Home Blog Page 1489

Alabama’s Nitrogen Gas Execution Method Halted: Court Declares It Unconstitutionally Cruel

0

In a significant legal development, a federal judge has permanently prohibited the state of Alabama from executing death row inmate Jeffrey Lee using nitrogen gas. This decision was based on the grounds that such an execution method contravenes the US Constitution’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

US District Judge Emily C. Marks delivered this ruling on Tuesday, just hours after an appeals court overturned her earlier decision which had deemed the controversial method constitutional. Consequently, the state is now barred from using nitrogen gas to carry out the execution of 49-year-old Jeffrey Lee, who was initially slated for execution on Thursday.

The ruling followed the appeals court’s conclusion that the nitrogen gas method posed “a substantial risk of serious harm.” A panel of three judges from the 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals highlighted that the estimated three minutes it might take for an inmate to lose consciousness was an “intolerable” period, considering the likely suffering under Alabama’s nitrogen hypoxia protocol.

In her ruling, Judge Marks noted that the state could resort to an alternative execution method preferred by Lee, which is a firing squad. This decision aligns with the legal requirement that inmates contesting execution methods must propose an alternative.

Judge Marks stated, “Therefore, Lee has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the protocol constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment.” This underscores the constitutional safeguard against inhumane treatment, further shaping the discourse on execution methods in the United States.

Marks’ order blocks only the state from executing Lee by nitrogen gas. The state has two other authorized execution methods: lethal injection and the electric chair. She said Lee is “not entitled to an injunction barring the state from executing him using one of those methods.”

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall’s office is appealing the decision, according to a new court filing. Alabama officials have maintained that the method is constitutional.

The issue appears likely bound for the US Supreme Court, which has never ruled a state’s execution method to be unconstitutional.

“Were Alabama to adopt firing squad as a method of execution, that method would likely be challenged as well. Indeed, there is likely no method — no matter how humane — that would be immune to constitutional challenge. But the Constitution does not guarantee a painless death, and human life cannot be purposefully extinguished without some risk of pain. The Court, the condemned, and the State must all confront that sobering reality,” Marks wrote in her ruling.

Alabama began using nitrogen gas for executions in January 2024, when convicted killer Kenneth Eugene Smith became the first person in the country to be executed using that method.

The execution method, which involves strapping a respirator onto the inmate’s face and replacing breathable air with pure nitrogen gas, causing death by lack of oxygen, has been criticized by opponents as inhumane and torturous.

“Three minutes of conscious suffocation is torturous. If that doesn’t violate the constitution, let alone international law, nothing would,” Bernard Harcourt, a professor at Columbia University Law School and who represents one of several other Alabama inmates challenging the method as unconstitutional, told The Associated Press.

Nitrogen has been used in eight executions in the US, with seven of them in Alabama and one in Louisiana. Lee was set to become the ninth person executed with nitrogen before Marks’ order.

Opponents of the death penalty and critics of the controversial execution method praised Marks’ ruling on Tuesday.

“I pray that we are witnessing the collapse of this horrific method nationwide,” said the Rev. Jeff Hood, who served as spiritual adviser at two nitrogen executions.

Lee is being held at Holman Correctional Facility in Atmore for his conviction of two counts of capital murder for killing Jimmy Ellis and Elaine Thompson while robbing a pawnshop on Dec. 12, 1998. Prosecutors said Lee entered Jimmy’s Pawnshop with a sawed-off shotgun and shot Ellis, who was the owner of the store, and Thompson, an employee at the business.

A jury voted 7-5 that Lee should be sentenced to life imprisonment, but a judge overrode that recommendation and sentenced him to death.

Alabama later ended the ability of a judge to disregard a jury’s sentencing decision in death penalty cases.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

US Catholic Bishops Unite to Consecrate Nation to Sacred Heart of Jesus: Understanding the Spiritual Significance

0


In a historic gesture to commemorate the United States’ 250th anniversary, Catholic bishops from around the country will gather this Thursday to consecrate the nation to the Sacred Heart of Jesus.

This religious ceremony, which is part of the bishops’ spring assembly in Orlando, Florida, is rooted in a longstanding Catholic tradition that celebrates Jesus’ selfless love for humanity. Many Catholics extend this devotion by dedicating their homes and workplaces to the Sacred Heart.

