Home Blog Page 45

Alexandra Eala Powers Into US Open Third Round

0

Alexandra Eala’s surge at the U.S. Open is gathering serious momentum, with the rising Filipina star carrying a massive global following and an energized fan base into the third round.

“Ealamania” remained in full force at Flushing Meadows, where Eala delivered a composed 6-1, 6-4 victory over Oleksandra Oliynykova inside Louis Armstrong Stadium.

The win also carried a measure of payback for Eala, who had previously lost to the Ukrainian. This time, she fed off a lively pro-Filipino crowd, with red and blue filling the stands as Philippine flags and banners waved throughout the match.

Alexandra Eala hits a forehand return during her second-round U.S. Open win over Oleksandra Oliynykova on Sept. 3, 2026 at Louis Armstrong Stadium. Corey Sipkin for New York Post

“Everybody represents something in their own way,” said Eala, who will face American Iva Jovic in the third round. “I’m Filipino and I proudly represent that, and a lot of people in the crowd are Filipino and I’m sure they share the sentiment. Like Americans, or Ukrainians like Oleksandra who played so amazingly. We all represent something, and I’m proud of what I represent.”

At 21, Eala has emerged as one of the Philippines’ most prominent sporting figures, drawing comparisons in national stature to boxing legend Manny Pacquiao in a country of nearly 120 million people.

With an estimated quarter million Filipinos in the area, anywhere from 40,000 to 50,000 are concentrated in Little Manila, just three miles from the U.S. Open.

While many have come out to watch her play — and energetically cheer her on — Eala has struck a balance of focused but appreciative.

“I think it’s a good balance,” said Eala. “When I’m really competing in the match, I don’t tend to think about external factors, because there’s already — a tennis match at this level is very mentally costly, so there’s not much room to think about external factors. But not to say that it doesn’t go unnoticed.”

Alexandra Eala celebrates during her second-round win at the U.S. Open.

Alexandra Eala celebrates during her second-round win at the U.S. Open. Corey Sipkin for New York Post

While organizers have acknowledged that Louis Armstrong has morphed into a Filipino party, some critics have chafed that the 21-year-old is getting preference over more established players, with former Grand Slam champs relegated to outer courts, accusing her of getting preferential treatment due to her huge following.

“Well, [I don’t make] the schedule. So, I’m grateful to be on Armstrong and to play in such an incredible court,” Eala said tactfully. “But yeah, I don’t control the scheduling. And my job is to be prepared for whatever court they put me in, and whoever they put me against.”

Eala has garnered 2 million followers on Instagram, been honored by Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. at Malacañang Palace and been invited to events with Serena Williams and Anna Wintour. A video surfaced online of her meeting YouTuber/comedian Nella Rose, endearingly shocked at her own fame.

“That was a super crazy interaction. It was so fast, and I did not expect it,” said Eala. “Nella, I’ve seen her so many times on YouTube … so to see her in person and for her — I don’t know. It’s weird to think that some people that I watch a lot, they know me. Sometimes I forget that I’m also kind of famous.”

Eala has shot past “kind of.”

Why Lindsay Clancy’s Lawyer Sought to Dismiss One Juror

0

As jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial pressed through a sixth day of deliberations without reaching a verdict, a message from the jury foreperson offered a glimpse into the apparent tensions unfolding behind closed doors.

The note was delivered to Judge William Sullivan on the afternoon of Sept. 3, prompting an intense sidebar with attorneys for both sides. Sullivan then held individual sidebar discussions with each of the 12 jurors, according to reports from CNN and the Associated Press.

When the judge later brought the panel back together in the jury box, he revisited his instructions on the legal standard of reasonable doubt and directed jurors to continue weighing the case.

“I want to remind you,” Sullivan told them, “that you are required to follow my instructions on the law as I gave them to you.”

After jurors returned to the deliberation room, Reddington addressed the note’s contents, saying it appeared to identify one juror accused of not cooperating with the rest of the panel.

“The court has an instruction from the foreperson of that jury that’s been working for a week now, saying that there’s one juror who refuses to listen to the law that you’ve given him or her on reasonable doubt,” he said. “I suggest, respectfully, that the soft instruction that you gave them at the sidebar, ‘Can you listen to the law as I instruct you?’ does not focus on the issue. The question is not sufficient enough. It does not allow any foundation for a motion to remove the juror who refuses to accept your instructions on the law on reasonable doubt.”

“If we come back here in a half an hour with a mistrial because of a juror that has just spurned the instructions of this court, it’s a shame—it’s a real shame,” Reddington continued. “That’s why I object to the court’s ruling. I request that we have further inquiry. My motion is to remove this juror that refuses to listen to your instruction on reasonable doubt.”

In her response, Plymouth County prosecutor Jennifer Sprague weighed in on the situation.

“There’s no way to determine what the deliberations are, who’s correct, who’s incorrect—nor should we attempt to, because that’s part of deliberations,” she said. “I think that what Your Honor has done by asking each juror if they’re able to follow the law and then giving a general instruction on reasonable doubt is appropriate.”

In his ruling on the motion, Sullivan did not remove the juror, noting that the discharge of a member of the jury mid-deliberation is “a sensitive undertaking.”

“I don’t feel that it is proper for me to side with one side or the other of the deliberations. I don’t feel it’s appropriate for me to say I agree with one juror or 11,” he explained. “At this point, I’ve asked if they are able to follow my instructions. They swore earlier that they could. They’ve said at this point that they can. That was specifically addressed towards the specific question, and that’s what I’m doing.”

Jurors were later dismissed for the day and will return to court on Sept. 4 for their seventh day of deliberations.

They previously submitted two deadlock notices on Sept. 1 and Sept. 2, after which they were instructed to continue deliberations.

If jurors ultimately cannot reach a unanimous verdict, a mistrial would be declared, which would give prosecutors the opportunity to retry the case.

Parents of Saylor Hayes Make First Court Appearance

0

The parents of Saylor Hayes, a nonverbal 5-year-old girl found dead after disappearing in South Carolina over the weekend, made their first court appearance Thursday.

Their appearance came as newly surfaced legal documents revealed details about previous child abuse charges involving the couple.

Saylor’s body was discovered Monday morning following an overnight search involving deputies, K-9 teams, boats, Georgetown County Emergency Management and hundreds of local residents.

John Herb Hayes III, 70, and Geordyn Nichole Hayes, 31, were arrested Tuesday night in connection with their daughter’s disappearance and death.

