Home Blog Page 311

Bali Cliff Fall: Final Moments of 29-Year-Old Australian Tourist

0

An Australian tourist spent her final moments clinging to a steep rock face about 80 metres above the ground after falling at one of Bali’s best-known cliff sites, before a second fall proved fatal.

Brianna Cronin, 29, an ecologist travelling alone, died on Saturday morning at Kelingking Beach on Nusa Penida, an Indonesian island near Bali.

The dramatic coastal formation, famed for its resemblance to the head of a giant Tyrannosaurus Rex, is among Bali’s most recognisable sights and draws thousands of international visitors each year.

The University of Queensland graduate had been making her way along the notoriously steep, narrow trail to the landmark when she slipped on loose rocks and became stranded on the southern side of the cliff.

Another tourist saw Ms Cronin precariously stuck on a ledge beneath the path. She was unable to climb back to the track and was too far above the beach to make her way down.

It remains unclear whether she had been injured in the initial fall. The tourist notified a local lifeguard monitoring the rugged beach below at about 7.45am.

Rescuers were preparing a plan to reach Ms Cronin when she fell again as she waited for help. She landed on the sand at Kelingking Beach and died at the scene after suffering multiple fractures in the fall down the rocky cliff.

The route down to the beach has previously been described as a “death trap” and an “accident waiting to happen”.

Brianna Lani Cronin (above) died on the Indonesian island of Nusa Penida on Saturday

Brianna Lani Cronin (pictured) died on the Indonesian island of Nusa Penida on Saturday.

Emergency crews attend the scene on the beach after the fatal fall

Emergency crews at the beach following the fatal fall.

Another tourist had spotted Ms Cronin stranded on the cliff face before she fell a second time, landing on the beach

Another tourist had spotted Ms Cronin stranded on the cliff face before she fell a second time, landing on the beach

‘The views are spectacular but it is downright dangerous and irresponsibly managed,’ one visitor wrote on Tripadvisor in 2019.

‘At least half of the ”path” is sheer, vertical drops, requiring climbing, hanging, and holding on to broken side rails made literally of sticks and bamboo. 

‘Should you twist your ankle or break something you’d be in serious trouble, let alone how easy it would be to tumble through the ”side rails” and drop straight down the side of a cliff.

‘Beautiful as it is, this attraction is going to make headlines for all the wrong reasons if responsible action is not taken soon.’

Another traveller, in a video posted to TikTok in 2024, issued a stark warning to anyone considering attempting a hike to Nusa Penida’s famous beaches.

‘My number one tip for Diamond Beach, Nusa Penida, is do not do the climb down,’ she wrote.

‘There have been numerous deaths over the years. The last part is actually so hard to get onto the beach that after climbing down for 40 minutes we had to turn around and climb back up.’

Local authorities in recent years had constructed the metal framework for a large elevator between the top of the cliff and beach, but construction was called off in 2025 following concerns over the impact to nature and increased tourist numbers.

An aerial view of Kelingking Beach and the surrounding 'T-rex' cliffs

An aerial view of Kelingking Beach and the surrounding ‘T-rex’ cliffs

Rescuers had to carry Ms Cronin's body up the notoriously dangerous stairs

Rescuers had to carry Ms Cronin’s body up the notoriously dangerous stairs

A large lift was built between the clifftop and sand to safely carry visitors down, but construction was called off and it has been largely dismantled since

A large lift was built between the clifftop and sand to safely carry visitors down, but construction was called off and it has been largely dismantled since

The base of the abandoned lift could be seen in the background as emergency crews and tourists carried Ms Cronin's body back up the treacherous track

The base of the abandoned lift could be seen in the background as emergency crews and tourists carried Ms Cronin’s body back up the treacherous track

It is not the first fatal fall at the site which is infamous for it's dangerous hike to the beach

It is not the first fatal fall at the site which is infamous for it’s dangerous hike to the beach

Rescuers on Saturday spent about 90 minutes carrying Ms Cronin’s body back up the cliff to an awaiting ambulance.

An earlier attempt to remove her body by boat had to be abandoned due to large and dangerous swells.

She was later taken to Griya Penida Medical Clinic.

The recovery operation involved Indonesia’s Search-and-Rescue Agency, the Indonesian Navy, police, lifeguards, tourists, and local residents.

The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade is assisting Ms Cronin’s family.

‘We send our deepest condolences to the family at this difficult time,’ a spokesperson said.

Queensland Premier David Crisafulli on Sunday said he was heartbroken for those who knew Ms Cronin. 

‘A young woman on the trip of a lifetime, active and enjoying herself, and to have her life taken away in a heartbeat like that is incredibly sad,’ he said.

Ms Cronin’s body will be repatriated to Australia.

Jorgie Porter Reveals Pregnancy Insomnia and 3am Hunger Struggles

Jorgie Porter has shared an honest glimpse at life during her second pregnancy, showing off her growing bump while opening up about sleepless nights.

The 36-year-old Hollyoaks actress, who is expecting baby number two with her fiancé Ollie Piotrowski, posted a series of Instagram photos on Monday chronicling her pregnancy journey.

In one mirror selfie, Jorgie wore a dark cropped hoodie with low-rise tracksuit bottoms, leaving her bare baby bump on display.

