Home Blog Page 1667

DCLM Daily Manna 23 June 2026 — Loyalty to The Master

DCLM Daily Manna 23 June 2026 Devotional by Pastor W. F. Kumuyi — Loyalty to The Master

TOPIC: Loyalty to The Master (DCLM Daily Manna 23 June 2026)

KEY VERSE: Joseph of Arimathaea, an honourable counsellor, which also waited for the kingdom of God, came, and went in boldly unto Pilate, and craved the body of Jesus – Mark 15:43

TEXT: Mark 15:40-47 (KJV)

40 There were also women looking on afar off: among whom was Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the less and of Joses, and Salome;

41 (Who also, when he was in Galilee, followed him, and ministered unto him;) and many other women which came up with him unto Jerusalem.

42 And now when the even was come, because it was the preparation, that is, the day before the sabbath,

43 Joseph of Arimathaea, an honourable counsellor, which also waited for the kingdom of God, came, and went in boldly unto Pilate, and craved the body of Jesus.

44 And Pilate marvelled if he were already dead: and calling unto him the centurion, he asked him whether he had been any while dead.

45 And when he knew it of the centurion, he gave the body to Joseph.

46 And he bought fine linen, and took him down, and wrapped him in the linen, and laid him in a sepulchre which was hewn out of a rock, and rolled a stone unto the door of the sepulchre.

47 And Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of Joses beheld where he was laid.

DCLM Daily Manna For Today MESSAGE:

Chuken Hachiko, the loyal dog, became famous for waiting at Shibuya Station (the same spot where he greets his master) in Tokyo every day for nearly 10 years after his master ’s death. In the evening, Hachiko stood on four legs at the ticket gate, gazing at each passenger as if searching for someone. His story symbolises loyalty and devotion, and a statue was erected in his honour at the station. Hachiko’s tale has touched many hearts worldwide, inspiring movies and books. Japanese school children are taught the story of Hachiko, also known as the loyal dog Hachiko, as an example of devotion and fidelity.

Our passage is an eloquent testament to Joseph of Arimathaea’s love for Christ, even at his death. His act exemplified the height of passion, commitment, dedication and consecration to Christ and all He stood for. While Joseph may be considered a secret disciple because he was not known among the twelve, and the women in the text, regarded as weaker vessels, they still displayed heart-warming heroism of faith in Christ. Apart from John the Beloved, one of the twelve disciples, all the other disciples abandoned Jesus at his most trying time and eventual crucifixion. Joseph and the women were different. They risked their lives and ensured the Lord of glory was honoured at burial. Boldly, Joseph requested and got the body of Christ from Pilate and decently laid Him in his new ‘tomb.

The opportunity to serve the body of Christ is always there for us all. The head of the church, Jesus Christ, is in heaven, but his body (the Church) is here, awaiting His return. We can show our love and devotion to Him by loving, caring for, and compassionately relating with our fellow brethren. Needy members and even ministers are all around us. Are we touching them? Seeing sick, diseased, infirmed, afflicted, homeless, imprisoned, hungry and naked brethren around us, how much love have we shown?

On the other hand, have we abandoned the bereaved – widows, widowers and orphans? Just how can we prove that we love Jesus? Have we forgotten what He said? Deeds of kindness to any member of the body of Christ are deeds unto Christ, and shall be rewarded. “And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me” (Matthew 25:37- 40). We demonstrate our love for Jesus by loving and caring for His body, the Church. What about the other sheep and lamb outside? The time to start is now

THOUGHT FOR THE DAY
Commitment to Christ makes us follow Him to the end.

THE BIBLE IN ONE YEAR
Ezra 4-6

Deeper Life Daily Manna For Today 2025 was written by Pastor W. F. Kumuyi; is the founder and General Superintendent of the Deeper Life Bible Church situated at KM 42 on the busy Lagos-Ibadan Expressway, Nigeria.

REMINDER!!! JESUS IS COMING SOON

ARE YOU BORN AGAIN? IF NO, WHY NOT ACCEPT JESUS NOW!

Accept Jesus Christ today and secure a life of eternal rest and Glory by saying this short prayer below:






Lord Jesus, I believe you died for my sins, Forgive me of all my iniquities. I accept you as my Lord and Saviour from today and forever.



Come and Be the Lord of my life and I am willing to obey Your command and live according to Your will by Your Grace, Thank you for accepting me into Your fold

AMEN!!! John 6:37…and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.

Rhapsody Of Realities 23 June 2026: The Language Of The Heavenly

Rhapsody Of Realities 23 June 2026 By Pastor Chris Oyakhilome (Christ Embassy): The Language Of The Heavenly

TOPIC: The Language Of The Heavenly (Rhapsody of Realities 23 June 2026)

…The inhabitant shall not say, I am sick: the people that dwell therein shall be forgiven their iniquity (Isaiah 33:24).

Rhapsody Of Realities For Today’s MESSAGE:

Your words reveal your origin. What you say is the expression of who you are and where you’re from. In other words, your speech unveils your nature. If you’re born of God, then your language must reflect your heavenly nature and divine origin.

You hail from God. You’re born after the second and last Adam, the Lord from heaven; therefore, you’re a heavenly being (1 Corinthians 15:47-48). You have a heavenly life, with its own consciousness, its own characteristics, and its own language.

This is where many miss it. They acknowledge they’re born again, but their communication doesn’t align with their origin. They still speak the language of the earthlings: words of fear, weakness, defeat and limitation. Don’t speak like the world because you’re not of this world: “They are not of the world, even as I am not of the world” (John 17:16). Speak from heaven.

And what does that mean in practical terms? It means your speech must be consistent with your nature in Christ and aligned with the Word of God. The inhabitants of Zion don’t speak sickness. That’s what the Scripture says: “The inhabitants shall not say, I am sick.” It’s not merely a statement; it’s a culture, a consciousness, and a way of life.

