We have a curated list of the most noteworthy news from all across the globe. With any subscription plan, you get access to exclusive articles that let you stay ahead of the curve.
We have a curated list of the most noteworthy news from all across the globe. With any subscription plan, you get access to exclusive articles that let you stay ahead of the curve.
We have a curated list of the most noteworthy news from all across the globe. With any subscription plan, you get access to exclusive articles that let you stay ahead of the curve.
We have a curated list of the most noteworthy news from all across the globe. With any subscription plan, you get access to exclusive articles that let you stay ahead of the curve.
Reflecting on the tragic loss of their 19-year-old son Finlay, who was struck by a car during the Volta a Portugal cycling race earlier this week, Michael and Dawn Tarling expressed their emotions in a heartfelt Instagram tribute on Sunday.
In their post, they acknowledged the profound difficulty of the past few days, stating, “This has been the hardest couple days of our lives and it’s taken us a bit of time to be able to post this.” They found solace in the overwhelming support they received, adding, “The wave of posts, messages, emails, articles and calls from across our family, friends, team, local and sporting communities has been a huge help to us, as we hear how lovingly and fondly Fin was thought of.”
Expressing gratitude, they wrote, “We simply can’t thank you all enough for the support we’ve had. I don’t know how we’ll carry on from here, but we’ll figure out with the support of all our family, friends and community.”
Though their loss is immeasurable, they fondly remembered their son, describing him as not just a son and brother but their best mate. “Gentle, loving with the driest sense of humour, we will miss him terribly,” they shared, emphasizing the void left by his absence.
Finlay, despite his young age of 19, lived a life filled with remarkable experiences and achievements. His parents concluded their tribute with pride, stating, “His short life was packed full of wonderful experiences and achievements and we couldn’t be prouder of him.”
“If you’re heading out on your bike in the next few days, give him a thought as you clip in.
“We will of course share funeral details as soon as we know.”
Tarling was riding for the NSN Development Team when a light goods vehicle collided with him during the eighth stage of the race, between the municipality of Melgaco and Fafe in the north of Portugal. Police told local media that an investigation is underway.
The race was neutralized, with the podium ceremony canceled.
“At this time of deep sorrow, the organisers of the Volta a Portugal and the Portuguese Cycling Federation extend their deepest condolences to Finlay Tarling’s family, his teammates, the NSN Development Team, and all his friends and loved ones,” a statement from race organizers read.
A number of figures in the cycling world left comments on the Tarling family’s post, and the cyclists’ union released a statement saying they were “speechless and filled with anger,” over the manner of his death.
“It is not right that a young athlete’s life should end this way, and we are furious that even today it is still not possible to prevent such serious accidents,” their statement read. “We share in the grief of his family, friends, team and everyone who knew Finlay. Rest in peace, young rider; we pray for you, and we will carry you in our hearts.”
In a tense confrontation, riot police thwarted an attempted mass entry by migrants into Ceuta, a Spanish territory, marking the second such organized attempt.
A large throng of men advanced toward the border crossing located at the northern fringe of Africa, seeking entry.
This incident follows closely on the heels of a significant breach two weeks ago, when 72,000 individuals navigated the waters from Morocco to the Spanish enclave’s shores, tragically resulting in 145 fatalities.
According to reports from Morocco’s Le360 news outlet, authorities detained over 300 individuals, with 46 identified as Moroccan nationals and the remainder hailing from sub-Saharan Africa.
To control the situation, police deployed tear gas against clusters of migrants positioned on hills roughly 3 kilometers (1.9 miles) from the border, as stated by Spanish news agency EFE.
Reporters later saw hundreds of officers, some in riot gear, returning from the hills outside Fnideq.
Huge groups of the men were seen pouring down the hills and mountains near Ceuta during the attempted crossing yesterday.
In the weeks leading up to the crossing attempt, messages began to swirl around social media calling for a new invasion of the Spanish enclave.
Hundreds of migrants were seen trying to storm border of Spanish enclave in planned Ceuta
Huge crowds of men were seen storming the border crossing at the northern tip of the African continent
Police and military personnel from Spain and Morocco were both deployed early on Saturday
Earlier this week, Rabat said it was monitoring ‘the circulation of social media posts and messages of unknown origin’ calling for a mass crossing on August 15, warning it would prosecute organizers and participants.
A message posted to an online forum read: ‘The Ceuta border will be open on the 15th [of August], a public holiday in Spain.’
They are also being urged to cross the border into Melilla, another Spanish autonomous city on the northern coast of Africa.
Ceuta and Melilla form the European Union’s only land borders with Africa.
Social media was previously blamed for the organisation of the first large-scale attempt on the border.