Both have been charged with unlawfully placing a child at risk or willfully abandoning a child, and authorities have accused them of misleading search efforts.

Authorities allege in arrest warrants that the parents placed Saylor ‘at an unreasonable risk of harm, affecting her life and safety by failing to provide supervision and safeguards appropriate for a nonverbal, autistic five-year-old child with known affinity to water and [a] history of elopement.’ 

‘After the child was discovered missing, the defendant encouraged search efforts to be directed toward the use of tracking technology, despite knowing the child was not wearing the monitoring device,’ authorities also claim. 

John and Geordyn appeared in a Tennessee courtroom for the first time on Thursday, where they waived their rights to attorney and waived extradition to South Carolina, meaning they have agreed to return to the state for prosecution. 

Saylor Hayes, a nonverbal five-year-old girl, was found dead after she went missing in South Carolina over the weekend

Saylor Hayes, a nonverbal five-year-old girl, was found dead after she went missing in South Carolina over the weekend 

Her parents, John Herb Hayes III, 70, and Geordyn Nichole Haynes, 31, were taken into custody Tuesday night in connection with their daughter's disappearance and death

Her parents, John Herb Hayes III, 70, and Geordyn Nichole Haynes, 31, were taken into custody Tuesday night in connection with their daughter’s disappearance and death 

The parents appeared in a Tennessee court on Thursday for the first time since they were arrested. The mom is pictured

The parents appeared in a Tennessee court on Thursday for the first time since they were arrested. The mom is pictured

The father is pictured in court. Both parents waived their rights to attorney and waived extradition to South Carolina

The father is pictured in court. Both parents waived their rights to attorney and waived extradition to South Carolina

The two will remain in a Tennessee jail while waiting for South Carolina authorities to pick them up. State officials have 10 days to do so. 

A status hearing has been scheduled for September 14 in Tennessee if the parents are not picked up in time. 

According to court documents reviewed by the Daily Mail, Saylor’s mother was charged with one count of abuse of a child and disregard to life, and one count of cruelty and/or injury to a child, in February 2026.

Documents show the first charge was initially classified as a Class 6 Felony, but was amended to a misdemeanor charge of delinquency of a minor.

She was bailed on that charge and entered a deferred disposition plea, which means that providing certain conditions are met, such as probation or community service, the court will not enter a conviction and she will not be formally prosecuted. Hayes is next due in court in August 2027.

The charge of cruelty or injury of a child was disposed Nolle Prosequi, meaning authorities chose not to prosecute that specific charge, and it was dismissed without prejudice, meaning it can be resubmitted at a later date.

The documents do not give details as to the identity of the child she allegedly abused.

Additional court documents obtained by WJHL also revealed that in August 2023, the parents were charged with two counts of abuse and neglect of children after two of their kids tested positive for methadone and methamphetamine.

The parents' arrest warrants claim that Saylor was previously fitted with a device called Project Lifesaver but did not have the device attached to her body when she was found

The parents’ arrest warrants claim that Saylor was previously fitted with a device called Project Lifesaver but did not have the device attached to her body when she was found 

Court documents revealed that two of the Hayes family's children tested positive for methadone and methamphetamine

Court documents revealed that two of the Hayes family’s children tested positive for methadone and methamphetamine 

The documents stated that a girl tested positive for methadone, while a boy tested positive for both methadone and methamphetamine. 

The Department of Social Services (DSS) conducted a drug screen on the parents, and Geordyn tested positive for methamphetamine and methadone, while John tested positive for methadone, the documents claim. 

The parents had methadone clinic cards, but when authorities asked how it was that their children became exposed to the drugs, Geordyn and John allegedly replied that they did not know, according to the court documents.  

The parents’ recent arrest warrants claim that Saylor was previously fitted with a device called Project Lifesaver, which is designed to track the locations of vulnerable people with conditions that make them prone to wandering or ‘eloping.’

However, she did not have the tracker attached to her body when she was found, and the sheriff’s office said the tracker band was found in Washington County, Virginia, where her family is from, more than 300 miles away. 

In footage taken by GAB News just hours before Saylor’s body was found, Hayes appeared frantic as she speculated what could have happened to her daughter.

‘She would go in somebody’s house, you know, she loves food, she’s always going for the refrigerator,’ the mother told onlookers.

As a bystander said they had been searching for her daughter, Hayes continued: ‘Yeah, we looked on the camera, we didn’t see her… we didn’t see her on the camera.’

She said she and her husband were ‘just praying that she’s somewhere, and she fell asleep maybe.’

The family is originally from Virginia, and had been on vacation in South Carolina when the tragedy unfolded

In footage taken by GAB News just hours before Saylor's body was found, Hayes appeared frantic as she speculated what could have happened to her daughter

In footage taken by GAB News just hours before Saylor’s body was found, Hayes appeared frantic as she speculated what could have happened to her daughter

Saylor's disappearance spurred a massive search effort consisting of a helicopter, an underwater drone, a boat and hundreds of volunteers

Saylor’s disappearance spurred a massive search effort consisting of a helicopter, an underwater drone, a boat and hundreds of volunteers 

In a statement announcing the charges against Saylor’s parents Tuesday night, Georgetown Sheriff Carter Weaver called the girl’s death ‘a heartbreaking tragedy that has deeply affected our community and everyone who worked so hard to find her.’

Saylor’s disappearance spurred a massive search effort, with the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division sending out a helicopter and an underwater drone as the US Coast Guard sent a vessel to help with the search.

Hundreds of neighbors also jumped in to search their own properties and the surrounding areas, with one neighbor telling WMBF how they tried to lure the little girl by walking with pets and getting an ice cream truck to play music throughout the neighborhood.

The young girl’s body was later found in the water behind the rental property.

An autopsy has been scheduled for Friday morning, but there were no visible signs of trauma to the body, Georgetown County Coroner Chase Ridgeway told WPDE.

The cause of death and manner of death remain undetermined pending the completion of the autopsy and any other necessary testing.

But after authorities conducted an ‘extensive investigation,’ they decided to charge Saylor’s parents, Weaver said.

‘Parents and caregivers have a fundamental responsibility to protect children who cannot protect themselves,’ he said.

‘When the evidence establishes probable cause to believe that a child has been unlawfully placed in circumstances that endanger that child’s safety, law enforcement has a responsibility to act.’

The sheriff then went on to call the girl ‘a vulnerable five-year-old child who depended upon the adults responsible for her care and protection.

