Home Blog Page 146

Tree Crashes Onto Minivan in Santa Clarita паалийәт

0

Powerful winds sent a massive eucalyptus tree crashing onto a minivan in Santa Clarita on Friday, leaving the driver injured but alive after the frightening collision.

The tree fell onto the vehicle while the driver was inside on McBean Parkway, north of Magic Mountain Parkway, at about 12:40 p.m., authorities and witnesses said.

The woman was traveling northbound when the tree came down. She survived the impact but was injured and taken to a hospital for treatment.

“We heard it too. It was like a loud crack,” one witness told a journalist at the scene. “It falls, and from 100 to 150 feet away, the concrete rumbled. We felt it.”

“Everybody around started scattering. We heard it and felt it, and this lady was inside with her car,” the witness said. “Thankfully, she wasn’t in the right lane, because if she had been, she would’ve been toast.”


Los Angeles County Fire Department crews and Santa Clarita officials responded to the scene, while the northbound lanes of McBean Parkway were closed, according to The Signal.

Crews used chainsaws to cut the fallen eucalyptus into sections and clear the debris from the roadway.

The tree temporarily blocked every lane of the road, disrupting traffic in the area.

The incident unfolded as winds of up to 70 mph were expected to sweep through the region on Friday.

You Can See Everything’s Secret Star Offers a Fresh Perspective on the Story

0

Contains spoilers for “You Can See Everything”

Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim’s documentary about Elizabeth Holmes, “You Can See Everything,” has a pivotal figure whose identity cannot be discussed in a spoiler-free review. Her appearance changes the film’s direction, tone and meaning: Amanda Seyfried, who portrayed Holmes in the Emmy-winning 2022 miniseries “The Dropout.”

After completing “The Dropout,” Seyfried believed she had moved on from playing Holmes. Instead, the documentary brings her back to the role, using reenactments to reconstruct events the filmmakers witnessed but were unable to record. One such scene depicts a business meeting that took place before production started and delivers a startling revelation: Holmes’ husband, Billy Evans—played in the reenactments by Seyfried’s “The Testament of Ann Lee” co-star Christopher Abbott—demands a share of the documentary’s profits. The unusual request raises ethical concerns and potentially draws the film’s audience into the same moral maze as its subjects.

A24 agrees to the arrangement in order to move the production forward, although closing title cards reveal that Evans abandoned the deal after filming wrapped. The disclosure appears to undermine Holmes’ claim that she would not profit from the documentary. Yet Holmes leaves the room just before Evans makes the demand, allowing her either to claim genuine ignorance or to maintain plausible deniability. Fielder later visits Holmes in prison to ask about the episode. Because cameras were not permitted inside the prison, Seyfried once again steps into the reenactment.

Amanda Seyfried reevaluates her own work — and Nathan Fielder’s

Seyfried’s contribution extends well beyond recreating past events. During the second half of the nearly three-hour documentary, she works alongside Fielder and occasionally pushes back against him. The film’s most audacious meta moment arrives when Seyfried watches archival footage of the real Holmes watching Seyfried portray a fictionalized version of her in “The Dropout.”

That layered encounter exposes the peculiar tension at the heart of biographical drama: a real person is responding to a performance that may be compelling but is not entirely accurate. The question becomes even more complicated when the subject herself is accused of fabricating parts of her own story.

Seyfried eventually speaks with Holmes by phone and later confronts Evans in person. Of everyone in the documentary, Evans emerges as the most plainly unsympathetic. Arguments over whether documentaries and docudramas are inherently exploitative seem minor beside his attempts to monetize his wife’s public image, create an AI version of her and acknowledge that he posts on her X account without her consent. During one particularly revealing exchange, Evans criticizes Seyfried for her comments about Charlie Kirk.

While recreating Fielder’s prison conversation with Holmes, Seyfried also questions whether he has been manipulated by his subject. Viewers familiar with the extraordinary precision of Fielder’s work on “The Rehearsal” may instinctively trust his memory of the encounter. But when he changes Holmes’ reported wording from “I know he was talking to you about it” to “I know he was talking to you about something,” Seyfried detects a possible hesitation. Is Fielder simply correcting his recollection, or is he reluctant to say something that could further implicate Holmes?

Could Amanda Seyfried get an Oscar for a documentary performance?

Given the sweeping critical and audience response to “You Can See Everything,” awards speculation is already gathering. The documentary could become the first nonfiction film nominated for best picture—or the second, depending on whether one counts “Chang: A Drama of the Wilderness,” which received a nomination in the one-time-only “best picture, unique and artistic production” category at the first Oscars in 1929. Seyfried may also enter the conversation for best supporting actress.

The nearest comparison may be Maria Bakalova’s nomination for “Borat Subsequent Moviefilm.” While that film was not strictly a documentary, its cringe-comedy format placed actors in interactions with unsuspecting real people, most famously Rudy Giuliani. Bakalova, however, played a character throughout her appearances. Seyfried’s position is more unusual: she portrays Holmes in some scenes while appearing as herself in others. Her reenactments are strong enough to justify an awards campaign, but the film’s most compelling moments may come when she is not obviously acting at all.

That leads to the documentary’s most tantalizing uncertainty: is Seyfried truly being herself outside the reenactments, or is she performing in those scenes too? Fielder has spent years making audiences question how much of his awkward on-screen persona is authentic and how much is carefully constructed. Those doubts naturally extend to the professional actor sharing the frame with him. “You Can See Everything” may invite viewers to look closer than ever, but it also suggests that some truths will remain impossible to see completely.

Nick Clegg’s £100m Windfall: Why Critics Call Him a Hypocrite

0

It may not have been entirely unexpected that Sir Nick Clegg, the tech millionaire, found himself alone at a party in Madrid last weekend.

He has never been everybody’s favourite, after all. With his glasses perched on his face and a drink in his hand, Clegg appeared to be deep in thought.