In Ceuta, Spanish soldiers guarded supermarkets while police heavily patrolled the enclave’s main streets. The city was calmer than in the days after the deadly crossing attempt on July 30.
Madrid has since installed a maritime barrier and deployed more than 500 additional police from mainland Spain, raising the total in Ceuta to more than 1,600. The Interior Ministry said the reinforcements would remain for as long as needed.
‘We’ll continue to deploy whatever personnel are necessary to restore normality as soon as possible and prevent events like those of July 30 from happening again,’ Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska said on Thursday.
About 5,000 migrants remained in Ceuta, the minister said.
Mr Grande-Marlaska said migrants who entered irregularly would not be allowed to stay in the enclave, travel to mainland Spain or obtain legal status, except in rare cases involving extreme vulnerability. Those without a right to remain would be returned to Morocco, he said.
Moroccan security forces monitor as they thwart attempts by hundreds of sub-Saharan African and Sudanese migrants to enter Ceuta
Sub-Saharan African and Sudanese migrants gather near Fnideq (Castillejos), Morocco, as they attempt to enter the Spanish city of Ceuta, 15 August 2026
Migrants are pictured taking shade beneath a tree as temperatures are set to reach 32C on Saturday, as authorities stand watch
Witnesses saw reinforced security near the border, including police vans with wire shields and road checkpoints. Local media reported similar measures near Melilla.
Authorities prevented several groups from boarding trains and buses to northern Morocco in cities such as Casablanca, Fez and Kenitra. However, witnesses told Reuters that some migrants from sub-Saharan Africa were bypassing security checkpoints by taking mountain routes towards Fnideq.
One witness said the schools in Fnideq had been turned into accommodation for security forces deployed near the border.
Many of the young people who entered Ceuta on July 30 were fishing, swimming or washing at Tarajal beach on Friday.
Driss Sadik, a 22-year-old from Fez who said he swam for five hours to reach Ceuta, urged others not to follow his example.
‘The important thing I would advise people trying to cross: Don’t cross now, my brothers. You’re only going to suffer,’ he told Reuters.
The warning was echoed by Adil Jamil, 17.
‘Those who enter aren’t going to benefit from anything. There will just be more and more of us, and they won’t find a solution for all,’ he said.
Adil said that the mass border crossings were ‘planned by the people’ who pick a date, gather in Fnideq and cross together to find strength in numbers.
According to El Pais, one message posted to online forums in which migrants discuss mobilising read: ‘The Ceuta border will be open on the 15th [of August], a public holiday in Spain.’
Rachid el-Jalfi, a spokesman for Morocco’s Ministry of the Interior, said on Wednesday that ‘all necessary measures’ had been taken to prevent illegal crossings.
He urged those planning to travel to Ceuta or Melilla to ignore online messages that appeared ‘suspicious and deceptive’, warning that attempts to cross posed ‘serious risks to people’s safety’.
Early last month, Spain’s top judicial body ruled that a procedure used to return illegal migrants only applied when they breached a physical border, rather than when they arrived by sea.
A heavy police and army deployment prepare at the border between Morocco and Spain today, after fresh social media calls for people to attempt the crossing
Migrants attempting to cross into Spain’s North African enclave of Ceuta gather on a hilltop during clashes with Moroccan security forces near the town of Fnideq, on the Morocco-Spain border, on July 31, 2026
Migrants gather along the fence close to the site of clashes near Fnideq last month
Under the ruling, migrants who cross an unmarked maritime border can still be returned, but only through a separate formal procedure.
The crisis began on July 30, when more than 72,000 migrants surged into Ceuta. The following day, the Spanish government announced plans for a maritime containment barrier, which it began installing off the coast on August 1.
The influx also triggered a diplomatic row within the European Union after Italy temporarily suspended its Schengen arrangements with Spain and introduced checks on travellers arriving from the country by air and sea.
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni described the ‘uncontrolled immigration’ from Morocco into Ceuta as a national security threat.
Spain summoned the Italian ambassador in response, with Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares saying Madrid expected ‘European solidarity and not partisan demagoguery’. Spain then suspended its own Schengen arrangements with Italy.
Spanish authorities are meanwhile processing migrants who remain in Ceuta ahead of possible returns to Morocco.
Officials are using warehouses in Tarajal and elsewhere in the enclave to temporarily house migrants while they are identified and processed, with authorities hoping to return those without a right to remain within 72 hours of locating them.
The aftermath of the crossing has also been marred by allegations that several young migrant girls were raped after arriving in Ceuta.
The alleged victims, all under the age of 14, sought treatment at the University Hospital of Ceuta (HUCE) this past week, health services told the El Pueblo de Ceuta newspaper.
