Home Blog Page 13

UK Charity Teaches Migrants About Laws Banning Sex With Underage Girls

0

Asylum seekers in Britain were given guidance on avoiding sexual relationships with underage girls during a consent lesson that has prompted a backlash, with the teacher warning that “young men” had previously been caught out.

Footage posted online appears to show a teacher from asylum-support charity the Mamacita Foundation advising migrants to ask young people for identification when approaching them.

The instructor also cautioned attendees not to rely on a teenager’s appearance, saying some British young people may look younger or older than their actual age.

In the video, she asks: “For you to have a girlfriend, a boyfriend, you see a 12-year-old, a 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, before they turn 18 or 19 and you see someone, what is the right age for a young person to be before you can approach them for anything sexual, intimacy?”

“Please, this is very, very essential because we’ve had young men fall for these things that could be preventable,” she says.

She then tells the group: “So guys, we’ve got our answer. It’s 16 years old for both England and Scotland. I thought it was 18 for England so we’re all learning.”

“So please, if you see a young person, ask for their age. In fact, ask for their ID card,” the teacher adds.

“Don’t be deceived, we have young persons growing bigger than their age,” she says.

In the footage, a woman, who appears to be a teacher, warns the class of migrants 'not be deceived' by British teenagers appearing younger than their real age

The footage appears to show a teacher warning migrants not to judge British teenagers’ ages by their appearance.

In the footage the woman tells migrants to ask people for their ID if they think they might be underage

In the video, the teacher advises migrants to request identification if they believe someone could be under 18.

“In fact, 14 years, 12 years, are taller than myself, so don’t be deceived by the size,” she says.

The Mamacita Foundation, the charity associated with the consent session, supports asylum seekers in Britain.

Based in Aberdeen, the organisation offers drop-in sessions, food assistance, CV and employment workshops, youth programmes, and dance and fitness activities aimed at wellbeing.

The charity has faced strong criticism over the clip, with Reform UK describing the workshop as “disgusting”.

The controversy follows the publication last month of an official government guide for asylum seekers that included warnings against raping or assaulting women.

Sharing the footage online on Saturday, a Reform UK spokesman repeated the teacher’s words: “We’ve had young men, you know, fall for these things.”

“These are the words of a charity worker teaching newly arrived migrants about the age of consent,” the spokesman said.

He called the lesson “a disgusting way of describing the numerous assaults young British girls suffer at the hands of fighting-age illegal migrant males”.

It comes after asylum seekers were warned in an official government guidebook not to rape or beat women last month. Pictured: A page from the new guidebook for asylum seekers

The criticism comes after asylum seekers were warned in an official government guide not to rape or assault women last month. Pictured: a page from the new guidebook.

“Reform UK will detain and deport them. Enough is enough,” the spokesman added.

Meanwhile, Reform MSP Mark Simpson described the footage as ‘deeply concerning’. 

In a letter to trustees, he accused the Mamacita Foundation of admitting the organisation ‘believes some of the men it works with do not understand that children are off limits’, in reference to the comments made by the charity worker. 

Mr Simpson said: ‘The recording is deeply troubling. The organiser first gets the age of consent wrong for England. 

‘A participant then states that it ‘can be 14’. The age of consent across the United Kingdom is 16. 

‘Two points stand out as particularly concerning: An organisation that cannot provide clear guidance on such a vital issue should not be permitted to carry out this role; Grown men should not need a publicly funded workshop to be told not to have sex with children. If they do, that is a policing and immigration control issue.’ 

A spokesman for the Mamacita Foundation told GB News‘We received Mark Simpson MSP’s email and attached letter on Friday 18 September 2026 at 8:31pm. 

‘He subsequently published a social media post before we had a reasonable opportunity to respond.

‘We would have welcomed the opportunity to clarify these matters directly before conclusions were shared publicly.

‘We are concerned that volunteers have expressed fears for their safety following the online attention.

‘We welcome fair scrutiny and respectful discussion, and ask everyone to consider the effect of their words on volunteers and people accessing community support.

‘Our dedicated volunteers make our work possible, and we are grateful for their kindness and commitment to the people of Aberdeen.

‘We remain willing to work constructively with elected representatives, public bodies, and specialist organisations to strengthen community understanding and safeguarding.’

The Daily Mail has approached the charity and also the Home Office for further comment. 

The incident comes after migrants were last month warned in an official government guidebook not to rape or beat women.

The Home Office publication setting out the ‘rules and expectations’ of living in Britain will be handed to asylum seekers as part of an education campaign.

It warned: ‘If you have sex with someone without their consent, this is called rape. Rape is a serious crime in the UK.’

The seven-page booklet, published in the wake of a series of horrific rapes and sex attacks by asylum seekers, also warns new arrivals not to ‘follow someone or block their path’, or ‘make rude or offensive gestures’.

Asylum seekers are told never to ‘make sexual comments to someone, even if you think it is a compliment’ or ‘whistle or make kissing noises at someone’.

It sets out that it is illegal to have sex with someone under the age of 16, adding: ‘There are no exceptions to this rule. Even if they say yes, it is still illegal.’

The pamphlet, entitled ‘Understanding behaviours and expectations in the UK: A guide for asylum seekers’, is expected to be made available in a range of foreign languages.

It also outlines how physical violence, threats and controlling behaviour are forms of domestic abuse and amount to a serious crime.

It says: ‘We understand that coming to a new country can be difficult, and that laws and customs here may be different from your home country.

‘This booklet will help you understand what is expected of you when living in the UK.’

It adds: ‘These rules and expectations are not just for people seeking asylum, they apply to everyone living here.’

The booklet goes on to explain that men and women in the UK have equal rights and that women are allowed to ‘work and earn their own money’, study, travel freely, and ‘make their own decisions about their lives’, including whether to marry.