‘She deserved to be safe. She deserved to be protected,’ Weaver declared.

‘Nothing we do can bring Saylor back,’ the sheriff noted. 

‘What we can do is pursue the truth, seek accountability through our justice system and continue doing everything within our authority to protect the most vulnerable members of our community.’

Trump Names Adam Telle Acting Army Secretary After Driscoll Exit

0

President Donald Trump said Thursday that Adam Telle, who has been serving as assistant secretary of the Army for Civil Works, will step in as acting secretary of the Army.

“I am pleased to announce that Adam Telle, the current Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, will become Acting Secretary of the Army, effective immediately,” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.

Trump praised Telle in the same announcement, calling him “a Great Patriot” and saying he is “respected by all.”

The move came shortly after Dan Driscoll submitted his resignation as Army secretary to the president earlier in the week.

A photo taken of Adam Tell.

President Donald Trump appointed Adam Telle as acting secretary of the Army after the resignation of Army Secretary Dan Driscoll. (Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Telle, who was nominated by Trump and confirmed by the Senate in 2025, oversees the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Civil Works program, where his responsibilities include flood and storm protection, commercial waterways and Clean Water Act permitting.

Previously, Telle served as chief of staff to Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., and was Trump’s chief liaison to the Senate during the president’s first administration, when he led the White House Office of Legislative Affairs’ Senate team.

Before that, Telle served on the Senate Appropriations Committee subcommittee responsible for overseeing the Department of Homeland Security’s budget. He also spent 10 years in the office of former Sen. Thad Cochran, R-Miss., where he served as deputy chief of staff, legislative director and the senator’s top national security staffer.

Then-Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, War Secretary Pete Hegseth, and President Donald Trump in July 2026.

U.S. Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll, War Secretary Pete Hegseth and President Donald Trump attend a dignified transfer at Dover Air Force Base for military casualties of the war with Iran July 22, 2026, in Dover, Del. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Telle is viewed as having strong relationships with senators on Capitol Hill, which could prove important as the administration works to confirm Army nominees stalled in the Senate.

The appointment fills a key leadership vacancy atop the nation’s largest military branch.

Driscoll’s exit came after he reportedly butted heads with Secretary of War Pete Hegseth over the Army’s transformation and readiness, including Driscoll’s belief that Hegseth had hindered those efforts, News Media previously reported.

Donald Trump in the briefing room

President Donald Trump announced that Adam Telle would become acting secretary of the Army “effective immediately,” calling him a “Great Patriot.” (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

The outgoing Army secretary said Wednesday would be his “last full day” in the position, adding that serving under Trump and Hegseth had been “the honor of a lifetime.”

“I had the privilege of working with them to modernize and accelerate how the Army mans, trains, and equips the most lethal fighting force on the face of the earth,” Driscoll said in a statement posted on X.

“We could not have made the progress we did without the support of Secretary Hegseth,” he continued. “I am forever grateful to President Trump for the opportunity to once again serve my country.”

Donald Trump Breaks Silence on Tiger Woods’ Driving Ban

0

President Donald Trump has weighed in on Tiger Woods’ latest legal case, calling the golf superstar’s plea agreement “very fair” after Woods received a five-year driving ban this week.

Woods entered a no-contest plea Wednesday to a reckless driving charge tied to a March rollover crash in Florida, a case that initially saw the 15-time major champion accused of driving under the influence.

According to authorities, Woods’ SUV struck a truck before tipping onto its side along a residential road near the coast close to his Jupiter Island home. A sheriff’s report said deputies discovered two pain pills in his pocket and noted signs of impairment. While Woods passed a Breathalyzer test with a negative result, he declined to provide a urine sample.

The incident drew further attention after bodycam video surfaced showing Woods speaking to Trump shortly after the crash. In the footage, Woods can be heard telling officers, “I was just talking with the President.”

Asked about Woods’ legal outcome by a reporter in the Oval Office on Thursday, Trump offered a brief but clear response, describing the resolution as “very fair.”

He continued: ‘But I think he’s going to have somebody drive him. I told him that a long time ago: ‘Why don’t you get somebody to drive you’

President Donald Trump declared Tiger Woods' plea deal 'very fair' in the Oval Office

President Donald Trump declared Tiger Woods’ plea deal ‘very fair’ in the Oval Office

Woods appeared puffy-eyed as he left the court alongside doting girlfriend Vanessa Trump

Woods appeared puffy-eyed as he left the court alongside doting girlfriend Vanessa Trump

‘So he’s going to have somebody drive him from now on. He’s just a very special guy and I’m glad that was resolved.’

Trump added: ‘It’s a very tough situation because they didn’t find alcohol on him. You know, he didn’t test positive at all for alcohol. It’s a tough deal when you’re taking a painkiller because you’re under pain… and you have a problem and you test positive.’

In the bodycam footage, the golf icon – who is dating Trump’s former daughter-in-law, Vanessa – could be seen in the distance as a police officer repeatedly called after him. The cop approached Woods, urging him to return. 

The 15-time major champion appeared to be speaking on the phone when the officer told him: ‘We’ll get you to hang down here with us, please.’

A few moments later, Woods could be heard ending his conversation as he approached the police. ‘Thank you so much – all right, you got it, thank you, bye,’ the 50-year-old says.

Woods, who has a close relationship with Trump and was awarded the Medal of Freedom during his first term, then tells police: ‘I was just talking with the president.’

Before the hearing in Florida’s Martin County on Wednesday, Woods, 50, sat at the defense table looking back at the mostly empty courtroom gallery. He said little as he agreed to the reduced charge and left the courthouse without addressing reporters. 

He had arrived with girlfriend Vanessa and the couple was swarmed by photographers before she took her seat behind him during the proceedings.

Woods called Trump in the moments after his shocking car crash in Florida back in March

Woods called Trump in the moments after his shocking car crash in Florida back in March

Woods is a 'very close friend' of Trump and was awarded the Medal of Freedom in 2019

Woods is a ‘very close friend’ of Trump and was awarded the Medal of Freedom in 2019

Woods also pleaded no contest to refusing to submit to testing after the crash

Woods also pleaded no contest to refusing to submit to testing after the crash 

‘Tiger is not absolved of accountability and he surrendered his license for the next five years,’ Mark Steinberg, his longtime manager at Excel Sports told the AP. ‘He is continuing his treatment and prioritizing all aspects of his health.’