Judicial sources said many of the alleged rapes were prevented by the direct intervention of residents of Ceuta.
Some residents of the autonomous city were also among the accused, however.
Barely a fortnight after Lake Mead, known as the largest reservoir by capacity in the United States, reached an all-time low, Lake Powell, the nation’s second-largest reservoir, has now met the same unfortunate milestone.
On Saturday, the water level of Lake Powell dipped to 3,519.91 feet, marginally undercutting its prior record of 3,519.92 feet set in April 2023.
Federal water authorities have warned that the daily readings are “provisional and subject to revision,” suggesting that the new record might be adjusted since the difference is so minimal. However, even if this particular figure changes, the ongoing downward trend indicates that an actual record low could be imminent.
“If you consider the combined capacity of these two reservoirs, the last time they were so severely depleted was in 1957, before Lake Powell even existed. This situation is indeed unprecedented,” remarked Jack Schmidt, a seasoned research scientist and director of the Center for Colorado River Studies at Utah State University, in an interview with ABC News. “We are navigating entirely new territory.”
Lake Powell and Lake Mead hold the majority of the Colorado River water, vital for the urban and agricultural needs of Southern California, Arizona, Nevada, and Mexico, along with several federally recognized tribes. These reservoirs also play a crucial role in generating hydroelectric power and maintaining a consistent water supply downstream, particularly during droughts and times when the Rocky Mountains’ snowpack is limited.
Sharon Megdal, the director of the Water Resources Research Center (WRRC) at the University of Arizona, called the situation a “natural disaster” and compared it to a savings account. She said the demand for water acts like a withdrawal, and the drought and reduced snowpack limit the deposits you can pull from the savings when times are tough.
“What’s really happened in this last year acutely is that the flows are so low and given how we’ve been operating the system, we’re getting to these record lows that honestly were not anticipated as recently as a year ago, and so it’s kind of a critical situation on the river,” said Megdal. “It’s appropriate to use the words critical, crisis because we haven’t been there before since these two reservoirs had been filled.”
While this year’s El Nino may bring much-needed rain to the West, it won’t be enough to replenish the lakes’ water supplies, according to Megdal and Schmidt.
“It will take multiple years of good winters in terms of precipitation and snowmelt. We had a very good year in 2023. It would take multiple years, like 2023, to start filling the reservoir system, so one year won’t do it,” explained Megdal.
And Schmidt said there is a weak correlation between an El Nino and a significant snowpack in the Rockies. Add the impacts of climate change, which have resulted in warmer springs and drier soils that reduce runoff into the reservoirs, and average or above-average rainfall no longer guarantees equivalent runoff. The area is also losing snowpack due to sublimation, in which ice turns directly into vapor, and evaporation.
“Now there’s lots of uncertainty, but (the Bureau of Reclamation’s) most probable forecast right now is 75 percent of average (for water inflows into Lake Powell). If that’s what really happens, our crisis only deepens, only gets more significant, only gets even worse than it is. If we were to get an exceptional year, such as what we got in 2023, we remain in crisis,” said Schmidt.
But that doesn’t mean the water will stop flowing to people who need it. Megdal says that cutbacks so far have fallen on agriculture rather than municipal customers, and that even if cities are hit, most have other water supplies.
The cities in the West have also done a good job at reducing consumption even as they’ve grown, according to Schmidt. Both experts agree that if significant cuts in water use are necessary, it’s the agriculture industry that will have to shoulder the burden.
“Fifty-five percent of all the water used in the Colorado River Basin is used to produce livestock feed, growing alfalfa and grass hay. If you take all the agricultural activities in the basin, about 70% of all the water used of the Colorado River is used for some agricultural activities,” said Schmidt.
Schmidt said growing vegetables such as broccoli, tomatoes, onions and carrots that help feed the country during winter, makes a lot of sense and should continue, even if it requires supplemental water.
“But it is inevitable that summertime production of grass, hay, and alfalfa in extreme climates where there’s lots of water loss due to evapotranspiration and exceptionally hot conditions, those uses might have to be cut back,” said Schmidt.
“The savings in the cities are so great that, despite their population growth, they use less water today than they used to. We’re going to need to have agriculture be much more efficient in its use of water, much more targeted in its decisions about what crops to grow, where and when,” he added.
Megdal said that grass and hay production could impact grocery prices. “There’s multiple ways people will feel impact. It may not be the reliability of water to your home, right? But it could be what you’re paying in the supermarket and what our communities look like in terms of green spaces and open spaces,” she said.
Schmidt said cutting back agricultural water use is not going to be easy. The industry holds the oldest water rights and unless the laws are changed, it would have to be compensated for any water it gives up.