Another image showed the soap favourite sitting on the stairs at home with her 17-month-old son Forest, whom she shares with property mogul Ollie.

Alongside the candid snaps, the actress said pregnancy insomnia has left her exhausted — and unexpectedly hungry in the middle of the night.

Jorgie Porter displayed her bare baby bump in a cropped hoodie as she detailed her battle with pregnancy insomnia

Jorgie Porter showed off her bare baby bump in a cropped hoodie while speaking candidly about pregnancy insomnia

The actress, 36, revealed in the caption that she has been 'starving' in the middle of the night while she is suffering from 'insomnia'

The 36-year-old actress said she has been waking up starving during the night as she deals with sleeplessness

Jorgie also shared a late-night selfie while eating what she described as an “emergency” slice of jam on toast at 3am.

She wrote: “My feed was looking pretty perfect, so here’s a bit of reality. For some reason, over the last few weeks, even though I’m exhausted, I can’t sleep.

“On top of that, Forest has been waking up in the night, which is so unlike him, and then when he’s finally back to sleep, I get hungry!”

‘I mean… starving. Emergency 3am jam on toast and yep I’ve not washed my face. Pregnancy insomnia, who knew that was even a thing. July – be kind.’

The actress also shared a glamorous selfie of her and Ollie in the back of a car as they headed on a date night in Manchester. 

In another picture, Jorgie cradled her growing bump as she donned a stylish white long sleeved minidress and sandals.

The actress announced she was expecting her second child during an episode of her ITVBe show Drama Queens at the end of May. 

Jorgie told the camera: ‘So guys… guess what? I am pregnant.’ 

She revealed in the caption that she has been 'starving' in the middle of the night at the minute as she suffers from 'insomnia'

She revealed in the caption that she has been ‘starving’ in the middle of the night at the minute as she suffers from ‘insomnia’

The Hollyoaks star who is expecting her second child with fiancé Ollie Piotrowski, shared a gallery of pictures on Instagram on Monday as she documented her pregnancy so far

The Hollyoaks star who is expecting her second child with fiancé Ollie Piotrowski, shared a gallery of pictures on Instagram on Monday as she documented her pregnancy so far 

In another snap the star, who already shares son Forest, 17 months with Ollie, was seen sitting on her staircase at home posing with her son

In another snap the star, who already shares son Forest, 17 months with Ollie, was seen sitting on her staircase at home posing with her son

The actress also shared a glamorous selfie of her and property mogul Ollie in the back of a car as they headed on a date night in Manchester

The actress also shared a glamorous selfie of her and property mogul Ollie in the back of a car as they headed on a date night in Manchester

Jorgie and her fiancé, who welcomed Forest in December 2022, later added a sweet post to Instagram confirming the happy news.

‘We’ve been keeping a little secret,’ the couple posted, alongside a video of the couple, Forest and their pet dog uncovering an ultrasound photo.

Jorgie previously miscarried five babies after falling pregnant with quadruplets in 2021 – and suffered another loss when she was six weeks pregnant before having Forest.

The star added during her reveal to camera on Drama Queens: ‘I am a little bit moody, not full mood.’

She is then seen chatting to Ollie about it and asked if he was excited, to which he said he was but quickly added: ‘And scared.’

‘Lets just hope and pray, it is one healthy extra, and then I am booking into the clinic.’

On a previous episode of Drama Queens, Jorgie explained that while she was keen to think about having more kids, her partner was more hesitant because of what they have been through. 

‘For me, talking about babies, I’m like “yes, let’s”,’ she said. ‘But Oliver, it’s a bit more of a tentative subject because he obviously knows the past situations, what we went through, also the risks.

‘I was high risk. I could have literally died, and the doctors were telling him that… Oh, I get sad, because I think about him. Also, I’ve got no one else to talk to about it.’ 

In August 2021,  the couple discovered during their 14-week scan that Jorgie had lost the quadruplets they had conceived naturally and in February they learnt of their second miscarriage at six weeks into the pregnancy – on the day of their engagement party. 

The former I’m a Celebrity… Get Me Out of Here! contestant explained that she has never met anyone in her situation before.

But, she is perhaps ‘more upset’ about her pregnancy losses now as she mourns what she could have had.

She said: ‘Because I’ve had no one go through… I never met another quad mum, and I’m actually probably a bit more upset for the loss of them now.

‘Whereas at the time, it made more sense, but… it’s… when you think, ‘aw, there could have been a football team.’

Jorgie began playing Theresa McQueen in Hollyoaks in 2008 and left the role in 2016, but returned in 2020 and has been on-screen since. 

Jorgie and Ollie confirmed they were expecting their second child during a TV appearance in late May (pictured at the BAFTAs on May 12)

Jorgie and Ollie confirmed they were expecting their second child during a TV appearance in late May (pictured at the BAFTAs on May 12) 

Kimi Antonelli Wins Spanish GP After Lando Norris Drama

0

Whenever a crack of daylight appears in the Formula One title race, Kimi Antonelli seems to slam it shut. Just as the prospect of a genuine world championship battle begins to emerge, the Italian finds a way to snuff it out.