Under the warm autumn sun, several hundred guests gathered in a botanical garden close to the city centre to celebrate the launch of his Spanish-born wife Miriam Gonzalez Durantez’s new political party.

As Lady Clegg addressed her supporters, perhaps her husband was reminded of his own brief period as Britain’s political sensation — the moment when he appeared to embody the future. The country had been swept up, if only temporarily, in “Cleggmania”, a term that went on to enter the Collins English Dictionary.

The former Liberal Democrat leader and deputy prime minister is now approaching 60, with little of the youthful appeal or popularity that once defined him. Many voters still remember what they regarded as his betrayal over university tuition fees, after he abandoned his party’s pledge to oppose and abolish them.

Nor have the failed policies and political consequences of his time in the Conservative-led coalition, formed after the 2010 general election, disappeared from public memory.

Within months, Clegg had gone from being hailed as a possible political saviour to seeing effigies of himself burned in the streets. Yet one attendee at the Madrid gathering said yesterday that he now appeared “content, happy with his lot”.

His financial success is certainly hard to dispute. After his political career collapsed in humiliating fashion a decade ago — Cleggmania exposed as a fleeting illusion and the Liberal Democrats losing 49 seats at the 2015 election — he went on to build a lucrative second act.

Power couple: Sir Nick with his Spanish-born wife Miriam Gonzalez Durantez at a book launch event in London back in 2015

Power couple: Sir Nick with his Spanish-born wife Miriam Gonzalez Durantez at a book launch event in London back in 2015

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg pictured with Clegg in 2019. The former deputy prime minister joined Meta in 2018

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg pictured with Clegg in 2019. The former deputy prime minister joined Meta in 2018

His fortunes could soon rise further. Clegg is reportedly in line to make as much as £30 million from the forthcoming Wall Street listing of Nscale, the UK artificial intelligence company.

That would represent a substantial return for someone who joined the company’s board just seven months ago.

The potential payout would add to the estimated £100 million he earned during his controversial Silicon Valley career alongside Mark Zuckerberg at Meta, formerly Facebook and the parent company of Instagram and WhatsApp.

Clegg was once openly sceptical of Facebook. “I actually find the messianic California new-world-touchy-feely culture a little grating,” he said.

“Nor am I sure that companies such as Facebook really pay all the tax they could.” His position changed after Meta offered him a substantial package of salary, bonuses and shares, eventually giving him the title “Master of the Metaverse”.

Critics accused him of sacrificing his principles for Big Tech after he moved his family — he and Miriam have three sons — from their home in Putney, south-west London. They relocated to a £7 million faux Queen Anne property in Atherton, the Silicon Valley community described as having “the most expensive postcode in America”.

And despite his earlier disdain for California’s touchy-feely corporate culture, Clegg soon became immersed in it himself.

He revealed that he was expected to take part in Zuckerberg’s daily mixed martial arts sessions — an unusual bonding exercise — and was once caught in a manoeuvre known as a “Domination Mount”. Clegg said his deputy “straddled me and we grappled awkwardly in a way that was, let’s just say, a little too close for comfort”.

Until last year, Clegg served as Meta’s president of global affairs, travelling internationally as Zuckerberg’s political defender. His role included responding to criticism that the company knew its algorithms were amplifying hate and contributing to the deterioration of teenagers’ mental health.

To his detractors, however, he was little more than a highly paid figurehead, recruited to give the technology giant a reassuring liberal image while it pursued enormous profits. Clegg was repeatedly called upon to answer questions about whether Meta had done enough to police content across its platforms.

The father of Molly Russell, a 14-year-old from Harrow, north-west London, who died by suicide in 2017 after viewing images of self-harm on Instagram, said he had ‘no doubt’ that it ‘helped kill’ his daughter.

Similar graphic images still present on the platform two years after her death prompted Clegg to promise that Meta would do ‘whatever it takes’ to be safe for young people.

Such cases doubtless caused the ex-politician deep unease, but he was well rewarded for his work. His stake in the company is worth £22.8million. Regulatory filings in the US also show he has sold Meta shares worth £29million since May 2022 and retains options with a potential value of £42.4million.

Nick and Miriam Clegg pictured with Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg in 2018

Nick and Miriam Clegg pictured with Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg in 2018

During his years in government, he had decried moneyed elites and called banker bonuses ‘gratuitously offensive’. In a 2013 interview he tried, none too subtly, to project an image as a regular guy, claiming that his favourite television programme was Channel 4’s Come Dine With Me and that he ferried his kids around in a second-hand ‘slightly battered’ Ford Galaxy people carrier. How times – and principles – change.

Having sold their Californian home for £10.3million when he left Meta, the Cleggs are back in London, living in another Queen Anne-style home, which they bought from Oscar-winning actor Colin Firth for £8.2million.

Now Clegg is looking for a new role. He could simply count his money, but he has told former colleagues he still feels ‘energetic’.

One told the Daily Mail that the Cleggs were casting themselves as ‘a kind of European power couple’, adding: ‘I know it’s a bit odd, and bear in mind this is a loose concept, not a carefully judged strategy, but think the Clintons, only on a much, much less grand scale.’ Poundshop Clintons?

After Bill Clinton left office in 2001, his wife Hillary twice ran for President. Such comparisons might seem wildly fanciful but there is no denying that 58-year-old Lady Clegg, a high-powered lawyer, harbours serious political ambitions. Her new liberal centrist party, Democracia 21, will contest Spain’s general election on November 29.

Vowing to clean up politics and give voters an alternative to the dominant socialist and conservative parties, she says Democracia 21 will offer a modern, transparent kind of politics that ‘doesn’t feed on fear, insults or nostalgia’.

Not too dissimilar, then, to the stuff her husband was peddling when he was starting out. Her manifesto accuses the ruling Spanish Socialist Workers’ party and the Right-wing People’s Party of squandering decades of government.

No doubt Nick is helping behind the scenes, offering her the benefit of his wisdom. Whether she chooses to accept it is another matter.