The prosecutor in the case said two toxicologists found there was insufficient proof of his impairment and determined Woods had built up a ‘pharmacological’ tolerance after years of using pain pills.

Thomas Bakkedahl, a state attorney, defended his decision to accept the plea, saying, ‘I did what I think is right.’

Prosecutors obtained the golfer’s pharmacy records that showed he had a lawful prescription, Bakkedahl said.

He has had numerous surgeries on his legs and back over the last two decades – some to treat cartilage and ligament damage, a ruptured tendon, arthritis, and damaged discs in his back.

At Wednesday’s hearing, Woods also pleaded no contest to refusing to submit to testing after the crash and was fined $1,500, according to court documents.

A no-contest plea is not an admission of guilt, but means the accused will offer no defense. The plea is treated as a conviction in the criminal justice system.

49ers GM John Lynch Leaves Door Open for Blockbuster Roster Move

0

John Lynch is not publicly guaranteeing that the 49ers will swing another major in-season deal.

Still, he is making it clear San Francisco is not closing that door, either.

As the 49ers head toward a new NFL season with real Super Bowl ambitions, Lynch suggested the club’s play through the opening stretch could shape how aggressive the front office becomes ahead of the Nov. 10 NFL trade deadline.

“That’s not like a charge to a team, ‘Hey, you want us to keep adding? Go earn it,’” Lynch told The San Francisco Standard. “But that’s just the reality of this league. Put yourself in position, then if it fits and the deal’s right, then yeah.”

For the 49ers, that kind of move would hardly be unprecedented.

Lynch and Kyle Shanahan landed Christian McCaffrey from Carolina during the 2022 season, surrendering four draft picks for the running back who became one of the defining players of their current era. San Francisco also acquired Emmanuel Sanders at the 2019 deadline during its run to the Super Bowl.

“I think our history shows we’re not averse to that,” Lynch said. “But I do believe you have to put yourself in position to even have those conversations.”

It’s extraordinarily early to predict who might be available by November. The sellers likely won’t reveal themselves until struggling teams reach October and begin looking toward 2027.

But a few fascinating names have already surfaced.

ESPN’s Dan Graziano included Raiders star Maxx Crosby and Falcons tight end Kyle Pitts among his early potential deadline candidates in June.

Pitts is already an example of how quickly those projections can change.

Atlanta was reportedly open to trading Pitts before the NFL draft, but the former No. 4 overall pick subsequently signed a three-year, $54 million extension with the Falcons.

That makes a midseason move considerably less likely.

Still, if Atlanta unexpectedly struggles and changes direction, Pitts would offer San Francisco an intriguing luxury alongside George Kittle. The 25-year-old caught 88 passes for 928 yards last season, and pairing his receiving ability with Kittle would give Shanahan another weapon for an offense capable of leaning heavily into multiple-tight-end formations.

Crosby would represent an entirely different level of swing.

Las Vegas actually agreed in March to send Crosby to Baltimore for two first-round picks, only for the Ravens to back out because of medical concerns following his knee surgery. Crosby later acknowledged being furious about the failed transaction before recommitting himself to the Raiders. The bizarre failed Crosby trade left one obvious takeaway: Las Vegas has already demonstrated there is a price at which it will move its franchise pass rusher.

That price would be enormous.

And there is currently no indication the Raiders are looking to move Crosby again. But if Las Vegas starts poorly and San Francisco determines another elite edge rusher could push its defense over the top, Crosby’s name would be difficult to ignore.

Pairing him with Nick Bosa would constitute exactly the type of aggressive win-now gamble Lynch has made before.

The 49ers have plenty to determine first.

The 2026 trade deadline arrives Nov. 10 at 1 p.m. PT, giving Lynch through Week 9 to decide whether his roster has earned another major investment.

The names available then may look nothing like the names being discussed now.

But Lynch has already made the prerequisite clear: give the front office a reason to believe one more player could make the difference.

People Are Jumping, I Have to Go: Haunting Final Words to a 9/11 Widow

0

“I have to go.” They were the final words Monica Iken would ever hear from her husband — a brief, ordinary-sounding goodbye that, in the stunned minutes after their call ended that September morning, gave no hint of the devastation behind it.

About 10 minutes earlier, Michael had called from his desk on the 84th floor of the World Trade Center to say a plane had struck the North Tower, the building opposite his own. It was just before 9 a.m., and he told her not to be frightened.

A few minutes later, the phone rang again. Once more, Michael tried to calm her, insisting that he was safe and that there was no reason to panic.

“Then he said, ‘People are jumping out of the window. I have to go.’ And that’s the last thing he ever said to me,” Monica, now 56, recalls.

Moments afterward, inside the New York apartment they shared, she watched in horror as live television footage showed a second plane cutting through the clear blue sky and heading straight for the South Tower — the building where Michael was at work.

‘I remember standing there, just frozen, trying to process that I was looking at this huge jumbo jet. And by the time I snapped out of it, it had hit his building,’ she says. ‘That’s the moment my nightmare began.’

That day the man she had walked down the aisle with just 11 months earlier became one of the 2,977 victims of the worst terror attack in US history. His body was never recovered. 

Monica, then 31, had gone to bed the night before a happy newlywed only to find herself transformed into a widow.

Monica Iken reveals she feels closest to her late husband Michael, a bond broker who was killed on the 84th floor of Tower Two in the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, when she visits the memorial at Ground Zero

Monica Iken reveals she feels closest to her late husband Michael, a bond broker who was killed on the 84th floor of Tower Two in the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, when she visits the memorial at Ground Zero

Monica with her husband Michael on their wedding day in October 2000. Extraordinarily, they had met on September 11, 1999 - two years before everything would change forever

Monica with her husband Michael on their wedding day in October 2000. Extraordinarily, they had met on September 11, 1999 – two years before everything would change forever

On September 11, 2001, Michael Iken became one of 2,977 victims of the worst terror attack in US history

On September 11, 2001, Michael Iken became one of 2,977 victims of the worst terror attack in US history

While time has moved on, a part of her is anchored to the events of a quarter of a century ago.

‘You learn to live with it but each year brings with it the milestones he never saw,’ she says. ‘Last year we would have celebrated our silver wedding anniversary.’

For before Michael became one of the thousands whose lives were extinguished on a day seared into history, he was simply the man Monica had expected to grow old with – a man who, from almost the moment he saw her, had been convinced they were destined to be together.

Extraordinarily, they had met on September 11, 1999 – exactly two years to the day before the tragedy. Monica had just emerged from a two-year relationship. 