However, the devotion isn’t without its complexities. In various contexts, it has been linked to Catholic nationalism, while in others, it serves as a counterbalance to the worship of the state.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops plans to leverage the consecration event to advocate for a commitment to God, the nation, and those in need, according to Archbishop Alexander Sample of Portland, Oregon, who leads the bishops’ committee on religious liberty.

“As we express our gratitude for the blessings bestowed upon our nation, our dedication to the Sacred Heart compels us to consider ways to nurture truth, justice, and charity in American society,” Sample emphasized in a promotional video for the event.

Other countries dedicated to the Sacred Heart

This would be the first time U.S. Catholic leaders have held such a service, though it’s not unprecedented.

Bishops in several other countries in Europe and Latin America have dedicated their lands to the Sacred Heart, sometimes with the participation of political leaders. The practice began in Ecuador in 1874. Most of these ceremonies took place in countries with majority-Catholic populations, unlike the U.S.

Pope Leo XIII — the most recent namesake of the current pontiff — consecrated the whole world to the Sacred Heart in 1899.

Devotion to the Sacred Heart has been promoted by multiple popes. The late Pope Francis highlighted the Sacred Heart as an inspiration for service and justice. Pope Leo XIV urged an audience to turn “to the Sacred Heart, model of true humanity.”

The devotion also has been politically controversial in some countries. It has been invoked in support of a blend of Catholicism and nationalism.

The landmark Basilica of Sacre-Coeur (Sacred Heart) in Paris has long been perceived as a symbol of Catholic resistance to secularism amid France’s revolutionary turbulence.

More recently, a French film titled “Sacre Coeur” tells the story of a 17th century French nun’s visions that gave rise to the modern devotion.

The docudrama drew large crowds in France last year despite criticism from some secular and Catholic sources. One group of progressive Catholics, writing in the publication La Croix, lamented the film was being used “to further a political agenda obsessed with reaffirming France’s Christian identity.”

The movie began being distributed in American theaters Tuesday.

Separately, a Catholic group launched a billboard campaign this month promoting June as the official month of the Sacred Heart. A Republican candidate for Florida governor, James Fishback, officially consecrated his campaign to the Sacred Heart.

There is precedent for a devotional expression to take on controversial political overtones, even if it’s neutral and spiritual on its own.

The phrase “Christ is king” has increasingly been proclaimed in U.S. political settings, at times used in connection with Christian nationalist proclamations or even anti-Zionist or antisemitic claims.

A long history of devotion to a ‘king with a heart’

Catholic scholar Robert Fastiggi, who has researched the long history of the devotion to the Sacred Heart, said the U.S. bishops’ consecration service should be seen as a unifying step in a polarizing time.

It counters any effort to idolize the state — instead promoting Jesus as “a king with a heart,” he said.

“There’s such polarization or infelicitous language even coming from the president of the United States, threatening violence and annihilation on a whole civilization,” Fastiggi said in an interview. “Pope Leo was correct in saying this is unacceptable.”

Consecrating to the Sacred Heart, Fastiggi said, is “reminding ourselves we’re answerable to the law of God and of love.”

A visionary nun and a pope’s healing

The devotion to the Sacred Heart has ancient roots, but it began taking its modern shape in the 17th century, Fastiggi wrote in the academic journal Religions in 2025.

That’s when a French nun, St. Margaret Mary Alacoque, reported visions of Jesus revealing “the marvels of His love and the inexplicable secrets of His Sacred Heart.”

Numerous religious orders and fraternal organizations formed to spread this devotion. Parishes and schools took the name Sacred Heart.

A 19th century German nun, Blessed Marie of the Divine Heart, urged then-Pope Leo XIII to consecrate the entire world to the Sacred Heart. She foretold that he would be healed of a dangerous disease.

Leo XIII obliged, reporting the healing in an encyclical that promoted the devotion.

Today, many Catholic homes, businesses and churches feature images of Jesus with his Sacred Heart exposed, often accompanied by flames, a cross and a crown of thorns to symbolize suffering love. The devotion is often combined with veneration of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

___

Democrats’ Gamble: Graham Platner’s General Election Bid and Its Implications

0


With 42 percent of precincts reporting, Decision Desk HQ has declared Democrat Graham Platner the winner of the Maine primary for the U.S. Senate. Platner dominated the race, securing 75 percent of the votes. Governor Janet Mills, who had halted her Senate campaign as Platner gained momentum in polls and endorsements, still managed to capture 20 percent of the vote. Meanwhile, the third Democratic contender, David Costello, received 7 percent.