There’s a language that goes with your nature in Christ. You don’t talk lack, you don’t talk defeat, and you don’t talk fear, because that’s not who you are. Your words carry power. They transmit life, strength, health, victory, righteousness and prosperity. Therefore, speak the language of the Kingdom.

Speak like the Master. Speak only what God says. The Bible declares, “…He hath said…so that we may boldly say…” (Hebrews 13:5-6). That’s the pattern: He says it, and you say the same in agreement. Refuse to speak contrary to your nature. Refuse to align your words with circumstances. You’re not governed by what you see or feel; you’re governed by the Word. Speak faith-filled, life-giving words. Speak the language of the heavenly.

PRAYER

Dear Father, thank you for the life of Christ in me and for my heavenly nature. I speak in alignment with your Word, and my words are filled with power, life and grace. I speak health, strength, victory and righteousness today. The communication of my faith is effective, producing results that glorify you, in Jesus’ Name. Amen.

FURTHER STUDY

1 Corinthians 15:47-48 (KJV)
The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven. [48] As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly.

Hebrews 13:5-6 (KJV)
Let your conversation be without covetousness; and be content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee. [6] So that we may boldly say, The Lord is my helper, and I will not fear what man shall do unto me.

Proverbs 18:21 (KJV)
Death and life are in the power of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof.

Mark 11:23 (KJV)
For verily I say unto you, That whosoever shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; and shall not doubt in his heart, but shall believe that those things which he saith shall come to pass; he shall have whatsoever he saith.

1-YEAR BIBLE READING PLAN
Acts 10:24-48 & Ezra 7-8

2-YEAR BIBLE READING PLAN
2 Corinthians 8:1-8 & Isaiah 10

DIVINE HEALTH CONFESSIONS – 23RD JUNE 2026

I walk in absolute health, safety, and wellness because I am in Christ. Christ is my life! His wisdom, righteousness, peace, glory, and joy are resplendent in me and expressed through me today and always. Glory be to God.

Remember to share with all your friends and loved ones today. Thank you and God bless you richly.

Rhapsody of Realities 2026 Devotional was written by Pastor Chris Oyakhilome (D.Sc., D.D.). President of Loveworld Inc. aka Christ Embassy Int’l.

REMINDER!!! JESUS IS COMING SOON

ARE YOU BORN AGAIN? IF NO, WHY NOT ACCEPT JESUS NOW!

Accept Jesus Christ today and secure a life of eternal rest and Glory by saying this short prayer below:






Lord Jesus, I believe you died for my sins, Forgive me of all my iniquities. I accept you as my Lord and Saviour from today and forever.



Come and Be the Lord of my life and I am willing to obey Your command and live according to Your will by Your Grace, Thank you for accepting me into Your fold

AMEN!!! John 6:37…and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.

Rethinking Career Beginnings: The Future of Entry-Level Jobs in a Changing Economy

0

Artificial intelligence (AI) is not merely another technology concern; it has emerged as a significant issue affecting the middle-class landscape.

This transformative force has infiltrated various sectors such as work, education, healthcare, finance, media, and transportation. It influences housing, hiring practices, law enforcement, political campaigns, and even family dynamics. What’s remarkable is the speed of its integration—much swifter than the legislative pace in Washington or Sacramento, quicker than adaptations within school districts, unions, businesses, and too rapid for parents striving to explain these changes to their children.

For many years, Americans adhered to a conventional life blueprint: excel academically, gain admission to a reputable institution, secure a stable job, master a profession, advance a career, buy a house, start a family, and contribute to the community. This traditional ladder, though not perfect or universally accessible, was a recognized path to success.

However, AI now poses a threat to the foundational steps of this ladder.

The immediate concern isn’t about the elimination of all jobs overnight. Instead, the more insidious threat is the erosion of entry-level roles crucial for career development. Positions such as junior analysts, junior engineers, paralegals, associates, coders, designers, consultants, finance staff, writers, researchers, schedulers, and campaign workers involve tasks often dismissed by seasoned employees as routine. Yet, these roles play an essential role in building skills and experience.

It is how young people learn judgment.

A junior analyst does basic research, but learns how to think. A junior engineer writes simpler code, but learns systems. A young lawyer drafts routine documents, but learns reasoning. A campaign staffer starts with doors, phones, data entry, and scheduling, but learns voters, persuasion, pressure, logistics, discipline, and leadership.


Proposed Moratorium on Regulating AI Is Bad for Everyone, but Especially for Conservatives


Entry-level jobs are not just labor. They are training infrastructure. If AI takes over the basic work, where do young people learn?

That question should be at the center of Republican policy right now. The party cannot afford to sound afraid of the future. But it also cannot accept a future where technology gets smarter, shareholders get richer, government gets bigger, and human beings become economically and spiritually disposable.

Conservatives should not become anti-technology scolds. AI can do enormous good. It can help doctors detect disease earlier, help students learn faster, help farmers improve yields, help small businesses compete with large corporations, help workers become more productive, and give ordinary people access to tools once reserved for elite institutions.

But abundance on paper does not automatically become abundance in real life. That is the mistake the technology class often makes. It points to innovation and assumes people will feel progress. They may not.

A parent worried about a child’s future does not feel abundance. A worker who sees his job automated does not feel abundance. A young adult locked out of the first step of a career does not feel abundance. A family whose data is collected, sold, monitored, and nudged by invisible systems does not feel freedom. They feel replaceable.

That gap between technological progress and lived experience is where politics lives, and Republicans should own that space.

The Democrat answer will almost certainly be more federal programs, more central planning, more mandates, more redistribution, more regulation, and more bureaucratic control. Big Tech will offer a different version of the same future: trust us, give us your data, let our systems manage the complexity, and everything will get more efficient.

Neither answer is enough.

A future where a small class of AI billionaires gets richer while millions of Americans receive government checks and lose purpose is not abundance. It is dependency with better branding.

People need more than income. They need dignity, usefulness, recognition, belonging, contribution, formation, community, and purpose. Work is not just a paycheck. It is structure, pride, and the ability to provide. It is one of the ways people become adults, build families, serve neighbors, and earn respect.