It adds that a husband, father or brother should never stop a woman from working or studying; control what she wears or where she goes; stop her seeing family or friends; or make decisions for her without her agreement.

The document also warns that it is a crime to take sexual images of someone without their consent.

It contains advice and helpline numbers for anyone who has suffered sexual or other abuse.

A separate document, ‘Keeping children safe in the UK’, sets out that ‘babies and toddlers must never be left alone’.

Children should not be ‘hit, smacked, shaken or hurt’ and that ‘not giving a child enough food, clean clothes, healthcare, or a safe place to live’ amounts to neglect.

The material has also been reproduced as a series of posters featuring comic-style illustrations, presumably to be displayed in asylum hotels and other types of migrant accommodation.

Last year there were 41,472 arrivals by small boat – most of whom went on to claim asylum – and of those 34,201 were male.

The largest nationalities among Channel migrant arrivals last year were Eritreans with just over 7,600, Afghans (4,800), Iranians (4,400), Sudanese (4,400) and Somalis (3,800).

  • Do YOU have a story? Email William.G.Hallowell@dailymail.co.uk 

Hayden Panettiere Honored by Celebrity Friends at Malibu Memorial Service

0

Hayden Panettiere was remembered by friends and former colleagues during a memorial service in Malibu, California, on Saturday.

Paris Hilton, along with Panettiere’s former Nashville co-stars Connie Britton and Charles Esten, joined the celebration of life at a local church, according to TMZ.

Evan Ross, Jonathan Jackson and Lennon Stella were also among the well-known guests in attendance.

A source described the gathering as “emotional and beautiful,” telling the publication that the service began outside with the release of doves.

Roughly 150 mourners then went inside, where a band had been arranged for the occasion. Britton and Esten delivered heartfelt speeches in honor of their late friend.

Esten also performed a song from Nashville, the series in which he and Panettiere worked together.

The late Hayden Panettiere was honored by celebrity friends at a memorial on Saturday, TMZ reports

Hayden Panettiere was remembered by celebrity friends at a Saturday memorial service, according to TMZ

Panettiere’s Nashville costar Connie Britton was one of the stars who gave a touching speech; Britton and Panettiere are seen above in 2012

Connie Britton, Panettiere’s Nashville co-star, was among those who spoke at the service; the pair are pictured together in 2012

Stars including Paris Hilton attended the celebration of life at a church in Malibu, California

Stars including Paris Hilton and Evan Ross attended the celebration of life at a church in Malibu, California

Paris Hilton and Evan Ross were among the stars who attended the celebration of life in Malibu, California

Panettiere’s father, Skip, attended the service, while her mother, Leslie Vogel, was reportedly absent. The actress had been estranged from Vogel.

A source close to Vogel disputed the suggestion that she had been invited, telling TMZ that she was unable to attend because of a family emergency.

Brian Hickerson, Panettiere’s on-again, off-again boyfriend, and his brother Zach have responded to reports that they were not included in the actress’s memorial service.

According to TMZ, the brothers understand why they were left off the guest list for Panettiere’s celebration of life.

Panettiere died a month ago at 36. She suffered cardiac arrest following a suspected overdose in South Carolina, where she had been staying at an Airbnb with Brian, 37, and Zach, 38.

In the aftermath of the Nashville star’s death, Brian has reportedly struggled emotionally and is said to have lost 40 pounds.

Detectives told the Daily Mail last month that they had responded to a 911 call from someone described as an acquaintance of Panettiere. The caller reportedly said she was unresponsive.

TMZ previously reported that Narcan, a nasal spray used to reverse the effects of an opioid overdose, was discovered on a mattress inside the loft apartment where Panettiere had been staying.

Charles Esten also performed a song from their show, Nashville, at the gathering on Saturday

Charles Esten performed a song from Nashville during the memorial gathering on Saturday

Panettiere's on-off boyfriend Brian Hickerson and his brother Zach were snubbed from the late actress's memorial; pictured in 2018

Brian Hickerson and his brother Zach were reportedly not invited to Panettiere’s memorial; they are pictured in 2018

The Greenville County Sheriff’s Office confirmed that Panettiere’s autopsy had been completed and that no signs of trauma were found on her body.

She had arrived in Greenville with Brian one day earlier.

According to the Greenville Police Department’s incident report, Zach told police that Brian was sleeping in a separate room of the Airbnb when he arrived and found the actress unresponsive in a chair.

Zach stated that Brian administered Narcan – a medication that reverses opioid overdoses – and that they performed CPR while communicating with 911 dispatchers.

Earlier this month, Brian and Zach were involved in a bar brawl, leading to the former’s detainment and the latter’s arrest for disorderly conduct.

The brothers had been drinking at Wild Wing Cafe, an eyewitness told TMZ, when other patrons allegedly heckled them over Panettiere’s August 16 death.

Panettiere had a tumultuous on-and-off relationship with Brian beginning in 2018.

Throughout their relationship, he was arrested and charged in connection with domestic abuse multiple times.

In the weeks since Panettiere's shock death, Zach (pictured) and Brian have run into trouble with the law

In the weeks since Panettiere’s shock death, Zach (pictured) and Brian have run into trouble with the law

In 2021, he pleaded no contest to two felony counts of injuring a spouse or girlfriend, resulting in jail time, probation, domestic violence classes, $500 in restitution, and a five-year protective order, per People.

Zach previously told TMZ in the wake of the actress’s death: ‘There are a lot of assumptions, speculations and accusations currently swirling.

‘The truth will come out as the authorities complete and release additional details from the investigation. And that is important because the people who loved and adored Hayden deserve the truth.’

He described Panettiere as ‘precious’ and said her friends and family should be allowed to mourn her peacefully.