During the 2010 general election campaign, Westminster-educated Clegg shone during Britain’s first-ever televised debate among party leaders. One opinion poll suggested rather hastily that he was almost as popular as Sir Winston Churchill. And ‘I agree with Nick’ – a sentence Gordon Brown used repeatedly during the debate – became a new catchphrase for the nation.

Judging by an appearance she made on Spanish television last week, it seems Lady Clegg, for one, doesn’t always agree with her husband – at least not on the thorny subject of Gibraltar’s sovereignty. 

She insisted that the Rock rightly belongs to her country. Asked if her husband shared her view, Lady Clegg replied: ‘That again? Well, let’s try not to talk about Gibraltar. He’ll defend his position and I’ll defend mine.’

Clegg is estimated to have made £100million during his controversial Silicon Valley sojourn

Clegg is estimated to have made £100million during his controversial Silicon Valley sojourn

Suffice to say Clegg is unlikely to become his wife’s foreign secretary should she sweep to power next month. After her husband lost his job as deputy prime minister in 2015, Lady Clegg, for whom being a political spouse never came easy, said: ‘Now he can do the flower arrangements.’

It is not clear how they will split their time between Chiswick and Spain, but for years they have summered in Miriam’s family home in Olmedo, 90 miles north of Madrid. 

Public service, if not a return to frontline politics, looms for Clegg. For now, he will try to help Britain navigate future AI challenges. He has already dismissed recently expressed fears over AI’s ‘godlike power to exterminate humanity’, calling such discourse a sign that tech bosses were ‘breathing their own fumes’. 

He said such industry titans should focus on addressing known specific threats such as cybersecurity and bioweapons rather than the ‘slightly hand-wavy view that this technology is unavoidably going to develop some godlike power which is going to turn on us and exterminate humanity’. 

He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: ‘I think it is perhaps accidentally self-serving, because it sort of implies that we can only be made safe by having everything controlled, in effect, by an oligopoly of a small number of companies, and I think it slightly paralyses the political debate.’ 

In March, Clegg joined the board of one such company. 

Nscale is building the country’s biggest AI data centre in Loughton, Essex, with an energy consumption projected to be equivalent to 315,000 homes. It is a key part of the Government’s ambition to make the UK a world leader in artificial intelligence. 

The company’s prospectus says: ‘Clegg’s extensive experience in global public policy, international government affairs and technology industry leadership, as well as his deep relationships with governments and regulatory bodies worldwide, make him qualified to serve on our board of directors.’ 

Set up just two years ago, the UK-based start-up spun out of a cryptocurrency mining business and has rapidly raised billions amid surging demand for facilities to run AI. 

Clegg owns more than 917,000 shares in the company, which is reportedly seeking a valuation of up to £26.3billion in the US flotation. Based on Clegg’s stake of 0.12 per cent, that could yield about £31million. And it is likely that there will be more bumper paydays to come. 

As ever with big tech, though, the company has not escaped controversy. Last week, it removed references to its relationship with the Chinese technology giant ByteDance – which has long faced scrutiny from US politicians – from official filings ahead of the public listing. 

A deal between Nscale and ByteDance had long been rumoured, but not acknowledged by the company, despite including details of such a deal in confidential documents it disclosed to US regulators earlier this year. 

ByteDance runs TikTok but was forced to sell the site’s American arm to US investors in January due to fears the Chinese firm could use the app to surveil its 200million American users. 

Last month Clegg was invited to talk about his book, How To Save The Internet: The Threat To Global Connection In The Age Of AI And Political Conflict, at the Chiswick Book Festival. 

Here was a soft landing close to home, an opportunity to hold forth at St Michael & All Angels Church before an audience of mainly elderly and middle-aged locals without fear of contradiction. Or so he thought. 

For as it happened, within the audience were a number of guests with a close knowledge of Facebook’s questionable practices. 

One was a lawyer working on the case of Professor Meareg Amare Abrha, an Ethiopian academic who was shot dead outside his home after he was slandered on Facebook. Posts also revealed identifying information about him. A legal claim from his family alleges the company’s algorithm helped fuel the viral spread of hate and violence during Ethiopia’s civil war. 

‘I don’t know the individual case,’ said Clegg after he was asked by the lawyer to apologise. ‘There are four billion people who use Facebook. It’s not reasonable to ask me to comment on it.’ 

Yet as The Chiswick Calendar, a news and listings website that covered the event, observed: ‘Surprising he did not recognise the case though, as it is very well known and was in the news while he was in post.’ 

Next came Deborah Annetts, chief executive of the Independent Society of Musicians who has co-authored a report on ‘the industrial-scale theft of the UK’s cultural riches’ by AI companies. 

She asked Clegg whether he believed Meta should have to comply with UK copyright law. ‘Of course the company should abide by the law of the land,’ he replied, but rather patronisingly claimed the process was ‘more complicated’ than she suggested.

He added: ‘They don’t take a book and reproduce it as it is. They “tokenise” the data.’ Had she been given chance to respond, Ms Annetts would have told him that writers have indeed found their entire books reproduced.

On a more general point from someone else about the morality of working for Meta, Clegg said: ‘I wouldn’t have stayed seven days, much less seven years if I thought they were awful, amoral people.’

Maybe so. But his bruising experience at, of all things, a literary festival was a salutary reminder that the ‘Master of the Metaverse’ will need to tread carefully in his brave new world. 

Three Sentenced to Life for Murdering Australian Surfers

0

Three men in Mexico have received lengthy prison sentences after being convicted of killing two Australian brothers and their American friend at a well-known surfing destination.

Jake Robinson, 30, his brother Callum Robinson, 33, and their American companion Jack Carter Rhoad, 30, were visiting Mexico’s Pacific coast for a surfing trip when they were fatally shot in Baja California.

The three friends were camping near a remote beach when they were attacked in April 2024.

Their bodies were discovered several days later in a shaft near a cliff, each bearing gunshot wounds to the head. Their vehicle was subsequently found burned out in the Santo Tomás area.