READ MORE: Bernie, Billionaires, and What’s Really Broken in the Economy


Any future that replaces work without preserving dignity will fail. That is why Republicans need a pro-human AI agenda.

First, the party should lead with a work-first transition. AI should augment workers before replacing them. Companies that benefit from public contracts, tax incentives, subsidies, or regulatory advantages should be expected to show how they are helping workers adapt. If public policy helps accelerate automation, public policy should also demand a bridge for the people affected by it.

Second, Republicans should champion AI apprenticeships. If the old entry-level tasks are being compressed, then new training pathways must be built. That means employer-based learning, trade-tech programs, community college partnerships, applied AI certificates, campaign fellowships, and apprenticeships that teach judgment, communication, ethics, problem-solving, and leadership. A four-year degree is no longer a guaranteed doorway into the future economy.

Third, Republicans should support portable skills accounts. Do not pay people to stand still while the economy changes around them. Help them move. Help them retrain, buy tools, earn credentials, start businesses, purchase software, get licensed, and compete.

Fourth, Republicans should push ownership accounts. The answer to technological disruption cannot be consumption alone. It must be ownership. Child investment accounts, employee profit-sharing, small business formation, retirement savings, and portable wealth-building tools all point toward a better future. If AI creates historic productivity gains, ordinary Americans should have a path to own part of the upside.

Fifth, every AI policy should be tested against family stability. Does it help Americans marry, raise children, buy homes, access health care, start businesses, and live near family? Or does it create a world where people are more efficient but lonelier, more tracked, more replaceable, and less rooted?

Sixth, privacy must become a central Republican freedom issue. AI will be powered by data, and personal data is becoming one of the most valuable assets in the world. If AI systems operate in phones, homes, schools, workplaces, cars, medical records, financial accounts, and government services, then consent, ownership, and control over personal data cannot be afterthoughts. Americans should not have to choose between innovation and liberty.

Seventh, Republicans should rebuild community contribution. Tutoring, mentoring, coaching, elder care, foster care support, neighborhood safety, volunteerism, church service, and civic work create real value. But that value should be encouraged through families, churches, schools, nonprofits, employers, local institutions, philanthropy, and tax incentives, not through a centralized social credit system.

This is where Republican governors, legislators, donors, entrepreneurs, and local leaders should move. Build state-level pilots. Build community college partnerships. Build employer coalitions. Build skills accounts. Build child ownership accounts. Build privacy protections. Build local AI training hubs in places that usually get ignored until election season.

California should be ground zero.

If California is home to the companies building the AI future, then California Republicans should be the ones asking whether that future will work for families in Torrance, Fresno, San Bernardino, Bakersfield, East Los Angeles, Oakland, the Central Valley, the Inland Empire, and everywhere else.

AI gives Republicans another chance to turn working-class frustration into lasting trust. Steve Hilton and every Republican candidate serious about governing should seize this issue before Democrats define it as another case for dependency, bureaucracy, surveillance, and centralized control.

The conservative answer to AI cannot be nostalgia. We cannot tell people to return to an economy that no longer exists. But it also cannot be surrender. We should not accept a future where technology gets smarter, shareholders get richer, government gets bigger, and human beings become economically and spiritually disposable.

The party that leads on AI will not be the party that talks the most about machines. It will be the party that talks most clearly about people.

City Greenlights $31 Million Eastern Wharf Parking Garage, Dismissing Alternative Sites

SAVANNAH, Ga. — City officials in Savannah are advancing plans for a potential new $31 million parking facility within the bustling Eastern Wharf area. This move aims to enhance infrastructure in one of the city’s rapidly expanding developments, although similar initiatives are not anticipated for other regions, such as the Starland District.

During a recent session, the Savannah City Council conducted the initial reading of a proposal authorizing the Downtown Savannah Authority to issue bonds for constructing the parking garage at Eastern Wharf, situated at the eastern end of River Street. Before any financing proceeds, the proposal requires further approvals.

According to city officials, the envisioned parking structure is essential for supporting the projected growth at Eastern Wharf—an increasingly popular mixed-use development on Savannah’s waterfront.

Mayor Van Johnson clarified that this $31 million endeavor is slated for funding through bond proceeds, ensuring that it will not impact property tax revenues.

“It is crucial to note that this is contingent on a bond issuance process that is yet to occur,” Mayor Johnson remarked. “Ultimately, those utilizing the garage will be responsible for the repayment of these bonds.”

Under the proposal, the Downtown Savannah Authority would issue bonds to fund construction of the garage. Parking fees generated by users of the facility would then be used to repay the debt over time.

While the financing structure has raised questions among some residents, city officials emphasize that the bonds would not be repaid through property taxes.

Documents submitted to City Council say that Savannah would enter into an intergovernmental agreement with the Downtown Savannah Authority that would facilitate the bond issuance and establish repayment obligations.

The proposal would also include funding for capitalized interest and issuance costs associated with the bond.

City officials argue the garage is not a new idea but rather part of a long-standing development agreement tied to the former Savannah River Landing project, now known as Eastern Wharf.

An amended development agreement approved in 2017 envisioned multiple city-owned parking garages within the 55-acre riverfront redevelopment. The agreement called for public parking structures to be integrated into larger mixed-use buildings containing apartments, retail space, hotels, and other commercial uses.

The original plan included a Phase 1 garage with approximately 660 parking spaces and a second garage with roughly 720 spaces as future development progressed.

The agreement also outlined significant public infrastructure investments, including Riverwalk extensions, park construction, streetscape improvements, and utility upgrades designed to connect Eastern Wharf to Savannah’s Historic District.

City leaders have long argued that parking infrastructure is necessary to support the area’s anticipated residential and commercial growth.

As discussion of the Eastern Wharf proposal gained attention, some residents questioned why the city appears willing to support a parking garage downtown but not in areas such as the Starland District, where parking shortages have become a growing concern.

The question surfaced just weeks after City Council debated parking challenges in Starland and ultimately approved additional on-street parking along portions of Maupas Avenue.

