Taylor Swift and her fiancé, Travis Kelce, were the picture of romance as they attended a friend’s wedding in New York City on Saturday.

The globally acclaimed singer and the Kansas City Chiefs star, both aged 36, were seen sharing a tender moment, holding hands as they made their way to the Brooklyn celebration.

This public appearance adds to the growing anticipation surrounding their much-talked-about July wedding, which has been creating quite a buzz.

Swift nearly stole the spotlight at the event with her dazzling Maria Lucia Hohan gown, a piece valued at approximately $2,280.

Her dress, crafted from golden silk mousseline, featured elegant ruching across the bodice and a flowing ankle-length skirt, beautifully highlighting her toned arms.

It featured sizable cutouts over her back – which her fiancé highlighted as he placed a hand over the cutouts after they stepped out of their SUV – and she elevated her stature with a pair of open-toe heels.

Taylor Swift and her fiancé Travis Kelce put on a loved-up display as they arrived at what appeared to be a friend’s wedding in New York City on Saturday

The pop superstar and the Kansas City Chiefs tight end, both 36, displayed some PDA as they held hands upon arriving at the celebration in Brooklyn

Swift added a regal touch with a golden ribbed clutch, a gold necklace with a small diamond at the center and dangling earrings comprised of opals arranged to look like rain showers. 

Kelce contrasted her with a striking navy pinstriped suit, which he paired with lustrous patent leather shoes.

He dressed down his suit with a simple black T-shirt and matching sunglasses, and the NFL star added some major bling to his wedding outfit thanks to a Rolex Cosmograph Daytona ‘Rainbow.’

The gleaming watch – which sells for between $400,000 and $550,000 on the secondary market – featured an 18k white gold case and bracelet, along with a diamond pavé dial and a bezel of rainbow-colored sapphires.

Kelce previously flaunted the timepiece on Friday night, when he and his fiancée were spotted enjoying a night on the town in the Big Apple. 

Swift is known for her own impressive collection of ultra-expensive luxury wristwatches, but she appeared to have skipped them in favor of matching gold bracelets with opal links. 

She and the football star didn’t share any details about the wedding they were attending, but a fellow attendee surreptitiously snapped a photo of the two chatting with one of their friends, which was subsequently posted by a Swiftie fan account on X.

The couple’s weekend outing came after Kelce’s coach, Andy Reid, confirmed that he will be attending their upcoming nuptials.

Swift threatened to steal the attention at the event thanks to her shimmering Maria Lucia Hohan dress, which retails for around $2,280

Her golden dress, which was ruched across the low-cut top and ankle-length skirt, showcased her fit arms, and she elevated her stature with a pair of open-toe heels

Swift’s golden silk mousseline dress featured cutouts over her back that her fiancé highlighted when he placed a hand their as they walked into the venue

She added a regal touch with a golden ribbed clutch, a gold necklace with a small diamond at the center and dangling earrings comprised of opals arranged to look like rain showers

Kelce contrasted her with a striking navy pinstriped suit, which he paired with lustrous patent leather shoes

The NFL star added some major bling to his wedding outfit thanks to a Rolex Cosmograph Daytona ‘Rainbow,’ an 18k white gold watch with a diamond pavé dial and a bezel of rainbow-colored sapphires, which sells for between $400k and $550k on the secondary market

Swift is known for her own impressive collection of ultra-expensive luxury wristwatches, but she appeared to have skipped them in favor of matching gold bracelets with opal links

During an appearance on Thursday on 96.5’s The Drive, the three-time Super Bowl winner was grilled on whether he had received his invitation to the year’s most anticipated wedding.

‘Well, I probably have. And if I don’t outgrow my tuxedo before then, I’m going,’ confessed Reid. ‘But you keep talking about this barbecue, I might have to go get some.’

The Drive host, Carrington Harrison, suggested that the 68-year-old Chiefs coach should get a new ensemble for the special occasion. However, Reid didn’t seem too keen on the idea.

‘I’m not the show; I’m just going to show up,’ he said. ‘I’m so happy for them. When you come down to it, it doesn’t matter how big the show is around them. 

‘They’re in love and that’s the most important thing,’ Reid added. 

His comments followed reports about the unusual way guests have been receiving invitations to Swift and Kelce’s wedding.

Despite her busy schedule, the global superstar has taken it upon herself to invite guests and celebrity friends by calling them on the phone.

Swift has been making some calls herself while her team has also been helping with others, TMZ reported.