His latest display of that championship-clinching instinct came in Madrid, where Antonelli won a race that appeared to be slipping well beyond his reach.

Lando Norris was the man left to rue his luck, finishing third behind Max Verstappen. The Briton had controlled the Spanish Grand Prix at the capital’s gleaming new circuit, converting a superb pole position into a lead of more than six seconds over the 20-year-old Antonelli within the opening 15 laps.

McLaren’s upgraded car is plainly quick, underlining how well Andrea Stella’s technically astute and methodical team has interpreted the demands of Formula One’s new regulations.

Norris looked set for his third victory in four races, driving with considerably more assurance than Antonelli, who ran off track at least twice while trying to keep hold of second. Then the race turned decisively in the championship leader’s favour.

The pivotal moment arrived when Lance Stroll’s Aston Martin hit the wall, with his brakes seemingly overheated. A virtual safety car was deployed, but Norris had already passed the pit-lane entry. Antonelli had not. He was summoned for a stop and benefited from the reduced-speed conditions while Stroll’s damaged car was removed.

Kimi Antonelli celebrates on the podium after winning a race he never should have done

Kimi Antonelli celebrates on the podium after claiming a victory that had appeared unlikely

A stroke of fortune fell the Italian's way as he strengthened his grip on the championship

A timely slice of fortune helped the Italian tighten his grip on the world championship

Lando Norris had been leading the way before making a mess of a change of rubber

Lando Norris had led comfortably before a costly error during his tyre change

A lap later, Norris was brought in for fresh tyres, only for McLaren’s stop to drag on for a painful 7.0 seconds. It was a costly shambles. The world champion rejoined in fifth, 13 seconds behind Antonelli. In Formula One, fortunes can change in an instant.

Norris’s chances were extinguished in that brief phase of the race, and it is the Italian who is edging by degrees towards the world title at the youngest age ever, even eclipsing the then 23-year-old Sebastian Vettel. And this in only his second season.

Before us, the truths of Formula One are being redrawn. The old verity that experience counts and you must bide your time is being ripped up as never before.

Antonelli has won eight times this campaign, including unforgettably at Monza a week ago in front of his home crowd. He was cheered and rhapsodised, though his success was in a way only compensation for the partisans after Ferrari performed disappointingly.

He has also gained from the affection and favours of his Mercedes team, from boss Toto Wolff down (my assertion, which they deny). Poor George Russell is hardly the chosen one there. But, it has to be admitted, that in all racing teams love is lavished on the faster of every given pair, and that character is the man-child called Kimi. Russell has won just twice in 2026.

Mercedes believe they have found their star, their future, and who can say they are wrong? Antonelli certainly looks unbeatable this season. The arithmetic supports the assertion. His lead over Russell, who finished fifth, is 81 points with nine rounds remaining.

As for Norris? He is 106 points adrift, which leaves him with an uphill task almost as steep as the North Ridge of Everest.

And Lewis Hamilton, who retired six laps in with brake problems, is barely better placed 101 off the summit. Ferrari are too error-prone and Hamilton is not quite as good as he once was – though he is admittedly rejuvenated this season compared to last – and it will be tough for him to scale the eighth world title he wants to leave as his lifetime’s mark.

He clashed with Verstappen on the opening lap. Verstappen passed Hamilton and clawed his way into second place. ‘He has to give the place back,’ implored the Briton.

Verstappen countered: ‘He was out of control.’

Red Bull told Verstappen to yield. He has never been known to pull out of an arm wrestle, and he gave his race engineer and pal Gianpiero Lambiase a blast of industrial language. ‘Mate, what the f*** are you guys going on about? We would have shunted.’

After the tough talk, he yielded. But, in a boring race, pretty much devoid of overtaking, Verstappen did hand the place back. But soon Hamilton was plummeting down the field with his technical problems.

‘I hit the brake, the car started stopping and then the pedal took a step and, all of a sudden, the car didn’t decelerate as fast as it would normally,’ explained Hamilton.

Charles Leclerc got the other Ferrari home in fourth place, having led for a long period prior to his late stop. Antonelli resumed the lead, coming home 4.3sec ahead of runner-up Verstappen. Norris harried his pal to the line, just 0.7sec back, in taking the final podium place.

The last words here centre on Antonelli. ‘Beautiful work, an absolute masterclass,’ eulogised Peter Bonnington, his race engineer.

‘Bono’, once the voice in Hamilton’s ear during his glory days, is chivvying his new student all the way to what now seems to be an inevitable title a few months out of his teens.

Bill Maher Blasts Media’s Terrorism Debate on 9/11

0

Bill Maher took aim at news media’s evolving approach to the term “terrorism” during Friday night’s Real Time With Bill Maher, arguing that the language surrounding the word has become unnecessarily fraught.

The HBO host devoted part of his September 11 broadcast — airing on the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks that claimed 2,977 lives — to examining how public and journalistic terminology has shifted in the decades since.

“There was a war on terror, and we won. And yet, so much has changed since 9/11. For example, back then, we were against the terrorists,” Maher said in the “New Rule” segment that closed the episode.

Maher specifically criticized media organizations and journalism groups that have advised reporters to use caution with the word “terrorism,” citing concerns that it may be politically charged or emotionally loaded.