Johnson said the city is intentionally moving away from relying on large parking structures as a long-term transportation strategy.

“We’re trying very hard to get away from building parking garages,” Johnson said. “They’re very, very expensive and they really serve no other use but for parking.”

Instead, the mayor said Savannah’s focus is increasingly shifting toward mobility improvements, including public transportation.

“We have to help save Chatham Area Transit and create other ways for people to create mobility around our city,” he said. “We don’t want to become a city of parking garages.”

Johnson said Eastern Wharf represents a unique circumstance because structured parking was incorporated into the development plan years ago and designed as part of the project’s overall infrastructure.

The Starland District, by contrast, presents different challenges.

“The Starland District is very, very dense,” Johnson said. “I think it would be very difficult to put a parking garage right in the midst of where people live, where they work or where they play.”

He added that neighborhood concerns, limited space, and development patterns make a large parking deck less practical in the area.

The mayor also addressed calls for additional parking options for Savannah’s hospitality workforce, many of whom work downtown where parking demand remains high.

Johnson said the city already offers discounted parking programs for hospitality employees, though those spaces are often located farther from workplaces than some workers would prefer.

“A lot of people want to park in front of where they work, and that’s just not practical these days,” he said.

The Eastern Wharf proposal remains in its early stages.

Under Georgia law, the Downtown Savannah Authority’s request for bond approval must be considered through two separate City Council readings before consent can be granted. Public notices and hearings are also required before final action can be taken.

If approved, the garage would become one of the largest recent public parking investments in Savannah and could serve as a key piece of Eastern Wharf’s continued expansion.

For now, city leaders say the project reflects a commitment made years ago as part of the waterfront redevelopment plan – not the beginning of a broader push to build more parking garages across Savannah.

Family Tragedy: Man Allegedly Shoots Parents and Grandmother, Say Police

0

Inset: Gaurav Chopra (Hidalgo County Jail).

In a chilling incident just days before Father’s Day, a young Texas man is accused of fatally shooting his father, mother, and grandmother, and attempting to kill his brother, narrowly missing his target.

The suspect, 19-year-old Gaurav Chopra, faces serious charges including capital murder of multiple individuals. The tragic victims are identified as his father, Sweeta Ram, aged 56, his mother, Kamlesh Rani, 46, and his grandmother, Minder Kaur, 73. He is also charged with attempted capital murder for allegedly firing at his brother.

Sheriff J.E. “Eddie” Guerra of Hidalgo County reported to the media that law enforcement officers arrived shortly after 9 p.m. on Tuesday at a residence in the 3700 block of Roosevelt Avenue in Alton, located in southeastern Texas.

The unsettling 911 call came from Chopra’s brother, stating that Chopra had “killed his family” and also attempted to shoot him. Chopra fled the location in a white Lexus. Upon arrival, one deputy spotted the suspect’s car leaving the gated community.

Chopra allegedly fled the deputy and later crashed into two other cars. He was arrested. Deputies recovered a 9mm gun inside the car believed to be the murder weapon.

Back at the home, deputies discovered all three victims on the second floor suffering from gunshot wounds to the head. Rani and Kaur were pronounced dead at the scene. Ram later died at a hospital.

Guerra said investigators are still trying to determine a motive.

Ram owned a local motel and event center and was well respected in the community.

“He was a high-spirited, motivating person and always had positive things to say. I never heard him say a negative thing,” Palmview Mayor Rick Villarreal told local NBC/CBS affiliate KVEO.

Ram was happy to host various events and celebrations for the community.

“Any time we asked, he never said no,” Villarreal told the TV station. “We had several functions, a Christmas celebration, our Thanksgiving, employee recognitions. He always provided the best food.”

Chopra remains in the Hidalgo County Jail without bond. His next court date is unclear. KRGV reports that he was a student at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley.

Venezuelan Man Faces Charges for $1,250 Sunglasses Heist at Bass Pro Shops

0

Contributed by Staff

GAINESVILLE, Fla. – Venezuelan national, 35-year-old Henyer Jose Rivero-Torres, found himself in legal trouble on June 12 after being apprehended for driving without a valid license. He further faced allegations of pilfering sunglasses worth $1,250 from Bass Pro Shops.

Following Rivero-Torres’s detention for the driving offense, a detective from the Alachua County Sheriff’s Office (ASO) connected him to a theft incident at Bass Pro Shops in May.

The theft occurred on May 15, when reports indicated that around 11 a.m., a male individual was seen near the Sunglass Outfitter’s kiosk. He reportedly stole six pairs of high-end sunglasses, relocated to another part of the store, and severed security tags before exiting without making a purchase. Evidence suggests that the same individual and a Hispanic woman are habitual offenders at the retail outlet.

The store’s Loss Prevention Officer provided a license plate that was spotted on two vehicles at the Bass Pro Shops location: a Toyota Camry and a Toyota Highlander.

The detective noted that a University of Florida Police Department officer had stopped a Toyota Highlander with the same tag number on April 3 and reported that it was driven by Rivero-Torres. The officer issued a citation for attaching a tag that was not assigned to the vehicle and for driving without a valid license. The detective noted that the pictures from that officer’s body-worn camera looked like the suspect in the Bass Pro Shops theft.

The detective learned on June 12 that a car with the same tag had been pulled over by ASO, and the driver was arrested for driving without a valid license. The detective noted that photographs of Rivero-Torres’s shoes from the arrest were “clearly the same” as those worn by the Bass Pro Shops suspect.

The detective administered a photo lineup to the Bass Pro Shops LPO, and he identified Rivero-Torres as the suspect in the theft of the sunglasses.

The detective also noted that five anti-theft devices made from steel cables were found in the pocket of the pants that Rivero-Torres tried on after visiting the sunglasses kiosk.

Rivero-Torres has been charged with grand theft and five counts of destruction of loss prevention devices. He has no local criminal history, but he has a federal history from 2024. Judge Jonathan Ramsey set bail at $60,000, and Rivero-Torres is being held on a federal detainer.

