Home Blog Page 44

Marine Veteran Jimmy Friesenhahn’s Health Issues May Delay Testimony in Texas Shooting Case

0

A Marine veteran who was left paralyzed after being shot while working as a security guard was scheduled to testify next week against the man accused of attacking him. But a serious decline in his health has forced him back into the hospital, his family told Fox News Digital.

Jimmy Friesenhahn, a combat veteran who served on multiple overseas deployments, has spent at least a week hospitalized with complications from a blood clot that developed after an Aug. 28 surgery, according to his sister, Becky Borjon.

“We encountered some medical setbacks, and he’s been hospitalized for a week now,” Borjon said. “Prior to that, he was in inpatient rehab for three weeks following a surgery he had on Aug. 28, and things just kind of took a turn.”

Friesenhahn was expected to testify in a Bexar County courtroom during the upcoming trial of Wilmer Vladimir Ruiz Ortega, 29, a Honduran national accused of shooting him.

“Trial is scheduled to begin next week on the 20th,” Borjon said. “I believe they will start with jury selection and go from there. Jimmy was expected to appear and testify on his own behalf, and we are still hoping he will be able to do that.”

Ortega was arrested after allegedly shooting Friesenhahn at El Patio Sports Bar in San Antonio on May 4, 2025.

According to police, Friesenhahn noticed a gun in Ortega’s pocket and attempted to prevent him from entering the bar. A struggle followed, and Ortega allegedly fired several shots.

Friesenhahn was hit twice in his bulletproof vest and once in the neck. The neck injury left him paralyzed and unable to speak, requiring round-the-clock medical care.

Ortega faces charges of aggravated assault against a security officer and illegal entry into the United States. He is also involved in federal immigration proceedings.

The shooting fueled outrage among Friesenhahn’s relatives, who highlighted Ortega’s lengthy criminal history in Texas.

Court records indicate that Ortega was arrested for driving while intoxicated in October 2020 and later arrested for violating probation in August 2023.

He was arrested twice more for failing to appear in court, including an arrest in November 2024.

“His last court appearance was in March 2025, and Jimmy was shot on May 4, 2025,” said Emmanuel Martinez, Friesenhahn’s brother-in-law. “At that point, the DA’s office should have complied with removal orders and turned him over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement.”

Borjon likewise questioned why Ortega remained free despite his repeated arrests and alleged offenses.

“I’m not opposed to immigration, but there is a process set in place for a reason,” Borjon said. “This guy was arrested multiple times, released on bond and never reported. He had active warrants for repeated offenses while missing court appearances.”

“Those warrants should have been acted upon, and maybe we wouldn’t be here today. This guy should have been returned to his country.”

As the case moves toward trial, Friesenhahn’s family remains committed to pursuing the charges while confronting the permanent impact of his injuries.

“Unfortunately, we don’t see this as a road to recovery because there is no recovering from an injury like this. We see it as the beginning of a lifelong fight,” Borjon said. “My brother will never walk again. He will never be able to get married or raise a family.”

The Bexar County District Attorney’s Office declined to comment to Fox News Digital about the case’s status.

Homeless Woman Arrested After Allegedly Mooning Woman at Carwash

0

GAINESVILLE, Fla. – Jennifer Gayle Reese, 46, was arrested yesterday after she allegedly exposed herself on a public sidewalk by pulling down her pants and lifting her shirt.

At approximately 9:52 a.m. on September 24, a Gainesville Police Department officer investigated a reported indecent exposure near Gallo Car Wash at 3020 NW 13th Street. The officer located Reese, who matched the witness’s description, in a nearby parking lot.

Reese reportedly denied exposing herself. However, a witness who drove past the scene and saw Reese with the officer identified her as the person she had seen exposing herself.

According to the witness, she was leaving the car wash when Reese approached her on the sidewalk. The witness said she attempted to wave Reese along, but Reese declined, prompting the driver to continue forward and prepare to turn onto the street. When she turned to check for traffic, she said she saw Reese pull down her pants and underwear before lifting her top, exposing her breasts and genitals.

Reese’s address is listed as GRACE Marketplace. She faces a charge of indecent exposure of sexual organs. Although her complete criminal history was unavailable, records show three local nonviolent misdemeanor convictions. She was also found incompetent to proceed in a 2017 trespassing case. Local records show no arrests between 2017 and yesterday, though she was arrested multiple times in Broward County during that period. Judge Adam Lee set bail at $50,000.

Tech Executive Draws Backlash After Revealing Dating Demands

0

A glamorous tech executive has faced intense backlash after unveiling an extensive list of requirements for her ideal partner.

Brooke LeBlanc, 29, from San Francisco, went viral on X earlier this week after posting a detailed list of her dating “non-negotiables.”

Her criteria covered everything from a potential partner’s physique and personality to his views on having children.

She also set out expectations for personal growth, saying any prospective partner must be “on the healing path” and have a “history of serious commitment” to self-improvement through therapy, self-help books or wellness retreats.

“Wrote out a list of who I’m looking for,” she wrote in the now-deleted post. “X, work your magic.

“Non-negotiables: 35 to 42 years old, healthy, masculine, smart, funny, lighthearted, provider/protector mentality, post economic (still hardworking), must be kind, generous, thoughtful.”

LeBlanc added that she wanted a man without children who had already decided he would like to have them in the future.

“[They must be] on the healing path (history of serious commitment ex therapists, books, retreats),” the list continued.