“Now a lot of media outlets don’t even want you to say the ‘T-word’ on the 25th anniversary,” Maher said, referring to guidance from journalism associations that he said recommended placing terrorism in quotation marks because of its political and emotional weight.

Maher’s answer to that advice was characteristically blunt.

“Yes, so is the World Cup, but we don’t put soccer in quotes,” he quipped.

He then displayed an image of the 19 hijackers responsible for the September 11 attacks.

“They shared something. Oh, let’s call it a worldview — and it wasn’t astrology,” Maher said.

The comedian also cited the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, which had advised journalists not to characterize the 9/11 attacks as terrorism before subsequently withdrawing that guidance.

“What should we call it then — unruly passengers,” Maher joked.

“A wrong turn, taken at the Chrysler Building,” he added, prompting applause from the audience.

He wasn’t finished. Maher also singled out the BBC for its argument that calling someone a terrorist can be a “barrier rather than an aide to understanding.”

“You know, it’s really a barrier to understanding lying,” Maher said.

Maher did not make clear during the segment which U.S. news associations he was referring to.

The terminology is the subject of an ongoing debate in journalism. The Poynter Institute has outlined several approaches to using the word “terrorism,” particularly when authorities themselves have used the term.

The Associated Press Stylebook, for example, states that “AP generally avoids labeling someone a ‘terrorist’ on its own, preferring to cite competent law enforcement officials or other credible authorities. Instead, we describe the specific actions we are reporting on and what we know about the perpetrators’ motives.”

For Maher, though, the debate over terminology was another opportunity to revisit how dramatically the conversation around terrorism has shifted since 9/11.

And, naturally, to make a few jokes about it along the way.

You can watch the full segment above and catch new episodes of Real Time with Bill Maher on Fridays at 10:00 p.m. ET on HBO.

5 Notorious Box Office Flops Turning 40 in 2026

0

The domestic box office generated $3.065 billion in 1986, fueled by blockbuster successes including “Top Gun,” “Crocodile Dundee,” “Aliens,” and “Down and Out in Beverly Hills.” Yet a look back at the year’s top earners reveals that many have not maintained the cultural staying power of the genre favorites released in 1982. In the 2020s, for instance, audiences are far less likely to encounter GIFs or frequently repeated quotes from “Down and Out in Beverly Hills.”

Even if not every major 1986 release has endured as a cherished classic, the year produced no shortage of commercial winners, including the still-revered “Aliens.” But every prosperous movie year also has its flops, and 1986 was no different. Several films crashed at the box office despite ambitious creative goals and apparent studio faith, leaving behind five especially notable examples of the year’s financial low points amid a marketplace packed with hits.

No single factor doomed these 1986 releases, though competition from the year’s biggest films played a role for many of them. Nearly four decades after they debuted, however, each title remains fascinating for the unusual path it took at the box office.

Big Trouble in Little China

John Carpenter may be best known for his horror classics, but his work has stretched across a wide range of genres. His 1986 standout, “Big Trouble in Little China,” is a lively adventure packed with a wonderfully himbo Kurt Russell performance, impressive practical effects, and exhilarating set pieces. It has all the ingredients of an immediate crowdpleaser, yet when it first arrived in theaters, “Big Trouble in Little China” barely registered with moviegoers.

Today, “Big Trouble in Little China” stands as one of the ’80s box office bombs most deserving of rediscovery. Despite opening over the favorable Fourth of July weekend, it earned only $11.1 million during its initial domestic run. The film was overwhelmed by fierce summer 1986 competition, particularly “Top Gun” and “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off,” while its more elaborate premise—both a subversion and an expansion of classic adventure-movie conventions—may have made it harder to sell.

Carpenter had also faced similar struggles with earlier movies, most notably his other Russell collaboration, “The Thing,” which initially failed to catch on theatrically. His films have often required audiences to catch up with them over time. Considering its enormous popularity today, “Big Trouble in Little China” clearly did eventually find the audience it missed in 1986.

The Transformers: The Movie

Aside from recent disappointments such as “Transformers One” bombing at the box office, 21st-century “Transformers” films have generally been reliable moneymakers. Even installments containing some of the franchise’s most questionable material, including the cringe-inducing Romeo & Juliet scene in “Transformers: Age of Extinction,” surpassed $1 billion worldwide. Since 2007’s “Transformers,” the eight theatrical “Transformers” movies have combined for more than $5.4 billion globally. Those enormous numbers make it all the more startling that the Autobots and Decepticons first encountered major financial trouble when they reached the big screen.

Released in 1986, “The Transformers: The Movie” brought in just $5.84 million worldwide, an embarrassing total that placed it 99th among the year’s domestic releases. Its North American haul fell behind both “My Little Pony: The Movie” and “Care Bears Movie II: A New Generation.” While the “Transformers” television series was hugely popular, this theatrical feature came from an independent distributor and opened during a year crowded with toy-based movies, leaving it little room to gain traction. The controversy surrounding the death of Optimus Prime (Peter Cullen) also did no favors for word-of-mouth.

Fortunately for the companies behind the later live-action “Transformers” films, subsequent adaptations of the franchise became vastly more profitable—and, unfortunately, far more problematic—than “The Transformers: The Movie.”