‘At this time, I want to clarify my involvement in effort to keep the focus on the fact that we lost one of the most precious individuals on this earth and to allow those that cared about her to mourn without additional noise, chaos, and misinformation being created and propagated by the media as well as the public,’ he said.

The “Unprofessional” Item Gen Z Brings to Job Interviews That Could Cost Them Offers

0

In today’s unforgiving job market, Gen Z candidates are bringing their best game to interviews.

Some are bringing an iced latte, too.

A generational debate has taken over the internet: Is arriving at a job interview with an iced coffee in hand unprofessional—or perfectly acceptable?

The conversation began after TikTok corporate recruiter @caitlinrecruiter criticized Gen Z candidates for showing up to interviews with iced lattes. Drawing on 16 years of experience placing candidates with Fortune 500 companies, she urged job seekers to think twice before bringing a casual beverage into the room.

“When you show up with an iced coffee or an iced latte, it is perceived—from my opinion and a hiring standpoint—that this interview is just a stop on your list of errands for the day,” she said in a viral video. “It looks like you went to Target, went to Starbucks, and now you’re stopping by your interview before moving on to the next thing.”

She maintained that carrying the drink can create an overly casual impression and make the candidate appear less serious about the opportunity.

The post quickly divided the internet, prompting hiring managers, job seekers and other professionals to weigh in on the iced coffee interview debate.

Another creator described bringing a “wet, plastic, condensation cup” into an interview room as “diabolical.” They pointed to the water ring a cold drink can leave on a table and the awkwardness of taking loud sips while trying to make a strong first impression.

Gen Z job seekers and their supporters, however, defended the right to stay caffeinated. Some argued they would not want to work for an employer that judged them over their choice of beverage.

“I don’t want to f–king work for you if you don’t want to hire me because I bring an iced coffee,” one Gen Z TikToker said, dismissing what they called “traditional etiquette” and corporate brainwashing.

LinkedIn News brought professional advice to the discussion. Benjamin Chipman, a Gen Zer who works in marketing, suggested that interviewees who choose to bring a drink should carry it in their left hand, leaving the right hand free for a handshake. He also advised candidates not to rattle the ice or slurp the last drops.

“Is this a generational thing?” communications manager Adam Raider asked. “I would NEVER bring an iced coffee… or a hot coffee… or tea, soda, juice, sangria… or any other beverage into a job interview. I WOULD accept water, if it was offered.”

Only 43% of Gen Z prefer hot coffee, compared to 89% of adults over 60. matinee – stock.adobe.com

One Gen Z TikToker argued that the dispute is not really about lattes. Instead, they said, it reflects a broader rejection of “arbitrary standards of professionalism” that do not indicate whether a candidate can actually perform the job.

Critics see it differently. To them, arriving with a fresh cold brew can suggest poor time management—as if the candidate could not finish their morning coffee before heading to the office.

Gen Z is already facing a difficult employment landscape. Job postings in the United States for young adults ages 22 to 25 have fallen 13% since 2022 across industries exposed to artificial intelligence. Resumetemplates.com also reports that 41% of hiring managers believe Gen Z candidates show a general lack of professionalism, while 30% cite distraction.

In a highly competitive job market that is already scrutinizing Gen Z workplace habits, that iced coffee could cost candidates far more than the five dollars they paid for it.

Ed Sheeran Tightens Security at Philadelphia Concert After Fallout

Ed Sheeran took the unusual step of removing the B stage from his Philadelphia concert Saturday, saying he was “afraid of what might happen” if he performed in the middle of the crowd.

The decision came during Sheeran’s first Loop Tour performance since Macklemore was dropped as an opening act over the rapper’s comments supporting Palestine. The controversy also led the tour’s remaining opening acts to withdraw, leaving Sheeran to perform without a supporting lineup.

“At this point in the show, to be honest, I usually go out on the B stage,” the 35-year-old singer told the audience at Lincoln Financial Field. A fan recorded the remarks and shared the footage on X over the weekend.

Sheeran said he had been uncertain about how the Philadelphia crowd would respond. “I didn’t know what this audience would be like,” the Grammy winner explained. “I didn’t know if I would have things thrown at me. I didn’t know if people would be angry at me.”

With a smile and a shrug, he apologized for changing the format of the concert. “Today is not the usual Loop show,” Sheeran said. “I took the B stage out because I was afraid of what might happen if I stood in the middle. And I will admit that.”

A representative for Sheeran did not immediately respond to Page Six’s request for comment.

The singer launched his Loop Tour in January, but Saturday’s Philadelphia performance differed from the usual production in another significant way beyond the missing B stage.

Because no opening acts were scheduled, Sheeran moved the concert’s start time to 8 p.m.

Macklemore, 43, was removed from the bill the previous week following his “Free Palestine” remarks. Sheeran’s backing band later left in solidarity, while scheduled openers Fikas, Lukas Graham and Aarow Rowe also pulled out.

Sheeran addressed the fallout at the beginning of Saturday’s show, becoming emotional and breaking down in tears as he spoke to the crowd.

“This is not usually how I would open the show,” the “A Team” singer said. “But before I play some songs tonight, I hope it’s OK if I say a few words about this last week.” Sheeran added that he was accustomed to criticism of his music, but said the latest backlash involved “something much more important.”

“I am making mistakes, and I’m so, so sorry,” he continued. Sheeran said he had never intended to become an activist musician, but found himself caught up in “an important and passionate argument about freedom of speech and the most complex political issue on the planet.”

He emphasized that his concerts have always been intended as welcoming spaces for everyone. “Honoring my commitment to my fans is also completely essential to who I am,” Sheeran said, explaining that this was why he had come to perform alone and continue the tour.

Sheeran first addressed the controversy publicly in an Instagram statement Tuesday. He said he was “not complicit” in the “devastating conflict” in the Middle East and stressed that he was not personally responsible for Macklemore’s removal.