According to RedState, Platner’s campaign has faced intense scrutiny and controversy from the start. As noted by our Senior Editor Joe Cunningham:

Editor’s Note: The outcome of the 2026 Midterms will be crucial in determining the future of President Trump’s America First agenda. It is vital for Republicans to retain control of both houses of Congress.

The column runs through the full scandal file. There is the chest tattoo bearing a Nazi Totenkopf symbol that Platner claims he did not know was a Nazi symbol until the fall of 2025, by which point he was already running for Senate. There are the sexually explicit texts sent to as many as a dozen women after his 2023 marriage, his Kik profile still active when reporters found it. There is the New York Times report on former girlfriends who described volatile relationships, including Lyndsey Fifield, who said Platner “twisted her arm behind her back, shoved her into a bedroom and held the door closed from the other side so she couldn’t get out.” 

Add the years of sexist and racist Reddit posts and the exaggerated working-class background, and you have a candidate whose entire biography is under active revision.





Despite these crater-sized and landmine-filled potholes in his candidacy, Platner has maintained the endorsement of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Democrat Congressman Ro Khanna (CA-17). They have been Platner’s staunchest defenders, even after other key Democrats, like Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA), have encouraged the party to cut its losses and back another candidate.

Platner was effusive in his thanks to his supporters in Maine for having his back, and he promised to have theirs as he goes forward in the race to win the U.S. Senate seat currently held by Republican Susan Collins.


Editor’s Note: The 2026 Midterms will determine the fate of President Trump’s America First agenda. Republicans must maintain control of both chambers of Congress.

Help RedState continue to report on the Democrats’ radicalism and inform voters as our nation faces a crossroads. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.



Food Delivery Driver Detained for Alleged Crack Cocaine Distribution to Undercover Source

0

Staff Report

GAINESVILLE, Fla. – Authorities apprehended 46-year-old Handy Roman Ford Jr. yesterday, accusing him of selling crack cocaine to a confidential informant earlier this year in February.

In February 2026, an officer from the Gainesville Police Department collaborated with the Gainesville Alachua County Drug Task Force to orchestrate a controlled purchase. A confidential informant bought roughly 10 grams of crack cocaine from Ford at a parking lot located at the intersection of NW 13th Street and NW 39th Avenue. It is alleged that Ford set up the deal through a phone call.

Ford is now facing charges of selling a controlled substance and unlawful use of a communication device. He reportedly works as a delivery driver for DoorDash and Uber Eats. His criminal record includes nine felony convictions, two of which are violent, alongside 13 misdemeanor convictions, with two violent offenses. Ford has served four prison terms, with his most recent release in 2019. Judge Susan Miller-Jones has set his bail at $150,000.

News articles regarding arrests are informed by reports from law enforcement agencies. The charges mentioned are sourced from arrest reports and court records, serving as accusations only. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.


Taiwan Conducts Strategic Drills, Launches U.S.-Supplied Rockets Towards China in Show of Defense Readiness


TAICHUNG – In a bold display of military readiness, Taiwan’s armed forces launched rockets toward China on Wednesday, employing “shoot-and-scoot” mobile launchers as part of a strategy to deter potential aggression.

This exercise marked a significant milestone as it involved the first-ever firing of rockets into the waters of the Taiwan Strait using the U.S.-supplied HIMARS system, despite the system having been tested previously.

Army Sergeant Wang Ming-hui emphasized the importance of these exercises, stating, “Given the current threat from our adversary, we are committed to rigorous HIMARS training to safeguard Taiwan, leveraging the nation’s most formidable defense capabilities.”

The military clarified that they utilized reduced-range training rockets, ensuring they landed safely in the waters just off the coast.

China considers Taiwan a breakaway province and insists it will eventually reclaim control. It routinely conducts military operations, including ship and aircraft deployments, near the island. Although the United States does not officially recognize Taiwan as an independent nation, it opposes any forceful alterations to its status and remains Taiwan’s primary arms supplier for defensive purposes.

HIMARS, which stands for High Mobility Artillery Rocket System, is a truck-mounted pod of rockets that can be driven out from a hidden position to fire its missiles, then quickly taken to a new hiding place in what are called “shoot-and-scoot” tactics.

