it would still mark a dramatic rise from its 2024 result. The Conservatives are forecast to secure 125 MPs.

Labour would nevertheless remain short of an overall Commons majority under the projection. However, a potential alliance with the Liberal Democrats, on 63 seats, and the SNP, on 27, could allow the party to form a government.

The possibility of a so-called “rainbow coalition” has unsettled figures on the Right, amid concerns that Mr Burnham could agree to significant concessions, including another referendum on Scottish independence.

More in Common estimates that tactical voting could deliver Labour a further 25 constituencies. That would potentially give the party a majority with Liberal Democrat support alone.

More in Common research found that if the country voted currently Labour would have 250 MPs, some 140 more than the firm estimated in July

More in Common’s latest projection suggests Labour would win 250 seats if voters went to the polls now—about 140 more than its July estimate

Mr Burnham used a marathon round of pre-conference broadcast interviews on Friday to say he was 'knocking dead' rumours of an election before 2029

During a marathon series of pre-conference interviews on Friday, Mr Burnham said he was “knocking dead” suggestions that an election would be held before 2029

When tactical voting is taken into account, Reform’s total could drop to 117 seats, allowing the Conservatives to move ahead on 132.

Calling an election now would represent a major gamble for the Prime Minister, given the Government’s historic majority and the fact that almost three years remain in the current Parliament.

Supporters of an early election argue that Labour could improve its standing during a campaign and convert its recent polling gains into more seats.

But Mr Burnham used a lengthy round of broadcast interviews ahead of the conference on Friday to dismiss claims that he was preparing to call an election before 2029, saying he was “knocking dead” the rumours.

In an interview with the BBC in Liverpool, he indicated that a social care plan would need to be agreed before any election. He said he remains determined to include such a policy in Labour’s manifesto.

More in Common’s analysis uses the MRP method, which applies polling data to the demographic make-up of individual constituencies to estimate how each area might vote.

The organisation surveyed almost 16,000 adults between August 21 and September 21.

Luke Tryl, More in Common’s UK director, said the contrast with last year’s Labour conference was striking. At that time, the group’s MRP model suggested Reform could approach a three-figure majority, while Labour and the Conservatives were each projected to fall below 100 seats.

He said the latest figures showed that the electoral landscape had changed dramatically, with Andy Burnham now serving as Prime Minister.

Mr Tryl also warned that “volatility has become the new watchword” of British politics, noting that almost half of all projected winners are expected to take their seats with a margin of less than five percentage points.

The snapshot reflects a shift in support for parties since Mr Burnham became PM

The latest snapshot points to a major shift in party support since Mr Burnham became Prime Minister

A year ago Reform were seen as on track for a landslide victory

A year ago Reform were seen as on track for a landslide victory 

‘The other clear message of these numbers is that tactical voting, of the sort we have already seen play out in by-elections, could have an outsized impact on the numbers – giving a Lib-Lab coalition the numbers for a majority and allowing the Tories to leapfrog Reform,’ Mr Tryl added.

Mr Tryl said the poll suggested Mr Burnham was ‘sensible’ to rule out an early election.

‘While Labour is off its death bed, the party’s recovery is far from complete,’ he said. 

‘To call a poll the Prime Minister would have had to be willing to risk the careers of scores of his colleagues including his Chancellor and Foreign Secretary, while even small shifts in the current numbers would have left him vulnerable to having a stint in Downing Street only longer than that of Liz Truss.’

READ MORE

Labour shambles as Andy Burnham refuses to back Heathrow expansion

PM faces Labour conference civil war after Rayner ‘drive-by shooting’ on migration – as Left revolts

CHRISTIAN CALGIE: My sources say PM’s plan is so radical, he’ll have to gamble on an early election 

I Was Chrissy Teigen’s Surrogate—It Wasn’t as Easy as I Expected

0

Quinta Brunson Divides SNL Viewers With Taylor-Travis Joke

0

New York Knicks star Jalen Brunson opened the latest Saturday Night Live series as host, months after leading the franchise to an NBA championship and bringing the title back to New York.

Brunson is now only the fifth basketball player to host the iconic comedy program, following NBA legends Bill Russell, Michael Jordan, Charles Barkley and LeBron James.

He kicked off the episode with a five-minute monologue, immediately turning the Knicks’ dramatic NBA Finals victory over the San Antonio Spurs into comedy. The series had been defined by a string of thrilling fourth-quarter comebacks.

“I’m going to approach hosting the same way I approach a Knicks Finals game,” Brunson joked.

“So the first three quarters of the show are going to be God awful. The last sketch is gonna be amazing.”

Brunson also referenced the other major spectacle held at the Knicks’ Madison Square Garden home since his last appearance there: the star-studded wedding of pop superstar Taylor Swift and NFL icon Travis Kelce.