“Macklemore coming off tour was the promoter’s decision, it was not mine,” Sheeran wrote. He explained that Macklemore’s agreement was with the promoter rather than with him, adding that he would not abandon fans who had made plans or the touring crew and support musicians depending on the shows for work.

Messina Touring Group, which promoted the US leg of Sheeran’s Loop Tour, said Macklemore was removed after discussions with shareholders. The company cited several venues, including the Philadelphia stadium, that would not permit concerts featuring Macklemore on the lineup.

Macklemore addressed the situation first on Instagram, writing that believing all people deserve equal treatment “should never be controversial.”

In a lengthy post Monday, the “Thrift Shop” rapper defended his decision to speak openly in support of Palestinians during the Israel-Hamas War. He said he wanted people in Gaza and the occupied West Bank to know they had not been forgotten.

Macklemore also argued that he and Sheeran should not be viewed as victims because they have careers, financial security, opportunities, safety and global audiences. Palestinians, he wrote, have been killed, starved, displaced and subjected to unimaginable violence.

Despite the dispute, Macklemore said in his post that he hoped to remain friends with Sheeran.

California Animal Rescue Operator Faces Felonies Over Conditions

0

A California animal rescue operator could face up to 24 1/2 years in state prison after being charged with 35 felony and misdemeanor counts over allegations that she left about 300 animals living in severe squalor.

Christine De Anda, 57, who operated the “Rock ‘N’ Pawz” rescue, is charged with 12 felony counts of animal cruelty, two felony counts of grand theft of labor and 21 misdemeanors. The charges include failing to provide proper care and operating an unlicensed kennel, according to the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office.

Prosecutors have asked that De Anda’s bail be set at $914,500 before her arraignment at the Antelope Valley Courthouse.

animals at the Lake Hughes, California, Rock ‘N’ Pawz animal rescue

More than 300 animals at the Rock ‘N’ Pawz rescue in Lake Hughes, California, allegedly lived in inhumane and unsanitary conditions. Authorities said some were dehydrated, severely injured or starving. (Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office)

“For someone who calls herself an animal rescuer, there’s a fundamental responsibility to protect and care for the animals entrusted to her,” Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan J. Hochman said. “Instead, purported rescuer Christine De Anda allegedly left these animals to suffer or die from starvation, dehydration, untreated injuries and painful urine and fecal burns in filthy conditions.”

“After repeated citations and warnings, Ms. De Anda continued taking in animals she could not care for, leaving hundreds to endure prolonged suffering,” Hochman added. “These animal victims cannot speak for themselves and look to us to protect them. My office will hold their victimizer fully accountable for her inhumane actions.”

The case follows a March 20, 2026, search warrant carried out by Los Angeles County Animal Care and Control, or DACC. Investigators removed more than 300 animals, mostly dogs, along with cats, a pig, a rabbit, a goose and two goats. DACC Director Marcia Mayeda described it as the department’s “largest companion animal search warrant and rescue operation ever conducted.”

Rock ‘N’ Pawz animal rescue in Lake Hughes, California

De Anda is also accused of violating several county codes at the Lake Hughes facility, including operating an animal kennel without the required land-use approval, maintaining unsanitary conditions and using structures with unpermitted construction, plumbing, electrical and grading work. (Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office)

“More than 300 animals were removed from severely inhumane conditions,” Mayeda said. “Animals were living in and saturated with their own excrement, had serious untreated illnesses and injuries, were emaciated, and were forced to live in small crates without adequate room to properly lie comfortably. Our teams have worked tirelessly to stabilize them, provide the medical care they needed, and help them recover.”

Authorities said at least one cat was found dead from starvation and dehydration when the investigation began.

a scared dog in a small cage at Rock ‘N’ Pawz animal rescue

A 57-year-old Lake Hughes, California, woman who operated the Rock ‘N’ Pawz animal rescue was charged with 35 felony and misdemeanor counts after allegedly keeping more than 300 animals in inhumane and unsanitary conditions. Some of the animals were reportedly dehydrated, severely injured or starving. (Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office)

“Sadly, despite all efforts, we were unable to save every animal due to the extent of their illnesses and injuries,” Mayeda said. “DACC is deeply grateful for the support of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Los Angeles, Pasadena Humane and Kern County Animal Services for assisting us with this rescue and the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office for its commitment to pursuing justice for these animals.”

The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office also released a YouTube video showing the rescued animals at a shelter and documenting the conditions that led to the charges.

cats were shown in a video to have lived in their own excrement

“These animal victims cannot speak for themselves and look to us to protect them,” Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman said. “My office will hold their victimizer fully accountable for her inhumane actions.” (Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office)

Prosecutors allege that De Anda continued accepting more animals despite years of citations and warnings about her inability to provide adequate care. She is also accused of violating county regulations by operating a kennel without the necessary land-use approval, allowing unsanitary conditions and maintaining structures with unpermitted construction, plumbing, electrical and grading work.

Prince William and Harry ‘Won’t Be Surprised’ by King Charles Claims, Uncle Says

0

Earl Spencer has said that claims he makes about the King in the aftermath of Princess Diana’s death will not come as a shock to her sons, Prince William and Prince Harry.

The earl indicated that he had previously told the brothers about an alleged exchange in which Charles reportedly said, during an argument over Diana’s funeral, that she would soon be forgotten.

William and Harry are understood to have been unaware of the full contents of their uncle’s forthcoming memoir, including the account of the King’s alleged words.

Speaking to the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg, Earl Spencer said: “I don’t like to talk about what I’ve been speaking about to William and Harry, but this will not be a surprise to them.

“I will tell you that these words will not be a surprise to them.”

The Royal Family has faced a fresh wave of controversy following revelations from Spencer’s memoir, Swan Song: Diana, My Sister, after extracts were published exclusively by the Mail last week.