King Kong Lives

King Kong’s screen history extends well beyond the landmark 1933 original and the various 21st-century reimaginings. A 1976 remake starring Jessica Lange and Jeff Bridges brought the giant ape’s story into the then-modern era, with Kong climbing the World Trade Center rather than the Empire State Building. Although it was an expensive production, “King Kong” turned a profit, inevitably prompting efforts to find new ways to capitalize on the property.

While today “Kong: Skull Island” was followed up by “Godzilla vs. Kong” just four years later (which would’ve been sooner if it weren’t for COVID-19-induced delays), it took ten years for the 1976 “King Kong” to get a follow-up. 1986’s “King Kong Lives” hailed from the De Laurentiis Entertainment Group and saw the titular ape getting resurrected and falling in love with a female member of his species. Grossing only $4.7 million domestically on a $10 million budget, “King Kong Lives” was a mighty flop that’s box office fate was sealed by how long it’d been since its predecessor.

Certain films, like “Zootopia” or “The Terminator,” can withstand lengthy gaps between sequels. 1976’s “King Kong” wasn’t remotely such a title. Throw in the cheeseball “King Kong Lives” premise and of course audience apathy killed this beast at the box office.

Labyrinth

Today, Jim Henson’s “Labyrinth” is unquestionably popular and beloved. Comic conventions all over the world are crammed full of cosplayers dressed as David Bowie’s Jareth. Prolific museum exhibits offer a chance to witness the beautiful handmade artistry that went into it. The lyrics to the original “Labyrinth” tune “Magic Dance” are second-nature to countless theater kids. However, when it first came out, “Labyrinth” didn’t just miss the mark at the box office. It was a colossal failure that stood in sharp contrast to the many instant hits Henson had been associated with throughout his career.

“Labyrinth” got a cushy launch before 1986 4th of July weekend and with marketing materials promising tangible spectacle. However, over its opening weekend, it debuted to a disastrous $3.54 million, coming in behind the third weekend gross of “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off.”  The eventual 4th of July holiday and summer weekdays only got “Labyrinth” to $13.15 million worldwide, an anemic gross given its $25 million budget. That summer, audiences were more invested in stories firmly rooted in reality like “Ferris Bueller” and “Top Gun” as opposed to titles promising to sweep people off to fantasy worlds.

Its initially mixed reviews also didn’t help “Labyrinth” convince 1986 audiences to take a chance on something so original and tonally complex. That initial grim financial outcome for “Labyrinth” would be incomprehensible to modern audiences who know the movie as a beloved cult classic. 

Howard the Duck

“To this duck, we say a toast/So get to bumpin’ off of his case/No, he got too good to roast/’Cause he saved the human race.” So goes the lyrics in the shockingly catchy “Howard the Duck” song from the movie of the same name crooned by the fictional in-universe band Dolby’s Cube. Alas, having “saved the human race” wasn’t enough to get general audiences invested in seeing “Howard the Duck” in theaters. This infamous misfire wasn’t just a financial disappointment, but became one of those ’80s bombs that changed Hollywood forever.

Costing $37 million to make, “Howard the Duck” only made $37.96 million worldwide, including a dismal $16.29 million domestically. Despite wielding such a major price tag and hailing from producer George Lucas, “Howard the Duck” didn’t come close to winning over audiences who were clamoring to see summer holdovers like “Aliens” and “Top Gun.” To boot, “Howard the Duck” received absolutely awful reviews, with many critics instantly claiming it as one of the worst movies of all time. Everywhere “Howard the Duck” looked, further bad news emerged.

While several summer 1986 films bit the dust financially, few were as embarrassing as “Howard the Duck.” After all, what other summer 1986 box office dud got a Universal Studios executive fired while casting a toxic reputation over live-action Marvel movies for over a decade?

Meghan Markle, Prince Harry and Their Children Embrace British Country Life in New Video

0

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have offered a glimpse of their family’s British countryside routine, with a new Instagram video showing the couple and their children enjoying muddy puddles, woodland walks and time outdoors with their dogs.

The cheerful footage marks the first time Harry and Meghan have been seen together in Britain since their return. Shared through Meghan’s social media, the clips capture a series of relaxed moments with their young family.

In one scene, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex walk hand in hand through the woods in Wellington boots. Meghan turns towards the camera — thought to be held by one of the children — and calls out: “Come on, you!”

Princess Lilibet, five, appears beside a fire warming her bare feet as she hums happily. The video then cuts to a muddy puddle, where boots believed to belong to seven-year-old Archie splash into view.

Another shot shows Lilibet riding a pink, tasselled bicycle, complete with a doll seated in a rear chair, along a park track towards a small group of deer.

“Archie!” Harry can be heard calling as his son runs into frame wearing a pink shirt and blue wellies.

Meghan and Harry are shown walking in wellingtons through the woods, with Meghan beckoning to the camera, presumably held by one of the children, and saying 'Come on, you!'

Meghan and Harry walk through woodland in Wellington boots, with Meghan gesturing towards the camera, believed to be held by one of their children, and saying: “Come on, you!”