“The West lives by a doctrine of first in time, first in right. The American West was settled first by agriculturalists, and only late in the game did the big cities come along,” explained Schmidt.
Recently, the Bureau of Reclamation, the federal agency overseeing water management, announced its plan for managing the Colorado River when the current operating guidelines expire at the end of the year, but it didn’t specify the size of the cuts. That decision is expected to come soon. The move came after Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming failed to reach an agreement on future water allocations after more than three years.
One thing that everyone agrees on is that when it comes to water in the West, business can’t continue as usual.
“What we should be doing that we’re not already doing is really looking at what curtailments or what cutbacks on the (water) demand side we can do, how quickly we can do them and what are the opportunities to substitute other water supplies,” said Megdal.
For Schmidt, who has been studying these issues for decades, he says the region is in for “tough times” and that tough choices will have to be made. But he still believes there are solutions to be had.
“I guess I’m optimistic, but it’s going to be a very painful process,” added Schmidt.
Dan Peck and Dan Manzo contributed to this report.
As the years go by, maintaining your balance shouldn’t just be an afterthought; it needs to become a central part of your fitness regimen.
>
Experiencing balance issues later in life can have serious consequences. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), falls lead to the hospitalization of about 1 million seniors each year. While it’s easy to let balance exercises take a backseat to other types of workouts, maintaining your stability is a key preventative measure against severe injuries. A decrease in physical activity can lead to muscle weakness, and changes in vision and depth perception can further destabilize you. Even a minor tumble can result in injuries ranging from a sprained ankle and bruised knee to a broken hip or even a head injury.
The significance of enhancing stability cannot be overstated, which prompted us to consult with Cara Bonney, a Master Instructor at Club Pilates. She shared with us five morning exercises that can significantly boost your balance, proving more effective than tai chi once you’re over 65. Dive into these exercises below.
For those wanting to elevate their regimen beyond simple home routines, Bonney offers some expert advice.
“If you’re ready for something beyond your at-home morning exercises, Reformer Footwork can be your next step. This exercise effectively engages all lower body muscles in squat and calf raise positions while lying down, with your core muscles stabilizing your back,” Bonney elaborates. “It’s a safe and effective way to build muscle strength and endurance essential for walking. The Mat Pilates side-lying leg series is another excellent way to strengthen the muscles that support your pelvis during upright activities. Using the Reformer, you can add spring resistance to further fortify these muscles, crucial for hip and knee protection as you grow older.”
Heel Raises
Begin standing tall, facing a counter with your hands lightly resting on the surface for support.
Place your feet hip-width apart.
Slowly rise onto the balls of your feet.
Hold at the top for 1 second.
Slowly lower back down.
If You Can Do These 3 Balance Tests at 60, Your Body Age Is 20 Years Younger
Toe Raises
Begin standing with your back a few inches from a wall.
Keep your heels planted on the floor.
Lift your toes and the balls of your feet off the ground as high as you’re able to.
Slowly lower.
If You Can Do These 8 Lower-Body Moves, Your Leg Strength Is Elite
Bodyweight Squats
Stand tall with your feet shoulder-width apart.
Extend your arms ahead of you or place your hands on your hips.
Bend at the knees and hips as you lower into a squat.
Descend until your thighs are parallel to the floor.
Press through your heels to rise back up to standing.
Over 45? If You Can Wall Sit This Long, Your Body Beats Your Age
Single-Leg Stand
Stand tall on a flat surface with your feet hip-width apart and arms at your sides.
Shift your body weight onto your left foot.
Lift your right foot off the ground.
Activate your core while keeping your shoulders stacked over your ribs and your hips level.
The time begins once your leg comes off the floor and stops when your foot touches the ground.
Hold the single-leg balance for the prescribed amount of time.
Repeat on the other side.
5 Best Chair Exercises That Rebuild Lost Muscle Faster Than Gym Workouts After 60
Brittany Danielle, the makeup artist behind Karoline Leavitt’s polished White House appearances, has recently shared her unsettling experiences of receiving ‘death threats’ linked to her work. Known for prepping many within the Trump administration, including Leavitt and Lara Trump, Danielle ensures her clients are camera-ready for press conferences and TV spots on Fox News. Yet, despite her work being largely behind the scenes, Danielle finds herself targeted due to her affiliation with Trump-era figures. ‘I was getting death threats,’ Danielle revealed in an interview with IW Features, recalling ominous messages like, “I pray every day that you go to hell.” She frequently shares glimpses of her work on Instagram, featuring shots of Leavitt and other political figures, although the backlash prompted her to make her account private. ‘People talk so much trash, and they don’t know the situation,’ she reflected on the backlash she faces, acknowledging the harsh criticism often directed at those working with prominent politicians.