Jesus ‘El Kekas’ Gerardo, described in court as the alleged ringleader, was convicted last week alongside Irineo Francisco and Angel Jesus.

A week after the guilty verdicts, a Mexican court sentenced each man to 158 years and nine months in prison.

According to ABC News, the defence has indicated that it plans to appeal the convictions and sentences.

Jake and Callum’s parents, Debra and Martin Robinson, held hands in court as the verdicts were delivered on October 9.

Australian brothers Jake Robinson, 30, and Callum Robinson, 33, pictured with their American friend Jack Carter Rhoad, 30, were killed during a surfing trip to Mexico’s Pacific coast

Jesus 'El Kekas' Gerardo, identified in court as the ringleader, was found guilty of the killings alongside co-defendants Irineo Francisco and Angel Jesus last week

Jesus ‘El Kekas’ Gerardo, described in court as the ringleader, was convicted last week along with co-defendants Irineo Francisco and Angel Jesus

The three men were each sentenced to 158 years and nine months in prison. The defence team has suggested their intention to appeal the sentence. Pictured is on of the trio, Angel Jesus

The three defendants were each sentenced to 158 years and nine months in prison, although their lawyers have indicated they may appeal. Angel Jesus is pictured

In a victim impact statement delivered on October 8, Debra Robinson urged the court to impose the maximum possible sentences.

“No sentence can bring Callum and Jake back; nothing can undo what has happened, but accountability matters,” she said.

The Robinsons attended every day of the trial and sat only metres from the defendants during six hours of closing arguments before the verdict was reached.

When the guilty verdicts were announced, Ms Robinson wept and embraced an Australian consular representative.

Prosecutors told the court that the three tourists were killed during a robbery that spiralled out of control. Defence lawyers, however, argued that the evidence was not strong enough to establish the men’s guilt.

The judge rejected that argument, finding that multiple witnesses had delivered testimony that was both credible and consistent.

One of those witnesses was Ari Gisell, the former girlfriend of Jesús Gerardo, who had already been jailed for helping instigate the robbery connected to the murders.

Gisell told the court that Gerardo had described the victims begging for their lives before they were killed, and later mocked the men for crying.

During a victim impact statement on October 8, Jake and Callum Robinson's mother, Debra, had asked the court to hand down maximum prison sentences

Debra Robinson, the mother of Jake and Callum, called for maximum prison sentences during her victim impact statement on October 8

Police alleged the trio's vehicle (pictured) was later found burnt-out in the Santo Tomás area

Police alleged the trio’s vehicle (pictured) was later found burnt-out in the Santo Tomás area

Debra and Martin Robinson (pictured with their sons) had attended every day of the trial and sat through six hours of closing arguments before the conviction

Debra and Martin Robinson (pictured with their sons) had attended every day of the trial and sat through six hours of closing arguments before the conviction

Jake Robinson, 30, was a doctor who was due to take up a position at a hospital in Geelong, southwest of Melbourne, after returning to Australia.

His older brother Callum, 33, was a professional lacrosse player based in San Diego, in the US.

Mr Rhoad worked at a technology services company and was set to get married in August 2024.

Three wooden statues were installed overlooking the North Baja coast to commemorate the Perth brothers and their American friend.

The Callum and Jake Robinson Foundation said in 2025 that the ‘unveiling ceremony brought together surfers, representatives from the Australian embassy and the Baja California governor’s office’.

‘After a few words were shared, the community honoured the boys with a traditional paddle out,’ the statement said.

Although Baja California is a hotspot for cartel activity, authorities say the killings were not tied to organised crime.

More to come. 

Johnny Depp: The Swashbuckling Star Who Survived Cancel Culture

0

Johnny Depp once insisted he would never reprise Captain Jack Sparrow—not even for “$300 million and a million alpacas.”

For a long time, the actor appeared determined to leave his most famous role behind, particularly after Disney ended its relationship with him amid allegations made by his former wife, Amber Heard.

Depp was reportedly negotiating another appearance as the eccentric pirate in 2018 when the bitter fallout from his divorce intensified. The dispute later led to two highly publicized court cases, while Disney moved quickly to distance itself from the star.

According to Depp’s former manager, the abandoned agreement could have earned the actor $22.5 million.

In the years that followed, Depp showed little appetite for returning to Disney—or for taking on another major Hollywood studio production.

“They dropped him without a second thought, even though he believed he was telling the truth,” a friend said three years ago. The source added that Depp no longer wanted to deliver “someone else’s words,” preferring to express himself through music and art rather than return to Hollywood.

Yet eight years after the allegations appeared to derail his career, Depp’s professional fortunes now seem to be shifting dramatically.

The actor is once again being positioned as a leading man in major studio projects—and he may soon return to the red bandana and swagger of Captain Jack Sparrow in a new Pirates of the Caribbean movie.

Johnny Depp is set to don his famous red bandana, and bring back family favourite Captain Jack in the next Pirates of the Caribbean film (pictured in 2003)

Johnny Depp could reprise his iconic Captain Jack Sparrow role in the next Pirates of the Caribbean movie, having first played the character in 2003

Depp (right) was dropped by Disney bosses following allegations levelled against him by ex-wife Amber Heard (left). Pictured: The couple attending 'The Danish Girl' premiere during the 2015 Toronto International Film Festival on September 12, 2015 in Toronto, Canada

Disney parted ways with Depp after allegations were made by his former wife, Amber Heard. The pair are pictured at The Danish Girl premiere during the 2015 Toronto International Film Festival in Canada

Pirates producer Jerry Bruckheimer has confirmed that discussions are underway. “We’re talking with Johnny, we’re working on a screenplay, and hopefully we can get this done,” he said.

The proposed comeback would reportedly be more limited than Depp’s earlier appearances. The project has not yet received final approval because the script remains under revision, although production could begin in 2027.