‘I was looking forward to being single for a while,’ she says wryly.

But around 10pm that evening, as she and a friend headed for a night out in downtown Manhattan, they stopped at a favourite bar and restaurant because her friend was hungry.

‘There was this handsome guy dressed in black sitting by himself at the bar and as I was trying to move a stool, he starts telling me his whole life story,’ she recalls. It was the start of a conversation that, as Monica puts it, ‘never really stopped from there’.

Six years older and divorced, Michael revealed he had spotted Monica at the same bar the previous weekend. ‘He told his friend, “I’m going to marry that girl,” and he had come back a week later to find me. 

‘He’d been there for hours, just waiting,’ she recalls.

‘And the freaky thing is that we were never intending to go back to that bar that night. We only went because my friend decided she was hungry. The next time I looked at the clock it was 3am.’

And while Monica was initially ambivalent about plunging straight into another relationship, Michael was ‘all in’ from the start.

‘I was trying to see if I could date other people – obviously that did not happen. He was just determined,’ she says with a smile.

Then, one evening in October, she recalls watching Michael walk into a restaurant and something inside her shifting. ‘There was this moment where I just knew my soul had to be with his and from then on we were inseparable.’

Michael proposed just a month later and in February 2000 they moved into a rented flat in Riverdale, a serene residential neighbourhood north of Manhattan.

That October they married in an intimate beachside wedding in the Caribbean. After the ceremony, Michael changed his voicemail greeting to: ‘I am happily married. Leave me a message.’

Like any young couple, the Ikens had dreams and plans for the decades they assumed lay ahead. Michael, in particular, longed for children. 

‘He really wanted to be a father,’ says Monica.

Yet running oddly in parallel with those hopes for the future was a conviction that he would not live to see old age. ‘It was horrible. He said it all the time,’ Monica says now. Neither of them, of course, could possibly have envisaged how or when that premonition would come true.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, Michael left their apartment shortly before 6am to make the 15-mile journey from their home to his job as a bond trader.

‘He was in a good mood,’ Monica recalls. ‘He had been taking a sailing course and was collecting his certificate after work. He kissed me goodbye and we both said: “I love you.”‘

Having recently left her job as a teacher, Monica went back to sleep. ‘I had no idea it would be the last time I’d see him,’ she says.

Three hours later, she woke to the unexpected sound of the phone ringing. ‘He never called me in the morning because his work was particularly focused in the early hours,’ she says.

Around ten minutes earlier, at 8.46am, American Airlines Flight 11 had crashed into the World Trade Center’s North Tower, killing everyone on board and trapping those working above the impact zone.

‘He asked me if I was up and told me to turn on the TV,’ Monica recalls. ‘He told me a commuter plane hit the building but it wasn’t his building, it was Tower One. And I’m looking at this image on screen of a giant hole but he was cool as a cucumber and told me everything was fine. Then he said, “I gotta go. I’ll call you back.”‘

The phone rang again five minutes later, this time Michael asking his wife to call family and friends to reassure them he was fine because he didn’t have the capacity to respond to their panicked messages.

‘I ran to get the address book and when I got back to the phone, he told me people were jumping and he had to go,’ she says. ‘All I could get out of my mouth was, “OK,” before he hung up. Now I wish I’d screamed: “Get out.” I just assumed that he’d call me back.’

Instead, just moments later, Monica joined millions around the world in watching the unthinkable unfold live on television.

At 9.03am, United Airlines Flight 175 crashed into the South Tower, striking floors 77 to 85. Michael was on the 84th. Only later would Monica learn that a handful of people from the 81st floor and above had managed to escape.

While some colleagues had fled in panic when the first plane hit the North Tower, Michael, along with several co-workers, had stayed behind to try to persuade a colleague in shock to come out from beneath her desk.

Monica was told that he would most likely have died from carbon monoxide poisoning. ‘That’s the only comfort I have,’ she says. ‘That he didn’t suffer.’

Unable to get through to her husband’s phone, Monica could do nothing but watch in horror as, less than an hour later, the entire South Tower collapsed.

‘I really thought I was in another dimension,’ she says. ‘I couldn’t process what was happening.’

Yet the mind does strange things in the face of unimaginable loss: Monica spent that afternoon lying on the sofa by the door, praying for Michael to walk through it and calling his phone, leaving frantic messages, before eventually collapsing into sleep.

What happened next remains extraordinarily vivid to her. ‘I had this incredibly lucid dream. We had a garden apartment with a red door and I was in the living room on the couch and Michael came through the door.

‘I jumped up, wrapped my legs around him and he said, “Monica. It’s so beautiful here.” And it felt so real but when I woke up I knew he was gone.’

Even so, in the dire days that followed, Monica clung to a sliver of hope – one that she admits she has never completely extinguished.

‘His best friend got out. His other friends got out. There was no ID card, no wedding ring,’ she says. ‘Deep down I knew straightaway but at the back of my mind there was part of me which felt like he’s wandering the streets somewhere and that’s very difficult.’

The days and weeks that followed passed in a torment of grief. ‘I wasn’t functioning at all. I was so not well,’ she says.

‘Drinking was the only thing that calmed my nerves. I’d not only lost my husband but all our dreams and plans, the family we were going to have.’ She pauses. ‘And not only that but he didn’t just die. He was murdered – and the whole world saw it.’

With no body, there could be no funeral in the conventional sense. Instead, Monica and Michael’s family held a memorial mass. 

Meanwhile, she found herself drawn repeatedly to the place where the towers had stood. ‘I wanted to remember him in the place where he took his last breath,’ she says.

Within a week of Michael’s death, she was seized by a conviction: there must be a permanent memorial at Ground Zero. 

‘The recovery hadn’t even been done yet but the city was already talking about rebuilding,’ she says. ‘I was horrified. I had lost my soulmate. We were married 11 months, looking forward to having a family. I had nothing to live for but his memory, so if they wanted to build over dead people, I determined they would have to build right over me.’

Grief had given her a cause: within weeks of Michael’s death, Monica launched September’s Mission, a non-profit organisation devoted to building a positive and meaningful legacy out of the events surrounding 9/11.

She met politicians, building consultants and the families of other victims and, 11 months after the tragedy, was one of 5,000 people who took part in Listening To The City, an innovative town meeting held in New York in which citizens from every walk of life came together to discuss how Lower Manhattan should be rebuilt and how those who died should be memorialised.