Jalen Brunson delivered the opening monologue as he hosted Saturday Night Live

Jalen Brunson launched his SNL hosting debut with the show’s opening monologue

Kenan Thompson portrayed Stephen A Smith as Brunson poked fun at the ESPN star

Kenan Thompson impersonated Stephen A. Smith as Brunson took aim at the ESPN personality

Brunson quickly made a joke about the other big event to take place at MSG this year

Brunson wasted little time joking about another headline-making event at Madison Square Garden

“The new season is just a couple of weeks away, and I’ve gotta say it’s going to be pretty cool to be back at Madison Square Garden,” Brunson said.

“Looking around like, ‘Wow, just a few weeks ago this was the exact spot where Taylor and Travis got married.’”

He then shifted his attention to Stephen A. Smith, with cast member Kenan Thompson appearing on stage to deliver an impression of the ESPN star.

“I would say the most satisfying part of winning the title is thinking about all the people who doubted me along the way,” Brunson said.

“And tonight I finally get some closure. I invited one of my biggest doubters out here to apologize to my face. Stephen A. Smith.”

After Thompson completed his Smith impression, Brunson asked, “Sorry Stephen, how long’s this gonna go?” The response: “About another seven minutes…”

“Yeah, forget it,” Brunson replied, ushering him away from the stage before turning to “audience questions” from members of the Knicks’ starting five.

Viewers were split over Brunson’s performance. Many felt his teammates Josh Hart, Karl-Anthony Towns, Mikal Bridges and OG Anunoby—who joined him on stage to close the monologue—appeared more comfortable in front of the cameras.

Brunson's Knicks teammates were in the audience and involved in his opening monologue

Brunson’s Knicks teammates watched from the audience before joining the monologue

Brunson led the Knicks to the NBA Championship earlier this year in dramatic circumstances

Brunson guided the Knicks to a dramatic NBA championship earlier this year

The Knicks star’s SNL debut divided viewers as he ventured beyond his usual basketball setting

‘That monologue just proved that KAT would have been a better choice than Brunson,’ one viewer wrote, as another said: ‘jalen brunson is lowkey the worst knicks player to host #snl he just ain’t that funny.’

‘tbh the rest of the Knicks starting 5 seem more comfortable on the show than Brunson,’ one commented. 

Anunoby earned praise with a post saying: ‘OG having more swag than Jalen Brunson in the opening monologue is the funniest SNL moment in a minute.’ 

Others criticized Brunson’s monologue and noticed his apparent nerves as he laughed while trying to deliver his jokes on a number of occasions.  

A different post said: ‘The Jalen Brunson monologue was… as expected. I think his voice cracked. And who did his makeup? That said? The other NY Knicks were perfect.’

‘The Brunson monologue sucked,’ read one comment, and another said: ‘Jalen Brunson maybe one of the worst SNL hosts I’ve ever seen.’

Even some fans weren’t impressed with one writing: ‘I genuinely would take a bullet for Jalen Brunson. But this is unwatchable and SNL has so outlived its purposefulness.’

Another concluded: ‘Jalen Brunson opening monologue is somehow worse than I thought it’d be’ as a further post said: ‘Jalen brunson gave maybe the worst monologue in snl history ive never seen a man with less charisma.’

But plenty of viewers, especially Knicks fans, loved seeing him on their TV screens in a different capacity.  

‘Brunson is great at everything. Even acting,’ said one. Another said: ‘Jalen Brunson came to play tonight’.

Others called his opening ‘perfect’ and said: ‘Ok i cant even lie, the #SNL opening with Brunson and the rest of the Knicks was pretty f***ing funny lol.’ 

‘taylor and travis mention from Brunson and a great monologue hell yeahhhh,’ read another post. 

Another viewer concluded: ‘It’s always endearing to see guys like Brunson that are so cool under pressure in their profession get nervous on SNL. KAT and Hart are naturals though.’

Lindsay Clancy Defense Attorney Kevin Reddington Responds to Lone Holdout Juror’s Lawyer After Fiery Interview

0

PLYMOUTH, Mass. — Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, has pushed back against criticism from the lawyer representing the sole juror who wanted to convict her, accusing him of making inflammatory statements to the media.

“I think Ed ought to learn how to go into the courtroom and articulate his position rather than be a histrionic individual that’s just mouthing off for the media,” Reddington told News Media.

Reddington was responding to social media posts and a recent interview by juror attorney Edward Paltzik. Paltzik has described Reddington’s request for an investigation into the holdout juror as “a full-frontal attack on the U.S. Constitution” and a threat to the Sixth Amendment, which protects criminal defendants’ due process rights.

The defense attorney walking into court.