She and the football star didn’t share any details about the wedding they were attending, but a fellow attendee sneakily snapped a photo of the two chatting with one of their friends, which was subsequently posted by a Swiftie fan account on X

The couple’s weekend outing came after Kelce’s coach, Andy Reid, confirmed that he will be attending their upcoming nuptials; Reid is pictured in January in Las Vegas 

However, guests have not been informed of the exact location of the nuptials or given a specific date. Instead, they have been told to keep their schedules open for the summer.

Insiders said that calling guests, as opposed to sending traditional invitations, is meant to prevent leaks and keep wedding details private. 

The day before celebrating their friend’s wedding, Swift was pictured stepping out in New York City while wearing a summery floral dress and holding hands with Kelce.

On Thursday, she was spotted going solo in a bridal-white top as she arrived at the exclusive membership club Zero Bond.

The Daily Mail recently confirmed that Swift and Kelce are set to marry in NYC on July 3.

It was previously speculated that the couple would say ‘I do’ at her lavish Rhode Island estate.

Guests who received an invitation have also been required to RSVP with a signed NDA to help keep details of the ceremony private, per a source.

The exact location of the wedding is not known, but it is said to be an arena or museum-like space.

The day before celebrating their friend’s wedding, Swift was pictured stepping out in New York City while wearing a summery floral dress and holding hands with Kelce (pictured)

On Thursday, Swift was spotted going solo in a bridal-white top as she arrived at the exclusive membership club Zero Bond. The Daily Mail recently confirmed that she and Kelce are set to marry in NYC on July 3

The Daily Mail previously reported that Swift has asked her longtime friend Selena Gomez to be her bridesmaid, but the Spring Breakers star has turned her down multiple times; pictured together in 2024 in Beverly Hills

Swift and Kelce kicked off the fierce interest in their upcoming wedding when Kelce proposed in August.

The Super Bowl winner had transformed his Kansas City estate into a picturesque garden wonderland for what became a romantic photoshoot.

Kelce popped the question shortly after his soon-to-be wife made a guest appearance on his New Heights podcast.

The Daily Mail previously reported that Swift has asked her longtime friend Selena Gomez to be her bridesmaid, but the Spring Breakers star has turned her down multiple times. 

That’s despite the fact that the Eras Tour superstar attended Gomez’s wedding to music producer Benny Blanco and even delivered a speech in her honor.

Sources said Gomez had politely declined Swift’s invitation to be part of her bridal party out of fears that she might steal the spotlight from her good friend.

Swift is also said to have asked her model friend Gigi Hadid to be a bridesmaid.

(The Hill) — On Friday evening, former President Trump announced that a collaborative effort between the United States military and Nigerian forces successfully led to the elimination of a prominent ISIS leader.

“Under my orders, courageous American troops along with the Nigerian Armed Forces successfully carried out a highly detailed and intricate mission to remove the world’s most active terrorist from the field,” Trump shared in a Truth Social post.

Trump identified the target as Abu-Bilal al-Minuki, whom he described as “second in command” of the terrorist organization, noting that al-Minuki had been concealed in Africa.

“His reign of terror on the African continent and his role in orchestrating attacks against Americans has ended,” Trump added. “With his elimination, ISIS’s global capabilities are significantly weakened. I extend my gratitude to the Nigerian Government for their cooperation in this mission. GOD BLESS AMERICA!”

According to a statement released by U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) on Saturday, their preliminary analysis indicates that the operation also resulted in the deaths of additional ISIS leaders alongside al-Minuki.

“As President Trump shared last night, AFRICOM in coordination with the Armed Forces of Nigeria, bravely and valiantly conducted a successful mission that resulted in the elimination of Abu-Bilal al-Minuki, and multiple other ISIS leaders,” AFRICOM Commander Gen. Dagvin Anderson said in the Saturday release. 

“This operation underscores the exceptional value of the U.S.-Nigeria partnership and was made possible through the cooperation and coordination of our forces in recent months,” Anderson continued. “Make no mistake, our two nations will relentlessly pursue and neutralize terrorist threats and are committed to protecting our people and interests.”  

Nigerian President Bola Tinubu commended both military forces in a Saturday statement, calling it a “significant example of effective collaboration in the fight against terrorism.”

“Our determined Nigerian Armed Forces, working closely with the Armed Forces of the United States, conducted a daring joint operation that dealt a heavy blow to the ranks of the Islamic State,” he said. 

The Trump administration has previously targeted alleged ISIS members in the African nation. In what the president called a “Christmas present” to the militant group last December, the U.S. military launched strikes on “ISIS Terrorist Scum” in northwest Nigeria. 