The extraordinary event, largely forgotten in the intervening years, has now become the subject of a compelling new film, 9/11: Reclaiming Ground Zero, which tells the story of an ambitious democratic experiment that has never been repeated since: thousands of ordinary people, still living amid the raw aftermath of the attacks, being given a voice in how their city should remember its dead and chart its future.

‘It was extraordinary,’ Monica recalls. ‘Everybody was calm and listening and I wonder why we can’t do this now. It feels like we need it more than ever.’

Yet if campaigning gave Monica’s days purpose and structure, it could not mend what was happening inside her. ‘I was a wreck,’ she says. ‘For years I was basically a functioning alcoholic.’

Then, in June 2004, she met the man who would change her life again. In a Manhattan bar, Monica got talking to Bob Murphy, a 6ft firefighter who had been off work on September 11 but been called to the site in time to see the collapse of Tower 7, a separate 47-storey building just north of the main complex. 

He lost his entire company that day. ‘We were mourning, but in different ways, and that helped,’ she says.

The pair started dating and, within months, Monica discovered she was pregnant. Her eldest daughter, Madison, now 21, arrived in the autumn of 2005 followed, in 2007, by their second daughter, 19-year-old Megan.

By then she and Bob had married, Monica’s wedding ring incorporating diamonds from the ring Michael had given her six years earlier. 

It was a new chapter, although from the start, Monica was clear that building a new family did not mean erasing Michael from her life.

‘Michael wasn’t a parent in this life but I was passionate about the fact he would be a parent in the life he was in now,’ she says.

‘I talked to him, asking him to watch them and take care of them and he has. He’s forever a part of me, they’re part of me, so he’s a part of them.’

It has not always been the easiest emotional landscape to navigate. ‘I don’t think many people could handle the fact that their wife is still in love with someone else who’s not even here,’ Monica says. ‘Bob has been as accepting as anyone could be but it’s not always been easy.’

She has also shared Michael’s story with her daughters, a process which has become ever more urgent as she gets older. ‘I have this panic about what happens if I’m not here – who’s going to carry the torch? So I’m always putting things in place to make sure the legacy of him stays alive,’ she says.

Next Friday, Monica will again visit the memorial at Ground Zero to commemorate her husband. ‘I’m there all the time,’ she says. ‘That’s my happy place. I feel close to Michael there.’

She tries not to dwell on the men who robbed Michael of his future and her of the life they had planned, although she cannot forgive the terrorists for the destruction and heartbreak they unleashed. 

Yet nor does she want the defining message of the 25 years since Michael’s death to be one of hatred.

Instead, she wants it to be one of hope. ‘I could have crawled into a hole and never come out, because it felt like my whole life was over,’ she says. ‘But I came out of that and made a difference.

‘And I hope that can inspire someone in despair that things can and do get better.’

  • 9/11: Reclaiming Ground Zero is available now on some digital channels and on Amazon Prime from September 11

Judge Explains Why Tyler Robinson Still Faces Death Penalty

0

PROVO, Utah — In allowing prosecutors to continue pursuing the death penalty against Tyler Robinson, the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk, Utah Fourth District Judge Tony Graf Jr. said the mere allegation that Robinson opened fire in a crowded setting was not, by itself, enough to establish probable cause that he knowingly placed a bystander in “great risk of death.”

Robinson, 23, is charged in the fatal shooting of Kirk, a 31-year-old father of two and founder of Turning Point USA, during a daytime campus event at Utah Valley University last year. Thousands had gathered to watch Kirk speak when he was shot.

What met the legal threshold, Graf determined, was the evidence showing where several people were positioned in relation to Kirk at the moment he was killed.

Charlie Kirk surrounded by a large audience, tosses hats to the crowd shortly before his assassination in Utah

Charlie Kirk is seen at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, 2025, in Orem, Utah. Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, was speaking during his “American Comeback Tour” when he was shot in the neck and killed before a crowd of thousands. (Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images)

“The Court therefore considers the actual spatial circumstances surrounding the shot, the proximity of other individuals to Mr. Kirk, and the evidence bearing on Defendant’s knowledge of those circumstances,” Graf wrote in his ruling.

Kirk was sitting under a Turning Point USA-branded tent, on a small stage, responding to questions from audience members — one of whom was standing at a microphone “east of and in front of Mr. Kirk,” Graf wrote. There was a security guard under the tent with Kirk and two more nearby, to the left and right in front of the canopy.

The fatal gunshot is alleged to have come from the east — the rooftop of the Losee Center on the far side of the courtyard.

charlie kirk at uvu before shooting, facing the crowd

Charlie Kirk speaks at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, 2025 in Orem, Utah. (Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images)

The first part of Graf’s reasoning is based on those “documented positions,” Graf wrote.

“Second, the physical evidence establishes that the shot was fired from an elevated position approximately 415 feet from the canopy and 68 feet above it, and that the bullet traveled anatomically from front to back and downward after striking Mr. Kirk,” he continued.

Because the bullet did not exit Kirk’s body, Graf wrote that he did not “assign a quantitative probability” of ricochet, over penetration “or a hypothetical deviation in aim.”

People run after Charlie Kirk was shot at UVU

People run after shots were fired during an appearance by Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, 2025 in Orem, Utah. (Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images)

“Rather, the relevant evidence is that Defendant allegedly discharged a .30-06 rifle toward a seated victim while several other individuals occupied positions in and around the canopy area,” he wrote. “Viewed favorably to the State, their documented positions in relation to the intended target, considered together with the elevated location and downward direction of the shot, permit a reasonable inference at the preliminary-hearing stage that at least one third party was within the relevant zone of danger and that the risk was more than an abstract possibility.”

Thirdly, he wrote, the state showed probable cause that Robinson was aware that people near Kirk were in danger after allegedly visiting the scene in advance and having a scope on his rifle.

Witness in the Charlie Kirk murder pretrial hearing

Sgt. Jennifer Faumuina, of the Utah Department of Public Safety, describes the distance from Charlie Kirk’s tent to the position from which prosecutors allege that Tyler Robinson fired the rifle round that killed Kirk, during a preliminary hearing at the Fourth District Courthouse in Provo, Utah, July 9, 2026. (Spenser Heaps/AP via Pool)

“From the southwest roof area, there was a clear line of sight to Mr. Kirk’s canopy,” Graf noted. “The rifle also contained an optical accessory. Without making findings about the degree of magnification or precisely what Defendant saw through the optic, these circumstances support a reasonable inference that Defendant was aware that other individuals were positioned near Mr. Kirk when he fired.”