Among the most explosive claims is Spencer’s account of an alleged conversation held days after Diana died in 1997, when Charles is said to have told him: “Rest assured, we’ll forget her soon enough.”

The alleged remark reportedly came during a heated dispute over whether William and Harry, then aged 15 and 12, should walk behind their mother’s coffin during her funeral procession.

The Palace issued an unusually direct response last week, casting doubt on the account and warning that grief between family members can “cloud reason, affect judgment and colour memory”.

Spencer has described a furious confrontation with Charles after expressing concern about the two young princes taking part in the procession. According to his account, the future King challenged what he viewed as a lack of commitment to family duty.

In his BBC interview, the earl said the impact of that dispute—and his response to the alleged comment about Diana—can be seen in the eulogy he delivered at her funeral.

The earl today suggested that he had informed the two brothers in the past that Charles remarked during a row over her funeral that their mother would soon be forgotten

Earl Spencer suggested that he had previously told William and Harry about the alleged remark from Charles that their mother would soon be forgotten.

In an interview with the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg, Earl Spencer said: 'I don't like to talk about what I've been speaking about to William and Harry, but this will not be a surprise to them.'

Speaking to the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg, Earl Spencer said the revelations “will not be a surprise” to William and Harry.

Alongside his well-known declaration that Diana’s “blood family” would protect her sons, Spencer’s eulogy paid tribute to his sister as “the unique, the complex, the extraordinary and irreplaceable Diana”, adding that her inner and outer beauty would never disappear from their memories.

Reflecting on the alleged dispute with Charles before the funeral, Spencer said: “You can see evidence of that conversation in the final eulogy.

“I really stress Diana’s sense of duty—duty comes across very clearly in the eulogy, and then it culminates in something which I think really underlines the truth of my assertion here.

“If you get to the final bit of my eulogy, it is that her fantastic qualities ‘will never be extinguished from our minds’.

“It was a direct rebuttal of ‘we’ll forget her soon enough’.”

The earl also rejected suggestions that he was threatening the King when he said his memoir could have included further unflattering details about him.

“This is not a threat, it’s a fact,” Spencer said. “I know lots of things about the King which I chose not to include in the book because they were not relevant.”

Challenged that his remarks did, in fact, sound a bit like a threat, he continued: ‘No, it’s not at all a threat. It’s just the reality. I want to give the context of what I said and what I didn’t say, I’m not threatening. 

‘I’m not a salacious writer on any level, but if I was a salacious writer and wanted to write that sort of thing, I have plenty of other things I could have said, and really have no interest in doing so.’

Earl Spencer later claimed he had no intention of making any further claims about the Royal Family, saying: ‘That’s it. That’s me done.’

Earl Spencer has accused King Charles of 'gaslighting' him over the suggestion his memoir is 'clouded by grief'

Earl Spencer has accused King Charles of ‘gaslighting’ him over the suggestion his memoir is ‘clouded by grief’ 

He has claimed that in the days after Diana's death, the then Prince Charles told him 'we'll forget her soon enough'

He has claimed that in the days after Diana’s death, the then Prince Charles told him ‘we’ll forget her soon enough’ 

Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed in Saint-Tropez, France, on August 22, 1997 - just days before they died

Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed in Saint-Tropez, France, on August 22, 1997 – just days before they died 

Describing his account of the first of two phone conversations with Charles following Diana’s death in a Paris car crash in 1997, he told the BBC: ‘I felt there was a sort of giddy tone.’

‘I’d had a lot of calls that day from people who cared, who were stunned… and I just felt there was a lightness in his tone about Diana’s death that really jarred with me.’

He claimed he then received a second call from Charles after expressing concerns to a member of the Buckingham Palace household about William and Harry walking behind their mother’s coffin.

‘He said “I gather you don’t think William and Harry should walk behind Diana’s coffin” and I said “of course not, sir, she wouldn’t want it”. 

‘Then he said, “I walked behind Lord Mountbatten’s coffin”, and I said “yes, but you were 30, and he wasn’t your mother”. 

‘He went ballistic and started really going for my family as a whole about their sense of duty not being adequate enough and ranted for a while, I have no idea how long, but it was a significant period and I just listened. 

‘Then he stopped, and I thought, oh, now, now he’s going to pull himself together and say something more appropriate, and then he said, “We’ll forget her soon enough”.’

Asked what went through his mind, he said:  ‘Well, I’m not sure I can say exactly what went through my mind, but I really was so stunned, and I just, after a stunned silence, I said, “I cannot believe you just said that”, and I hung up on him.’

Pressed on whether he was effectively accusing the King of lying, Earl Spencer replied: ‘I can hardly be responsible for what Buckingham Palace says. 

‘All I can tell you is what was said and what I heard and what shocked me.

‘What else would have made me hang up on the king that day? It was something as outrageous as that slur against Diana.’

My Husband Discovered My Shameful Secret—Dear Jane Advice

0

Ed Sheeran Changes Philadelphia Stage Layout After Fan Backlash

0

Ed Sheeran said he altered the stage setup for his Philadelphia concert on Saturday because he feared audience members might throw objects at him.

During the show, the Shape Of You singer explained that he had originally planned to perform on a smaller B stage, but changed his arrangements because he was uncertain how the crowd would react.

“At this point in the show, I usually go to a B stage,” Sheeran told fans. “I’m going to be totally honest with you, I didn’t know what this audience would be like.”

“I didn’t know if I would have things thrown at me. I didn’t know if people would be angry at me, so today is not the usual Loop show.”

“I took the B stage out because I was afraid of what might happen if I stood in the middle. And I will admit that.”

Security was a clear concern for the singer, although the concert appeared to proceed without incident. Philadelphia police had previously told TMZ that “appropriate measures” would be taken to protect everyone attending the event.