Seeing the White House through new eyes
‘Often, the criticism is not aimed at the makeup artist but rather at the politician, and by extension, you get caught in it,’ Danielle noted. Her unique vantage point inside the White House has reshaped her perspective, fostering a newfound appreciation for the country. ‘Seeing the tireless work done behind the scenes changes your mindset,’ she shared. ‘Regardless of political views, witnessing people work passionately for what they believe benefits the nation is eye-opening.’
Danielle’s journey with Leavitt began at Fox News, where their professional paths first crossed. At that time, Danielle was the only makeup artist available when Leavitt arrived unexpectedly for a TV appearance. ‘She came by last minute and thanked me afterward,’ Danielle recalled. ‘I asked if she had a regular hair and makeup artist, considering her frequent news appearances.’ Their collaboration bloomed from there, cementing a professional bond. ‘I really want to make her look beautiful and feel really good,’ Danielle expressed about her work with Leavitt.
A Growing Friendship
‘Working with her is a distinct experience—not only because she’s the press secretary but due to her work ethic,’ Danielle said. ‘Sometimes, I’m running through hallways with her, reminding her about lipstick or blush, which makes for some hilarious moments.’ Their working relationship has grown into a friendship, with Danielle helping to organize Leavitt’s baby shower in March, preceding the birth of her second child, daughter Viviana, in May.
Leavitt Returns to the Podium
Danielle was also responsible for glamming Leavitt for her return to the podium on July 16, marking her first press briefing after maternity leave. Leavitt’s choice of attire—a powder pink suit—appeared to be a tribute to her daughter. The ensemble, reportedly from Zara, included a blazer priced at $29.97, though its matching pants are out of stock. She completed the look with nude heels and a gold cross necklace, delivering a charming sartorial nod to her family amidst her professional duties.
Just weeks following the release of a former president from a United States federal prison, another world leader has been apprehended and charged with serious crimes.
Interestingly, these leaders’ legal sagas share notable parallels. Both individuals were presidents ensnared by US authorities due to allegations related to drug trafficking. They each ended up within the US justice system’s grasp, and coincidentally, both were detained at the same federal facility in Brooklyn, New York.
The individuals in question are Juan Orlando Hernández, the former president of Honduras, and Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela.
A pivotal moment occurred in January when Maduro was captured, marking four years since Hernández’s imprisonment, and occurring only two months after Hernández received a surprise pardon from then-US President Donald Trump.
Maduro’s situation now highlights two distinct routes leading to a US courtroom: one via extradition and subsequent prosecution after leaving office, the other through a dramatic military operation displacing a sitting leader from his homeland.
Why Maduro’s US prosecution is so significant
Unlike Hernández, Maduro was captured while still Venezuela’s president in a US military operation and flown directly to New York. Hernández, by contrast, was arrested after leaving office and extradited to the US through formal legal proceedings.
That distinction has put questions of sovereignty, head-of-state immunity and the limits of US power at the centre of Maduro’s prosecution.
Maduro was first elected president in 2013, winning by a narrow margin in an election his opponents disputed. He remained in power through two further presidential terms, amid repeated allegations of electoral irregularities and repression.
The US has long accused Maduro and senior members of his government of facilitating cocaine trafficking through Venezuela. US prosecutors have alleged Venezuelan officials used state institutions and their positions of power to provide protection and logistical support to drug-trafficking organisations.
Maduro has repeatedly denied the allegations and described the US case as politically motivated.
He faces four federal criminal counts: narco-terrorism conspiracy, conspiracy to import cocaine, possession of machine guns and destructive devices, and conspiracy to possess machine guns and destructive devices. He has pleaded not guilty.
The charges carry lengthy potential prison terms, including a possible life sentence if Maduro is convicted on the narco-terrorism charge.
But the criminal allegations are only part of the story. The circumstances of Maduro’s capture have raised a broader set of legal and diplomatic questions, including whether the US had the authority to seize a sitting foreign leader and bring him before an American court.
The Trump administration has defended the operation by arguing Maduro was not Venezuela’s legitimate president and therefore could not claim the protections ordinarily afforded to a sitting head of state.
Critics, including some international law experts, have questioned whether that position is sufficient to overcome the principles of state sovereignty and non-intervention, particularly given that Maduro was removed by US forces rather than through an extradition process.
For many international law scholars, those questions have become just as significant as the criminal allegations themselves.
Yvonne Breitwieser-Faria, lecturer and co-director at Curtin Law School, who specialises in atrocity law, international human rights law, and state responsibility, says the manner of Maduro’s removal from Venezuela is deeply troubling.