A glamorous tech executive has sparked fierce backlash by revealing her immense dating demands

A glamorous tech executive has drawn fierce criticism after revealing her extensive list of dating requirements.

Brooke LeBlanc, 29, from San Francisco, went viral on X after she shared her extensive list of 'non-negotiables' when it comes to prospective new partners. It included everything from their body type and the specific personality traits she was after to their stance on kids

Brooke LeBlanc, 29, from San Francisco, went viral on X after sharing a detailed list of dating “non-negotiables,” covering everything from a man’s body type and personality to his views on having children.

“Can meet anywhere but will not date unless [we] live in the same city. [Must be] fit and sober because you care about your health.”

Alongside her deal-breakers, LeBlanc also listed qualities she “strongly preferred” in a potential partner.

Among them were having no previous marriages or engagements and working in the technology industry.

The post quickly came under heavy scrutiny. However, LeBlanc, who serves as head of community at AI insurance company Corgi, later claimed in a follow-up post that she had already identified five potential partners since her list went viral.

She has since deleted her entire X account. The Daily Mail contacted LeBlanc for comment but had not received a response.

LeBlanc joined Corgi in February 2026. Previously, she worked as a business development manager at software company iDeals, where, according to her LinkedIn profile, she “sold the largest VDR contract in US to JP Morgan.”

The controversy comes months after a leading etiquette expert shared her own list of “non-negotiable” qualities for the “perfect man” with the Daily Mail.

Jo Hayes, founder of EtiquetteExpert.org, described the traits she considers essential in a future husband. Her perspective is informed not only by her professional expertise but also by personal experience, as she is also looking for love.

Join the discussion

Are extensive dating requirements empowering, or do they create impossible standards for modern relationships?

It also contained rules, like, they must 'be on the healing path' and have a 'history of serious commitment' to healing by having seen a therapist, read a self-health book or been on a wellness retreat

It also contained rules, like, they must ‘be on the healing path’ and have a ‘history of serious commitment’ to healing by having seen a therapist, read a self-health book or been on a wellness retreat

Speaking from both a professional and personal perspective, Hayes told the Daily Mail she is ‘intentionally seeking a man who pursues a low-tech, low-digital lifestyle.’

For Hayes, a man who isn’t on social media isn’t just a bonus – it’s highly preferred.

‘Why? For all of the reasons,’ she said. ‘They’re more emotionally available, less distracted, less mentally over-stimulated by the excess “noise/content” on social media, less aware of the details of other people’s lives.’

She believes that removing social media from the equation allows relationships to feel more private and meaningful, which is what women crave.

Beyond her rigid stance on social media, Hayes’ list leans heavily into shared values and long-term compatibility, particularly when it comes to faith. 

Finances are another major factor, and one she says many couples underestimate at their peril.

‘Ask any married couple, or marriage therapist, and you’ll discover that finances are up there as the leading issues of marital stress and conflict,’ she said.

But it’s not simply a case of marrying a rich man. Rather than wealth alone, Hayes emphasizes the importance of financial wisdom.

‘He doesn’t need to be a billionaire, but he must be financially secure, wise in creating wealth, and wise in stewarding that wealth,’ she added.

Trump’s Diesel Export Ban Could Raise U.S. Gas Prices, Experts Warn

0

President Donald Trump is considering a ban on US diesel exports as he seeks to curb rapidly rising fuel prices.

Diesel prices reached record highs this week, alarming Republican congressional candidates just weeks before the crucial midterm elections. Because diesel powers major parts of the economy, from freight and farming to construction, the increase is also adding to inflation pressures.

Speaking in New York while attending the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday, Trump said he had already advocated restricting exports. ‘Well, I’ve called for that, too,’ he said. ‘I’ve said, “Let’s not send out the diesel.” We make a lot of diesel.’

The national average price for diesel reached a record $6.53 a gallon this week, according to AAA. That compares with $3.69 a gallon at the same point last year.

Senior administration officials have indicated that the White House may favor a less sweeping response than an outright ban. Energy Secretary Chris Wright told the WSJ Journal House that voluntary limits could help balance domestic demand with the needs of overseas markets.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said during a United Nations bilateral meeting between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that officials were assessing whether a full or partial suspension of overseas shipments would accomplish the administration’s objectives.

But energy experts and industry leaders warn that an export ban could ultimately backfire, driving up gasoline prices as well as diesel costs over the longer term.

Mike Sommers, chief executive of the American Petroleum Institute, rejected the proposal, noting that ‘restricting US energy exports would only compound the problem – exacerbating refining challenges and ultimately hurting consumers.’

Gasoline and diesel prices at a gas station in Los Angeles, on September 22, 2026 (Photo by Frederic J. BROWN / AFP via Getty Images)

Gasoline and diesel prices displayed at a Los Angeles gas station on September 22, 2026 (Photo by Frederic J. BROWN / AFP via Getty Images)

President Donald Trump and Secretary of Energy Chris Wright are hashing out a plan to potentially ban or restrict US diesel exports (EPA/BONNIE CASH / POOL)

President Donald Trump and Energy Secretary Chris Wright are developing a plan that could ban or limit US diesel exports (EPA/BONNIE CASH / POOL)

Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy

Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy

Trump himself has acknowledged that intervening in international fuel markets could produce unintended consequences for drivers, conceding that the policy might have ‘a little bit of effect’ on fuel costs for motorists.

Global supply chains have been disrupted by the escalating conflict in the Middle East, while Ukraine’s attacks on Russian refineries have added to pressure on fuel markets.