They were fired on the second day of exercises on Taiwan’s west coast, which faces China. The drills, which also included 155mm howitzers, simulated a response to a Chinese invasion and were designed to test rapid deployment and precision-strike capabilities.

The HIMARS was the centerpiece of the drill. After receiving a firing order, the vehicle maneuvered into position and launched its rockets with bright flashes within three minutes, demonstrating its “shoot-and-scoot” mobility.

The U.S. announced plans in December to sell 82 more HIMARS to Taiwan as part of a major arms deal, but that package appears to have been put on hold after President Donald Trump met Chinese leader Xi Jinping in Beijing last month.

Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Meghan Markle Shares Adorable Insight: Daughter Lilibet is a Beyoncé Fan

0

Meghan Markle recently shared that her daughter, Princess Lilibet, is a fan of Beyoncé. This revelation came via a photo of the five-year-old sporting a T-shirt that celebrates the iconic singer.

On Instagram, the Duchess of Sussex posted a picture showing the King’s granddaughter wearing a shirt adorned with an illustration of Beyoncé and the words “B is for Beyoncé.”

Designed by a talented ten-year-old named Pearl, this T-shirt is available for purchase through the National Women’s History Museum, priced at $48 (£36).

In Meghan’s Instagram post, Lilibet’s face was intentionally cropped out. The photo was part of a collection of 11 images that seem to have been captured at the family’s residence in Montecito, California.

Meghan posted the pictures under the caption: ‘Springing into summer.’ Another showed Harry and Archie playing football with an oversized ball, a third was of the Sussexes embracing and a fourth showed Meghan preparing food in her kitchen.

Meghan’s connection to Beyoncé dates back to July 2019, when the two met at the European premiere of Disney’s live-action adaptation of The Lion King in London.

Former actress Meghan and Prince Harry joined Beyoncé and Jay-Z, when the Duchess held the singer’s hand affectionately and Beyoncé said: ‘We love you guys.’

Their meeting in Leicester Square came two months after Prince Archie’s birth, and Jay-Z was heard to tell new father Harry: ‘Always find some time for yourself.’

The Duchess of Sussex posted a photograph on Instagram of Princess Lilibet with a white T-shirt featuring an illustration of Beyoncé along with the phrase 'B is for Beyonce'

The Duchess of Sussex posted a photograph on Instagram of Princess Lilibet with a white T-shirt featuring an illustration of Beyoncé along with the phrase ‘B is for Beyonce’

A separate new image of Lilibet posted last week by Meghan on Instagram to celebrate her fifth birthday showed her standing barefoot on the grass in the sunshine, wearing a summer dress

A separate new image of Lilibet posted last week by Meghan on Instagram to celebrate her fifth birthday showed her standing barefoot on the grass in the sunshine, wearing a summer dress

Another new image of Princess Lilibet posted last week shows the barefoot youngster, with her long red hair down and covering her face, being held in Harry's arms as he looks at her

Another new image of Princess Lilibet posted last week shows the barefoot youngster, with her long red hair down and covering her face, being held in Harry’s arms as he looks at her

Jay-Z could also be seen saying ‘congrats’ while his wife said ‘baby, so beautiful’.

Harry kissed Beyoncé on both cheeks and appeared to say that the singer and Jay-Z were a busy pair. Beyoncé answered: ‘A little bit. No more busy than you guys.’

Beyoncé also reportedly calling Meghan ‘my princess’, and Harry spoke with Disney boss Bob Iger and appeared to ask him if there were any voiceover roles for Meghan.

‘You know she does voiceovers,’ Harry could be heard saying in a video, as Mr Iger replied: ‘Oh, really?’ Harry then said: ‘Did you know that? You seem surprised.’ 

Gesturing towards Meghan, who was speaking with Beyoncé, the Duke can be heard saying: ‘She’s really interested.’ Mr Iger replies: ‘Sure, we’d love to try.’ 

Billy Eichner, who voiced meerkat Timon in the animated film, later said of Beyoncé: ‘That was the first time she met Meghan Markle. And that was a big moment.’

That meeting followed Beyoncé accepting a Brit Award in February 2019 with Jay-Z in front of a portrait showing the Duchess as a royal version of the Mona Lisa.

In a post explaining why they had decided to put Meghan in the frame, Beyoncé and Jay-Z wrote: ‘In honour of Black History Month, we bow down to one of our Melanated Monas. Congrats on your pregnancy! We wish you so much joy.’