“My reaction is one of considerable unease — not because a former leader should be immune from accountability, but because of the way Nicolás Maduro was brought before the New York court,” she tells SBS News.
She argues the reported unilateral US military operation bypassed extradition, cooperation with Venezuelan authorities and international judicial mechanisms.
That raises serious questions under the prohibition of the use of force, the principle of non-intervention, and the sovereignty of states.
Other leaders, different paths
Maduro’s prosecution nevertheless joins a small group of cases in which the US has pursued foreign leaders through its own courts.
The closest historical parallel is Panama’s former military ruler Manuel Noriega, who was captured during the 1989 US invasion of Panama before being prosecuted in the US.
The invasion itself was highly controversial, with the United Nations General Assembly condemning it as a violation of international law and Panama’s sovereignty.
Like Maduro, Noriega argued he was entitled to head-of-state immunity — a form of immunity recognised in customary international law that can protect an incumbent head of state from the criminal jurisdiction of foreign domestic courts.
The rationale is to protect sovereign equality and stable relations between states.
That immunity, however, is not absolute in every context. Its scope can depend on whether a leader remains in office, the nature of the proceedings and the legal system in which the prosecution takes place.
In Noriega’s case, the US rejected his claim to immunity after refusing to recognise him as Panama’s legitimate leader.
Besides Maduro, Noriega and Hernández, the US has played a direct role in the capture or prosecution of only a handful of other world leaders.
In 2003, US forces captured Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein before transferring him to Iraqi authorities, who later tried and sentenced him to death. He was hanged in December 2006.
In 2011, the US joined an international military intervention in Libya that ultimately led to the capture and killing of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi by rebel forces.
Other high-profile prosecutions elsewhere that followed have very different legal pathways.
Former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet was arrested in Britain in 1998 after Spain sought his extradition on charges related to human rights abuses. In 2012, former Liberian president Charles Taylor was convicted of war crimes and crimes against humanity by the Special Court for Sierra Leone, while former Chadian leader Hissène Habré was tried and convicted of crimes against humanity, war crimes, and torture by the Extraordinary African Chambers in Senegal in 2016.
“These cases show that leaders can be held accountable outside of the International Criminal Court,” Breitwieser-Faria says, “but they do not support the forcible military removal of a sitting leader from his own state”.
That distinction is important. These cases involved different legal mechanisms, including extradition, domestic prosecution and international or hybrid tribunals. The circumstances of each case also differed, meaning they offer different points of comparison with Maduro’s capture and subsequent prosecution in the US.
Breitwieser-Faria also points to Israel’s capture of former high-ranking Nazi official Adolf Eichmann in Argentina as a reminder that the legality of an arrest and the jurisdiction of a court to try a defendant are separate legal issues.
Even where a defendant is ultimately tried, she says, questions over how they were brought before the court do not simply disappear.
Politics and accountability
Some academics argue the legal questions cannot be separated from politics.
Sarah Walsh, a lecturer in global history at the University of Melbourne, says Maduro’s prosecution raises broader questions about how powerful political leaders are held to account and whether those standards are applied consistently.
“While Nicolás Maduro is objectively an authoritarian leader who has done virtually nothing to improve the lives of Venezuelans, the global community is asked to treat him as meaningfully different than Donald Trump …,” she tells SBS News.
Maduro’s government rejects accusations of authoritarianism and wrongdoing, while international governments and human rights organisations have criticised its record on democracy and human rights.
“We are being asked to see these men as meaningfully different because Maduro is being tried for his involvement in alleged narcoterrorism, whereas Trump’s myriad[s] of alleged financial crimes, human rights violations, and corruption scandals are seemingly irrelevant,” Walsh says.
Debates over accountability have also surrounded political leaders in countries like Russia, China, Israel and Saudi Arabia, though the circumstances differ. For Maduro, those questions sit alongside unresolved issues over his capture and immunity claim.
Can Maduro get a fair trial after his capture?
The debate over Maduro’s case does not end with the legality of his capture. A separate question is whether a court can still conduct a legitimate trial after a defendant has been brought before it through allegedly unlawful means.
In international law, there is no single rule that automatically invalidates criminal proceedings because a suspect was unlawfully apprehended.
Instead, courts may consider factors such as whether they have jurisdiction over the accused, whether due process is respected, and whether the defendant receives a fair and impartial hearing.
The legality of an arrest and the legitimacy of a subsequent trial can therefore become two distinct legal questions.
Maduro’s case brings that contrast into sharp focus.
While critics argue that his forcible removal from Venezuela violated international law, others contend that those alleged violations do not necessarily preclude a US court from hearing the case or from providing the protections required for a fair trial.