ASO’s arrest forms do not have a field for citizenship status, and local court records are silent about Rivero-Torres’s citizenship status. He told Court Services that he has been in the area for about two years and is self-employed.

Articles about arrests are based on reports from law enforcement agencies. The charges listed are taken from the arrest report and/or court records and are only accusations. All suspects are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

US-Iran Negotiations Progress After Challenging Start to Two-Day Talks

0

On Monday, senior negotiators from the United States and Iran concluded a series of extensive initial discussions aimed at achieving a lasting resolution to the longstanding conflict between the two nations.

Beginning on Sunday in Switzerland, the mediation efforts, though occasionally tense, resulted in some significant agreements between the countries involved.

Mediators from Qatar and Pakistan praised the “encouraging progress” achieved, noting that both Iran and the United States have agreed to establish a “de-confliction cell” to manage hostilities in Lebanon.

A senior U.S. diplomat reported advancements on several issues, including the creation of systems to ensure the continued accessibility of the Strait of Hormuz—a crucial passageway for global energy transport—and maintaining a ceasefire in southern Lebanon.

Despite the presence of Qatari and Pakistani officials, the talks were disrupted by inflammatory remarks from U.S. President Donald Trump. Speaking from a distance of thousands of miles, at a resort nestled in the Swiss mountains near Lake Lucerne, his comments were perceived as offensive by the Iranian delegation.

Iranian state media said talks had paused after the “publication of an insulting message by the US President.” The Iranian delegation then met with Qatari mediators and left the negotiating site, state media said. The senior US diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity to brief journalists on the ongoing talks, said late Sunday that the Iranians remained on site and the negotiations were on.

Iranian state television reported Monday that the Iranian delegation had left the summit site to head to the airport in Zurich to fly back to Tehran.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian had vowed to “never back down from the right to enrich uranium,” according to state media, and Trump later told Fox News in a phone interview that Pezeshkian should watch what he says and also threatened to take over Iran, according to one of the news channel’s correspondents.

Trump also continued to issue warnings against Iran on social media, posting as negotiators worked: “Iran must immediately stop their highly paid PROXIES in Lebanon from causing trouble. If they don’t, we’ll hit Iran very hard again, just like we did last week, only harder!!!”

The chief negotiators for the US include JD Vance, the vice president; special envoy Steve Witkoff, and Jared Kushner, the son-in-law of the president. Iran is represented by Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, Iran’s parliamentary speaker, and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.

It’s unclear when Vance will depart Switzerland, although he told Fox News in an interview Saturday that he anticipates staying only a “day or two.” Kushner and Witkoff are handling much of the technical details on behalf of the U.S. delegation.

In a joint statement, Pakistan and Qatar said the high-level talks had ended and that technical negotiations would continue in Switzerland for the rest of the week.

The statement said the sides had agreed to establish a “communication line” to ensure safe passage of ships in the Strait of Hormuz, as well as a mechanism to bring about an end to the fighting between Israel and the Iranian-backed militant group Hezbollah in Lebanon.

The US offered no immediate comment, while Iran praised the meditators’ work.

Araghchi wrote on X that Pakistani and Qatari mediators delivered “major progress to end the Lebanon War.” He added that the first “real test” of negotiations would be whether the mechanism succeeded in halting the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah.

The senior US diplomat said among the issues discussed was Iran’s messaging as it related to the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran’s military said it closed Saturday in response to continued fighting in Lebanon. US Central Command has disputed that Iran closed the strait again.

The interim deal to end the fighting in Iran, signed last week by the leaders of the US and Iran, outlines a 60-day period for negotiators to settle the future of Tehran’s nuclear program amid concerns that it wants to use it for military purposes, a claim Iran denies.

The fate of frozen Iranian assets, among other thorny issues, are also on the agenda.

Though the talks will encompass a vast array of complex matters, Iran first wants to focus on addressing the fighting in Lebanon.

Saturday’s renewed cease-fire in Lebanon appeared to be holding, and Israel’s military said it would lift movement restrictions for residents near the Israel-Lebanon border on Monday morning. Neither Israel nor Hezbollah is a signatory to the US-Iran deal.

There was cautious calm Monday in Lebanon, with no Israeli strikes reported overnight after a day of quiet Sunday.

Hezbollah likewise has not announced any attacks on Israeli forces since Saturday.

The lull in fighting in Lebanon is the longest since the outbreak of the latest Israel-Hezbollah war on March 2.

Keir Starmer Steps Down as British Prime Minister Amid Labour Party Revolt and Election Setbacks

0

Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced his intention to resign on Monday in the face of increasing dissent within the Labour Party. This decision follows significant losses in local elections, the resignation of several government ministers, and mounting pressure from prominent figures within his cabinet.

Starmer expressed his decision to step down from both his roles as prime minister and Labour leader, having concluded that unifying the party was beyond his reach. However, he plans to remain in office until a successor is appointed.

“My decisions have always put this beloved country first. Thus, I am resigning as the Labour Party leader. I informed His Majesty the King of my choice earlier today,” he declared in a statement outside 10 Downing Street.

Acknowledging the internal revolt, Starmer remarked, “The current question within my party is whether I am the right person to lead us into the forthcoming general election. I have listened to my parliamentary colleagues’ responses and accept them graciously.”

He added that he will serve as a caretaker prime minister until the Labour Party elects a new leader in the upcoming weeks.

The announcement follows weeks of turmoil inside Britain’s ruling party after Labour lost roughly 1,500 council seats and control of more than 25 councils in local elections last month, according to reporting from U.K. outlets. The losses were fueled by major gains from Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party in Labour’s traditional strongholds and by Green Party advances in urban areas.

Keir Starmer

Britain’s PM Starmer speaks during a press conference, in London. (Thomas Krych/Pool via REUTERS)

Starmer’s domestic troubles deepened after a damaging dispute with President Donald Trump over the Iran conflict earlier this year. The British prime minister initially resisted U.S. requests to use British bases during military operations against Iran, prompting Trump to criticize him publicly, saying: “This is not Winston Churchill that we’re dealing with,” on March 3.