Multiple ISIS members were killed in that strike as well, according to AFRICOM.

If you missed the recent controversy involving The New York Times, here’s a quick overview of what happened and its broader implications.

At the center of the storm is Nicholas Kristof’s unusual column from last Monday, where he repeated discredited claims alleging that Israeli dogs had assaulted Palestinian prisoners. Critics have been vocal, pointing out that Kristof seemed to uncritically accept information from sources known for promoting Hamas narratives.

The claims made by Kristof are so extraordinary that the Israeli government has announced plans to pursue a defamation lawsuit against both him and the Times.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu commented, accusing Kristof and the newspaper of “slandering the soldiers of Israel,” and of spreading a harmful myth equating Hamas’s violent acts with the actions of Israel’s military forces.

This situation draws attention to the documented incidents of Hamas militants committing assaults, including against women, children, and even the deceased, during and after their attack on October 7, 2023.

Those proven war crimes are a prime reason why the paper’s dogmatic defense of Kristof’s column is as outrageous as the column itself. By embracing without reservations the Hamas-tainted sourcing and the author’s claims that echo ancient antisemitic tropes about Jews, the Times has tied itself to wild assertions that most rookie reporters would suspect.

Laughable defense

Despite some internal misgivings about how such preposterous claims got through the editing process and were published, the paper’s top editors have issued unyielding statements defending the column and its extreme assertions.

In one of those statements, the editors called the column a “deeply-reported piece of opinion journalism” and insisted it “draws together on-the-record accounts and cites several analyses documenting the practice of sexual violence and abuse conducted by various parts of Israel’s security forces and settlers.”

The most laughable claim is that the column was “extensively fact-checked.” How do you fact check the claim of dogs raping prisoners when science says it’s not anatomically possible?

That’s not independent fact-checking, that’s just repeating the writer’s and his sources’ assertion without offering a shred of new evidence.

Also, the reference to the column being “opinion journalism” does not confer an exemption from facts. In my long experience with opinion writing, I have kept in mind a line from the late, great Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who said, “You’re entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.”

Others have made similar points about Kristof’s work, including Free Press columnist Matti Friedman and Dan Senor on Senor’s always-excellent podcast, “Call Me Back.”

According to Friedman, Kristof’s column is a prime example of “a broader shift in modern journalism,” where many people have traded credibility to become “a weapon in the fight for justice.”

He and Senor also make the key point that if the column’s wild assertions are even plausibly true, they would be the basis of a “bombshell news story.”

But other than defending Kristof, the paper has not followed the sensational claims with an attempt to uncover evidence that could show the events actually happened.

As such, the Times’ reactionary defense strikes me as a moment whose significance goes well beyond the views of a biased writer and his biased editors’ incompetence.

The episode marks a turning point in the American left’s divorce from Israel. The column, and the paper’s bombastic defense, ends any hope the marriage can be saved.

The Times is the lead spear carrier for the radical left-wing of the Democratic Party. The issues, people and language the paper champions are table setters for much of the progressive agenda.

From DEI to transgender surgeries, to hating Donald Trump and promoting climate change dogma, the Gray Lady has become the Pink Lady.

No leftist cause is too wild or impractical to embrace, and that certainly includes demonizing the lone Jewish state.

Open season on Israel

Although the paper has stopped short of directly calling Israel a colonizing entity, its views about the region and its wars consistently condemn Israel while giving Hamas, Hezbollah and other Iranian terror proxies every benefit of the doubt.

In that context, the paper’s conduct in the case at hand reads like a signal to Dems that it’s open season on Israel.

In truth, radical Dems have been increasingly turning against Israel in recent years. The handful of House members known as the squad often make blatantly antisemitic comments, and 40 of 47 Dem Senators recently voted against supplying Israel with defensive weapons.

Meanwhile, complaints accusing the Times of biased Mideast coverage are nothing new among many Israeli and American conservatives, including but not limited to Jewish ones.

But this time is clearly and painfully different. The Kristof defense is not just chiding Israel or dreamily pushing for a two-state solution.

Rather, it resembles a condemnation of Israel’s right to defend itself from those who vow to eliminate it.

Kristof’s column reeked of the same anti-Israel bias that is increasingly finding its way into the paper’s every nook and cranny.

Reporters openly accused Netanyahu of talking Trump into the war against Iran, as if America has no interest of its own in eliminating the mullahs’ nuclear program.