Lilibet on a pink tasselled bicycle fitted with a dolly in its chair on the back, rides towards a group of deer across a track in a park while her brother Archie runs ahead

Lilibet rides a pink tasselled bike, with a doll secured in the rear seat, towards deer on a park track as her brother Archie runs ahead.

Next is a family fishing trip accompanied by their Labrador Pula. 'I got this', says Archie in what appears to be an American accent

The family also enjoy a fishing outing with their Labrador, Pula. “I got this,” Archie says, apparently with an American accent.

The montage later features the family’s Labrador, Pula, racing along a fern-lined woodland path as Wham!’s Wake Me Up Before You Go-Go begins playing over the video.

Cut to the next scene, and the family is sitting in a rowboat in a mirror-like lake, with Harry fixing up a hook on a fishing rod, with Pula playing on the banks.

Archie is heard saying, ‘I got this’ in a distinctly American accent as fish writhe around in the lake waters.

The video – posted on Meghan’s Instagram account – has a Union Flag and red heart emoji side by side throughout, in place of a post caption.

The couple has recently said they are ‘happy to be back’ in the UK, and the children have started at school already.

This is in spite of their swirling row with Buckingham Palace over Uganda’s withdrawal from the Invictus Games.

Insiders close to the couple say that their exit was a ‘direct result’ of a letter written by King Charles, which insisted they are ‘private citizens’.

Charles’s letter made it clear that while the family was back in the country, they were not back in the Firm.

There had been talks that they would have a ‘half in, half out’ arrangement on their return, but it appears that this will not be the case.

The Sussexes had left the UK six years ago to enjoy personal and financial freedom in the US but moved back just over a fortnight ago.

A bitter argument has existed between the breakaway family and the Royals back home after it was decided that they would not be allowed to have police security when visiting the UK, as they were no longer working royals.

The Duke of Sussex has reportedly ‘privately pleaded’ with Shabana Mahmood for a decision on whether or not he is getting funding for security for his family. 

Prince Harry said last year he was ready to ‘reconcile’ with his family and that the issue of police protection was the last remaining ‘sticking point’ in the feud. 

Princess Lilibet, 5, is seen warming her little bare feet next to the fire, humming contentedly

Princess Lilibet, 5, is seen warming her little bare feet next to the fire, humming contentedly

Meanwhile, Labrador Pula is seen trekking through a dappled wooded path

Meanwhile, Labrador Pula is seen trekking through a dappled wooded path

Splashing fish beneath the royal rods as Archie commentates, determined to reel them in

Splashing fish beneath the royal rods as Archie commentates, determined to reel them in

However, Harry and Meghan’s autumn diary still appears to be heavily laden. Harry is due to have a pseudo-royal appearance at the inaugural ‘Invictus Spirit’ Awards on Thursday, September 17.

There is even chatter that the duchess could join him at this glitzy event.

It has caused a major clash in the royal calendar with William and Catherine’s ‘royal away-day’ visit to the Isle of Bute on the same day, announced on Friday.

The King has a major public engagement at the same time, as it was announced that he would attend a meeting with global AI chiefs in hopes that it could be developed for ‘the good of humanity’.

Other engagements for Harry this month include the launch of the Invictus education programme INSPIRE. Afterwards, there’s the WellChild Awards in London on September 21, a charity for ill children and their families, which the prince has been involved with since his earliest days as a working royal.

Meanwhile, Meghan has been mulling over a ‘return to charity work’ once Archie and Lilibet settle into their new life.

There have also been rumours that she would return to acting after Guy Ritchie offered her a role in his hit TV show The Gentlemen, which was quickly revoked following massive backlash against the decision.

Trump Urges Ukraine to Halt Diesel Strikes Over Shortages

0

KYIV, Ukraine — U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to stop targeting Russian diesel supplies, saying Ukraine’s strikes were contributing to a fuel shortage in Russia.

Trump was asked by a reporter whether he had spoken with Zelenskyy after his recent conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Rather than directly addressing the question, Trump used the exchange to call on Zelenskyy to end attacks on targets in Russia.

“Mr. Zelensky has to do one thing. He has to stop knocking out diesel fuel in Russia,” Trump told reporters on the sidelines of the Irish Open at his Doonbeg golf club.

“Let him go after targets but not diesel fuel, because he’s causing a shortage of diesel fuel.”

For months, Ukraine has used long-range strikes to hit Russia’s oil and gas sector, which Kyiv says helps finance and directly support Moscow’s invasion, now more than four years old.

Ukraine’s drone campaign has led to fuel rationing in parts of Russia, despite the country’s status as a major exporter of oil and gas. Kyiv has also struck major Russian online retailers, bringing the effects of the war closer to the Russian public.

Russia, meanwhile, has intensified its aerial assault on Ukraine in recent weeks, deploying ballistic missiles and jet-powered drones in efforts to overwhelm Ukrainian air defenses. Moscow has targeted Ukraine’s power grid ahead of winter, in attacks Ukrainian officials say are intended to weaken civilian morale.

Civilians were killed and wounded overnight into Sunday as Russia and Ukraine exchanged large-scale drone attacks.

Local officials said two people were killed and 14 injured near an oil and industrial center in Russia’s Tatarstan region. In Ukraine, authorities reported that Russian drones struck the Black Sea port city of Odesa and ignited a fire near a border crossing with Poland.