At the same time, US stockpiles of commercial diesel have fallen by double digits since the Iran war began.

US refineries have increased diesel shipments overseas to help address shortages abroad, with government data showing foreign deliveries up by more than 30 percent.

Wright, a former corporate energy executive, has specifically warned that stopping those exports could create immediate problems.

At an industry event hosted by the Economist this week, he said disrupting current trade flows would lead to ‘more expensive gasoline right away,’ placing additional pressure on everyday commuters.

Experts predict that banning diesel exports would send average US gasoline costs up by another $0.30. Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, predicted that if a diesel ban comes into effect, regular gas prices might shatter previous records.

AAA data put the average US gasoline price just below $4.50 a gallon this week. An additional 30 cents would lift it to $5.20, nearly 19 cents above the previous record of $5.02 set in June 2022 during pandemic-related shortages.

Some traders say keeping more diesel in the domestic market could briefly lower prices. Drew Rathgeber, a commodities specialist, described the likely initial market response if refiners were left with unsold inventory.

If refiners lose their export customers for diesel then refiners respond by refining less crude oil

If refiners lose their overseas diesel customers, they may respond by processing less crude oil

The deepening conflict in the Middle East has rattled global supply chains (Photo by US NAVY / AFP via Getty Images)

The deepening conflict in the Middle East has rattled global supply chains (Photo by US NAVY / AFP via Getty Images)

Jennifer Lockett, freight factoring operations manager at altLINE

Jennifer Lockett, freight factoring operations manager at altLINE

‘If refiners lose their export customers for diesel, the extra fuel does pile up here for a while, but then refiners respond by running less crude,’ Rathgeber told the Daily Mail.

This reduction in overall crude oil processing is exactly why a diesel ban would drive up gasoline prices. ‘When they cut back, they make less gasoline too, and that can push pump prices up,’ Rathgeber told us.

Geography also plays a massive role in why a nationwide embargo would fail to help many struggling Americans. 

The Eastern Seaboard relies heavily on foreign imports because domestic pipelines from southern states are notoriously inadequate.

Therefore, a massive surplus of fuel sitting in Texas storage tanks does virtually nothing to lower costs for drivers in New York or Boston. Transporting that excess product up the coast by ship remains incredibly expensive and logistically challenging.

Furthermore, removing American energy from the global equation will inevitably trigger a worldwide bidding war. As international prices surge, the raw crude oil that US companies must purchase will also become significantly more expensive.

Nations that currently depend on American refineries will be forced into a desperate scramble to keep their own economies running. Supply chain experts are already mapping out the catastrophic ripple effects of this geopolitical shift.

‘They would have to find fuel elsewhere, potentially bidding up prices in other markets. That could feed back into the US market rather than insulating it from higher prices,’ cautioned Jennifer Lockett, a freight operations expert.

Vince Stanzione, CEO and founder of First Information

Vince Stanzione, CEO and founder of First Information

Ultimately, any relief experienced in a specific US region would be incredibly short-lived. Within weeks, the broader economic fallout would erase any temporary savings at the pump for domestic drivers.

Vince Stanzione, CEO and founder of First Information, noted that while President Trump may threaten a diesel ban, Energy Secretary Chris Wright, an energy veteran with decades of experience, would be deeply involved in the decision.

‘Trump will take counsel from Wright after all, he appointed him to be a steady energy hand,’ Stanzione told the Daily Mail.

Stanzione told us that what the US needs is more refining capacity, not a diesel ban. The last new US refinery was opened in 1977.

Experts agree that political gimmicks will not solve the fundamental infrastructure problems plaguing the American energy sector. The root cause of the current bottleneck is a severe lack of modern facilities to process raw crude.

LaGuardia TSA X-Ray Finds Illegal Stash Beside Passenger’s Xbox

0

A routine airport security check took an unexpected turn after an Xbox gaming console triggered an alarm inside a traveler’s checked luggage.

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) later revealed that the screening led officers to a discovery far more serious than the electronic device itself.

The incident happened this month at New York City’s LaGuardia Airport (LGA), where the passenger’s bag was flagged during the TSA screening process.

According to the TSA, the alarm was linked to an Xbox. TSA Officer Ashley Leo, who was working in the on-screen resolution area, redirected the luggage to the checked baggage resolution area, where Supervisory Transportation Security Officer Christopher Ramos was assigned.

The most significant find was not the gaming console, however, but what officers discovered next to it.

During the inspection, Ramos located a plastic bag filled with several suspected fake identification documents beside the Xbox that had triggered the alarm.

“I noticed various driver’s licenses with different dates of birth and different class types, but all with the same photograph,” Ramos said in a statement released by the TSA.

Ramos said he remained focused on following established screening procedures while watching for anything that appeared out of the ordinary.

“When I discovered the fraudulent IDs, I knew it was important to report the situation through the proper channels,” he said.

TSA management, airport officials and Port Authority police were notified. Authorities determined that the identification documents were fraudulent and arrested the passenger shortly before the scheduled flight was due to depart.

John Essig, the TSA’s federal security director at LaGuardia, credited Ramos’ attention to detail and adherence to security procedures with stopping the IDs from reaching the airport’s secure area.

“Identifying fraudulent IDs is an important part of TSA’s layered security approach,” Essig said. “It helps ensure that people entering secure areas of the airport are who they claim to be and supports the safety of the traveling public.”

Fox News Digital contacted the TSA seeking additional information and comment about the arrest.