The performance also marked Sheeran’s first show with a new backing band after Irish group Beoga left the Loop Tour in solidarity with Macklemore’s controversial departure.

Ed Sheeran revealed that he changed his stage layout for his Philadelphia gig on Saturday night because he was 'afraid the audience might throw things at me'

Ed Sheeran said he changed the stage layout for his Philadelphia concert on Saturday because he feared the audience might throw things at him

It comes as the concert was swarmed by pro-Palestine protestors before he took the stage

The concert took place after pro-Palestine protesters gathered outside the venue before Sheeran went onstage

“There are certain songs that just don’t work on the loop pedal,” Sheeran explained. “When my friends dropped off this show, I was thinking, ‘How am I going to keep the show the same? And how am I going to get musicians to stand on stage with me in a week where no one wants to stand on stage with me?’”

Introducing violinist Alicia Enstrom, he said: “I rang up a friend of mine. She’s a superb human and I toured with her all of last year on my Mathematics Tour and the year before that.”

“I said to her, ‘Would you stand on stage with me?’ And she said yes. I asked her if she knew some musician friends and she said yes, and they’ve had three days to learn these songs.”

Before the musicians joined him, Sheeran added: “I just want to say, they said yes to being onstage with me knowing that the world thought I was a certain type of person.”

“They said yes knowing that the world may hate them too for standing on stage with me, and I am so grateful for them being here tonight and standing on stage with me in front of you guys.”

Sheeran is known for performing live without a regular accompanying band, using a loop pedal to build and layer each song. He is joined by musicians for tracks including Galway Girl and Nancy Mulligan.

During another emotional moment, Sheeran held back tears as he apologised to fans over his handling of the Israel-Palestine controversy, which has threatened to derail his tour.

He said he was unsure whether upcoming concerts would go ahead amid the backlash and boycott threats following the decision to remove opener Macklemore, who has expressed support for Palestine.

Sheeran said he had “found out who his friends are” and added: “I cannot hide how I feel any more.”

The singer acknowledged making “mistakes” in his response to the dispute. He also moved away from his earlier promise to keep politics out of his concerts, describing the situation in Gaza as “catastrophic and unjustifiable” and Hamas’s October 7 attacks as “horrific”.

In his first appearance onstage since the Loop Tour was thrown into turmoil, the father of two said he had “never wanted to be an activist musician”. However, he explained that the intense criticism had forced him to “take and make difficult decisions”.

He said: ‘I really didn’t know whether this tour would be carrying on. In these situations, you really find out who your friends are and it’s been a weird week. I just feel like it happened very quickly.’

Ed said his heart had been broken ‘by the scale of devastation and loss of lives’ and became emotional as he told a cheering crowd: ‘I’m so grateful you are here with me tonight.’

He apologised and became visibly emotional again at the end of the show for bringing politics to his concert – something he had vowed not to do.

Ed said at the end of the night: ‘The one thing that I would like to apologise for is the first bit of the show where it wasn’t about music and I had to talk. 

During the recent concert, the Shape Of You hitmaker told the crowd that he had to drastically alter the stage as he was initially going to perform on a B Stage but decided against it

During the recent concert, the Shape Of You hitmaker told the crowd that he had to drastically alter the stage as he was initially going to perform on a B Stage but decided against it

Ed returned to the stage in Philadelphia for the first time since 43-year-old Macklemore, real name Benjamin Haggerty, was axed from the tour

Ed returned to the stage in Philadelphia for the first time since 43-year-old Macklemore, real name Benjamin Haggerty, was axed from the tour

‘I understand that people have children here and I understand that families didn’t buy a ticket to hear that first bit of the show, but that was something I felt like I needed to say.’ 

Ed had previously said that ‘those who come to my shows do not expect a political forum’.  

The gig at the Lincoln Financial Field marked the first time the star returned to the stage since the rapper Macklemore was dropped as his opening act after taking a vocal stance in favour of a ‘Free Palestine.’

In a solemn speech at the start of the concert, Ed said: ‘I have tried in my career not to be a political commentator of any kind because I want my music and shows to be about unity and not division, about humanity and not politics. But this is a humanitarian issue and I cannot hide how I feel about it anymore.’

‘What happened in Israel at Nova music festival on October 7 was horrific and compounded centuries of Jewish pain. 

‘What is happening in Gaza is catastrophic and unjustifiable and disproportionate,’ Sheeran said in a video captured and shared online by a concertgoer. 

‘My heart has been broken by the scale of devastation and loss of civilians’ lives, of children’s lives, and the systemic injustice we’re seeing unfold in the West Bank cannot be overlooked,’ he declared.

Ed told the audience that he plans to ‘continue my current tour’ despite each of his openers dropping out in solidarity with Macklemore. 

By the end of the show, Ed  broke down into tears, telling fans: ‘I’m so grateful. The world is a scary place right now. America is a scary place right now. This gives hope. This gives hope.’

The crowd broke out in applause as Ed  appeared deeply moved. 

‘My shows are about this,’ he said. ‘They are about people coming together that don’t know each other, that have different beliefs. They’re about unity. They’re about love. They’re about family.’

As fans cheered, Ed vowed that the controversy would not stop him from performing.

‘You’re jumping around like maniacs with each other and having fun,’ he said. ‘And I will never stop doing this. I will never stop doing this. I love doing this so much.’

It came after Macklemore said Ed had spoken to Robert Kraft, who owns Gillette Stadium in Massachusetts through his holding company, the Kraft Group.

‘Ed told me that Kraft said I would not be allowed to perform in his stadium. Ed also told me that Kraft had rallied some of the other stadium owners and collectively they gave him an ultimatum: if Macklemore stays on the tour, you will not be allowed to play in our venues,’ he wrote.

On Tuesday, Ed released his own statement on Instagram, saying it wasn’t his decision to remove Macklemore from the tour, but rather the promoter’s.