Ukraine targets more Russian oil facilities

The two Russian civilians died after a drone slammed into a tree near their parked car in the city of Nizhnekamsk, according to the office of regional head Rustam Minnikhanov.

Nizhnekamsk houses a key cluster of oil refineries and petrochemical, rubber and polymer plants, including some of Russia’s largest facilities of their kind. Mayor Radmir Belyaev said that a fire had broken out at an unspecified “enterprise.”

Ukraine also claimed on Sunday to have hit a major oil refinery in Slavyansk-on-Kuban, in Russia’s Krasnodar region, across from Crimea. The Defense Intelligence of Ukraine (DIU) agency said its drones struck a key oil processing unit and the refinery’s tank farm overnight.

Krasnodar authorities said the strike on “an enterprise” in Slavyansk-on-Kuban injured three people, damaged an oil pipeline and started a blaze. They did not directly respond to the Ukrainian claims.

Russian forces shot down 389 Ukrainian drones during the night, Russia’s defense ministry said Sunday.

Russia targets Odesa and western Ukraine

At least nine people were injured in a “massive” Russian nighttime attack on Odesa, according to Serhii Lysak, who heads the city’s military administration. The city is home to Ukraine’s main port hub on the Black Sea and has for months faced sustained drone and missile strikes, with Kyiv accusing Moscow of trying to choke off its exports.

Russian strikes also pounded western Ukraine throughout the night, though there were no immediate reports of casualties. One drone struck near the Yahodyn-Dorohusk border crossing with Poland, setting fire to a petrol station, according to Ukraine’s top diplomat and a spokesperson for the local customs force.

“This is Putin’s terror ‘knocking’ directly on the doors of the EU and NATO. Russian barbarians are at your gate, dear partners,” Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha wrote in a post on X.

Ukraine’s border crossings with Poland are a conduit for a large proportion of the military and humanitarian aid sent into the country by Western allies.

Valentyna Chernysh, a spokesperson for the Volyn Customs Office, told The Associated Press that the Yahodyn crossing was intact and no one was harmed.

Earlier this week, two people died when Russian drones hit the Starokozache border crossing between Ukraine and Moldova on Tuesday. The following day a “direct threat” to a Polish-Ukrainian crossing point was avoided due to the cooperation between Warsaw and Kyiv, according to Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk.

Tusk gave no further details of the incident on Wednesday, or any evidence of Russian involvement. But he warned of potential intensified provocations by Moscow at border crossings between Ukraine and Europe.

Ukraine’s air force said its air defenses shot down or suppressed 409 Russian drones of various types overnight, including a newer jet-powered version that is faster and more difficult to intercept. It said Russia had attacked Ukraine with 453 drones in total.

Kremlin says peace talks could restart in October

Also on Sunday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Moscow is open to restarting peace talks in autumn featuring Russia, Ukraine and the U.S.

“We are not ruling out that possibility. We are specifically talking about the foreseeable future. That is, October cannot be ruled out,” Peskov told reporters.

Last weekend, U.S. envoys Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff held talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow, followed by a meeting with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Kyiv. Despite the latest diplomatic push, the core demands of Moscow and Kyiv remain mutually exclusive, especially over territorial concessions.

Copyright © 2026 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

Mysterious New Condition Leaves Doctors Seeking Answers

0

Manchester United vs Manchester City: Premier League Live Updates

0

All eyes on Manchester

Football occasions do not come much bigger than this.

When the fixtures are released, supporters immediately circle a handful of blockbuster dates — and the Manchester derby is always at the very top of that list.

The wait for kick-off has felt especially long this week, such is the anticipation around covering this match. If the remote-control time travel from Click existed, fast-forwarding straight to the opening whistle would have been tempting.

This latest Manchester United vs Manchester City showdown also arrives at the start of a fresh chapter for both clubs. Michael Carrick leads United’s red half of the city, while Enzo Maresca is now in charge across town at City.

For the first time in a decade, Pep Guardiola will not be on the touchline for the Cityzens in a Manchester derby — a change that still feels strange. It is also possible to argue that United and City are more evenly matched in quality than they have been at any point since that previous era began.

Yet while a new era is taking shape, the enduring appeal of this rivalry remains exactly the same. The Manchester derby promises to be every bit as compelling as ever.

The anticipation is over. Let’s get underway.

epa13236489 A Fan wearing a half-and-half scarf ahead of the English Premier League match between Manchester United and Manchester City, in Manchester, Britain, 13 September 2026.  EPA/ADAM VAUGHAN EDITORIAL USE ONLY. No use with unauthorized audio, video, data, fixture lists, club/league logos, 'live' services or NFTs. Online in-match use limited to 120 images, no video emulation. No use in betting, games or single club/league/player publications.

Marshals Season 2: Release Date, Cast, Plot and Everything We Know

0

Nearly four months have passed since Marshals, Taylor Sheridan’s first Yellowstone sequel spin-off, wrapped its first season — and its finale left fans hungry for another dose of Dutton-family drama. Fortunately, Season 2 is set to arrive sooner than viewers may expect.