The LaGuardia incident is the latest in a series of unusual items uncovered by TSA officers during airport screenings around the United States.

At Dallas Love Field Airport in Texas, officers recently found a pocketknife hidden inside a tube of toothpaste during a carry-on bag inspection.

Meanwhile, TSA personnel at Tampa International Airport discovered a 4-inch double-edged knife concealed inside a flashlight designed to look like a baseball bat.

Oswego Police Charge 13-Year-Old in Snapchat Hate-Crime Case

0

OSWEGO, Ill. (WLS) — The mothers of two 13-year-old boys who were allegedly subjected to racist threats and harassment on Snapchat are calling on parents to pay close attention to their children’s online activity. Their warning comes after Oswego police announced hate crime and other felony charges against another 13-year-old boy.

Kisha Jenkins and Kiara Shaw said their sons received Snapchat messages containing their photos, racial slurs and threats.

“Hate, discrimination, racism, and even the threats that were in that message should never be tolerated, and you have to stand for something,” Shaw said.

Jenkins said the messages deeply affected her son.

“My child was, you know, very upset by it. He was very disturbed by it. He also felt threatened by it,” Jenkins said.

Shaw provided details about the messages sent to her son.

“With my son, he called him a monkey, said he was going to do some nasty things to him, said he was going to sell him on Facebook,” Shaw said.

The families reported the messages to both police and Oswego School District 308.

In a message to families, the district’s superintendent said the incident should prompt deeper conversations with young people about responsible technology use and the consequences of their words. “A post can take seconds to share and a lifetime to repair,” the superintendent wrote.

The mothers said they want the case to become a warning for both parents and children.

“Hopefully, you know, people will from this point on, will educate their children on things that they should not be saying and doing,” Jenkins said.

Jenkins also said she feels for the family of the boy facing charges.

“And I don’t feel good on either part that my son has to deal with this, nor that the parents of this boy, who I know, have to deal with this situation because it’s heartbreaking,” she said.

Police said the accused boy appeared in juvenile court Friday and was released while awaiting another court hearing.

“Last weekend, two of our students were targeted on social media. Their images were shared alongside threats and harassment, and the comments made about them were directed at their race, written to demean and to hurt. The Oswego Police Department has been involved, and their press release about the situation is linked below.

“Let me be clear: these harmful actions do not reflect the values of SD 308. This is not acceptable-not in our schools, not online, and not anywhere in our community. We are one community, and when any of our students is targeted because of who they are, all of us are affected.

“The impact of this incident reaches far. The lives of the students who were targeted, our broader community, and even the student who made the terrible decision to write, post, and share this content are forever changed.

“To the students who were targeted and to their families: we stand with you. You belong here, and we are committed to your safety and well-being.

“There is no undoing this situation, but there is a choice in what we do next. This moment must be a catalyst for change. It must be the reason we talk more deeply with young people about how they use technology, about the value and weight of their words, and about the importance of considering the outcome of their actions before they act. A post can take seconds to share and a lifetime to repair.

“Our commitment is grounded in Rightful Presence and our district’s Equity Policy. Our schools are carrying out this important work every day. Further, we will be extending learning opportunities and resources to families in the weeks ahead, because this work cannot happen in classrooms alone.

“I am asking something of every one of you: please talk with your students. Ask them what they see online. Ask them how they would respond if they saw someone being targeted. Remind them that their words matter, that silence can feel like agreement, and that reaching out to a trusted adult is always the right thing to do.

“If your student is struggling as a result of this incident, our school counselors and social workers are ready to help. Please reach out to your school directly.

“We are stronger than this moment. Let’s show our students, through our words and our actions, what it means to be one community.”

Copyright © 2026 WLS-TV. All Rights Reserved.

Is Emily Deschanel Pregnant in 2026? The Latest Update on Her Family, Marriage and Career

0

Emily Deschanel is not publicly confirmed to be pregnant as of September 26, 2026. The actress has not announced a new pregnancy, and no verified statement from Deschanel, her husband David Hornsby, or a representative confirms that she is expecting another child.

The current pregnancy speculation appears to be linked to older photographs and renewed online interest in Deschanel’s personal life. A change in appearance, clothing, or body shape is not reliable evidence of pregnancy, and there is no responsible basis for treating those rumors as fact.

Deschanel, born on October 11, 1976, is best known for playing forensic anthropologist Dr. Temperance “Bones” Brennan on the long-running Fox drama Bones. She is married to actor and writer David Hornsby, and the couple have two sons, Henry Lamar Hornsby and Calvin Hornsby.

Is Emily Deschanel pregnant in 2026?

There is no verified public confirmation that Emily Deschanel is pregnant in 2026. Neither the actress nor her family has announced that she is expecting a third child.

That means the online claim remains unsubstantiated. Public figures are often the subject of pregnancy speculation after appearing in loose clothing, attending fewer events, or being photographed from an unusual angle. None of those circumstances proves that someone is pregnant.

Deschanel has generally kept her family life private, so the absence of a public statement should not be interpreted as a confirmation or denial beyond the available facts. The accurate position is simply that no pregnancy has been confirmed.

Why did the Emily Deschanel pregnancy rumor start?

The rumor originally gained attention after Deschanel was photographed at the Apple TV+ premiere of Shrinking in Los Angeles on January 26, 2023. Some online viewers interpreted the way her outfit sat around her midsection as a possible baby bump.

That interpretation was never supported by an official announcement or credible evidence. A single red-carpet image cannot establish a pregnancy, and speculation based on a person’s body can be misleading and intrusive.