Antisemites make the same argument, and both they and the Times ignore Trump’s long history of declaring that he would do whatever it takes to stop the program.

Nor does the Times give much credence to Iran’s consistent promise to eliminate the two nations it calls the “Little Satan” and the “Great Satan.”

On top of the paper’s cockeyed coverage, comes now one of the weirdest and most lopsided stories it has published.

Here are the “nut” or overview paragraphs of a long article that started on the front page of the May 12th print edition, the day after Kristof’s column ran.

“A New York Times investigation found a well-organized campaign by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government that embraced Eurovision as a soft power tool, and a secretive contest organizer that was ill-equipped to respond.

“As the normally lighthearted contest became a proxy fight over Middle Eastern affairs and human rights, Eurovision struggled to defend a core tenet: Politics play no role in the event.”

Yes, that’s some “lighthearted contest” where other nations called for Israeli contestants to be denied admission and demanded a Palestinian state because of the war in Gaza.

Slanted coverage

Yet it’s only Israel’s conduct the Times sees fit to examine with a fine-tooth comb.

Better, it look inward. Consider the photo mistake where it showed a supposedly starving Gaza baby, only to concede after complaints that the baby’s doctor said it was born with health and genetic conditions that affected brain and muscle development.

Or how about its story claiming Israel bombed a Gaza hospital killing hundreds of people? It was eventually followed by an admission that the coverage should have been “more journalistically rigorous.”

Notice how the big mistakes all favor the same side. Hopefully, the same editors will wake up and make a u-turn on Kristof.

Alec Baldwin was quick to defend Lupita Nyong’o after Elon Musk criticized her casting as Helen of Troy in the upcoming film adaptation of Homer’s “The Odyssey.” Musk commented unfavorably on Nyong’o’s suitability for the role, which in Greek mythology, is that of Zeus’s daughter whose striking beauty incited the legendary 10-year Trojan War, following her abduction by the Trojan prince Paris.

In addition to portraying Helen, Nyong’o will also take on the role of Clytemnestra, Helen’s sister, who, while attractive, did not possess the allure said to have launched a thousand ships.

The exchange began when Matt Walsh, a political commentator and podcast host, expressed his skepticism on X, declaring, “Not one person on the planet actually thinks that Lupita Nyong’o is ‘the most beautiful woman in the world.’”

Baldwin defended Nyong’o via Instagram: ‘Dear Elon… but she IS the most beautiful woman in the world,’ alongside a photo of the 43-year-old Kenyan-Mexican actress.

Walsh, who has faced criticism for allegedly promoting white supremacy and spreading racist conspiracy theories, then shifted his critique towards the film’s director.

Walsh, whose critics have accused him of promoting white supremacy and spreading racist conspiracy views, then directed his attack on the film’s director.

Alec Baldwin didn’t take kindly to Elon Musk disparaging Lupita Nyong’o’s looks over her casting as Helen of Troy in the upcoming film The Odyssey; seen on March 9

The outspoken actor defended Nyong’o via his Instagram page by stating, ‘Dear Elon… but she IS the most beautiful woman in the world’; Nyong’o seen in March 2025

‘But Christopher Nolan knows that he would be called racist if he gave “the most beautiful woman” role to a white woman. Nolan is technically talented but a coward. Too afraid to do anything that even slightly challenges the spirit of the age,’ Walsh concluded.

Musk seconded Walsh’s opinion by writing, ‘True.’

When someone posed the question, ‘Why is Christopher Nolan like so many other directors so keen to race swap white characters?’ Musk responded, ‘He wants the awards.’

The billionaire said Nolan has ‘lost his integrity’ by casting Nyong’o in the role.

In another post, Walsh claimed people would be ‘driven to murderous violence’ if Sydney Sweeney had been cast in a film as ‘the most beautiful woman in Africa.’

‘Absolutely true,’ Musk chimed in. ‘Such hypocrisy in Hollywood.’

Earlier this month, rumors began to circulate online that 39-year-old transgender actor Elliot Page had been cast as Achilles, the legendary hero of the Trojan War, which also set Musk on edge.

He wrote on X that the idea was ‘one of the dumbest and twisted things I’ve ever heard.’

