Thousands of migrants find themselves in a precarious situation in Ceuta, a Spanish city in North Africa, as they await resolution. The European Union has stepped in, offering urgent support to bolster the enclave’s border defenses. Meanwhile, Spanish officials are conducting investigations to determine if last week’s mass crossing included activities by criminals or jihadists seeking entry into Europe.

According to Spanish authorities, approximately 72,000 individuals made their way into Ceuta from Morocco. Since then, about 70,000 have returned, leaving an estimated 2,000 people still in the enclave. The local reception facilities are struggling under the pressure, with hundreds of migrant minors needing shelter and officials working to ascertain the status of those remaining.

At present, local authorities are busy processing 862 migrant minors. These children benefit from special protections under Spanish legislation, meaning they cannot be returned immediately. Reports from The Associated Press highlight the dire situation, with some children forced to beg for food or sleep outdoors due to the overwhelmed youth shelter.

The European Union is stepping in to support Spain with emergency financial resources aimed at enhancing border security in Ceuta. This initiative was announced by Magnus Brunner, European Commissioner for Internal Affairs and Migration, following an emergency assembly of the EU ministers held in Brussels.

Brunner said the unprecedented crossing was fueled by criminal smuggling networks and disinformation spread through social media, as Spanish authorities were examining whether known criminals or suspected jihadists exploited the scale and disorder of the crossing to enter Ceuta undetected.

Spain’s National Police and Guardia Civil were reviewing video of the crossings and checking people who remained in the territory against criminal and counterterrorism databases, according to El Confidencial, which cited Spanish Interior Ministry sources.

The Spanish outlet reported that authorities were searching for known criminals and possible jihadists who may have entered among the tens of thousands who crossed. Interior Ministry sources acknowledged that the sheer scale of the surge created a genuine infiltration risk, according to the report.

El Confidencial said the concern was heightened by Ceuta’s proximity to Fnideq, also known as Castillejos, a Moroccan border town that has figured in previous jihadist recruitment investigations. Authorities have previously dismantled extremist cells operating across the Ceuta-Fnideq border area, while hundreds of people from northern Morocco traveled to join ISIS and other terrorist groups in Syria and Iraq during the mid-2010s, the outlet reported.

The crisis is also creating an opening for Islamist movements seeking to weaken confidence in Morocco’s government, according to Zineb Riboua, a research fellow at the Hudson Institute.

Riboua said in an article that Moroccan Islamists have spent years portraying the monarchy as overly secular and pro-Western, attacking its relationships with the United States and Israel and encouraging the belief that young Moroccans have little future at home.

At the same time, she wrote, Islamist voices have promoted an idealized image of Europe as a place where prosperity and legal status can be easily obtained.

Riboua said the Ceuta crisis allows those movements to transform public frustration over migration, unemployment and economic conditions into a broader political attack on the Moroccan state ahead of the national elections in September.

Evidence has separately emerged that the mass crossing was preceded by an extensive online mobilization campaign.

An open-source intelligence report prepared by Golden Owl Intelligence traced weeks of activity across TikTok, Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, including misleading interpretations of Spanish immigration law and practical information about routes, meeting points and recommended crossing times.

The report estimated that the content generated more than 11 million potential impressions through posts, videos, comments and interactions. It also identified messaging groups administered through telephone numbers carrying Algerian international codes.

The campaign accelerated after Spain’s Supreme Court issued a July 8 ruling concerning the immediate return of migrants intercepted at sea near Ceuta and Melilla, according to the report. Simplified and misleading interpretations of the decision, combined with confusion surrounding Spain’s policy to regularize hundreds of thousands of undocumented migrants, were presented online as evidence that people who reached Spanish territory would be allowed to remain and eventually obtain legal status.

The investigation documented the later circulation of maps, swimming routes, transportation information and suggested departure points as tens of thousands of people began moving toward the border.

Morocco’s Interior Ministry spokesman Rachid El Khalfi said at a news conference Sunday that the surge resulted from several overlapping factors, including the exploitation of digital platforms, misleading information, human-trafficking networks and inaccurate interpretations of legal and administrative developments.