Beyoncé also praised Meghan after the Sussexes’ bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021, during which the Duchess claimed to have encountered racism within the Royal Family.

Meghan and Beyoncé at The Lion King premiere in London's Leicester Square in July 2019

Meghan and Beyoncé at The Lion King premiere in London’s Leicester Square in July 2019

Prince Harry chats with Disney boss Robert Iger as Meghan embraces Beyoncé in July 2019

Prince Harry chats with Disney boss Robert Iger as Meghan embraces Beyoncé in July 2019

Meghan at a Beyoncé gig at the SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles in September 2023 with the singer's former Destiny's Child bandmate Kelly Rowland and actress Kerry Washington

Meghan at a Beyoncé gig at the SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles in September 2023 with the singer’s former Destiny’s Child bandmate Kelly Rowland and actress Kerry Washington

Beyoncé accepted a Brit Award in February 2019 with Jay-Z in front of a portrait of Meghan

Beyoncé accepted a Brit Award in February 2019 with Jay-Z in front of a portrait of Meghan

Beyoncé posted on her website: ‘Thank you Meghan for your courage and leadership. We are all strengthened and inspired by you.’ 

And in one episode of their Netflix documentary Harry & Meghan released in December 2022, Meghan claimed to have received a supportive text from Beyoncé.

She told the camera crew: ‘Beyoncé just texted, just checking in… I still can’t believe she knows who I am… She said she wants me to feel safe and protected.

‘She admires and respects my bravery and vulnerability and thinks I was selected to break generational curses that need to be healed.’

The Sussexes stepped down as senior royals and moved to the US in 2020 – and in September 2023, they watched Beyoncé on her Renaissance tour in California.

Meghan was pictured at the SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles catching up with Beyoncé’s former Destiny’s Child bandmate Kelly Rowland and actress Kerry Washington.

Then in May last year, Meghan and Harry again watched Beyoncé at SoFi Stadium during a concert which was part of her Cowboy Carter tour.

The Duchess’s latest posts of Lilibet come after Meghan shared a family photo on June 4 of ‘our dream girl’ to celebrate her daughter’s fifth birthday.

Another photo posted by Meghan yesterday showed Harry as he played football with Archie

Another photo posted by Meghan yesterday showed Harry as he played football with Archie 

Meghan also posted this photo taken from behind of her embracing her husband Harry

Meghan also posted this photo taken from behind of her embracing her husband Harry 

Meghan also posted an image of her in a striped button-up blouse and white linen skirt

Meghan also posted an image of her in a striped button-up blouse and white linen skirt 

She gave her fans a look into her kitchen in a short video shot over her shoulder that showed her preparing what might have been the supplies for a pasta sauce

She gave her fans a look into her kitchen in a short video shot over her shoulder that showed her preparing what might have been the supplies for a pasta sauce

The Duchess also showed her preparing what might have been the supplies for a pasta sauce

The Duchess also showed her preparing what might have been the supplies for a pasta sauce 

Meghan showed off a rugged double-denim look in a photo which was part of the collection

Meghan showed off a rugged double-denim look in a photo which was part of the collection 

One image featured Meghan's rescue beagle Guy as he took a nap on a stone path outside

One image featured Meghan’s rescue beagle Guy as he took a nap on a stone path outside 

Before-and-after photos were also posted, with the before showing a nest with three eggs

Before-and-after photos were also posted, with the before showing a nest with three eggs 

The after shot showed the birds after hatching as they cuddled up together

The after shot showed the birds after hatching as they cuddled up together 

The Duchess added some colour to the post with a photograph of a basket full of produce

The Duchess added some colour to the post with a photograph of a basket full of produce 

An image showed the barefoot youngster, with her long red hair down and covering her face, being held in Harry’s arms as he looks at her. 

Meghan is standing next to Harry with her arm on his shoulder, also smiling at the princess.

The Duchess wrote in the post: ‘Our dream girl. Happy 5th birthday, Lili’ followed by a white heart emoji.

She also shared another photo showing Lilibet standing barefoot on the grass in the sunshine, wearing a summer dress. 

Lilibet is reaching out to touch the flowers of a blue-purple agapanthus – which is commonly known as Lily of the Nile or African Lily.

Lilibet was born on June 4, 2021 in the US and was named Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor.

She became entitled to be a princess only when Charles acceded to the throne, because of rules set out by King George V in 1917.

