A magnificent Nantucket estate featuring an underground tunnel, concealed speakeasy and expansive ocean views is on the market for $45 million—an asking price that could set a new record for the most expensive home ever sold in Massachusetts.

The newly constructed residence covers almost 13,500 square feet and includes nine bedrooms, a swimming pool, a home theater, gym and billiards room.

Set on Cliff Road in one of Nantucket’s most prestigious areas, the three-story property was completed this year and is being sold fully furnished.

Among its standout features is a private underground passageway linking the main house with a separate guest residence.

The estate further includes a hidden speakeasy, a two-car garage with a studio and a rooftop walkway known as a widow’s walk, where residents can take in sweeping views of Nantucket Sound.

Designed in a classic New England style, the home occupies a 0.62-acre parcel and features an unpainted cedar-shingle façade, dormer windows and two barn-inspired rooflines that frame the entryway.

The interior offers a chef’s kitchen centered around a generous island, a formal dining area, spacious living rooms and bedrooms planned for large family stays.

Its Cliff neighborhood location places the property close to Nantucket’s north shore beaches, as well as the restaurants and shops of downtown.

“The Cliff area is one of Nantucket’s most sought-after neighborhoods, with beautiful homes, proximity to north shore beaches and easy access to downtown’s restaurants and shops,” said listing agent Bobby Sabelhaus of Great Point Properties.

Botticelli & Pohl Architects designed the mansion, Hehir Group Custom Builders handled construction and SLC Interiors created the interiors.

“33 Cliff was designed by Botticelli & Pohl Architects, built by Hehir Group Custom Builders, with interior design by SLC Interiors. The attention to detail throughout the property reflects that collaboration,” Sabelhaus told the Daily Mail.

Amenities include the swimming pool, hidden speakeasy and guest house, which is connected to the main residence through the underground tunnel.

“What makes it special is how much there is to enjoy right at home, from the pool and hidden speakeasy to the guest house connected by an underground tunnel,” Sabelhaus said.

ALSO READ: One Nation Leader Pauline Hanson Warns French-Style Protests Could Spread to Australia

“Views of Nantucket Sound add to the setting, with the roof walk offering an even broader perspective over the water and harbor.”

According to the listing agent, the property was created for entertaining and extended family gatherings, providing ample space for guests while keeping downtown Nantucket within easy reach.

“But what I picture most is family and friends filling the house, spending the day by the pool, then walking into town for dinner,” Sabelhaus said. “It’s an exceptional property that’s really designed to be lived in and enjoyed.”

The owners bought the property through a limited liability company for $13.95 million in 2024 from the estate of late retail mogul Roger Horchow. 

The previous house, built in 1982, was demolished to make way for the new estate. The owners had initially planned to live there but fell in love with another part of the island, according to Sabelhaus.

If the mansion sells anywhere near its asking price, it could overtake the current Massachusetts residential sale record of $43 million, set by a 31.5-acre estate on Martha’s Vineyard sold by Boston tech entrepreneur Michael Bronner in September.

It would also surpass the $42 million Nantucket record set in 2023 when Barstool Sports founder Dave Portnoy bought a waterfront property on the island.

Despite its price tag, the mansion is not directly on the waterfront. However, its location in the Cliff neighborhood and views of Nantucket Sound are major selling points.

The home is being marketed to buyers seeking a second residence, including families who want room for children and grandchildren while remaining within walking distance of Nantucket’s downtown restaurants and shops.

Potential buyers are largely coming from the New York, Boston and Connecticut markets, Sabelhaus has said.

For $45 million, the next owner will get a newly completed luxury compound with room for extended family, resort-style amenities and a private tunnel – all on one of the most exclusive islands on the East Coast.

A shark was filmed swimming perilously close to surfers at a popular Los Angeles-area beach, with its dorsal fin cutting through shallow water only a few feet from shore.

The unsettling video, shared Friday by social media influencer Josh Hublitz, captures the animal moving through the surf at El Porto Beach in Manhattan Beach.

“Surfing with sharks in Los Angeles… I’ve actually never seen a shark in El Porto before. This is the first,” Hublitz said in an Instagram post.

“Ankle deep water. That is super sketch,” he added.

In the footage, the shark’s dorsal fin emerges above the surface as it glides through the water near the shoreline.

One Instagram user speculated that the animal could be a harmless “baby thresher,” a species known to pursue baitfish in waters close to shore.

Officials and experts have not confirmed the shark’s species.

The sighting follows a series of shark encounters reported along the Southern California coast in recent months.