Khalfi said the messaging created the false impression that the border was open and that people could reach European territory without legal consequences. He said Moroccan prosecutors had opened investigations to identify those responsible and determine the appropriate legal consequences.

Reuters and the Associated Press have independently documented cases in which online claims influenced people to travel toward Ceuta. Reuters interviewed a Moroccan teenager who said Instagram videos inspired him and his cousin to make the journey, while a Moroccan human-rights activist told the AP that social-media posts initially claimed the border was open and later promoted a misleading interpretation of the Supreme Court ruling.

The crisis has also placed Spain’s intelligence services and its relationship with Morocco under scrutiny.

El País and Cadena SER reported, citing officials familiar with Spain’s intelligence assessment, that Morocco did not plan the mass crossing but allowed it to unfold after border controls were gradually relaxed.

Spanish Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska said Spain’s foreign intelligence agency had not warned him of an imminent surge of that magnitude.

Morocco has denied deliberately orchestrating the crossing. Interior Ministry spokesman Rachid Khalfi blamed the surge on online misinformation, human-trafficking networks and distorted interpretations of Spanish legal and administrative developments, according to The Jerusalem Post. The ministry said Morocco remained committed to international cooperation against irregular migration and human trafficking.

Spanish Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares defended Rabat’s response, saying Moroccan authorities quickly provided police support and helped facilitate the return of most of those who crossed.

Juan Jesus Vivas Lara, president of the autonomous city of Ceuta, offered a sharply different assessment, telling El País that many Ceuta residents believed Morocco had allowed, if not orchestrated, the surge.

“Morocco has shown us that it isn’t reliable,” Vivas said. “There’s no alternative but to put in place whatever means are necessary to ensure it cannot do this again.”

News Media reached out to the Moroccan government for comment but did not receive a response by the time of publication.

A British surgeon has been dismissed from his position after an operation went seriously awry, creating a life-threatening situation when the patient’s organs were improperly connected, obstructing normal bowel function.

Testimonies at the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service revealed that the patient received emergency surgery to remove a tumor from their bowel, conducted by NHS surgeon Dr. Yasser Adly Abdel Rahman at Greater Manchester’s Royal Oldham Hospital.

In collaboration with another surgeon, Dr. Rahman decided to execute a highly unusual procedure linking the small intestine to the stomach, attempting something uncharted in medical practice.

Yet, during the surgery, a critical mistake occurred. They accidentally linked the wrong section of the intestine to the stomach, an error experts consider incompatible with life.

Consequently, the patient’s intestinal contents ended up looping back into the stomach, effectively going around in circles, with no proper exit pathway.

Despite the patient reporting increasing pain and vomiting with no bowel movements for weeks afterwards, Rahman seemed unconcerned, according to a nurse.

The doctor even told the patient and their family that “all the signs are saying” that his bowels would work soon.

Rahman and his colleague had decided to connect the two organs to maintain digestive and bowel continuity, and had even tested for no obstructions.

A month after the initial procedure, Dr. Anthony Rate, another colorectal surgeon at the same hospital, took over care after the patient’s family raised concerns.

Rate performed a second surgery and managed to salvage some of the bowel by giving the patient a stoma, a surgical opening in the abdomen for waste to come out.

An expert witness at the tribunal, former consultant general and colorectal surgeon Anthony Blower, said Rahman’s decision was “as bad as it gets for a consultant surgeon.”

“[The patient] would have died in the post-operative period if it was not for the intervention,” Blower said in court.

He added that the initial move connecting the stomach and intestine would have been “extremely difficult” to perform because of the huge tumor present in the patient.

“Dr. Abdel Rahman’s procedure can at best be described as bizarre and was a totally unconventional operation that is not compatible with life,” Blower said.

“Patient A would have died in the post-operative period if it was not for the intervention of Mr Rate.”

During the tribunal, Rahman believed there was a “witch hunt” against him, claiming he had never had a single complaint among his “unblemished record” of 30 years.

Regardless of the doctor’s claims, the tribunal decided Rahman had given no “remorse, empathy, or recognition of the impact on” the patient and “no attempt at an apology.”

The court decided to remove him from the list of doctor’s at the hospital, and an immediate suspension was put in place in case he chooses to appeal against the decision.