Depp is also set to headline Paramount Pictures’ major pre-Christmas release, Ebenezer, a retelling centered on Charles Dickens’ Scrooge. He is expected to begin promotional work soon. In addition, he will lead Lionsgate’s thriller Day Drinker, scheduled for release next March.

The developments suggest that both Depp and the Hollywood establishment have reassessed their positions.

For the studios, the explanation may be straightforward: despite years of controversy, Depp has proved difficult for audiences to disregard.

The two widely followed trials, which examined allegations of domestic abuse involving Heard, exposed deeply troubling material, including violent and offensive text messages Depp sent to actor Paul Bettany. One message included threats to burn and drown Heard, followed by an explicit reference to her corpse. Despite the severity of the evidence discussed in court, public attention has since moved on.

Now 63, Depp is no longer the young star known for his sharply defined features, but he continues to command the kind of attention usually reserved for a pop idol at the height of his fame.

During the summer, he toured with Hollywood Vampires, the band featuring Depp on guitar and Alice Cooper on vocals. In Poland, Germany, Italy and the UK, enthusiastic fans gathered outside venues hoping to see him.

From the stage, Depp often acknowledges that loyalty by placing a hand over his heart—an affectionate gesture that is met with loud cheers from the crowd.

Join the discussion

What does Johnny Depp’s comeback say about forgiveness and second chances in Hollywood?

Depp attending the press conference for 'A Bunch Of Stuff' on November 27, 2025 in Tokyo, Japan

Depp attending the press conference for ‘A Bunch Of Stuff’ on November 27, 2025 in Tokyo, Japan

Research proves this: cinema-goers now actively want to see films starring Depp, meaning that the gambles taken by Lionsgate and Paramount look less risky.

Polling by the National Research Group, a film industry consultancy, suggests he remains a powerful draw. In the firm’s most recent global moviegoer survey, released in April, respondents ranked Depp seventh among stars they said would make them ‘most interested in seeing a new movie in a cinema in the future’.

Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt and Leonardo DiCaprio were in the top three spots. Below Depp were Tom Hanks, Keanu Reeves and Scarlett Johansson.

Also, Depp’s ‘Q score’ – a measurement of a star’s likeability – has increased lately.

In 2015, before Heard’s accusations, 36 per cent of adults surveyed by the Q Scores Company viewed him positively. That number fell to 24 per cent in 2023. By early this year, it was back up to 27 per cent.

Test screenings of Ebenezer have also shown strong approval for Depp’s return, with insiders reporting that 80 per cent of the audience rated it ‘excellent’ or ‘very good’.

More importantly the test audience loved him: 86 per cent of the audience gave him the top rating for a lead character, notably higher than the usual score of around 67 per cent. Women aged over 35 rated the film most favourably. That’s striking as it’s the very demographic whom you might expect to recoil from Depp. But they do not.

That view appears confirmed by scenes at CinemaCon in Las Vegas in April where his surprise appearance to promote Ebenezer was greeted with giddy delight.

‘We love you Johnny,’ shouted some in the crowd. One woman called out: ‘Have my baby!’

Miranda Banks, a professor of film, television and media studies at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles, commented: ‘I do see a path for him, particularly because Hollywood needs this comeback. There’s an incredible lack of compelling A-listers who can open movies on a worldwide basis.’

His popularity is also proven by his ventures outside of acting.

His Three Hearts rum brand, which he launched this year, is apparently a great success.

Pictured with his daughter Lily-Rose Depp at the Stella McCartney 2016 Fall Presentation party in Los Angeles

Pictured with his daughter Lily-Rose Depp at the Stella McCartney 2016 Fall Presentation party in Los Angeles

His paintings and drawings – he has an exhibition in London which started this week at the Halcyon Gallery – also sell briskly, at very high prices.

And he remains an ambassador for Dior’s best-selling aftershave, Sauvage. I’m told sales of the fragrance actually soared by 50 per cent over the course of his 2022 trial.

It’s clear, then, why the studios want him back: he is box office.

Heard, though, has never recovered from a trashing of her reputation on the internet (which continues to this day, with endless posts, many by bots, on X).

While the High Court in London dismissed Depp’s claims that he had been libelled by being called a ‘wife beater’ in 2020 and found that he had assaulted Heard and left her in fear of her life, a court in Virginia two years later found largely in Depp’s favour.

She has since, aged 40, retreated from view, and is living in Madrid with three children, born with the help of a surrogate, as a single mum.

One local source says she also maintains a holiday home on the island of Mallorca and is so determined to fly under the radar there that she goes by an assumed name.

Meanwhile, locals where Depp lives in Wadhurst, Sussex, see him only occasionally walking his bullmastiff, Bourbon, across the fields behind his 44-room house. He cuts a distinctive figure to say the least.

He lives in the listed manor house – which he refers to as his ‘castle’ – with a travelling entourage of staff who keep him company.

Socially, he is very quiet and no girlfriend has appeared in tow. He was recently spotted having dinner in the Middle House hotel, in Mayfield, with Sandra Beck, the widow of his close friend, guitarist Jeff Beck (the men were unlikely best friends, and Depp misses him greatly).

He maintains his rather ‘intellectual’ pose. Even now, I hear privately, he regards himself as an artist first, a guitarist second and, in a poor third place, an actor.

Indeed, Depp himself said in Cannes in 2023 – which he attended to promote his role in art house movie Jeanne du Barry – that he wasn’t going to scrabble around for anyone’s approval.

‘It’s almost like I need to comeback and do a tap dance and dance my best for you guys, and hope you approve,’ he said. ‘The notion of that is some kind of bizarre mystery.’

Depp and Heard attended the European premiere of 'The Rum Diary' at The Odeon Kensington on November 3, 2011 in London

Depp and Heard attended the European premiere of ‘The Rum Diary’ at The Odeon Kensington on November 3, 2011 in London

And yet here he is, getting ready to tap dance once more. Why? The answer is simple: the large cheque needed to sustain his lifestyle.