But after initially drawing a hard line, Starmer later approved limited defensive cooperation with the U.S., angering anti-war lawmakers inside his own party while still failing to satisfy critics who accused him of indecision and weak leadership.

Public frustration over the episode surfaced in YouGov focus groups and polling commentary, where voters described Starmer as “weak,” “indecisive” and overly reactive to Washington.

Nigel Farage celebrating with supporters at DCBL Stadium in Widnes

Nigel Farage, leader of the Reform UK party, celebrates the victory of Sarah Pochin in the Runcorn and Helsby by-election at the DCBL Stadium in Widnes, England, on May 2, 2025. (Oli Scarff/AFP)

The crisis escalated after two Labour ministers resigned publicly and called for a leadership transition.

Jess Phillips resigned from her government role after Starmer reportedly refused to step aside during a cabinet meeting. Phillips said Labour needed leadership with more “gusto” and warned the government was failing to deliver the change voters expected, according to The Guardian.

Miatta Fahnbulleh also resigned and called for what she described as an “orderly transition,” according to U.K. media reports Tuesday.

More than 80 LabourMPs publicly called for Starmer to resign. Steven Swinford, political editor at The Times, wrote on X, “What is striking is the fact that they hail from all wings of the party,” adding that roughly a third were centrists, while others came from Labour’s soft-left and hard-left factions.

John Healey defended Starmer publicly before the resignation announcement, saying, “More instability is not in Britain’s interest. Our full focus must be on security.”

Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer and U.S. President Donald Trump shaking hands in the White House East Room

Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer and U.S. President Donald Trump shake hands at a joint press conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington on Feb. 27, 2025. (Carl Court/Pool Photo/AP)

Starmer also faced criticism over his appointment of Peter Mandelson as ambassador to Washington, reviving media scrutiny surrounding Mandelson’s past association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 

Keir Starmer

Sir Keir Starmer announced his resignation on Monday.  (Leon Neal/Getty Images)

Attention now turns to a potentially divisive Labour leadership contest that will determine both Labour’s next leader and Britain’s next prime minister.

Wes Streeting is viewed as a leading contender from the party’s centrist wing, while Andy Burnham remains popular among Labour’s grassroots having recently won a seat in Parliament. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner is also expected to play a major role in shaping the succession battle.

Serena Williams Announces Wimbledon Comeback: Competing in Both Singles and Doubles at Age 44

0

Ever since Serena Williams revealed nearly three weeks ago her comeback to the world of professional tennis after a four-year hiatus, anticipation has been building.

Yet, it was genuinely startling to read the succinct statement from The All England Club confirming the legendary 23-time Grand Slam winner’s participation in the Wimbledon singles competition.

The pivotal announcement shared on Sunday, eight days before the prestigious grass-court event, declared, “Serena Williams (USA) receives the final ladies’ singles wild card.”

Williams, at the age of 44, will compete not only in singles but also in the doubles category at Wimbledon, partnering with her elder sister Venus after securing a wild card for the doubles event.

As if to highlight the gravity of the moment, Wimbledon took to social media on Sunday to declare, “This is not a drill.”

Commented the WTA Tour, “Name a more iconic return…we’ll wait.”

Serena Williams of the U.S. returns the ball during the WTA 500 Berlin Open tennis tournament at Steffi Graf Stadium, in Berlin, Germany, Tuesday, June 16, 2026.

Serena Williams of the U.S. returns the ball during the WTA 500 Berlin Open tennis tournament at Steffi Graf Stadium, in Berlin, Germany, Tuesday, June 16, 2026.(AP Photo/Ebrahim Noroozi)

Wimbledon held open the eighth and final women’s singles wild card spot until Williams made up her mind. As recently as earlier this week after losing a doubles match in Berlin, she appeared to be waffling over the decision.

“Oh my gosh, there are some left?” she replied when she was told there was still a wild card spot open. Wild cards are special invitations handed out by tournament organizers, which allow former champions and others access to the main draw without the necessary entry qualifications. But then she mused about her readiness for it.

“Do you think I’m ready for singles?” she asked a reporter and then turned to doubles partner Karolina Muchova to ask what she thought.

“I think I would be interested in it,” the Czech player responded.

“That’s the question of the hour, right?” Williams said. “I don’t know. I don’t know. I wonder why there’s – I don’t know.”

Well, now that Williams has made up her mind, the big remaining question is how she can physically handle singles play after so long.

Serena’s most-recent singles match was a loss to Ajla Tomljanovic in the third round of the 2022 U.S. Open. At the time, she said she didn’t want to use the word “retiring” and instead declared that she was “evolving” away from tennis. Her second daughter was born in 2023.

“Just finished a mean game of duck duck goose,” Williams said on X after the wild card announcement.

Of Williams’ 23 Grand Slam titles in singles, seven have come at Wimbledon: in 2002, 2003, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2015 and 2016. She’s also won 14 Grand Slams in doubles, all with Venus, and six of them at Wimbledon.

Serena also swept the singles and doubles (with Venus) titles at the 2012 London Olympics, when the tennis competition was held on the hallowed grass of the All England Club.

At her last Wimbledon appearance in 2022, Serena was beaten in the opening round by 115th-ranked Harmony Tan in her first match since having to stop less than a set into her opening contest at the All England Club because of an injury the year before.

Serena won a doubles match with partner Victoria Mboko at Queen’s Club last week but then the pair had to withdraw after Mboko injured her knee in a singles match.

In another doubles match at the Berlin Open on Tuesday, Serena and Muchova were beaten by Giuliana Olmos and Erin Routliffe.

As of Sunday, Serena had not entered the singles draws of any grass-court tuneup tournaments before Wimbledon.

She will learn who her first-round opponent is on Friday when the singles draws for Wimbledon are held.