Harry and Meghan started using prince and princess for Archie and Lilibet after the Princess’s christening in 2023, following correspondence with King Charles III about the matter.

Jury Finds Combat Veteran Guilty of Threatening Former President Trump

0

FILE – President Donald Trump speaks to the media, Friday, June 27, 2025, in the briefing room of the White House in Washington (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File).

In Arizona, a jury has handed down a guilty verdict to a Marine combat veteran who made threats to assassinate President Donald Trump using an M16 rifle. The veteran, Rene Ortiz, explicitly stated his intention to aim for the “head, not the ear.”

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona confirmed to Law&Crime that Ortiz, hailing from Casa Grande, was convicted on Monday for making threats against the president. This verdict was reached after a four-day trial held in Phoenix. The date for his sentencing has not yet been determined.

Ortiz’s trial commenced after his arrest in early 2025. The charges against him stemmed from threats he allegedly made in November and December 2024, during Trump’s term as president-elect.

According to a federal complaint, Ortiz left documents at federal courthouses in Phoenix and Tucson, initially demanding the courts to “execute the newly elected POTUS by firing an M-16A2 Service Rifle with a magazine of 6 rounds.” He went on to threaten that he would carry out the act himself if his demands were not met.

The complaint details Ortiz’s statement that “the execution shall commence 3 days upon notice to the Defendants to this action,” specifying that “6 rounds to be shot will be from 300 or 500 yards away from the target.”

“ANY REFUSAL OF ANY RIGHT, MR. ORTIZ WILL BE ENTITLED TO SHOT THE INCOMING FRAUDULENT ELECTED POTUS FROM 300 OR 666 YARDS AWAY WITH 666 ROUNDS FOR AN M-16A2 SERVICE RIFLE AT THE INAGURATION [sic],” Ortiz threatened, adding that he had an “Expert Badge” in marksmanship.

Federal agents questioned Ortiz about the threats on Dec. 5, 2024, at the Secret Service Phoenix field office. During the interview, Ortiz admitted to making them.

“When asked if Ortiz plans to shoot [Trump], Ortiz responded, ‘If my demands are not met,’” according to the complaint. “Ortiz explained his grievance is with the Department of Veterans Affairs. Ortiz explained while employed at the VA they promised to pay for his schooling if he quit working for them. Ortiz quit working at the VA and began school but has not been reimbursed for his education.”

During his trial, Ortiz’s family said he was upset after being fired from the Department of Veterans Affairs, according to the Tucson Sentinel. He began drafting lawsuits to challenge his termination and hand-delivered documents to the courthouses with help from family members, who drove him and said they had no idea what he was actually saying in the documents.

“Mountains and mountains of paperwork,” Ortiz’s eldest son, Ryun Ortiz, reportedly testified.

Ortiz’s public defenders argued that he did not mean what he said about harming the president and insisted no danger was ever actually present, per court filings and testimony. They also claimed he suffers from schizoaffective disorder and borderline personality disorder. Ortiz’s defense filed a motion on June 5 to declare a mistrial.

In it, Ortiz’s lawyers claimed there is a “manifest necessity” for a mistrial because the court “limited defense counsel’s questioning” of defense witness Deputy U.S. Marshal Vladimir St. Louis, according to the U.S. Attorney’s response to the filing. St. Louis investigated similar threats to the U.S. attorney’s office in central California that Ortiz allegedly made two months before his arrest for the Trump threats.

For the California threats, U.S. Marshals decided not to arrest Ortiz because they believed he likely suffered from mental health issues. The judge overseeing his Trump threats case, however, refused to let St. Louis be questioned about the decision after federal prosecutors argued that it would “elicit irrelevant hearsay,” according to court filings.

“The questions were improper and testimony inadmissible,” prosecutors say in a June 8 response to Ortiz’s motion to declare a mistrial, which was filed on June 5. “There is no reason, much less a manifest necessity, to declare a mistrial here and now.”

Hannah Diviney Alerts to ‘Dire’ Impact of Proposed NDIS Reforms: Urgent Call for Action

0


IN BRIEF

  • Disability advocates raised fears proposed NDIS reforms could reduce support and deepen isolation.
  • A key amendment drew criticism over concerns participants may need to prove treatment attempts.

Disability advocates are raising alarms that proposed reforms to the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) might adversely impact participants, as emotional testimonies unfolded on the second day of public hearings regarding the federal government’s comprehensive changes.