He has no fewer than four homes: the ‘castle’ in England (which is rented), a large home in LA and an estate in France which is essentially a small private village, plus the Caribbean island of Little Hall Pond Cay.

Modelling himself on heroes and friends such as Rolling Stone Keith Richards and the late writer Hunter S Thompson, Depp has long embraced a quixotic lifestyle in which spending money wildly seemed a point of pride. He told a magazine in 2018: ‘It’s insulting to say that I spent $30,000 on wine, because it was far more.’ He also said he spent more than $5 million to get Hunter S Thompson’s ashes shot out of a cannon.

His famously large recompense for the Pirates film, which included a slice of the profits,

is said to have made him around £240 million to date. But as Depp explained when in the High Court in London in 2020, he discovered in 2016 that he had ‘lost’ a fortune of $750 million (around £500million).

During a meeting with his advisers at business management group TMG, he was told that all the money he had made from the Pirates films was gone and that he was ‘$100 million in the hole’ because he had not paid his taxes for 17 years.

‘It was a bad meeting,’ he later said with some understatement.

Joel and Robert Mandel of TMG looked after his business affairs from 1999 to 2016. Depp then sued them, claiming $25million (£20million) for gross misconduct, including $5.6 million (£5 million) in late fees on taxes.

TMG said that he was repeatedly warned about looming financial disaster but just ignored them. They counter sued in 2017, calling him ‘a spoiled brat with no impulse control’ and said he was a compulsive spender.

‘Depp listened to no one… [and] demanded they fund a lifestyle that was extravagant and extreme,’ they said, before adding: ‘When Depp’s spending outpaced his earnings, and he refused to change his lifestyle, he was forced to borrow large sums of money to continue living the lifestyle he chose.’

The lawsuit was settled in mediation.

Depp settled another lawsuit with his personal lawyer Jake Bloom – once a father figure to him – who he claimed had improperly collected more than £23 million from him.

Bloom, who’d made Depp rich thanks to a profits deal he crafted for the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise, counter-sued.

A judge ruled partially in Depp’s favour, saying an oral agreement that they had about fees should have been put in writing.

Some estimates reckon Depp has spent up to £50 million on lawyers, all in all.

Some cutbacks have taken place: he sold his Kentucky equestrian estate and five penthouse apartments in LA, while his estate in France – where he and then partner Vanessa Paradis raised their children Jack and Lily Rose – comes on and off the market for prices around the £40 million mark but has yet to sell.

One source linked to the Depp camp tells me: ‘He never considers the cost of anything.’ But even so, a big payday which comes with a dose of adulation must be hard to resist.

Depp once told an interviewer: ‘Deep down, I’m like an old watch that refuses to be set to the right time. I like to go at my own pace, and not always in the same direction as everyone else.’

But just for now, it seems that direction aligns with the world of Hollywood which he was once so glad to reject.

Bradley Whitford, Allison Janney Discuss Their TV Shooting Scenes

It’s unusual for actors to share the screen on two political dramas separated by nearly three decades. Rarer still is the chance for both performers to portray characters who are nearly killed in assassination attempts. Allison Janney and Bradley Whitford have now experienced exactly that distinction.

**Spoiler alert for The Diplomat Season 4, now streaming on Netflix**

In the latest season of Netflix’s Emmy-nominated series, Janney plays President Grace Penn, who is leaving Windsor Castle with her husband, Todd Penn (Whitford), and several others when a sniper shoots her in the abdomen. The attack sparks widespread panic and sets off a chain of damaging events that unfolds across the season. For fans of The West Wing, the moment may feel familiar: Whitford’s Josh Lyman was also shot in the stomach during the NBC drama’s assassination storyline, alongside President Jed Bartlet (Martin Sheen). Nearly 30 years after Janney and Whitford first worked together, what was it like to revisit that history from opposite sides? Whitford admits he never expected it to happen.

“No, I know, we’re both in jeopardy,” Whitford tells DECIDER with a laugh. “Allison and I, we were talking yesterday, we realized, yeah, we both got shot.” The storyline immediately reminded him of his West Wing experience, particularly the uncertainty he felt when Josh was the one lying on the operating table. “First thing, when you’re an actor on a show and you get shot, you really wonder if you still have a job,” he says.

This time, Whitford finds himself in the position Janney occupied during The West Wing’s shooting arc. As C.J. Cregg, Janney played the concerned White House figure waiting for news and offering support while the injured characters were treated. Whitford says both perspectives bring their own challenges, but he found playing the victim more difficult. At the same time, Grace’s shooting carries wider consequences for The Diplomat, affecting not only Todd but the direction of the entire series.

“It’s definitely harder to, you know, to go through that ache,” Whitford says. He adds that Todd’s concerns echo some of what Josh experienced, particularly his fear that Grace has not fully processed what happened. “Are you dealing? Has your judgment been distorted in response to not only your sudden rise to the presidency, but this extraordinary trauma?”

Allison Janney as Grace Penn after being shot in 'The Diplomat' Season 4, Episode 1

Photo: Netflix

As the season progresses, the situation becomes increasingly volatile. Grace rejects the support she plainly needs, while Todd travels thousands of miles to London in an attempt to keep his distance. Unlike the long-term psychological fallout from Josh’s shooting in The West Wing, The Diplomat links Grace’s trauma directly to the stability of her marriage and the choices she makes on the world stage. That tension raises difficult questions about how such a crisis might be handled outside television.

“It’s an even more complicated question because I am saying to a woman, ‘Are you sure you’re not reacting emotionally to this?’ And so that’s a really interesting question,” Whitford explains. He points to the public response after Ronald Reagan was shot, when attention quickly shifted from fear for the president’s life to admiration for his courage and resilience. That history, he says, made him consider how the same circumstances might be viewed through the lens of gender. Grace is aware of the implication, even as Todd believes he has legitimate reasons to worry that her judgment has been affected while she makes increasingly dangerous geopolitical decisions.