While she’s No. 593 in the doubles rankings courtesy of her victory last week, Serena has no singles ranking after being away for so long.

Iga Swiatek is the defending Wimbledon champion, while Aryna Sabalenka is ranked No. 1.

Because Serena has no ranking, she could potentially face Swiatek, Sabalenka or any other top-ranked player in the opening rounds.

Copyright © 2026 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

Keir Starmer Resigns: Reflecting on Milestones in His Leadership Tenure

0

In an emotional announcement today, Keir Starmer revealed that he is stepping down, as Andy Burnham appears poised to make a bid for leadership at Downing Street.

Standing outside the iconic No. 10, Starmer reflected on his accomplishments in leading Labour to victory while also offering some questionable claims regarding his government’s achievements.

Despite these successes, Starmer conceded that his tenure was coming to an end. “The question isn’t whether I can continue to reform the Labour Party,” he stated, “but rather if I am the right person to lead us into the next general election.”

He graciously accepted the verdict, saying, “It’s with goodwill that I will step down as the leader of the Labour Party.”

Starmer assured that the process to find his successor would be orderly, with a new leader being appointed before the parliamentary summer recess on July 16, should Burnham be the sole candidate. If multiple candidates emerge, the decision might extend into August.

However, Sir Keir became emotional as he paid tribute to the support from his family – saying he would now focus on being the ‘best husband’ and the ‘best dad’. 

Wife Victoria and the couple’s son had joined close colleagues outside in the street to watch the news be delivered. Anti-Brexit protester Steve Bray, a perennial presence in Westminster, could be heard playing EU anthem Ode To Joy through speakers nearby.

Mr Burnham – who has rallied huge support from Labour MPs since romping home in the Makerfield by-election last week – is due to be sworn in at the Commons at 2.30pm.

But Nigel Farage immediate joined calls – including from some Labour MPs – for a general election to accompany the change at the top. 

The PM returned to Downing Street from Chequers early this morning, after spending the weekend locked in talks with wife Victoria and close aides. He spoke to the King, who is at his Highgrove residence, by phone before making the announcement.

In other twists and turns today:

  • A minister has warned that Mr Burnham must call a snap general election if he takes over from Sir Keir;
  • Markets are giving their verdict on a turbulent weekend, with fears a new PM could tear up fiscal rules and lurch Left;
  • Britain is on track for its seventh PM in a decade since the Brexit referendum;
  • Sir Keir is set to be the shortest-serving Labour PM since universal suffrage.  

Keir Starmer talked up his achievements in getting Labour elected in a statement outside the famous black door of No10

Keir Starmer talked up his achievements in getting Labour elected in a statement outside the famous black door of No10 

Sir Keir hugged his wife Victoria after paying an emotional tribute to his family

Sir Keir hugged his wife Victoria after paying an emotional tribute to his family

The tearful couple posed for pictures on the doorstep before heading back inside

The tearful couple posed for pictures on the doorstep before heading back inside 

Close colleagues gathered outside in the street to watch the statement

Close colleagues gathered outside in the street to watch the statement

How could Andy Burnham become PM? 

Contest 

Under Labour’s rules, a leadership contest is triggered if one challenger can get nominations from 81 MPs.

This is a bar Andy Burnham would easily reach. Any other contender – such as Wes Streeting – would also need to meet the same threshold.

As the incumbent Keir Starmer could automatically have gone on the ballot paper if he had chosen to fight.

His voluntary departure makes a contest much less likely.

The timetable for a vote by party members would be then set by the ruling National Executive Committee, although Sir Keir said the aim was to have a successor in place by the Commons recess on July 16.

The winner would then become PM.  

Coronation 

The preferred outcome of many Burnham supporters – and indeed MPs more widely – is to avoid a contest.

That would involve Sir Keir voluntarily stepping down, and Mr Burnham persuading other contenders not to run for the job.

The Makerfield result has increased the ex-mayor’s leverage, and he could offer Cabinet jobs to rivals as sweeteners. 

In that scenario Mr Burnham could take over as PM almost immediately – unless there is some sort of deal with Sir Keir to string the process out. 

Sir Keir reiterated his defiance on Friday after Mr Burnham stunned the political world by securing a 9,000 majority over Reform in Makerfield.

He insisted he would fight any challenge to his leadership.  

But the mood music had dramatically shifted by yesterday, when Business Secretary Peter Kyle – one of Sir Keir’s dwindling band of loyalists – was sent on TV to say the premier was reflecting on his situation. 

In his speech this morning, Sir Keir said: ‘Walking up this street two years ago was the proudest moment of my life, a new Labour government, the first in 14 years, a page in our country’s history turned after years of disappointment and despair, the chance to change the lives of millions of people for the better, that’s what I came into politics for the journey to that point was not easy.

‘Six years ago, I inherited a Labour Party that was politically, financially, and thoroughly bankrupt.

‘I was told time and time again that my party was finished, that we were consigned to history, that a majority at the general election, let alone a landslide majority, was impossible, but we proved those people wrong, because we changed our party, ripping out the poison of antisemitism, restoring trust on the economy, defence, and national security, and becoming a party that once again stood proudly with, not against, our national flag.’

Sir Keir insisted that people should ‘look at what we’ve achieved in just two years’.

‘An economy that is stronger, going faster than our peers, wages rising faster than inflation in every single month since we came to power,’ he said.

‘Investment secured, infrastructure being built, an end to austerity with the fastest fall in NHS waiting lists for 17 years, the biggest improvement in rights for workers and renters in a generation.’

‘The biggest uplift in defence spending since the Cold War.

‘Small boat crossings falling, asylum hotels closing, protecting young people from social media and half a million children being lifted out of poverty because of the choices that I made.

‘Our reputation in the world restored, with Britain once again standing up for decency, respect and the rule of law, securing trade deals, standing with Ukraine, standing up for our values and rebuilding our relationship with our allies in Europe.

‘Change promised by a Labour government. Change fought for by a Labour government. Change delivered by a Labour government.’