On Wednesday, senators continued to scrutinize draft legislation poised to potentially exclude or block approximately 300,000 individuals from the scheme over the upcoming four years.

The proposed changes are projected to save the government over $38 billion during this period.

Hannah Diviney, a prominent disability advocate, was among those who presented their concerns at the inquiry, offering a grave warning about the repercussions of the proposed reforms.

Diviney emphatically stated, “You may depict me as a frightened little girl, but mark my words, when disabled individuals die as a direct consequence of this bill—and they will—their blood will be on your hands.”

Your trusted source for staying up-to-date with the world around you. Get free daily news updates and analysis, straight to your inbox.

Diviney said she did not want to be “begging the government to see people like me as human” but felt compelled to speak out because of what she believes is at stake.

“If the bill gets passed into legislation, the consequences will be dire, far-reaching and near impossible to undo,” she said.

Concerns over proposed treatment requirements

A key concern raised by Diviney centred on proposed provisions she argued would require participants to demonstrate they had pursued appropriate treatments before receiving certain supports.

Diviney argued the measure failed to account for barriers including cost, geography and previous experiences of medical trauma.

“This amendment in my opinion is reckless, ill thought-out and entirely devoid of any shred of understanding of what living a disabled life is actually like,” she said.

She also questioned whether decisions affecting support access should be made through broad policy settings rather than individual circumstances.

Inquiry hears concerns about broader impacts

The inquiry also heard concerns that some proposed changes could create unintended consequences that disproportionately affect women.

The proposed legislation forms part of the government’s push to curb the growth of the now-more-than-$50 billion scheme and to place it on a more sustainable footing.

A key proposal would give the NDIS minister new powers over categories of support spending, beginning with reductions to social and community participation budgets.

Government defends reforms as sustainability measure

Health and NDIS Minister Mark Butler defended the reforms, saying the government remained committed to protecting the scheme’s future while improving oversight.

“It’s really important to ensure that we can secure the future of the NDIS in the long term, secure its social licence as well as secure its fiscal sustainability,” Butler told reporters in Brisbane on Wednesday.

Butler said the government was pursuing measures recommended through previous reviews, including expanding provider registration requirements under a risk-based model.

“In terms of investment, this will continue to be the largest social program the country has outside of the aged pension,” he said.

“We may not see the 10 per cent plus growth rates that we’ve seen over the last several years, but it will still be a very substantial social program.”

Butler said the government wanted the bill passed quickly and argued changes were necessary to slow cost growth after what he described as a $13 billion increase in projected NDIS spending.

He said more fundamental reforms would involve consultation with the disability sector and states before being rolled out over the coming years.

Public hearings continue on Thursday.


For the latest from SBS News, download our app and subscribe to our newsletter.

Bill Maher Featured in New Documentary on Turning Point USA’s Charlie Kirk

0

On Monday, talk show host Bill Maher shared some unexpected news: he is set to appear in a documentary about the late conservative activist Charlie Kirk, a co-founder of Turning Point USA.

During a conversation with comedian Jeff Dunham on his show “Club Random,” Maher was reminded of a particularly noteworthy interview he conducted with Kirk. Dunham complimented the interview, describing it as memorable and significant.

Charlie Kirk, who became well-known for his willingness to engage in debates with individuals from all areas of the political spectrum, tragically lost his life during a campus event last September, leaving a void in political discourse.

Maher echoed Dunham’s sentiments, expressing that he thoroughly enjoyed hosting the interview with Kirk. He then revealed, “By the way, they’re doing a documentary and they asked if I would be in it.”

“By the way they’re doing a documentary and they asked if I would be in it,” Maher announced.

“I said yes. I’m giving them five minutes after my taping Friday night because — and I told them, ‘Don’t expect me to be just saying you know, hagiography about Charlie.’ I liked him as a person. I’m glad I talked to him.”

While Kirk’s death caused some of his critics to emerge and dredge up his more controversial or pointed political statements, Maher said they ultimately did not make him a “monster” by any means.

“I do not think he was a monster,” he said. “And if you look at his statements, I’ve read the full statements — of course because everybody is only interested in getting points for their team. They mischaracterized them.

“But even when I read the full statement, which were accurately characterized, I still disagreed with them. But it wasn’t what they presented.”

“Again, it’s always in the middle,” Maher said. “It wasn’t as bad as they said, but I still disagree.”