CHECK THIS OUT: MANHUNT: FBI Seeking Iranian Spy Suspected of Masterminding Assassination of U.S. Officials – NewsFinale

On Tuesday, the Huntington Beach Fire Department shut a two-mile section of beach after an “aggressive” great white, estimated at 10 to 12 feet long, was reportedly seen circling near Lifeguard Tower 16.

In late June, a 9-foot great white was spotted off La Jolla. Officials posted warning signs, although the shark was not reported to have behaved aggressively.

The recent encounters coincide with unusually warm ocean temperatures associated with a powerful El Niño pattern, which has also been linked to a wave of unusual marine-life sightings off Southern California.

Scientists say warmer waters could be driving some shark species northward from their typical habitats and bringing them closer to heavily visited California beaches.

Two endangered olive ridley sea turtles were also found nesting on Orange County beaches near Seal Beach and Huntington Beach Pier, marking the species’ first documented nests on the West Coast.

Other rare visitors have included a hammerhead shark spotted off Malibu and venomous sea snakes seen along the Southern California coastline.

In a separate case, prosecutors say an Arizona man accused of plotting a mass-casualty attack at a Jewish or Muslim place of worship possessed a notorious bomb-making guide associated with Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh.

Matthew Bjornholt, 27, has been charged with felony terrorist threats over the alleged plan to target a religious institution.

Maricopa County prosecutors allege that Bjornholt developed a detailed plan involving firearms, explosives and a second person who would shoot at anyone left alive after the initial attack.

At a Friday court hearing, prosecutor Stephen Garcia requested a $500,000 cash bond and described Bjornholt as an immediate threat to the public, FOX 10 reported.

Garcia told the court that Bjornholt allegedly mapped out an attack on a religious location. Prosecutors also said investigators found a copy of “The Anarchist Cookbook,” a controversial book featuring bomb-making instructions and historically associated with McVeigh.

According to Garcia, Bjornholt allegedly described the manual as his “Bible.”

Prosecutors said the alleged scheme called for explosives to be detonated first, followed by an accomplice using a gun to begin “picking off people.”

Authorities later recovered three firearms and ammunition from Bjornholt’s residence.

Defense attorney Chad Schell disputed the allegations, arguing that the case rests entirely on unconfirmed claims made by a former acquaintance who was upset with Bjornholt, FOX 10 reported.

Schell told the judge that the information came from a “homeless alcoholic” who had briefly stayed at Bjornholt’s home before being asked to leave late last month.

Schell said federal officials had reviewed the accusations weeks earlier. According to the defense attorney, the FBI searched Bjornholt’s home on Sept. 29, and Bjornholt voluntarily turned over his electronic devices and the passwords needed to access them.

The defense said federal investigators found no proof of terrorism or bomb-making activity and declined to bring federal charges before county authorities assumed the case several weeks later.

“There is no evidence he’s a danger to the community. What is the evidence that he’s a danger to the community? Some hearsay statements from some dude — that my client kicked out of his house two days before September 29,” Schell told the court.

“Again, the FBI served a search warrant, got all of his electronic devices. He gave them access, gave him his passwords to those devices. They went through all of those electronic devices. They didn’t see anything about terrorism. And FBI cut him loose,” he continued.

Schell further maintained that Bjornholt legally owned the three guns. He said his client’s civil rights had been restored after Bjornholt completed a sentence on a drug charge connected to a previously closed first-degree murder case. The murder allegation was dismissed because prosecutors lacked sufficient evidence, according to Schell.

The ammunition found at the residence, Schell argued, amounted only to ordinary magazine loads.

News Media has reached out to the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office and FBI Phoenix for comment.

Despite prosecutors citing Bjornholt’s criminal history in arguing for a larger bond, the judge said the state’s preliminary evidence relied heavily on hearsay and set Bjornholt’s bond at $100,000, according to FOX 10.

The judge nevertheless found enough probable cause to move the case forward.

It remains unclear whether specific houses of worship were targeted in the alleged plot or whether there was a specific accomplice.

Bjornholt is scheduled to return to court on Oct. 22 for a status conference and then later for a preliminary hearing on Oct. 26.

White House border czar Tom Homan has cautioned that Democratic Representative Ilhan Omar could lose her U.S. citizenship and face deportation if a federal investigation finds evidence that she committed immigration fraud.

Speaking to Fox News, Homan said investigators had developed what he described as a “strong case” against the Somali-born congresswoman, whose Washington, D.C., residence was searched by federal agents last week.