His voice cracking, Sir Keir said: ‘I want to thank the brilliant Number 10 staff and our country’s extraordinary Civil Service who dedicate their lives to public service.

‘And when I leave the biggest job in the country, I shall spend more time on the most important job, being the best husband I can to my fantastic wife, Vic, who has been a rock by my side through good times and bad, and being the best dad I can to my beautiful children, who are my pride and my joy.’

Sir Keir is also slated to do a statement on the G7 summit in the House this afternoon, which would have been difficult unless he had provided some clarity on his intentions. 

Baroness Jacqui Smith, seen as close to Sir Keir, appeared to confirm Sir Keir was on the way out as she toured broadcast studios for the Government this morning.

The education minister used the past tense as she said she ‘would have been happy for him to continue’ as premier – although she also urged people not to ‘get ahead of themselves’.

Lady Smith, a former home secretary who was elevated to the House of Lords by Mr Starmer two years ago, told Times Radio: ‘My understanding from those I’ve spoken to who are close to the Prime Minister yesterday is that he has spent the weekend thinking very carefully about the future of the country and what is the best thing to do for the British people.

‘He has also, of course, been engaged in government — responding to the terrible train crash, speaking to the chief executive of the East Midlands Ambulance Service, and responding to the attack in Edinburgh.

‘But he always thinks carefully about the future of this country and the interests of the British people — he puts them ahead of the interests of the party — and he will make his own decisions in light of what everybody can see is a considerable amount of pressure and turbulence.’

Last night Donald Trump declared Sir Keir ‘will resign’, pre-empting the announcement from No10.

The US President, who met Sir Keir at last week’s G7 summit in France, waded into Labour’s leadership crisis.

‘Keir Starmer will resign as Prime Minister of The United Kingdom,’ he posted on his TruthSocial site in his latest intervention into British politics.

‘He failed badly on two very important subjects- IMMIGRATION AND ENERGY (OPEN NORTH SEA OIL!). I wish him well! President DJT’

The PM reached the conclusion that his position is no longer tenable after talking to Cabinet colleagues, No 10 advisers, union leaders and key Labour donors.

Attention will now turn to the prospects of a Burnham administration – with the former Greater Manchester Mayor the overwhelming favourite to take over.

Mr Burnham is being urged to tear up Labour’s tax pledges to fund his costly spending plans.

While fighting for the Makerfield seat, Mr Burnham said he would honour Labour’s manifesto tax pledges, which include not raising income tax, National Insurance or VAT. 

But allies of the new MP are now pushing him to drop the pledge or risk being ‘hamstrung’ in office.

Labour ministers and MPs on the Left of the party have rallied around Mr Burnham – including his right-hand woman Louise Haigh, Anneliese Midgley, who helped to run his campaign, and Energy Secretary Ed Miliband.

One pro-Burnham minister told the Daily Mail: ‘That manifesto was written at a certain point in time but so much has changed. I think Andy has an opportunity to say he’s a new PM and in order to bring about real change, it is going to require some big changes.

‘That includes on tax, where he is going to need to raise revenues to deal with the huge pressures in defence, in the NHS, in getting our high streets where they need to be… I think if we stick to those tax pledges he is going to be hamstrung from the start and people could become disillusioned very quickly.’

Toeing the line? Andy Burnham in Cheshire yesterday after his Makerfield by-election victory

The first solid sign of an announcement this morning was workers bringing out sound kit

The first solid sign of an announcement this morning was workers bringing out sound kit 

The outgoing Greater Manchester mayor has committed to slashing business rates for pubs and hospitality venues, nationalising water, energy and transport, a massive investment in council housing and a revival of the northern leg of HS2.

Mr Burnham is yet to outline how he will pay for these promises, made in the heat of his by-election campaign, which could cost taxpayers tens of billions of pounds.

Government estimates put the cost of nationalising the water industry alone at about £100billion – meaning Mr Burnham could have to look again at the tax commitments Labour was elected on in order to find cash for his economic agenda. Last night the Tories warned Mr Burnham’s spending plans will damage the economy, as they said that he has ‘high taxes, high borrowing in his DNA’.

Shadow Chancellor Sir Mel Stride told this newspaper: ‘Andy Burnham wants to tear up Labour’s already disastrous economic legacy and go even further. This will punish hard-working people who do the right thing.

‘Rachel Reeves has raised taxes by over £60billion while letting the welfare bill spiral out of control. Burnham wants to double down on all her mistakes, with yet more taxes and more reckless spending and borrowing.’

Mr Burnham, photographed in Cheshire yesterday wearing Birkenstock sandals ahead of his return to Westminster today, spooked the financial markets last year when he said the Government should be less ‘in hock’ to the bond markets. But during his by-election campaign, he said he supported the Chancellor’s fiscal rules – U-turning just weeks after suggesting they could be changed to fund defence spending.

There are those around Mr Burnham still advocating for such a move. Lord O’Neill, a former Treasury minister, has said the Government should be ‘bolder about borrowing to invest’.

The economist, who Mr Burnham has drafted in to boost his team of advisers, suggested more could be done to ‘explore’ Rachel Reeves’s fiscal rules in order to boost spending.

UK gilt yields, which determine the cost of government borrowing, rose after Mr Burnham’s victory cleared the way for his bid to oust Sir Keir. During his campaign he was likened to Robin Hood’s ‘Sheriff of Nottingham’ after he boasted of hitting Manchester with the highest tax of any mayor.

Reform UK’s Treasury spokesman Robert Jenrick last night warned that ‘Burnham will show his true colours’ upon entering No 10. 

‘Higher taxes to fund wasteful Net Zero spending, houses for illegal migrants, and benefits for those who don’t need them,’ he said. ‘Labour never changes and working Britons will be forced to pay for it all.’

Business Secretary Peter Kyle told Sky News yesterday that Mr Burnham must maintain ‘fiscal discipline’. 

Ms Reeves’s fiscal rules state that day-to-day spending must be matched by tax revenues, so that Labour can only borrow to invest and not to fund spending.