‘I would never let down the fans who had made plans, nor would I abandon the touring crew and the other support acts and musicians who rely on me for work and to make a living,’ the British singer-songwriter added.

Sheeran said in the lengthy statement that he has ‘personal views on this devastating conflict’ but made the choice ‘not to speak publicly’. 

He has faced criticism from other artists, including Pink Floyd co-founder Roger Waters, who bashed him on social media for not taking a stand against the decision.

Ed Sheeran’s cousin last week branded the pop star a ‘coward’ for dropping pro-Palestine Macklemore. 

Jethro Sheeran, who at 44 is nine years older than his cousin, responded to the row by saying he was ‘ashamed’ of his relative.

In a furious post on Facebook, he said: ‘Finally it’s all coming out! I’m ashamed of my cousin Ed and what he’s done.

‘Finally the world and all his fans see through him. He’s not a good person, I don’t like his music so I can’t say he’s even a good artist.’    

Finneas, Billie Eilish's brother, pulled out of his scheduled appearances in upcoming tour dates, stating that 'artists must not be silenced when they speak up for the oppressed'

Finneas, Billie Eilish’s brother, pulled out of his scheduled appearances in upcoming tour dates, stating that ‘artists must not be silenced when they speak up for the oppressed’

Billie Eilish’s brother, Finneas, pulled out of his scheduled appearances in upcoming tour dates, stating that ‘artists must not be silenced when they speak up for the oppressed’.

Tour openers including Aaron Rowe and the band Lukas Graham, along with Sheeran’s long-time backing folk band Beoga, also withdrew from the endeavor.

In his address to fans on Saturday, Sheeran stated: ‘I’ve had to take and make difficult decisions, and I am making mistakes, and I’m so, so sorry.’

He said: ‘I don’t want to disappoint fans and I’ve never wanted to be an activist musician. But this has put me in the middle of an important and passionate argument about freedom of speech in the most complex political issue on the planet.’

The pop star continued: ‘Our concerts have always been a safe space for everyone, and that matters hugely to me. Honouring my commitment to my fans is also completely central to who I am and that is why I’m here tonight, on my own, and continuing my own tour.’

He went on to say: ‘I am deeply worried about the idea that venues pre-approved content performance. This happens in so many places that I’ve gone around the world, but it should never happen in the free world.’

NFL Changes Rule After Stunning New England Patriots Reveal

0

A little-known Bill Belichick-era tactic has officially come to an end after the NFL moved to eliminate videoboard deception during games.

The league recently informed teams that it is tightening the rules governing what may appear on stadium screens during field-goal and extra-point attempts. According to a Sept. 7 memo obtained by ESPN, every team must now display the same All-22 view—either a high-sideline or high-end-zone angle—or use a static image for both the kicking team and its opponent.

Teams that fail to follow the revised policy will face discipline, the report said.

The change follows a viral social media post from former analytics coach Ryan Paganetti, who revealed a visual trick the Patriots used during Belichick’s 23-year tenure in New England to potentially unsettle opposing kickers.

Paganetti, who has also worked with the Eagles, Jaguars and Raiders, reviewed 10 years of Patriots game broadcasts before sharing his findings on X earlier this month. By Sunday, the post had generated 17.2 million views.

The eight-time Super Bowl-winning coach reportedly had Gillette Stadium’s scoreboard show a reverse-angle image of the kick, complete with a second, offset set of yellow goalposts, whenever an opposing team attempted a field goal or extra point.

As a result, kickers could see four yellow uprights in front of them instead of the two physical posts positioned on the field.

Paganetti posted several screenshots showing visiting kickers preparing to kick while the Jumbotron displayed the extra set of yellow uprights. At the time, NFL rules required videoboards to show a static image during kicks, prohibiting flashing graphics, video or moving images.

The NFL told ESPN that Belichick and the Patriots were operating within the rules as they existed at the time.

Paganetti said the tactic caused no apparent problems for New England’s own kickers across the 52 Patriots attempts he reviewed.

“When opposing kickers lined up at Gillette Stadium, the video board displayed a reverse view of the kick, placing a second, offset set of yellow uprights directly behind the real ones,” Paganetti wrote on X. “In windy conditions, even the orange streamers on the video board appeared to point in the opposite direction from those atop the physical uprights, making the illusion even more disorienting. I found dozens of examples.”

“It is the perfect encapsulation of the Patriots dynasty,” he added. “No detail was too small, and no possible edge was left unexplored.”

With the new ruling in place, NFL teams will need to find different ways to gain an advantage from their stadium videoboards.

5 Movies to Watch If You Like 2026’s Resident Evil

0

Video game movies have delivered plenty of guilty pleasures, but Zach Cregger’s “Resident Evil” may be the first to feel genuinely excellent. Our review even made the case that calling it the best video game adaptation ever is not an overstatement, largely because the competition remains surprisingly thin. The film’s 95-minute running time helps it maintain a relentless pace, while its decision to disregard established game lore allows it to play like a cinematic version of the most disastrous video game run imaginable. It recreates the adrenaline of playing without sacrificing its identity as a movie, filtering the franchise through Cregger’s grimly comic sensibility.

Anyone looking for similar movies should probably avoid returning to the earlier “Resident Evil” films. Those entries may stick closer to the games, but they rarely match the bloody, chaotic comedy that makes Cregger’s version so distinctive. Instead, we’ve gathered five films that share its spirit: inventive horror-comedies, acclaimed video game adaptations and original stories that bring the rules and rhythms of gameplay to life. Some have earned widespread praise, while others remain divisive, but each offers a chance to recapture the same breathless rush as this lethal trip through Raccoon City.