Deschanel’s reduced visibility compared with her Bones years may also have contributed to renewed interest in the rumor. However, appearing less frequently at public events does not indicate that an actress is pregnant.

Any future announcement would need to come from Deschanel herself, her representatives, or a clearly attributable statement from her family. Until then, reports describing her as pregnant should be treated as rumor rather than news.

Who is Emily Deschanel’s husband?

Emily Deschanel has been married to David Hornsby since September 25, 2010. Hornsby is an American actor, writer, producer, and comedian known for work in television and film.

He is recognized for roles including Matthew “Rickety Cricket” Mara on It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia, a series on which he has also worked as a writer and producer. He has additionally appeared in projects such as Good Girls and Mythic Quest.

Deschanel and Hornsby have maintained a relatively private marriage. They rarely make their relationship the focus of interviews, and both have generally kept their children away from the intense public attention associated with celebrity families.

How many children does Emily Deschanel have?

Emily Deschanel and David Hornsby have two children. Their first son, Henry Lamar Hornsby, was born on September 21, 2011.

Their second son, Calvin Hornsby, was born on June 8, 2015. Deschanel has spoken publicly about motherhood at different points in her career, but she has not announced plans for another child.

As of September 26, 2026, there is no publicly confirmed report that Deschanel and Hornsby have welcomed a third child or are preparing for one.

How did Emily Deschanel’s pregnancies affect Bones?

Deschanel’s two real-life pregnancies were incorporated into the storyline of Bones, allowing the series to reflect major changes in her personal life while keeping Dr. Temperance Brennan central to the plot.

During the sixth-season finale, Brennan revealed that she was pregnant with Seeley Booth’s child. The storyline became an important part of the seventh season, when Brennan and Booth welcomed their daughter, Christine.

The production also made adjustments around Deschanel’s first pregnancy. The seventh season was shorter than the show’s typical full-length seasons, with 13 episodes.

Her second pregnancy was written into the series as well. In the show, Brennan and Booth continued building their family, while the real-life Deschanel gave birth to Calvin in June 2015.

The decision to incorporate both pregnancies into Bones helped the drama develop its central relationship without removing Deschanel’s character from the story. Brennan’s growing family became part of the show’s wider arc rather than a temporary distraction from the forensic investigations.

How old is Emily Deschanel?

Emily Deschanel was born on October 11, 1976, in Los Angeles, California. She is 49 years old as of September 26, 2026, and will turn 50 on October 11, 2026.

She is the daughter of cinematographer and director Caleb Deschanel and actress Mary Jo Deschanel. Her younger sister is Zooey Deschanel, the actress and singer known for New Girl and the musical duo She & Him.

Deschanel’s family background in the entertainment industry gave her early exposure to filmmaking, but she established her own career through acting in independent films, television dramas, and major studio productions.

Emily Deschanel’s acting career before and after Bones

Deschanel made her film debut in It Could Happen to You in 1994. Her early screen work also included appearances in films such as Cold Mountain, The Alamo, and Glory Road.

In 2002, she played Pam Asbury in the television horror miniseries Rose Red, written by Stephen King. The role helped bring her wider attention before she moved into a series of film and television appearances.

She received additional recognition after being identified by Interview magazine in 2004 as one of six actresses to watch. The following year, she landed the role that would define her career.

Bones premiered in 2005 and ran for 12 seasons, ending in 2017. Deschanel played Dr. Temperance Brennan, a highly intelligent forensic anthropologist whose scientific expertise helped solve complex criminal cases.

Her performance earned award nominations, including recognition from the Satellite Awards and Teen Choice Awards. Brennan’s combination of scientific precision, emotional restraint, and gradually developing relationships made her one of the most recognizable forensic investigators on television.

After Bones ended, Deschanel continued working selectively in television and film. In 2022, she appeared in the Netflix limited series Devil in Ohio, in which she played hospital psychiatrist Dr. Suzanne Mathis.

What is Emily Deschanel’s role in ReEntry?

Deschanel has also been associated with the science-fiction romance project ReEntry, alongside actors including Sam Trammell and Noma Dumezweni. The project has been described as a genre film combining romantic and science-fiction elements.

Details about the film’s release schedule, distribution, and Deschanel’s current promotional activity should be checked against an official production or distributor announcement. A casting report or project listing does not by itself confirm that a film has been released or that a premiere date is set.

For Deschanel, the project represents a continuation of her work beyond the procedural format that made her famous. Her post-Bones roles have included darker, more dramatic material as well as projects connected to social and environmental issues.

Emily Deschanel’s animal-rights and vegan advocacy

Outside acting, Deschanel has been associated with animal-welfare advocacy and has publicly supported veganism. She has discussed becoming vegan after watching the documentary Diet for a New America.

She lent her voice to the documentary My Child Is a Monkey and was involved with the documentary How I Became an Elephant. These projects reflect her long-standing interest in animal protection and ethical treatment of animals.

Her environmental and animal-rights work is separate from the pregnancy rumors and should not be used to infer anything about her current health or family plans.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Emily Deschanel pregnant right now?

Emily Deschanel has not publicly confirmed a pregnancy as of September 26, 2026. Current claims appear to be speculation rather than verified news.

Who is Emily Deschanel married to?

She is married to actor and writer David Hornsby. They married on September 25, 2010.

How many children does Emily Deschanel have?

Deschanel has two sons with Hornsby: Henry Lamar, born in 2011, and Calvin, born in 2015.