Robinson faces seven charges total, all of which Graf green lit for trial.

An aerial view of UVU campus with marked locations showing the suspected movements of Charlie Kirk's alleged assassin

An approximation of the suspected movements of Tyler Robinson, Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin, based on court documents, video from the scene and conversations with law enforcement. (Google Maps, News Media)

The top charge, aggravated murder, is the only one that carries the potential for capital punishment. It requires prosecutors to show that “the defendant knowingly created a great risk of death to another individual other than Charlie Kirk and the defendant.”

Other charges include felony discharge of a firearm causing serious bodily injury, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and committing a violent offense in front of a child. The violent offense in front of a child allegations reclassify count 7 from a class B to a class A misdemeanor and are a sentencing consideration for count 2.

Judge Tony Graf sits at the bench during Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing in a Utah courtroom.

Judge Tony Graf presides over Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing. (Pool)

Another aggravator is that prosecutors allege that Robinson targeted Kirk over his political expression — which does not factor into the potential death penalty.

The reasoning is laid out in the official written order binding over the case against Robinson for trial, which was published Wednesday — and it mirrors what Graf said in court earlier this week.

The scene of Charlie Kirk's assassination in Utah

The scene after shots were fired at an appearance by Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, 2025 in Orem, Utah. (Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images)

Kathy Nester, one of Robinson’s defense attorneys, entered not guilty pleas on his behalf to all charges Tuesday.

He’s due back in court on Oct. 23 for a pretrial conference, where Graf may set a trial date.

What Jurors Heard in the Lindsay Clancy Trial’s Key Moments

0

PLYMOUTH, Mass. – Jurors in the trial of Lindsay Clancy have been working through deliberations as they consider whether she should be found criminally responsible for the 2023 deaths of her three young children inside the family’s Massachusetts home.

There is no dispute between prosecutors and the defense that Clancy killed the children. The central question is why. Her attorneys say she was in the grip of postpartum psychosis and that inadequate mental health care worsened her condition. Prosecutors contend the killings were intentional and planned.

During 21 days of testimony, jurors heard from a wide range of witnesses, including medical professionals, first responders, family members and Clancy’s former husband.

A conviction could lead to a sentence as severe as life in prison. If Clancy is found not guilty, she could either be released or continue to be held in a mental health facility. Should jurors remain deadlocked, the judge could declare a mistrial.

As deliberations continue, these are some of the key moments from the trial:

___

EDITOR’S NOTE: This story includes discussion of suicide. If you or someone you know needs help, the national suicide and crisis lifeline in the U.S. is available by calling or texting 988.

___

Judge declined to remove a juror

Before sending the deadlocked jury home Thursday, Judge William Sullivan declined a defense request to remove one of the jurors following heated discussions from both sides.

Earlier, the jury’s foreperson sent the judge a note saying a single juror won’t follow the court’s instructions about reasonable doubt.

Details of the jury room conflict weren’t revealed and only briefly discussed in open court, but it raised the possibility that a single holdout was standing in the way of a verdict.

Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington said the juror should have been dismissed from the case. Sullivan said removing a deliberating juror is a sensitive undertaking.

The judge questioned each juror individually in private, then reread his instructions about reasonable doubt in court.

Reddington said afterward outside the courthouse that the juror would be questioned again by the judge Friday.

Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague said in court that she believed Sullivan’s instruction was appropriate and no further action was necessary.

Jurors have struggled to agree on a verdict

Jurors have sent notes to the judge at least three times since they began deliberating Aug. 27.

On Tuesday, the fourth day of deliberations, jurors sent a note in the morning saying they could not unanimously agree.

The note did not elaborate, and there were no clues as to whether a majority of jurors were leaning toward a conviction or acquittal. It also did not provide any insight into the tone of deliberations or whether they had been cordial or acrimonious.

Sullivan asked jurors to keep deliberating.

On Wednesday they sent the court another short note saying they were still at an impasse. Sullivan again told them to keep trying.

Clancy’s former husband made anguished 911 call

Clancy’s former husband, Patrick Clancy, was first to take the stand.

In emotional testimony, he described the day he found his wife after she tried to kill herself.

Lindsay Clancy had sent him out to get takeout food and medication for their daughter, which prosecutors argue was an excuse to get him out of the house.

He came home to find the house unusually silent, before finding blood throughout the main bedroom and a window open.

Jurors listened to the 911 call Patrick Clancy made after finding his wife outside in the snow. Clancy can be heard speaking with his wife, then tells the dispatcher he’s going to check on the children.

Moments later, he howls and cries after finding his children in the basement. The confused dispatcher repeatedly asks what happened.

“She killed the kids!” he yells.

Everyone knew Clancy was struggling

Clancy’s mother, mother-in-law, sister, friends and co-workers testified that Clancy struggled with her mental health after giving birth to Callan, the youngest of her three children.

Clancy’s mother-in-law, Susan Clancy, said she and her former daughter-in-law were close. Both worked as labor and delivery nurses. She described Lindsay as a wonderful mother.

But Susan Clancy testified that Lindsay had become anxious, paranoid and suicidal, and that the psychiatric care she was getting wasn’t helping.

“She felt unwell. She had insomnia. She was losing her appetite. She was very anxious and sad,” Susan Clancy said. “She was begging for help.”

Lindsay Clancy’s mother, Paula Musgrove, testified that her daughter was scared of sleeping alone, became paranoid and believed the medications she was taking “were destroying her mind.”

“Mom, will you please come up and stay with me for a bit? I’m really sick. Something is wrong,” Clancy wrote in an October 2022 text message that Paula Musgrove read in court. “I had horrible insomnia all night, and I just don’t know how I am going to get through the day. … It’s just really scary, and I don’t want to be alone.”

The defense questioned the quality of Clancy’s medical care

Clancy saw several doctors about her declining mental health, and eventually checked herself in to a psychiatric hospital.

Her lawyer, Kevin Reddington, argued that she was misdiagnosed and overmedicated.

As he cross-examined one of her psychiatrists, Dr. Jennifer Tufts, Reddington questioned her expertise, prescribing decisions and use of 25-minute video appointments with limited time for talk therapy.

At one point, Reddington implied that Tufts was a box-checking “robot.”

“What did you do? You had a woman who was telling you she felt hopeless,” he asked as they discussed an appointment about two months before the killings.