Defense attorney Kevin Reddington speaks to reporters as jurors deliberate in the case against Lindsay Clancy, who is charged in the 2023 deaths of her three children. (JOSEPH PREZIOSO / AFP via Getty Images)

“Every motion that has been filed is legitimate,” Reddington said. “It’s all based on sound law, facts and jury questions, and I’m doing what I should do, representing Lindsay. And I’m pretty sure that Ed would have probably done the same thing, were it in Houston and he was representing his client.”

During an interview with Ray Marcel, who streams on YouTube under the name FugitiveTV, Paltzik also called for Clancy to be executed. She has not been convicted of any crime, however, and Massachusetts does not have the death penalty.

A man in a plaid shirt sits and cradles a sleeping infant wrapped in a pink blanket.

Michael P. Desronvil, the lone holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, which ended in a mistrial. (Fugitive TV)

“Ed, why don’t you just shut up?” Reddington said. “Really, you foul individual.”

Reddington said he initially did not understand Paltzik’s “Shooter McGavin” reference, but after someone explained it, he acknowledged that it was a humorous jab.

Paltzik responded Friday, making clear that he had no intention of softening his criticism.

“It’s really not complicated. I’m not backing down. I’m not backing off of it one inch. It should not be controversial at all that I called Lindsay Clancy a ‘demon.’ … She strangled her three innocent children,” he told News Media.

“My issue with Kevin Reddington is what happened after the mistrial when he got on the courthouse steps. He said Michael had an agenda. He said Michael robbed the other jurors. He said it. And you can’t do that as an officer of the court. It’s an attack on the system. And this motion to investigate him? It’s because Michael disagreed with Kevin Reddington.”

“Kevin Reddington was doing his job, but the problem is it’s off the rails now. I’m speaking as a criminal defense attorney for almost 20 years. I would never criticize a juror. And I would never file a post-trial motion to investigate a juror.”

“My real advice to Kevin — I think he should stop whining and go prepare for a retrial. Stop complaining. You only got 11, you needed 12.”

Kevin Reddington, Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney, and Clancy watch as Judge William Sullivan, who is out of frame, instructs the jury to continue deliberating during her murder trial at Plymouth County Superior Court in Plymouth, Massachusetts, on September 4, 2026. (Greg Derr / POOL / AFP via Getty Images)

Reddington also objected to the juror being characterized as the “lone holdout juror.”

“He is the obstructionist juror,” Reddington said.

The juror, identified by Paltzik as Michael Desronvil, has said he believes Clancy was guilty of murdering her three young children, Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. The children died by strangulation.

Three young Clancy children in pajamas sit together on a couch, the smiling baby resting against his older brother, with their sister beside them.

Callan, left, Dawson and Cora Clancy. The three children were killed at their home in Duxbury, Massachusetts, in January 2023. (Lindsay Marie Clancy/Facebook)

The other 11 jurors disagreed and favored finding Clancy not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect. Their position matched Reddington’s defense, which argued that Clancy was experiencing postpartum psychosis and was not criminally responsible for her actions.

Due to the deadlock, Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on Sept. 4 after a week of deliberations. Clancy is due back in court Tuesday for a hearing on several defense motions. Prosecutors may also announce plans to seek a second trial.

Lindsay Clancy and Patrick Clancy in an undated photo. Lindsay is pregnant in the photo.

On January 24, 2023, Clancy fatally strangled her three children in the basement of their Duxbury, Massachusetts, home using exercise resistance bands. She then cut her wrists and neck and jumped from a second-story window in a suicide attempt, leaving her partially paralyzed. (Greg Derr/Pool/The Patriot Ledger)

Reddington, in a motion filed last week, called for a “limited inquiry” into the holdout, for information about his background and potential criminal history, phone records, courthouse surveillance video and more.

In a separate filing, another attorney for Clancy, Martin Weinberg, argued that Sullivan’s decision to overrule a defense objection at trial should be grounds for dismissing the charges against the 36-year-old defendant on double jeopardy grounds. That motion also centered on the holdout juror and allegations that he ignored the judge’s instructions and the law.

Lindsay Clancy's husband, Patrick Clancy leaves court

Patrick Clancy exits Plymouth Superior Court, Plymouth, Mass., Monday, July27, 2026. (David McGlynn for News Media)

“The jury twice informed the Court that one of its members was refusing to apply the Court’s instructions regarding the fundamental concept of reasonable doubt,” Weinberg wrote. “After the first such report, the Court asked each juror individually whether he or she was able to apply the law. Upon receiving the second report, the Court tempered its response even further, simply reminding all jurors as a group of their obligation to follow its instructions generally. The Court denied Ms. Clancy’s explicit requests to go further.”

Weinberg’s motion argued that Sullivan’s decision to declare a mistrial before investigating the holdout is improper, alleging that the jury foreperson accused the holdout of making “statements acknowledging doubt but refus[ing] to apply it to the verdict as the law states.”