Exit 8

By coincidence, “Resident Evil” is the second celebrated video game adaptation this year to begin with its lead character learning that his girlfriend is pregnant. In Cregger’s movie, the revelation gives Bryan a personal reason to push deeper into an infected Raccoon City and find his way home. In the Japanese hit “Exit 8,” adapted from the viral horror game, it is the final piece of information heard by a commuter known only as The Lost Man, played by Kazunari Ninomiya, before he becomes trapped in an endless network of Tokyo subway passages. The connection goes beyond that shared detail, however, as director Genki Kawamura gives this liminal-space nightmare the scale and visual language of a proper movie.

The survival challenge remains faithful to the game: the protagonist must identify changes in the repeating environment, and moving ahead after spotting an anomaly sends him back to the beginning. Kawamura and co-writer Kentaro Hirase turn that basic mechanic into a narrative shaped like a live playthrough. The Lost Man becomes a substitute for the player, slowly learning the rules while repeatedly making mistakes that seem obvious to everyone watching. Like Cregger, the filmmakers understand that adaptations are often more entertaining when the hero keeps failing rather than effortlessly mastering each obstacle. Their film differs by expanding the limited viewpoint of the original game into a fuller story.

Hundreds of Beavers

Mike Cheslik’s indie comedy is not technically a video game adaptation, though its influence is unmistakable. Inspired in part by “Let’s Play” videos, “Hundreds of Beavers” gradually shifts from a spoof of survival movies into something resembling a chaotic playthrough of “Zelda” or “Animal Crossing.” Jean, played by Ryland Tews, is hopelessly outmatched by the beavers invading his apple orchard and cannot seem to catch even the simplest prey. His fortunes change after a Master Fur Trapper, played by Wes Tank, takes an interest in him, while the trapper’s daughter hopes to marry him. Her father agrees to the wedding only if Jean can first capture hundreds of beavers.

The film charts Jean’s development like an RPG character, showing him refine his hunting strategy, acquire new tools and gradually become more capable. Its frantic violence and physical comedy recall a live-action “Tom & Jerry,” yet its video game references are far more deliberate than the premise might suggest. Despite being largely silent, the movie uses familiar imagery—such as repeated trips to a merchant’s shop, straight out of “The Legend of Zelda”—to communicate information without lengthy explanations. Like “Resident Evil,” it moves at a furious pace and teaches its rules through action. It is arguably one of the finest video game movies that was never based on a game.

Society

Brian Yuzna’s body horror satire was embraced in Europe but savaged by American critics, remaining unreleased in the United States for three years after its premiere. Over time, however, it became a hugely influential cult movie, leaving its mark on a generation of genre directors. Its impact can be felt in the outrageous finale of “The Substance,” in the recent wave of anti-wealth black comedies and throughout the stomach-churning work associated with Cregger. Set in Beverly Hills, the story follows wealthy teenager Bill, played by Billy Warlock, who suspects that something is deeply wrong with his family. After his sister’s boyfriend dies soon after giving him a disturbing tape suggesting that Bill’s parents attended a murder orgy, the mystery only grows darker.

Taking the role of a noir detective, Bill searches for answers among his privileged classmates before discovering that the truth lies much closer to home. What follows is one of cinema’s most bizarre and grotesque third acts: a collision between Sam Raimi-style gross-out comedy and a Salvador Dalí fever dream. The twisted creature work in “Resident Evil” owes as much to this landmark film as it does to the original games. When Bryan encounters a body-fusing monster inside an otherwise charming family home, the resemblance feels especially striking, as though Yuzna’s movie was sitting somewhere in Cregger’s imagination.

Army of Darkness

The central figure in “Resident Evil” is a well-meaning failure who might save humanity from an undead plague if he could only stop making the wrong choice. That description applies just as neatly to Bruce Campbell’s Ash Williams in Sam Raimi’s “Army of Darkness.” In that film, the horror protagonist becomes something like Buster Keaton trapped inside a splatter movie—one reason it stands among the strongest entries in the franchise. Bryan is closer in tone to the Ash of “Evil Dead II,” but his misplaced confidence resembles the later version, as he slowly convinces himself that he is an action hero while repeatedly making matters worse.

During the finale at Umbrella Corporation, Bryan’s biggest mistake is assuming he has finally become capable of handling anything and that delivering the cure will automatically make him a hero. He still fails to consider the wider consequences of his choices. Ash faces a similar problem: celebrated in the Middle Ages after killing a Deadite, he soon endangers everyone by ignoring the rules, including his failure to remember the correct words needed to recover the Necronomicon. Both men are convinced that shortcuts will save time. Raimi and Cregger share an affection for reckless, flawed protagonists, then unleash catastrophe by placing those characters firmly in control.

Hardcore Henry

The final recommendation will depend heavily on your tolerance for first-person camera work. Ilya Naishuller’s film may exhilarate viewers who enjoy its first-person-shooter design, while leaving others with an instant headache. Its brief first-person passages connect naturally with the perspective shifts in “Resident Evil,” making it a fascinating example of how far a gaming viewpoint can be stretched within a feature film. Naishuller, who later directed Bob Odenkirk’s more traditional action thriller “Nobody,” presents the entire story from the perspective of its title character. The result is a chaotic tribute to video games that has little interest in conventional logic.

After awakening inside an airship laboratory with Estelle, played by Haley Bennett, the protagonist escapes to Moscow while mercenaries pursue him and his cybernetic body urgently needs to be recharged. Sharlto Copley plays multiple characters who repeatedly return after being killed, delivering exposition as the hero races through the familiar locations of a science-fiction shooter: abandoned warehouses, strip clubs, hotels, secret facilities and cartoonishly evil lairs filled with cloned armies. None of it makes much sense, but that is beside the point. The film is built to overwhelm, hurling new threats at its hero faster than any gamer could reasonably process them. It represents the most aggressively amplified version of Cregger’s “Resident Evil” formula—thrilling for some, exhausting for others.