As a quick recap, Kayce (Luke Grimes), Mo (Mo Brings Plenty), Cal (Logan Marshall-Green), Belle (Arielle Kebbel), Cruz (Ash Santos), Miles (Tatanka Means), and Tate (Brecken Merrill) united to take down an armed group sent to assassinate Rainwater (Gil Birmingham). By Episode 13, however, the central characters had gone their separate ways. Cruz prepared to leave for Washington, D.C.; Belle and Cal partnered on an investigation before Cal’s oncology appointment; Kayce’s connection with Dolly (Ellyn Jameson) deepened; and Tate headed to Texas for a fishing trip with Tom Weaver (Chris Mulkey), who appears poised to become Season 2’s primary villain.

With several major threads still unresolved — from romance and personal turmoil to high-stakes conflict — Marshals has plenty of ground to cover in its second season. Fans are also watching for a possible crossover with Dutton Ranch, the Yellowstone sequel spin-off starring Kelly Reilly and Cole Hauser.

Will Marshals return for Season 2 on CBS and Paramount+? When will the new season premiere, what time will episodes air, and is there a Season 2 trailer? Here’s what to know about the next chapter of Marshals, from its premiere date and preview footage to streaming details for Season 1.

Will There Be A Season 2 Of Marshals? Marshals Season 2 Renewal Status:

Yes, Marshals is officially coming back. In March 2026, ahead of the show’s third episode, CBS handed the series an early Season 2 renewal. The decision followed a blockbuster debut that CBS called the “best network TV launch since 2017” and the “most streamed CBS episode ever.”

“MARSHALS delivered a breakout performance, capturing a massive audience across platforms and quickly establishing itself as one of TV’s most powerful new series,” said Amy Reisenbach, president of CBS Entertainment. “The overwhelming viewer response speaks to the strength of the YELLOWSTONE world, the bold character-driven storytelling from the creative team and the dynamic cast performances led by Luke Grimes.”

Ash Santos as Andrea, Logan Marshall-Green as Pete Calvin, Luke Grimes as Kayce Dutton, Arielle Kebbel as Belle, and Tatanka Means as Miles

Photo: Sonja Flemming/CBS

When Does Marshals Return On CBS? Marshals Season 2 Release Date:

Marshals Season 2 debuts Sunday, October 4, 2026, on CBS and will stream on Paramount+. The official synopsis for Episode 201, “All Hat No Cattle,” reads: “When Kayce realizes Tate has been taken hostage, he goes rogue in a desperate race to save his son as the Marshals uncover a powerful criminal operation tied to the East Camp land grab. A violent showdown ensues, putting everything Kayce cares about at risk.”

When Does Season 2 Of Marshals Come Out? What Time Does Marshals Come Out?

Beginning October 11, Marshals will return to its usual Sunday slot at 8:00 p.m. ET/PT. For the Season 2 premiere on October 4, though, the series will air at 8:30 p.m. ET because of an NBC doubleheader.

What Will Marshals Season 2 Be About?

The Marshals will tackle new cases in Season 2, but the show also has no shortage of unfinished business from the Season 1 finale. Cruz was preparing to trade Montana for Washington, D.C., raising questions about how she will rejoin the team. Belle and Cal were under fire as their investigation intensified, while Kayce’s growing relationship with Dolly could move into new territory. Meanwhile, Tate’s fishing trip with Tom Weaver took a dangerous turn, leaving viewers to wonder how he will get home safely — and what Weaver plans to do next. A first look at Marshals Season 2 offers a glimpse at the turmoil ahead.

Is There A Marshals Season 2 Trailer?

Yes, a trailer has arrived. Released September 2, the action-packed Marshals Season 2 preview sets the stage for a major fight ahead. Kayce is determined to honor the Dutton legacy of “always having to fight” — for his son, his fellow Marshals, his chosen family, and his land.

When Does Dutton Ranch Season 2 Return?

While Kelly Reilly and Cole Hauser’s Yellowstone spinoff Dutton Ranch was also officially renewed for Season 2, there’s no official Dutton Ranch Season 2 premiere date on the books yet. That said, The Hollywood Reporter confirmed that “production [is] slated to begin early 2027.”

“We’re slated to start early 2027 to film,” Reilly told THR in July. “But the room starts up pretty quick. I think we’re going to be very much involved in the room, so the next sort of six months is all about writing it.”

Assuming production sticks to the predicted timeline, here’s hoping Dutton Ranch Season 2 will premiere in 2027. Stay tuned for more updates!

Based on the Season 2 trailer, we get the sense that Tate’s rescue will happen fairly quickly and perhaps not require any help from Kayce’s Texas fam, but we’ll ultimately have to wait and see what Sheridan has up his sleeve. And since Marshals is returning much sooner than Dutton Ranch, there’s still hope for Kayce to appear in Dutton Ranch Season 2 to try to help rescue Carter. Until we know more, here’s our case for a crossover.

Where Can I Watch Marshals? Paramount+ Streaming Info:

Paramount+ offers two subscription plans, Essential and Premium. Right now, you can get started with a seven-day free trial on the Premium plan.

The ad-supported Essential plan typically costs $8.99/month, while the ad-free Premium plan (which comes with Showtime titles and live CBS) costs $13.99/month.