Those tensions drive the season toward its explosive finale. Kate Wyler (Keri Russell), Vice President Hal Wyler (Rufus Sewell), White House Chief of Staff Billie Appiah (Nana Mensah) and Secretary of State Miguel Ganon (Miguel Sandoval) leave the G7 Summit in protest of Grace’s actions. For a brief moment, it appears Todd might join them. Whitford says the possibility was considered, even if his character ultimately struggles to take that step.

“I think he’s thinking about it, but I think it’s an impossible step for him to take,” Whitford says. “I can tell you, we read that episode and we were like, ‘Oh my God.’”

The Diplomat and The West Wing are both streaming on Netflix.

Netflix has three subscription options, beginning at $7.99 per month for the Standard plan with ads and rising to $24.99 per month for unlimited ad-free streaming in up to 4K UHD quality.

Kentucky Cheerleader Laken Snelling Sentenced in Baby’s Death

0

Former University of Kentucky cheerleader Laken Snelling is going to prison.

Snelling, 22, was sentenced Oct. 16 to 10 years behind bars after pleading guilty in August to manslaughter, abuse of a corpse, tampering with physical evidence and concealing a birth in connection with the 2025 death of her newborn son.

Before her arrest, Snelling’s life revolved around college classes, social activities and training with the University of Kentucky’s elite cheerleading stunt team. She will now serve her sentence within the Kentucky Department of Corrections.

Laken Snelling Admitted to Ending Baby’s Life in Court

Snelling gave birth to a baby boy during the early morning hours of Aug. 27, 2025. According to an arrest citation obtained by the Lexington Herald Leader, she told investigators that she passed out on top of the infant and woke to find him “turning blue and purple.”

Authorities said Snelling wrapped the baby in a towel, placed him in a plastic bag and hid the body in her closet. Her roommates later found the infant and called 911.

The Kentucky Medical Examiner’s Office determined that the baby had been born alive and died of asphyxia by an undetermined means, according to a statement from Lexington Police.

Under the terms of her plea agreement, Snelling was required to explain in court what happened that morning.

“I was under a lot of emotional stress and my baby came unexpectedly,” she said, according to NBC News. “And instead of helping him, I ended his life. And afterwards I cleaned up and didn’t tell anyone.”

What Was Laken Snelling’s Sentence? 

At the Oct. 16 hearing, Snelling received a 10-year sentence for manslaughter and one-year sentences for each of the three other charges. Commonwealth’s Attorney Kimberly Henderson Baird told Oxygen that the sentences will run concurrently.

The court also credited Snelling with the 415 days she has already spent under house arrest.

What Happens Next For Laken Snelling?

Baird said Snelling will not be eligible for parole until she has served 85% of her sentence under Kentucky statutes governing violent offenses.

After the sentence was handed down, Baird told WHAS 11 that she believed Snelling was remorseful over her son’s death.

“This was an extremely tragic case. The defendant made a very bad decision that resulted in the death of a newborn baby boy (Kade),” Baird told Oxygen. “Kade’s family spoke in court mourning the loss of a son, grandson, and nephew they never got to meet. No sentence the defendant received will take away that hurt and pain, but we hope that the family will now find peace and comfort, and that the defendant will be able to learn from her mistake and become a productive member of society when she is released from custody.”

Oxygen contacted Snelling’s defense attorney for comment but did not receive an immediate response.

Snelling will serve her sentence within the Kentucky Department of Corrections, but it remains unclear which facility will house her or whether she has already reported to prison.

Oxygen also contacted the Department of Corrections but did not receive an immediate response.

Cruz, Collins Among GOP Senators Sent Suspicious White Powder Mail

0

The offices of Republican Sens. Ted Cruz and Susan Collins received envelopes containing a “white powder” Friday, bringing the number of lawmakers targeted in the suspicious-mail campaign to more than a dozen.

The FBI, U.S. Postal Inspection Service and U.S. Capitol Police are investigating the letters. Some were intercepted before they reached their intended recipients.

“This afternoon, my Houston office received a suspicious piece of mail containing a white powder substance,” Cruz, R-Texas, wrote on X. “The FBI, Houston Police and Fire Department, and U.S. Capitol Police responded swiftly.”

Cruz described the incident as “deeply concerning,” adding that “attempts to intimidate your political opponents have no place in our country.”

A similar letter addressed to Collins, R-Maine, arrived at her Portland office, prompting an evacuation and emergency response. Another letter sent to her Washington, D.C., office was intercepted by U.S. Capitol Police.

“Thank you to the Portland police, the Portland fire department, the hazmat team, and the FBI for their quick and courageous response,” Katie Brown, Collins’ chief of staff, said in a statement to local outlets. “This was the fourth attack targeting Sen. Collins’ office or home in the past two months.”

“Despite escalating political rhetoric and harassment, we will continue our work for the people of Maine.”

Cruz and Collins are both facing close midterm reelection contests.

Senate offices received a warning about the letters from Capitol Police on Thursday, along with an image showing what the suspicious envelopes looked like.

Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said his staff did not open a “suspicious piece of mail” that arrived at his Sioux Falls, South Dakota, office Friday because of the law enforcement warning.

“I am grateful for the U.S. Capitol Police, who intercepted other letters and sent out a warning allowing my team to recognize this letter before opening it, and to the Sioux Falls Police Department,” Rounds wrote on X. “I am also grateful for all of my team members, who work tirelessly on behalf of South Dakotans despite the risks involved.”

The senator added, “This situation is deeply concerning and follows a trend of intimidating tactics that impact our team members. This has no place in our nation. America is better than this.”

The Senate warning included a photo of one suspicious envelope postmarked “DSA,” with a return address at 75 Maiden Lane, a Financial District building that the Democratic Socialists of America formerly listed on its membership forms.

“DSA has not occupied this office address since 2013,” a representative for the organization said in a statement. “We are also no longer headquartered at 75 Maiden Lane.”

In addition to the three Republican Senate offices that received letters Friday, at least 15 congressional offices held by Democrats and about 26 state election offices have also been targeted, according to NBC News.