For Juliette McIntyre, a senior lecturer in law at the University of Adelaide, the two issues cannot be so neatly separated.
While she acknowledges the New York court could ultimately conduct a fair trial — and may even find Maduro is entitled to head-of-state immunity — she argues the proceedings will always be overshadowed by the circumstances that brought him there.
No matter the result, these proceedings will be tainted by the unlawfulness of the US invasion of Venezuela and illegal capture of Maduro.
Professor Emily Crawford, deputy head of school and dean at the University of Sydney law school, takes a different view. She says the legality of Maduro’s capture and the legitimacy of his trial are distinct legal questions.
“There is mixed practice around the world regarding whether unlawful rendition or extraterritorial abduction before a court or tribunal is such a violation of human rights that it taints any subsequent court case,” she tells SBS News.
In other words, the fact that a defendant was unlawfully brought into a country does not necessarily deprive a court of jurisdiction or prevent it from conducting a fair trial.
That principle is reflected in US domestic courts. Crawford points to the 1992 US Supreme Court case United States v Álvarez-Machain, in which a doctor was abducted from Mexico and brought to the US to face criminal charges over his alleged involvement in the kidnap and murder of a US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agent and the agent’s pilot.
The court held that the circumstances of his abduction (he was abducted by men hired by DEA officials) did not, in themselves, prevent a US court from trying him.
A state with a strong separation of powers between the executive and the judiciary could still preserve and uphold due process rights for someone abducted to trial.
However, the decision was controversial and drew a strong dissent arguing the abduction violated international law and the US-Mexico extradition treaty.
Álvarez-Machaín was later acquitted.
Could Maduro’s capture set a new precedent?
The question at the centre of Maduro’s case is not only whether he can be convicted, but whether the circumstances of his capture could influence future arguments about the prosecution of foreign leaders.
One of the key principles at stake is head-of-state immunity.
Maduro’s case presents an unusual complication: he was captured while serving as Venezuela’s president but is now being prosecuted in the US as a former president after being removed from office.
That raises a question about the relationship between immunity and the circumstances of his removal. For international law experts, that is where the case’s potential significance lies.
Breitwieser-Faria says the concern is not that domestic courts are prosecuting a former leader, but rather the process by which Maduro was brought before one.
“The dangerous precedent is not the use of a domestic court,” she says.
“The concern is instead that a state may label a foreign leader illegitimate or criminal, use military force to remove that leader, bring them before its own courts, and then rely on the resulting loss of office to deny immunity.”
For McIntyre, however, the case is unlikely to create a new legal precedent in the formal sense.
I would be hesitant to suggest it’s a precedent in the legal sense.
“If anything, states prefer to uphold head-of-state immunity for self-interested reasons. It’s a very old and well-established rule of customary international law,” she says.
A single case may influence political debates or future arguments, but it would not, by itself, change customary international law.
Such a change generally requires sufficiently consistent and widespread state practice accompanied by opinio juris — the belief that the practice is legally required.
As one former president returns home after a US pardon and another faces prosecution in New York, the debate is no longer only about Hernández and Maduro themselves.
It is about the limits of US power beyond its borders, the protection — and limits — of sovereign immunity, and whether international law can adequately constrain state power when powerful countries pursue foreign leaders through their own courts.
Caitlyn Jenner has entered the fray of the heated debate over transgender athletes, particularly as discussions intensify within the Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA).
A trailblazer in her own right, the 76-year-old former Olympic gold medalist, who transitioned in 2015, has pledged her support to two ex-NBA stars: Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White. These athletes have expressed intentions to declare for the 2027 WNBA draft, aiming to challenge and assess the league’s existing policies.
“They’re highlighting the hypocrisy present in the WNBA,” Jenner remarked to Fox News regarding Kanter and White’s efforts. She noted, “During meetings about this topic, Cathy Engelbert, the league’s commissioner, acknowledged discussions about the trans issue but mentioned no decision had been reached. Cathy, it’s straightforward—XX chromosomes qualify you in, XY chromosomes do not.”
Jenner continued, praising the duo for their efforts to expose inconsistencies. “Both of these men are effectively pointing out the contradictions within the WNBA. We must safeguard women’s sports… I’m committed to protecting women’s sports. Title IX was monumental for women’s equality, especially in athletics.”
The ongoing conversation was stirred further by an ESPN interview featuring Sophie Cunningham. In this, the Fever player passionately voiced her determination to protect young girls from competing against “biological men.”
Cunningham went on to double down on her take, which sparked anti-trans athlete rallies in support of the 29-year-old at arenas she was playing at.
Last week, Freedom posted a video of him signing his name to a document that asks the WNBA to accept his “decision to enter the player pool for the 2027 WNBA Draft.”