How old is Emily Deschanel in 2026?

She is 49 years old on September 26, 2026. She was born on October 11, 1976.

What is Emily Deschanel best known for?

She is best known for playing Dr. Temperance Brennan on the Fox crime drama Bones, which ran for 12 seasons from 2005 to 2017.

Did Emily Deschanel’s real pregnancies appear in Bones?

Yes. Both of Deschanel’s pregnancies were reflected in the show’s storylines, including Brennan’s children with FBI agent Seeley Booth.

Emily Deschanel quick facts

  • Full name: Emily Erin Deschanel
  • Date of birth: October 11, 1976
  • Age: 49 as of September 26, 2026
  • Birthplace: Los Angeles, California
  • Spouse: David Hornsby
  • Marriage date: September 25, 2010
  • Children: Henry Lamar Hornsby and Calvin Hornsby
  • Breakthrough role: Dr. Temperance Brennan in Bones
  • Bones run: 2005–2017
  • Recent television role: Dr. Suzanne Mathis in Devil in Ohio
  • Pregnancy status: No pregnancy publicly confirmed as of September 26, 2026

HMO Street Was Once a Happy Community—Now Residents Say the Spirit Is Gone

0

Cynthia Leveridge has lived on Mansfield’s Princes Street for 47 years, but these days the 75-year-old barely pauses as she lists what she says are the offences committed by her new neighbours: “Drinking, swearing, shouting, druggin’.”

“It used to be lovely here. Everyone knew everyone. It was quiet, and children could play in the park. That’s all changed now,” she says.

Like many long-standing residents, Cynthia has watched in disbelief as the once-peaceful suburban street has taken in a steady stream of new arrivals.

Over the past few years, numerous three-bedroom terraced houses on Princes Street—once home mainly to local families—have been converted into houses in multiple occupation, or HMOs. Landlords are seeking larger returns by accommodating more tenants in properties that were built for far fewer people.

Residents including Cynthia accuse the council of turning a blind eye. They say the spread of HMOs has weakened the area’s social fabric, doubled the number of cars, contributed to a rise in anti-social behaviour and left communal bins overflowing.

Tensions intensified on September 15, when the owners of number 13 Princes Street applied for planning permission to house ten people in the modest property. The building was already a licensed HMO for six tenants.

The three-storey house originally had three bedrooms but was renovated to contain six, with two on each floor. Under the latest plans, four bedrooms would be “retrofitted” to accommodate couples, while five rooms would be equipped with hob cookers.

The garden, meanwhile, would make room for nine wheelie bins. In their planning application, the owners described the property as “underutilised” to support the proposed increase from six to ten occupants. Despite residents’ dismay, the plans have since been approved with conditions.

Residents on Princes Street in Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, say their neighbourhood is being overwhelmed by the growing number of HMOs

Residents on Princes Street in Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, say their neighbourhood is being overwhelmed by the growing number of HMOs

Locals in the area have complained of a loss of the area's long-standing community spirit

Locals in the area have complained of a loss of the area’s long-standing community spirit

Things came to a head on September 15 when the owners of number 13 Princes Street ¿ already a licensed HMO for six tenants ¿ applied for planning permission to squeeze ten people inside the modest property

Things came to a head on September 15 when the owners of number 13 Princes Street – already a licensed HMO for six tenants – applied for planning permission to squeeze ten people inside the modest property

“That sounds like a hotel, not a home,” one angry resident remarked.

So how did Princes Street become a symbol of the HMO crisis spreading across residential areas of Britain?

Government guidance defines an HMO as a property occupied by at least three people from more than one household.

That means people from different families living together and sharing facilities such as a kitchen or bathroom. Student accommodation is perhaps the most familiar example.

But as single renters—and increasingly couples—struggle to afford homes of their own, demand for shared accommodation has grown. It increased by 2.3 per cent between 2024 and 2025.

Landlords have responded by adapting their properties, attracted by the prospect of charging rent for each room rather than leasing an entire house to one household.

A Freedom of Information request found that 41,162 applications were made to convert homes into HMOs in 2018.

That number climbed to 57,725 in 2024. By 2025, the UK was estimated to have 472,823 HMOs.

One factor behind the rapid growth of HMOs is the Government’s effort to move asylum seekers from hotels into communities in an attempt to reduce the asylum bill.

Matthew Pennycook, the Minister for Housing and Planning, admitted in the Commons earlier this year: ‘Dispersed accommodation, including HMOs, is an important tool that local authorities can use to accommodate those seeking refuge as their claims are assessed.’

Despite more recent pledges – such as from Immigration Minister Anna Turley last month – to use ‘larger basic accommodation like former military sites’, there are currently more than 72,000 asylum seekers living in non-hotel accommodation, including flats and HMOs.

In 2023, 28,000 asylum seekers had been placed in 6,000 HMOs, a number that is thought to have risen in the past three years.

The total cost of supporting asylum seekers is more than £4billion a year, an increasing share of which goes to the private landlords of HMO properties.

Last month, Breckland District Council in Norfolk took steps to make it harder for homes to be repurposed into HMOs after government officials indicated a desire to move 240 asylum seekers into such properties in the area.

So just how many HMOs are there on Princes Street?

If official Mansfield Council records are to be believed, the answer is a mere three. But this is entirely misleading. 

Mansfield Council insists on an HMO licence only for so-called ‘large HMOs’: those housing five or more tenants. 

This is, of course, more than the official figure of three tenants that actually makes a property an HMO in law. 