“That’s what I loved about the interview is that is that you sat there and considered things and listened to him, let him talk and it was a really great discussion,” Dunham said.

“My little motto here is everybody’s a monster [until] you talk to them,” Maher responded, as he went on to list multiple famous conservatives he has spoken to on his show.

Maher went on to blast many Democrats for being unwilling to talk with their opposition, including fellow Democrats like himself.

“And the Republicans, they definitely are better at like, ‘Well, we’ll talk,” Maher said.

Trump’s Surprising Move: Major Overhaul on Green Card Policies Unveiled

0

In a discreet yet significant development, the Trump administration has indicated that upcoming modifications to the green card issuance process will not affect a vast number of individuals, following an outcry from business leaders.

According to The Washington Post, officials from the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) have been privately reassuring concerned executives that the majority of work visas will remain unchanged under the new policy. This reassurance comes amid growing anxiety within the business community.

The stir originated from guidelines released on May 22, which suggested that foreign visitors should apply for permanent residency from their home countries unless they encountered ‘extraordinary circumstances.’ The ambiguous nature of these guidelines has left immigration lawyers and business leaders uncertain about the potential scope and impact of these changes.

This uncertainty has sparked a wave of behind-the-scenes lobbying. Influential businesses, industry groups, and CEOs have sought private discussions with both the White House and the Department of Homeland Security to address their concerns and seek clarification, as reported by The Post.

The policy sparked a behind-the-scenes lobbying effort, with prominent businesses, industry groups and CEOs seeking private conversations with the White House and the Department of Homeland Security, The Post said.

Concern came from the US Chamber of Commerce, which pressed administration officials for greater clarity and warned about the potential impact on employers, according to an anonymous source cited by The Post.

The tech industry also quietly lobbied the White House, adding to a wave of behind-the-scenes outreach from corporate America. 

But their efforts appeared to pay off, with the administration shifting its tone at a meeting with business representatives late last week.

Business leaders raised concerns after the Trump administration announced that more green card applicants would have to return to their home countries

Business leaders raised concerns after the Trump administration announced that more green card applicants would have to return to their home countries

The updated guidance quickly drew concern from major business groups, including the US Chamber of Commerce

The updated guidance quickly drew concern from major business groups, including the US Chamber of Commerce 

Even so, the administration has yet to issue formal public guidance reflecting those assurances, leaving many employers uncertain about how the policy will be enforced.

A source close to the matter told the Daily Mail the policy wouldn’t affect current green card holders, and the policy memo was meant to reinstate longstanding law and policy that was disregarded by the Biden administration.

They also clarified that the policy won’t stop people who clearly qualify for a green card, but it may require some applicants who don’t meet the standards to apply from outside the US instead of inside the country. 

The policy, they claimed, targets fraud and keeps the focus on skilled, law-abiding applicants who benefit the economy, coinciding with the Trump administration’s vision for the way immigration should be shaped.

The tension is familiar. 

President Trump has previously faced resistance from business leaders over his hardline immigration policies, including last summer when the administration paused some immigration raids after agricultural employers warned they could lose critical workers.

The administration also clarified that a new $100,000 fee on H1B visas would only affect new visas after a similar uproar from the business community.

Even Trump weighed in, saying he was ‘opposed’ to a massive raid on the Hyundai facility in Georgia last fall after receiving outrage.

Trump previously responded to backlash over the large-scale raid on a Hyundai facility in Georgia last fall, saying he opposed it

Trump previously responded to backlash over the large-scale raid on a Hyundai facility in Georgia last fall, saying he opposed it 

After reports that the new green card policy had taken effect, some applicants were told this week that enforcement had been paused while immigration officials received further guidance, immigration lawyers told The Post.

Neil Bradley, chief policy officer at the US Chamber of Commerce, said the organization had also heard that some recent green card applicants would not be required to return to their home countries. 

Bradley welcomed the development but urged the administration to provide greater clarity.

A White House official told the Post that the policy largely restates existing law and is not expected to have a significant impact on skilled professionals and other qualified applicants. 

Officials also said immigration officers would have the discretion to decide on a case-by-case basis whether someone would need to leave the US to apply for permanent residency.

But business leaders remain only partially reassured, as the administration has yet to issue formal guidance detailing who would be affected. 

Lawyers representing major employers told the Post they are taking a wait-and-see approach.

The Daily Mail contacted USCIS for comment.