He later posted a workout video with a caption: “Let ‘The Transition’ to the @WNBA begin. Rules Are Rules! #LetFreedomPlay.”
White, a Republican candidate for US Senate who played three games and never scored in his NBA career, announced his plans to declare soon after.
“I’m transgender. I’m a woman… I identify as sometimes identifying as a woman for purposes of… professional basketball,” he told Fox News.
Days later, the WNBA had an anti-hate task force meeting that consisted of general managers and presidents. It found “no immediate eligibility matters affecting” the league.
“We strongly denounce the bad-faith efforts to use these topics to demean or marginalize others,” a spokesperson for the league added.
WNBA commissioner Cathy Engelbert previously said in a memo that regarding trans-athlete participation, the league will “always approach this topic thoughtfully, respectfully, and in alignment with the longstanding values of our league. Second, our player eligibility rules, unlike the eligibility rules of some other leagues and governing bodies, are collectively bargained.”
Tommy John, renowned for his impressive 288 victories over a 26-year Major League Baseball career and as the namesake for the revolutionary elbow surgery, has passed away at 83.
His passing occurred on Saturday night at his residence in Bradenton, Florida, as confirmed by his agent, Mike Maguire, on Sunday. John had been under hospice care.
On August 8, the New York Yankees shared a heartfelt social media message from John. In it, he expressed his farewells to his fans and friends, reflecting on their unwavering support during his career, saying, ‘I will never forget you.’
The Yankees reminisced about John as a ‘pillar of strength in our rotation’ during his tenure with them, highlighting his enduring popularity among fans.
John’s illustrious career, spanning from 1963 to 1989, earned him four All-Star titles. He compiled a record of 288-231 with a 3.34 ERA, playing for teams including Cleveland, the Chicago White Sox, the Los Angeles Dodgers, the Yankees, the California Angels, and the Oakland Athletics.
‘Tommy was an exceptional pitcher throughout his career in Major League Baseball, and his courageous role in becoming the first to have surgery that would go on to bear his name can´t be overstated,’ Stan Kasten, Dodgers president and CEO, said in a statement. ‘His impact both on and off the field has been felt by ballplayers of all ages and will be for generations to come.’
Baseball legend Tommy John has died at the age of 83
The left-hander was 31 years old when he tore the ulnar collateral ligament in his pitching elbow in 1974, a death knell for pitchers’ careers to that point.
John allowed Dr. Frank Jobe, the Dodgers´ team physician, to replace the ligament with a tendon from his right forearm. Jobe gave the surgery 100-to-1 odds of being successful.
The procedure had been done on others before, although it was usually performed on wrists and hands. John was the first pitcher to have it done on his elbow.
More than 2,600 big leaguers and thousands more amateurs have since had UCL reconstructions, better known as Tommy John surgery. It´s been a godsend for many of baseball´s greatest stars, including two-way sensation Shohei Ohtani, three-time Cy Young Award winner Justin Verlander and even Philadelphia Phillies slugger Bryce Harper.
‘If you put it in dollars and cents, I think there´s no question that Tommy John is the most valuable reconstructive procedure there is,’ Dodgers team physician Dr. Neal ElAttrache told The Associated Press in 2024.
John recorded 2,245 strikeouts but never led either league in wins or strikeouts. He had the second-most wins of any pitcher since 1900 not to be elected to the Hall of Fame.
From 1995 through 2009, John was on the Hall of Fame ballot, but he never received more than 31.7 per cent of the votes, falling well short of the 75 per cent required for election.
Known for his longevity, John was the opening day starter for both the 1966 Chicago White Sox and the 1989 New York Yankees. He won 124 games before his UCL repair and 164 after. His final appearance came days after his 46th birthday.
John won 288 games for the Indians, White Sox, Dodgers, Angels, Athletics and Yankees
John pictured with his wife, Sally; daughter, Tami; and son, Tommy Jr. back in 1984
After his pitching career ended, John worked as a broadcaster for the Minnesota Twins and Yankees in the 1990s. He managed the Bridgeport Bluefish from 2007-09.
John was hospitalized in December 2020 because of COVID-19 and later had Guillain-Barré syndrome, in which a person´s immune system attacks their nerves.
John told the New York Post in May 2022 that he was paralyzed in his lower extremities for several months.
John and his wife Sally Simmons had four children: Tamara, Tommy III, Travis and Taylor, who died of a prescription drug overdose at 28 in 2010. The couple divorced in 2013.
Besides his children, he is survived by his second wife, Cheryl, and son-in-law Patrick Mannelly, a retired NFL long snapper who played 16 years for the Chicago Bears.