The council does not collect or release information on properties beneath the five-person threshold, meaning the true number of HMOs on Princes Street is unknown.

‘There are definitely more than they’re saying,’ says 36-year-old Arthur, who rents a property on the street. ‘Whether it’s because they don’t need a licence or just haven’t bothered and the council won’t do anything, I don’t know.

‘But house prices are pricing ordinary families out and the landlords are charging people like students huge amounts, sometimes £800 a room each month when it should be half of that for a box room in a shared house.’

Residents say Princes Street, in Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, is crowded and full of strangers

Residents say Princes Street, in Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, is crowded and full of strangers

Indeed, according to Rightmove, the hammer price for properties on Princes Street has risen 36 per cent on last year. 

The average price is now about £143,000 while semi-detached properties – often more suitable for conversion into HMOs due to space – are valued at an average of £181,000. 

‘It’s close to the train station, which suits students at Nottingham University,’ Arthur explained. ‘And it’s five minutes from the hospital and I know we’ve got lots of NHS workers living here too.’

When the Daily Mail approached the three licensed HMOs on Princes Street this week, those at two of the properties refused to speak or reveal exactly who was staying there. 

In a third property, this paper was told – as Arthur alluded to – that healthcare workers were in residence.

While we cannot account for the numerous unlicensed HMOs on the street, there is no evidence that asylum seekers are being housed here, although – as we will discover – many residents have complained of new arrivals having little understanding of English, struggling to follow basic council rules or assimilate into this dislocated community.

But regardless of who exactly is moving into these renovated properties, local people are furious. ‘I’m absolutely fed up with the expansion of HMOs on our street,’ declared 57-year-old mother Lucy Bell.

‘There’s no infrastructure for this. We’ve got pavement parking, noise and mess. Bin day is horrendous.’ 

Indeed, overflowing bins is a concern that came up repeatedly on the doorsteps of Princes Street, and so it might with rubbish and debris – including numerous hideous instances of pet mess – lining the pavements.

‘There’s a man across the road who has lived here for 80 years,’ Lucy continued.

‘He remembers when there was a little butcher’s and a chip shop. It was a tight-knit community, great for families. 

‘Now you’ve got ten-bedroom flats. We used to help each other and look after each other’s kids, but now there’s no community. It’s transient. They’re here for a short period.’

Michael, 60, agrees: ‘I’ve lived here for 52 years and there are too many of them,’ he says of the HMOs. 

‘The whole country has gone to the dogs, we’re overcrowded. There are no morals with some of these people. They’re ruthless when it comes to parking. The council can’t even get up to the bins. The community is 100 per cent gone.

‘We only found out about these HMOs because of the builders; it wasn’t even on the council website. We found out by accident. I’ve had enough.’

Unfortunately, things are set to get worse before they get better. As previously explained, one of the three licensed HMOs on Princes Street has applied to expand from six tenants to ten. 

Meanwhile, three further properties have applied for ‘large HMO’ status, taking the total number to six. A further half-dozen homes have already been split into flats.

Tom Miles, 38, has concerns about exactly who will be moving in, having lived here for 11 years and seen the street change. 

‘We’ve had druggies on the street and in the flats in the past. It’s just frustrating to see what’s happening to the area,’ he told us this week. 

‘I’ve seen houses turned into flats, and they’re filling up the glass recycling bins with rubbish. It feels like [the council] is turning a blind eye. They get more money from the HMO licence fees, so they want them filled.’

Florence, 71, agrees. ‘I’ve lived here all my life, I was born in the house next to mine. I don’t agree with what’s happening,’ she said, looking each way down the street in the mid-morning sun.

‘There are foreigners and Eastern Europeans, and the fly-tipping is terrible. There are cars everywhere because of the HMOs, and the bin men can’t make it in. 

‘Every house that becomes available, landlords come looking for a quick buck. These are two-up, two-down houses for families, not for HMOs.

‘Some of the people living in them can’t speak English, which means they don’t know what rubbish to put where. It’s just getting worse.’

According to Rightmove, the hammer price for properties on Princes Street has risen 36 per cent on last year. The average price is now about £143,000 while semi-detached properties are valued at an average of £181,000

According to Rightmove, the hammer price for properties on Princes Street has risen 36 per cent on last year. The average price is now about £143,000 while semi-detached properties are valued at an average of £181,000

But it doesn’t have to be this way. Mansfield Council could clamp down on HMOs by introducing a so-called ‘Article 4 Direction’ to restrict permitted development rights.

In other words, to make all HMOs require a licence, not just ‘large’ ones. This would in turn give Mansfield Council the authority to block all HMOs within its jurisdiction.

Local Labour MP Steve Yemm supports the idea, telling the Daily Mail: ‘I believe the council should seriously consider introducing an Article 4 Direction, alongside reviewing current licensing arrangements, to give local communities a greater say over the spread of HMOs and ensure development is properly managed.’

‘I’ve spoken to many residents who feel their concerns about HMOs have been ignored for too long,’ Yemm continued.

‘Issues such as parking pressures, overflowing bins and the erosion of community cohesion are having a real impact on neighbourhoods across Mansfield. 

‘HMOs have a legitimate role to play in meeting housing need, but in some areas the concentration has gone too far. 

‘When too many are clustered together, the impact on local communities and services can be significant. 

‘I’ve repeatedly raised these concerns and will continue pressing the council to take stronger action.

‘Residents are right to question whether enough is being done, and the council must urgently review its approach.’

Of course, this isn’t just a Princes Street problem.