When conservative commentator Matt Walsh inferred the Kenyan-Mexican actress wasn’t beautiful enough to play the daughter of Zeus, Musk wrote, ‘True’; Musk seen Thursday in Beijing

The billionaire Tesla CEO said The Odyssey director Christopher Nolan (seen in 2024) has ‘lost his integrity’ by casting Nyong’o in the role and ‘wants the awards’

Baldwin – seen with wife Hilaria in December 2025 – is clearly not a fan of Musk’s

Nyong’o – seen in May 2025 – was crowned People magazine’s Most Beautiful in 2014, the same year she won the Best Supporting Actress Oscar for her role as Patsey in 12 Years a Slave

After it was announced that Page will portray the character Elpenor, Musk reposted a mean-spirited tweet that read, ‘I’m not mocking her masculinity. I’m denying its existence.’

Meanwhile, Nyong’o – who took home the Best Supporting Actress Oscar in 2014 for her role as Patsey in 12 Years a Slave – was crowned People magazine’s most beautiful that year.

‘It was exciting and just a major, major compliment,’ the actress said at the time. ‘I was happy for all the girls who would see me on [it] and feel a little more seen.’

Nyong’o used to base beauty on what she saw on television. ‘Light skin and long, flowing, straight hair,’ she told the publication. ‘Subconsciously you start to appreciate those things more than what you possess.’

She added that her mother, Dorothy, ‘always said I was beautiful, and I finally believed her at some point.’

Governor Maura Healey of Massachusetts has reached out to the U.S. Navy for assistance in probing the tragic incident involving a fishing boat that sank earlier this year, resulting in the loss of seven crew members. This request has been confirmed by the Navy to Fox News Digital.

In a joint effort, Healey and State Senator Bruce Tarr have appealed to the Secretary of the Navy, seeking aid in recovering a video recorder and hard drive from the wreckage of the Lily Jean. This vessel went down in January and now rests over 300 feet deep in the Atlantic, approximately 25 miles off the Massachusetts coast, as reported by WFXT-TV. The retrieval of these items could potentially shed light on the cause of the vessel’s sinking.

A representative from the Office of the Secretary of the Navy informed Fox News Digital on Saturday that they have received the communication from the governor’s office. They stated, “We are currently preparing a response, which will be sent directly to Governor Healey.”

Governor Healey is also determined to recover the bodies of the six remaining crew members from the 72-foot boat, which tragically sank on January 30.

Governor Healey’s request for Navy assistance highlights the ongoing efforts to uncover the details surrounding the unfortunate accident that claimed seven lives. (Jonathan Wiggs/The Boston Globe via Getty Images; Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

The body of Lily Jean Captain Accursio “Gus” Sanfilippo is the only one that has been recovered.

The six others who died in the sinking include crew member Paul Beal Jr.; crew member John Rousanidis; crew member Freeman Short; crew member Sean Therrien; and NOAA fisheries observer Jada Samitt.

“What caused it is not as important as retrieving the crew,” Donna Short, the mother of Freeman Short, a 31-year-old who was planning a wedding, told WFXT.

She said she spoke to him a few days before he went out on the doomed trip.

“He told me, ‘Hey mom, you know I’m going to be going,’ and I told him I loved him,” she said, adding that recovering his body is a “matter of laying him to rest where his legacy began next to both of his grandfathers, who are veterans.”

A placard honoring the crew of the Lily Jean is displayed at the Gloucester Fisherman’s Memorial in Gloucester, Mass., on Jan. 31, 2026. (Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe)

The National Transportation Safety Board and the U.S. Coast Guard are involved in an ongoing investigation into the sinking.

The Coast Guard’s search for the missing crew members was suspended on Jan. 31, a day after the sinking, and the NTSB said it doesn’t do recoveries, according to WFXT.

When the Lily Jean sank, Coast Guard watchstanders received an emergency position indicating a radio beacon (EPIRB) alert at about 6:50 a.m. registered to the vessel.

USCG crews attempted to contact the boat, and after getting no response, issued an urgent marine information broadcast (UMIB), according to officials.

Multiple aircraft, cutters and small boats searched 1,047 square miles over 24 hours, finding debris near the location where the EPIRB was activated, along with the captain’s body and an unoccupied life raft that had been deployed.

Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey talks with U.S. Coast Guard Captain Jamie Frederick after a press conference in Gloucester on Jan. 31, 2026. The Coast Guard called off the search for the fishing vessel Lily Jean, which had seven crew members. (Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe/Getty Images)

Search and rescue mission coordinators, on-scene commanders and the Coast Guard determined on Jan. 31 all reasonable search efforts for the missing crew members had been exhausted.

“The purpose of a Coast Guard investigation is to identify measures that can improve the safety of life and property at sea, not to assign civil or criminal blame,” the Coast Guard wrote in a statement at the time.

Fox News Digital has reached out to Healey’s office for comment.

<!–>