“I told her that this was something we could address, that there was hope, that there are treatments, that there are different types of programs,” Tufts said, “so she knew that she still had options and a reason to hope.”

Clancy said she heard a voice telling her to kill

Paul Zeizel, a clinical and forensic psychologist who visited Lindsay Clancy in the hospital after she killed the children, testified that he overheard her saying that a disembodied male voice had told her she had no choice but to kill her children and then herself. Zeizel said he believed Clancy wasn’t responsible for her actions because of her deep mental illness.

Prosecutors called a rebuttal witness, forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun, who said he didn’t believe Clancy had hallucinated voices.

“One of the things that she said when I asked about what happened, is that in the course of strangling each child, she said, ‘Go to God, baby. Go to God,’” he said. “That was part of her expectation that she and the children would be together in heaven with God.”

Dr. Gregory Saathoff, a senior psychiatrist for the FBI’s Behavioral Analysis Unit, testified for prosecutors that Clancy “had the capacity to know right from wrong.”

The lawyers got the last word

After testimony was complete, each side got about an hour to make their closing argument to the jury.

Reddington showed the jury a photograph of the Clancy family, looking happy, and a second one of Lindsay Clancy in the hospital.

“How does this turn into this?” Reddington asked. “How? Because of the damn medicine and the lousy medical care that she got.”

Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague said criticizing the mental health system was “a distraction.” She said Clancy chose to kill her children because doing so would make it easier to kill herself.

“She was depressed. She was exhausted. She was done. She didn’t want to try anymore. She felt damaged,” Sprague said. “But those kids, those kids were her protective factor. Those kids were keeping her from ending her misery.”

Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Lindsay Clancy Trial Reaches Its Most Dramatic Day Yet

0

The murder trial of Lindsay Clancy reached its most tense moment so far Thursday, as her defense attorney raised alarm over a deliberating juror he said was unwilling to apply the law as instructed.

Judge William Sullivan halted deliberations for the day after the jury foreperson submitted a note indicating that one of the 12 jurors was not adhering to the legal standard for reasonable doubt.

Clancy, seated in a wheelchair, was brought to the judge’s bench by her lawyer, Kevin Reddington, as prosecutors looked on. Sullivan then questioned each juror individually, asking whether they could follow the court’s instructions on reasonable doubt. Each appeared to answer that they could.

After the questioning, Sullivan again reviewed his reasonable doubt guidance with the panel and directed the jurors to resume their work.

‘You are required to follow my instructions on the law as I gave them to you,’ the judge told them.

‘Reasonable doubt. The burden of proof is on the Commonwealth to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of the charges made against her.

‘If you evaluate all the evidence and you still have a reasonable doubt remaining, the defendant is entitled to the benefit of that doubt and must be acquitted.’

Reddington then revealed that one holdout juror is holding up the verdict in a courtroom outburst.

The Lindsay Clancy jury has deliberated for 35 hours to determine whether she is guilty of murder, manslaughter or not criminally responsible for her actions

The Lindsay Clancy jury has deliberated for 35 hours to determine whether she is guilty of murder, manslaughter or not criminally responsible for her actions

Judge William Sullivan dismissed the jury for the day on Thursday after the foreperson sent a note saying one of the 12 jurors was not following the law on reasonable doubt

Judge William Sullivan dismissed the jury for the day on Thursday after the foreperson sent a note saying one of the 12 jurors was not following the law on reasonable doubt

‘The court has an instruction from the foreperson of that jury who’s been working for a week now, saying that there’s one juror who refuses to listen to the law that you’ve given him or her on reasonable doubt,’ Reddington said, growing animated.

‘I suggest respectfully that the soft instruction that you gave them, saying at the sidebar, “Can you listen to the law as I instruct you?” does not focus on the issue. The question is not sufficient enough. It does not allow any foundation for a motion to remove the juror who refuses to accept your instructions on the law.

‘If we come back here in a half hour with a mistrial because a juror that has just spurned the instructions of this court, it’s a shame.

He then demanded that the juror to be removed. 

The panel of 12, nine women and three men, has now deliberated for 35 hours to determine whether Clancy is guilty of murder, manslaughter or not criminally responsible for her actions.

They are still deadlocked, and a verdict has not been given. 

Clancy, 36, is on trial for the murders of her three children, Cora, five, Dawson, three, and eight-month-old Callan, at her home in Duxbury, Massachusetts, in 2023.

She admitted to killing her children but pleaded not guilty to murder by reason of insanity, citing postpartum psychosis as a result of overmedication.

During the five weeks of testimony, prosecutors argued the killings were intentional and well planned, not the work of someone who had lost control.

The defense attorney speaks to his client Clancy during the tense moment in court

The defense attorney speaks to his client Clancy during the tense moment in court

Reddington demanded that the one juror who is allegedly not following the law be removed

Clancy was then wheeled up to the judge¿s bench by her attorney, Kevin Reddington, and watched, along with the prosecution, as the judge asked each juror, one by one, whether they could follow the law on reasonable doubt

Clancy was then wheeled up to the judge’s bench by her attorney, Kevin Reddington, and watched, along with the prosecution, as the judge asked each juror, one by one, whether they could follow the law on reasonable doubt

Clancy, 36, is on trial for the murders of her three children, Cora, five, Dawson, three, and eight-month-old Callan, at her home in Duxbury, Massachusetts, in 2023

Clancy, 36, is on trial for the murders of her three children, Cora, five, Dawson, three, and eight-month-old Callan, at her home in Duxbury, Massachusetts, in 2023

The jury has not been sequestered during their deliberations.

Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague insisted the judge’s instructions on reasonable doubt were sufficient.

‘We have the note from the jury. There’s no way to determine what the deliberations are, who’s correct, who’s incorrect, nor should we attempt to, because that is part of deliberations,’ she said.

‘I think what Your Honor has done, by asking each juror if they’re able to follow the law and then giving a general instruction on reasonable doubt, is appropriate.’

Judge Sullivan noted the defense’s motion and acknowledged that removing a juror is a ‘sensitive undertaking.’

‘I’m sure the parties understand that the discharge of a deliberating juror is a sensitive undertaking,’ Sullivan said.

‘I was just specifically responding to the specific question that was asked. I don’t feel that it is proper for me to side with one side or the other of the deliberations. I don’t feel it’s appropriate for me to say I agree with one juror or the 11.

‘At this point, I’ve asked if they are able to follow my instructions; they swore earlier that they could.’