New York Reps. Laura Gillen, Tom Suozzi and Ritchie Torres, as well as Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., are among the Democratic lawmakers who have confirmed receiving letters.

The FBI has not identified the substance inside the envelopes, describing it only as “an unknown substance.”

Congressional offices have previously been targeted with contaminated letters, most notably during a series of anthrax attacks in 2001 that sent the deadly bacteria to Senate offices.

One of those letters arrived at the office of then-Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., in October of that year. Staff members sought medical treatment, and an entire building was later decontaminated.

The mailing spree killed five people and sickened at least 17 others.

Letters containing ricin, a poison, have also been mailed to Senate offices in the past, but didn’t result in any deaths.

Emilie Kiser Reveals 7-Year Struggle With an Eating Disorder

Emilie Kiser is speaking openly about her years-long struggle with an eating disorder.

The 27-year-old influencer, who is expecting her third child, addressed what she called “a topic that [she] really doesn’t talk about very often” in a TikTok posted Thursday, October 15.

“I had an eating disorder for about seven years on and off,” Kiser said. She explained that growing up as a dancer contributed to her difficult relationship with food and her body. “I really do feel like a lot of eating behaviors, body dysmorphia, self-consciousness with my body really did come from dance, even though so many good things came from it,” she shared.

Looking back on her recovery, Kiser said she has come a long way and credited her husband, Brady Kiser, with playing an important role in her healing.

@emiliekiser

“TW: talk about food and past ED. Ily guys and I just share because it was on my mind🤍🤍🤍”

♬ original sound – Emilie Kiser

“I really healed from it after Brady and I got married because he was able to help me a lot through it,” Emilie said. She added that this was also when people close to her began realizing how much she had been struggling. Emilie and Brady share sons Teddy, 16 months, and Trigg, who died at age 3 in a drowning accident.

She continued, “When you’ve suffered from an ED and it took up such a large chunk of your life, you constantly have moments where you’re like, ‘Oh wow. I’ve made a lot of progress.’”

Today, eating foods that once caused anxiety feels like a major milestone. Kiser said she “can’t believe it used to be a trigger” and recalled being afraid to eat certain foods or constantly worrying about calories and her appearance. She never expected to reach a point where she would no longer track everything she ate or focus obsessively on her body.

Emilie Kiser Says Husband Brady 'Allowed Me to Take Out Every Emotion' After Late Son Trigg's Death

Emilie Kiser previously shared an update on coping with grief after the death of her son Trigg in May 2025. While pregnant with her third baby, the 27-year-old spoke on TikTok about navigating life after Trigg’s drowning accident. She began the video by sharing […]

“I was thinking about it today [because] I am not fixated on my body at all anymore, and I think that comes with age but also it comes with healing,” she said. Kiser recalled that she once would not have allowed herself to eat a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Now, she said, “I’m so proud of myself because I don’t even think about that anymore. I eat what I want.”

Kiser emphasized that she is not a dietitian or an eating-disorder expert, but said her experience has shown her that recovery is possible. “I’m 27 years old, I’m pregnant with my third baby. I have come so far with food and the way that I think about food, and I don’t even think about it anymore,” she said.

She also encouraged anyone struggling to seek support from trusted people. “If you are someone that is struggling, I am here for you and I really hope that you have people in your life that you can trust and can help you in that journey,” Emilie said. She reiterated, “TW: talk about food and past ED. Ily guys and I just share because it was on my mind🤍🤍🤍.”

If you or someone you know is struggling with an eating disorder, visit the National Alliance for Eating Disorders website or call its hotline at (866) 662-1235. Free, 24/7 support is also available by texting “ALLIANCE” to 741741.

Osceola County Leaders Discuss Property Tax Amendment Impacts

0

Kissimmee – A proposed change to Florida’s property tax system is prompting debate over potential savings for homeowners and the impact those savings could have on essential services in Osceola County.

State Sen. Kristen Arrington joined county officials and residents at a Kissimmee town hall to discuss Amendment 3, which would raise the homestead exemption to $250,000 by 2028.

Supporters say the measure could deliver meaningful property tax relief to qualifying homeowners. Local leaders, however, warned that the resulting revenue loss could affect public services, infrastructure projects and county programs.

“When you ask the question what will be impacted? Everything will be impacted in Osceola County,” said County Commission Chair Brandon Arrington.

County officials estimate that Osceola could lose about $79 million in revenue if Amendment 3 passes. The shortfall could reach the general revenue fund, emergency medical services, libraries and the Save Osceola program.

In preparation for possible financial pressure, the county is already planning to cut $12 million from next year’s budget, freeze hiring and put capital projects on hold. Road improvements and other county services could also be affected.

Arrington said county officials have also warned thousands of businesses that their contracts could be affected by the potential loss of revenue.

“We already sent notices to 83,000 vendors that do business with the county letting them know their contracts may be in jeopardy or eliminated,” he said.

Arrington cautioned that lowering property taxes would not remove the cost of operating essential government services.

“It sounds great. We would all like to save money, but I would say unfortunately this measure is more of a tax shift,” she said. “At the end of the day, someone will have to pay for essential services.”

The town hall underscored the central trade-off: homeowners could see lower tax bills, while local governments could have less money available for services residents depend on.

That possibility concerned some people who attended the meeting.

“I really think this will be detrimental to the community I live in because we really need these services,” said Michael Woods, who attended the meeting.

Other attendees said the discussion gave them a clearer understanding of Amendment 3, though they had not yet decided how they would vote.

“It was very educational,” one attendee said.

After the town hall, the woman said she wanted to gather more information before deciding how she felt about Amendment 3.

“I still want to go home and do my own research, but I have a little bit more clarity on it,” she said.

With the general election approaching, Osceola County voters will weigh whether potential property tax savings are worth the possible effect on local government revenue and the services their communities rely on.

Copyright 2026 by WKMG ClickOrlando – All rights reserved.