In fact, council documents studied by the Daily Mail found a total of 173 licensed HMOs in Mansfield, that’s before taking into account the likely hundreds, if not thousands more, HMOs that currently don’t need a licence.

‘We understand residents’ concerns,’ a spokesman for Mansfield Council said. 

‘The council is currently reviewing HMO numbers, distribution and trends across Mansfield as part of our ongoing assessment of housing needs and local communities.

‘As part of this work, we are considering the range of planning powers available to local authorities, including whether an Article 4 direction may be appropriate.

‘Any decision would need to be based on robust evidence and a thorough assessment of local circumstances. 

‘We will continue to work with local partners, residents and elected representatives to ensure any future action is proportionate, evidence-based and in the best interests of Mansfield communities.’

For the residents of Princes Street any action may be too little, too late. 

‘Seventeen years ago, it was completely different,’ sighed father of two Justin, remembering the day he first moved to Princes Street. ‘Now half of the street seems to be HMOs.

‘There’s always work being done. Skips are left out for weeks on end. Landlords are just trying to make extra money, and it’s a shame.’

With the increase in HMO applications across the country, there will no doubt soon be similar stories to that of Princes Street – of communities hollowed out and neighbours turning into strangers.

Only then, when it is far too late, might landlords and councils wake up to the true cost to society of making all this extra money.

  • Additional reporting: Seb Topan

Jules Neale, Wife of AFL Star Lachie Neale, Supports His Rival Team at 2026 Grand Final

0

Jules Neale appeared to send a pointed message to her former husband, Lachie Neale, on Saturday after publicly backing his AFL Grand Final opponents, Fremantle.

The 36-year-old mother of two separated from the Brisbane Lions midfielder late last year, following reports that he had been unfaithful with her close friend, Tess Crosley.

On the day of the highly anticipated match, the Perth-born beauty posted an Instagram image showing her embracing Fremantle’s purple-and-white colours.

In a selfie shared to her Stories, Jules beamed while sipping an orange drink beside a friend, with both women wearing Fremantle scarves.

Jules once proudly supported the Lions, particularly after Lachie joined the Brisbane club in 2019 following his six seasons with Fremantle between 2012 and 2018.

But after returning to Perth in the wake of their separation, the former AFL WAG appears to have switched allegiances and resumed her support for her hometown team.

Jules Neale, 36, (right) took a subtle dig at ex-husband Lachie Neale on Saturday when she revealed she is supporting his rival team Fremantle at the AFL Grand Final

Jules Neale, 36, (right) appeared to take a subtle swipe at ex-husband Lachie Neale on Saturday by revealing her support for his rival club Fremantle at the AFL Grand Final.

The Grand Final post came after Jules attracted attention earlier this month at the Courting Summer 26/27 runway show at Claremont Quarter in Perth.

She made a dramatic entrance at the fashion event, turning heads in a daring ensemble that showcased her evolving personal style.

Jules wore a striking sheer white gown from Australian label Bec + Bridge, with the figure-hugging design highlighting her silhouette.

Her eye-catching appearance quickly became a talking point among guests and members of Perth’s fashion crowd.

Among those watching was fashion figure Pip Edwards, the co-founder of P.E Nation, who hosted the spring/summer showcase.

Pip also made an impression in a glamorous Zimmermann dress as she opened the evening, but appeared especially taken with Jules’ polished look.

The mother-of-two split from the Brisbane Lions player (second from left) late last year amid rumours he had an affair with her best friend Tess Crosley (far left)

The mother-of-two separated from Brisbane Lions player Lachie Neale (second from left) late last year amid reports of an alleged affair with her best friend Tess Crosley (far left).

The pair’s social media interaction continued the following day, when Jules uploaded a series of glamorous photographs and Pip responded with a heart emoji in the comments.

Since ending her marriage to the AFL star late last year, Jules has focused on reshaping her public image and establishing herself in the fashion and lifestyle space.

After moving back to Perth, she has steadily grown an audience through beauty, wellness and lifestyle posts, attracting followers with her approach to health and everyday routines.

Earlier this year, Jules also appeared to make a veiled reference to her former relationship while beginning her new career as a social media influencer.

In February, she promoted Elle Macpherson’s WelleCo supplements in an Instagram video, using narration that seemed to allude to the upheaval in her personal life.

“I used to be religious about my WelleCo routine. And then I got a little distracted along the way,” Jules said in the clip.

Jules was previously a Lions supporter, cheering on ex-husband Lachie after he got traded to the team in 2019 after playing for Fremantle from 2012 to 2018

Jules was previously a Lions supporter, cheering on ex-husband Lachie after he got traded to the team in 2019 after playing for Fremantle from 2012 to 2018

‘I stopped showing up for myself the way I used to. But lately, I have been fighting my way back,’ she added.

‘There’s just something really powerful about rebuilding your glow quietly.’

Jules added that she finally feels like herself again.

‘Getting back into my @welleco routine has been such a simple change with a big impact. My mornings feel brighter, my days feel lighter and it feels like I’m choosing myself again,’ she added in the caption.

Jules has moved back to Perth following her split from Lachie, taking their two young children, Piper, four, and Freddie, one, with her.

She and Lachie split in November after she posted to Instagram that the Brisbane Lions star had ‘betrayed [her] in the most unimaginable way’.

Lachie later admitted their split was a result of his actions, after rumours swirled about an affair with Jules’ former friend Tess Crosley.

The footy player did not go into specifics, but admitted the couple had separated.