When asked whether the probe could ultimately lead to Omar’s denaturalization and removal from the United States, Homan said that possibility could not be ruled out.

“Of course,” he said, explaining that federal law provides a process for revoking citizenship if an individual lied or concealed information during the naturalization process.

“We’ve done it before, and it is a long, tedious process, but it’s been done before,” Homan said.

He added: “I’ve been involved with those investigations before, and certainly if the evidence points that way, yes, it could happen.”

Homan’s comments came as former President Barack Obama mounted an unusual defense of Omar, accusing Donald Trump’s administration of using federal power against one of its most outspoken political opponents.

The dispute intensified after the FBI searched Omar’s Washington, D.C., home last Monday. Agents reportedly seized her cellphone during an investigation into allegations concerning immigration documents linked to her family.

Omar, 44, has not been charged with a crime and strongly denies any wrongdoing. She has described the investigation as a politically driven witch hunt.

Homan, however, suggested that investigators had growing confidence in the material collected during the probe.

“I’ve been told we have a strong case,” he told Fox News on Saturday. “We’ll let the evidence see where it leads. She’ll be held to the same standard you and I are held. If she violated law then she’d be held accountable.”

The border czar also portrayed the case as part of a broader effort to deter violations of U.S. immigration law.

“Deterrence is a part of what this administration is doing,” Homan said, citing reviews of refugee cases and the pursuit of denaturalization proceedings.

Pressed on whether Omar was being investigated for potential crimes beyond alleged immigration fraud, Homan declined to provide further details.

“I won’t go there,” he responded.

Homan’s remarks mark a further escalation in the politically sensitive investigation, which has drawn fierce criticism from Democrats and prompted Obama to intervene publicly on Omar’s behalf.

The former president took to X on Sunday to condemn the investigation, accusing Trump of attempting to intimidate an elected official for exercising her right to criticize the White House.

‘It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say,’ Obama wrote.

‘But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota.’

Obama argued that the investigation appeared to hinge on a disputed question about Omar’s age when her father became a naturalized American citizen.

DISCOVER MORE: Horror photos of scene where pit bull owner was mauled to death by pack of 13 dogs as neighbors watched unable to help – NewsFinale

According to the former president, Omar arrived in the United States aged 12 and automatically acquired citizenship five years later when her father was naturalized.

He claimed investigators were pursuing a theory that she had actually been 18 at the time, potentially undermining her citizenship status.

‘Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president,’ Obama wrote.

‘The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views.’

His intervention came after Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin revealed that multiple court-authorized search warrants had been executed on the same day as the raid on Omar’s residence.

Speaking on The Charlie Kirk Show, Mullin insisted the investigation was supported by substantial evidence and rejected accusations that Trump had ordered a political crackdown.

‘We had a judge sign it, and we expect to be able to take the case to a grand jury,’ Mullin said.

‘We wouldn’t move forward, and President Trump didn’t want to move forward either, unless we knew that it couldn’t be politically driven.’

Mullin also raised the possibility that investigators could examine potential offenses under federal racketeering laws if evidence emerged of a coordinated scheme to deceive immigration authorities.

He described a hypothetical situation involving fraudulent paperwork used to bring other people into the country.

‘Then that can be considered a RICO [Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations] case, right?’ he said.

However, no such charges have been brought against Omar, and officials have not publicly disclosed evidence establishing that she committed immigration fraud.

The investigation has revived longstanding allegations circulated by conservative critics that Omar married her brother to facilitate his immigration to the United States.

The congresswoman has repeatedly rejected those claims as ‘absurd and offensive.’

Her legal team has now demanded the immediate return of property seized during the search, accusing the Justice Department of conducting an unlawful and politically motivated investigation.

Omar’s attorneys insisted there was ‘no legitimate basis for any suggestion that she has violated any law concerning her citizenship status.’

They also accused federal authorities of disregarding longstanding Justice Department practices intended to prevent investigative actions from influencing elections.

‘This vindictive, retributive, and politically motivated criminal investigation into one of the President’s chief congressional critics violates Representative Omar’s constitutional rights and threatens the separation of powers,’ they wrote.

Justice Department spokesperson Emily Covington rejected the accusations, describing the lawyers’ letter as ‘riddled with false allegations and inaccuracies.’

‘Our attorneys and law enforcement partners complied with all court orders and legal obligations, as they always do,’ she said.

Trump previously denied having any involvement in the investigation, telling reporters following the search: ‘I think she’s a terrible person, but that’s really up to the DOJ.’